<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Tuesday Open Thread</title> <atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/</link> <description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator> <item><title>By: NFL picks</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/comment-page-2/#comment-775781</link> <dc:creator>NFL picks</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 22:48:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=19267#comment-775781</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;How to handicapp NFL...&lt;/strong&gt;...unlike NFL picks. Handicapping and making predictions can be quite fun, but try to check expert......</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>How to handicapp NFL&#8230;</strong></p><p>&#8230;unlike NFL picks. Handicapping and making predictions can be quite fun, but try to check expert&#8230;&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: free online math games</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/comment-page-1/#comment-760703</link> <dc:creator>free online math games</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:08:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=19267#comment-760703</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;online games...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]while the sites we link to below are completely unrelated to ours, we think they are worth a read, so have a look[...]...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>online games&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]while the sites we link to below are completely unrelated to ours, we think they are worth a read, so have a look[...]&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bluehost</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/comment-page-1/#comment-749100</link> <dc:creator>bluehost</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 05:30:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=19267#comment-749100</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Great Site...&lt;/strong&gt;[..] I Stumbled accross this good blog post and guessed you guys would love it.[..]...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Great Site&#8230;</strong></p><p>[..] I Stumbled accross this good blog post and guessed you guys would love it.[..]&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: personal finance</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/comment-page-1/#comment-717967</link> <dc:creator>personal finance</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 05:55:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=19267#comment-717967</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;see below...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>see below&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: monavie</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/comment-page-1/#comment-620487</link> <dc:creator>monavie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:44:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=19267#comment-620487</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;monavie momentum...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>monavie momentum&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Makeityourring diamond engagement rings</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/comment-page-1/#comment-620369</link> <dc:creator>Makeityourring diamond engagement rings</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:45:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=19267#comment-620369</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;wedding invitations...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]while the sites we link to below are completely unrelated to ours, we think they are worth a read, so have a look[...]...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>wedding invitations&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]while the sites we link to below are completely unrelated to ours, we think they are worth a read, so have a look[...]&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Makeityourring diamond engagement rings</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/comment-page-1/#comment-600843</link> <dc:creator>Makeityourring diamond engagement rings</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 18:29:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=19267#comment-600843</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;engagement rings jared...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]just below, are some totally unrelated sites to ours, however, they are definitely worth checking out[...]...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>engagement rings jared&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]just below, are some totally unrelated sites to ours, however, they are definitely worth checking out[...]&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: property and casualty licensing</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/comment-page-1/#comment-557244</link> <dc:creator>property and casualty licensing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:46:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=19267#comment-557244</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Great Site…...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]check this out as this contains important information about[...]...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Great Site…&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]check this out as this contains important information about[...]&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ch555x</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/comment-page-1/#comment-335616</link> <dc:creator>ch555x</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 04:42:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=19267#comment-335616</guid> <description>...over some musty underwear.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&gt;_&lt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;over some musty underwear.</p><p>&gt;_&lt;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mon_dieu_ishmael</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/comment-page-1/#comment-335611</link> <dc:creator>mon_dieu_ishmael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:31:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=19267#comment-335611</guid> <description>LOL - 20,000 health care workers divided by 10,000 community health centers = 2 health care WORKERs per center (not 2 doctors).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) medical schools need to have larger classes or new medical schools.&lt;br&gt;2) Doctors only need 2 years of undergrad and after that should go straight into medical schools.&lt;br&gt;3) Primary care doctors work very long hours for a lot less money than say interventional cardiologists.&lt;br&gt;4) 10 - 14 billion for community health centers - sounds more like a feel good, local empowerment money hole unless these centers are placed where there are no other health care facilities.  Are these centers in direct competition with private urgent care centers or private medical practices?