Jack & Jill Politics

From TPM, A Reader Dissents:

I remember being sent to monitor a tiny Ku Klux Klan rally in, of all places, Ann Arbor, when I was a stringer for the Detroit News in the early 1990s. Clearly they had chosen an avowedly liberal college town in the spirit of provocation in the hopes of getting some coverage. The editors told me that they didn't want to give the KKK any free press, but I should show up in case anything newsworthy happened.

[...]

There were a few somewhat nervous and defiant KKK types whose words were drowned out by a larger crowd of counter-protestors. After about a half hour, the KKK packed up its crew and hit the road. They didn't get any press coverage and they didn't come back to Ann Arbor during my time there: no percentage in it. I suspect editors still have similar policies in place about the Klan, but it's fascinating to me that they're willing to give Terry Jones's hate speech so much play. What has happened to the media environment that makes it possible for a fringe freak like this to get the media attention he so desperately craves, and without which he would have to close shop and find something else to do with his time? Whey are media outlets unable to just ignore this guy like they ignored the Klan's transparent attempts at media manipulation. Being an editor still means deciding whose attempts at media manipulation will get play — is this a symptom of the decline of editorial control in the internet era? Is this coverage being driven by shifts in the media environment that make it impossible to ignore any member of the lunatic fringe who might do something creepy enough to gain saturation coverage in the blogosophere? Is it a function of the shift toward focusing on the most sensational and polarizing figures in order to win ratings by catering to the kinds of excitement and indignation a figure like Jones incites? If so, are we going to see editors start reversing their long-standing policies about not catering to the Klan's media strategies? It's kind of depressing to see how this guy can make the media twitch and dance — and the international media are, of course, eating it up, since it confirms so many international stereotypes about the US. Just how low do you have to go these days to get saturation cable coverage by outlets who clearly take pleasure in fuelling a productive spiral of incitement and indignation?

Yep, I agree. The preacher is irrelevant, but the dog whistle wasn't.

Second!

Why is it now that when I click on like nothing happens?

WHAT HAPPENED RIGHT AFTER 9/11/01:

U.S. classes in Arabic bursting at the seams
Many enrollees hope to aid government
Tanya Schevitz, Chronicle Staff Writer
Sunday, October 21, 2001

Schools offering classes in Arabic and other Middle Eastern languages have been flooded with calls from people who are eager to help the U.S. government or want to better understand the region.

From Stanford to Los Angeles to Washington, Arabic classes that are usually sparsely attended are now overflowing, forcing schools to add new sections or hire additional tutors to accommodate the demand.

“I knew I would feel better if I was doing something that could be useful,” said Cari Sietstra, 26, a third-year Stanford University law student who signed up for an Arabic class after the attacks and hopes to work in the region after graduation.

“I can't donate hundreds of thousands of dollars, and I can't help fix what happened in New York and Washington, but I can do one small thing that may be useful.”…

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/10/21/MN44963.DTL

WHAT HAPPENED ABOUT A YEAR LATER:

Army discharges 6 gay foreign language students
Monterey institute [Defense Language Institute, not to be confused with Monterey Institute of International Studies] follows Pentagon policy despite shortage of speakers of Arabic
Christopher Heredia, Chronicle Staff Writer
Friday, November 15, 2002

The Army has discharged six gay Arabic linguists studying at the Defense Language Institute in Monterey, even as the military is clamoring to fill a critical shortage of fluent speakers of Middle Eastern languages.

The soldiers were dismissed after they disclosed their homosexuality, a violation of the military's “don't ask, don't tell” policy that says gay or lesbian soldiers may serve as long as they keep their sexual orientation private.

But the Washington, D.C.-based Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, an advocacy group for gays in the military, hopes that by bringing attention to the discharges, the military will reconsider its policy…

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2002/11/15/MN57382.DTL