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL &#8211; 20,000 health care workers divided by 10,000 community health centers = 2 health care WORKERs per center (not 2 doctors).</p><p>1) medical schools need to have larger classes or new medical schools.<br />2) Doctors only need 2 years of undergrad and after that should go straight into medical schools.<br />3) Primary care doctors work very long hours for a lot less money than say interventional cardiologists.<br />4) 10 &#8211; 14 billion for community health centers &#8211; sounds more like a feel good, local empowerment money hole unless these centers are placed where there are no other health care facilities.  Are these centers in direct competition with private urgent care centers or private medical practices?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: morphus</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/comment-page-1/#comment-335610</link> <dc:creator>morphus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:53:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=19267#comment-335610</guid> <description>Why are they resisting:  &quot;A $10 billion investment in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2009/12/19-0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;community health centers&lt;/a&gt;, expected to go to $14 billion when Congress completes work on health care reform legislation ... the additional resources will help bring about a revolution in primary health care in America and create new or expanded health centers in an additional 10,000 communities. The provision would also provide loan repayments and scholarships through the National Health Service Corps to create an additional 20,000 primary care doctors, dentists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants and mental health professionals ... the provision would save Medicaid tens of billions of dollars by keeping patients out of emergency rooms and hospitals by providing primary care when then needed it.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are they resisting:  &#8220;A $10 billion investment in <a href="http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2009/12/19-0" rel="nofollow">community health centers</a>, expected to go to $14 billion when Congress completes work on health care reform legislation &#8230; the additional resources will help bring about a revolution in primary health care in America and create new or expanded health centers in an additional 10,000 communities. The provision would also provide loan repayments and scholarships through the National Health Service Corps to create an additional 20,000 primary care doctors, dentists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants and mental health professionals &#8230; the provision would save Medicaid tens of billions of dollars by keeping patients out of emergency rooms and hospitals by providing primary care when then needed it.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/comment-page-1/#comment-335626</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:49:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=19267#comment-335626</guid> <description>I got the same vibe about the movie, which is why I didn&#039;t want to go see it. But others have convinced me to go see it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the same vibe about the movie, which is why I didn&#39;t want to go see it. But others have convinced me to go see it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/comment-page-1/#comment-335625</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:48:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=19267#comment-335625</guid> <description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dropping &#039;free&#039; TV for more expensive &#039;paid&#039; TV.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;uh huh</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i><br />Dropping &#39;free&#39; TV for more expensive &#39;paid&#39; TV.</i></p><p>uh huh</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/comment-page-1/#comment-335621</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:46:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=19267#comment-335621</guid> <description>thank you for the hat tip</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you for the hat tip</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/comment-page-1/#comment-335619</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:42:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=19267#comment-335619</guid> <description>I will not change my position:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;she WILL, before it&#039;s all said and done, wind up in a straight jacket in a Sanitarium somewhere in this country.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will not change my position:</p><p>she WILL, before it&#39;s all said and done, wind up in a straight jacket in a Sanitarium somewhere in this country.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: RonnieB</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/comment-page-1/#comment-335609</link> <dc:creator>RonnieB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:42:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=19267#comment-335609</guid> <description>I have no idea what these states are grumbling about.  This is good legislation that&#039;s about to be enacted.  Isn&#039;t it?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea what these states are grumbling about.  This is good legislation that&#39;s about to be enacted.  Isn&#39;t it?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/comment-page-1/#comment-335618</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:42:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=19267#comment-335618</guid> <description>he&#039;s a small, petty man. period.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he&#39;s a small, petty man. period.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/comment-page-1/#comment-335615</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:41:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=19267#comment-335615</guid> <description>it&#039;s about time..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ps- weren&#039;t you supposed to be away from computers for the next week?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;withdrawal already? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#39;s about time..</p><p>ps- weren&#39;t you supposed to be away from computers for the next week?</p><p>withdrawal already?</p><p>LOL</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: twg</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/comment-page-1/#comment-335624</link> <dc:creator>twg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:39:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=19267#comment-335624</guid> <description>No one knows what the caps and the gaps will be, yet. In the advertised plans, and family of 4 (very close to my situation) gets hit with more costs than my current insurance, mainly due to out-of-pocket expenses. The mortgage is high for the south, but not for anywhere else. The child care is about right, even low if you have children under 6 (mine is $210/week for 2 kids, at a local-owned working class daycare). My copays now are manageable, and drug coverage is 80/20 for names and 100% for generic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So it comes down to the caps, and the tax I will have to pay even if I already have insurance. If you read the bills, you should get the picture: we&#039;re paying more taxes, period. The caps are based the poverty line, so middle income folks will pay the middle rates. We&#039;re screwed. No new Prius for my wife until I can talk her into having some more deductions (kids I mean). No one has shown me, in the bills, how this really saves middle-income-me some money. Maybe because they can&#039;t.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one knows what the caps and the gaps will be, yet. In the advertised plans, and family of 4 (very close to my situation) gets hit with more costs than my current insurance, mainly due to out-of-pocket expenses. The mortgage is high for the south, but not for anywhere else. The child care is about right, even low if you have children under 6 (mine is $210/week for 2 kids, at a local-owned working class daycare). My copays now are manageable, and drug coverage is 80/20 for names and 100% for generic.</p><p>So it comes down to the caps, and the tax I will have to pay even if I already have insurance. If you read the bills, you should get the picture: we&#39;re paying more taxes, period. The caps are based the poverty line, so middle income folks will pay the middle rates. We&#39;re screwed. No new Prius for my wife until I can talk her into having some more deductions (kids I mean). No one has shown me, in the bills, how this really saves middle-income-me some money. Maybe because they can&#39;t.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: morphus</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/tuesday-open-thread-77/comment-page-1/#comment-335608</link> <dc:creator>morphus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:23:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=19267#comment-335608</guid> <description>As Congress prepares to pass the final health care reform legislation early next year, health care lobbyists are mobilizing legislatures in approximately 14 states to ratify constitutional amendments that would repeal all or parts of the new measure. “The states where the amendment has been introduced are also places where the health care industry has spent heavily on political contributions,” the New York Times notes:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Over the last six years, health care interests have spent $394 million on contributions in states around the country; about $73 million of that went to those 14 states. Of that, health insurance companies spent $18.2 million.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Overall, at least 21 states have indicated a desire to opt out of federal health care reform or block fundamental features of the reform bill, including mandatory health coverage. While Arizona, is the only state legislature to place an opt-out measure on the 2010 ballot, a significant number of gubernatorial and state legislature candidates across the country have also said that they are strongly “leaning towards” opting out of reform.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lawmakers in Wyoming, New Mexico, Montana, Kansas, Texas, Pennsylvania, Utah, Virginia, Arizona, Alabama, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, West Virginia, Louisiana, Alaska, Minnesota, North Dakota, Georgia Illinois and Florida have introduced ballot measures to protect their states from reform legislation or promised to spearhead such efforts if reform is enacted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While it’s unlikely that conservatives and their health care industry allies could repeal health care reform, (they are more likely to water-down certain elements of reform), a successful challenge would devastate the populations suffering from the most pronounced health care crisis. A back-of-the envelope analysis conducted by ThinkProgress suggests that on average, the repealing states have experienced very substantial premium increases, high rates of uninsurance and annual percent growth in health care expenditures and higher insurance market concentration:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    - 42% (9 of 21): have an uninsurance rate higher than the national average of 15.4%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    - 62% (13 of 21): have an average annual percent growth in health care expenditures that his higher than the national average of 6.7%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    - 62% (13 of 21): experienced premium increases of more than 75% between 2000 and 2007.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    - 90% (19 of 21): are dominated by two insurers that control more than 50% of the health insurance market. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The effort to repeal health care reform “began at the conservative Goldwater Institute in Arizona” and was latter “picked up by the American Legislative Exchange Council [ALEC], a business-friendly conservative group that coordinates activity among statehouses.” As the New York Times points out, “five of the 24 members of its ‘free enterprise board’ are executives of drug companies and its health care ‘task force’ is overseen in part by a four-member panel composed of government-relations officials for the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association of insurers, the medical company Johnson &amp; Johnson and the drug makers Bayer and Hoffmann-La Roche.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkprogress.org/2009/12/29/health-sector-state-opt/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Health Care Industry Coordinating Effort To Opt States Out Of Health Care Reform&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;hr&gt;If health insurance stock rallying on Wall Street was sign that they loved HCR, what is this a sign of?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Congress prepares to pass the final health care reform legislation early next year, health care lobbyists are mobilizing legislatures in approximately 14 states to ratify constitutional amendments that would repeal all or parts of the new measure. “The states where the amendment has been introduced are also places where the health care industry has spent heavily on political contributions,” the New York Times notes:</p><p> Over the last six years, health care interests have spent $394 million on contributions in states around the country; about $73 million of that went to those 14 states. Of that, health insurance companies spent $18.2 million.</p><p>Overall, at least 21 states have indicated a desire to opt out of federal health care reform or block fundamental features of the reform bill, including mandatory health coverage. While Arizona, is the only state legislature to place an opt-out measure on the 2010 ballot, a significant number of gubernatorial and state legislature candidates across the country have also said that they are strongly “leaning towards” opting out of reform.</p><p>Lawmakers in Wyoming, New Mexico, Montana, Kansas, Texas, Pennsylvania, Utah, Virginia, Arizona, Alabama, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, West Virginia, Louisiana, Alaska, Minnesota, North Dakota, Georgia Illinois and Florida have introduced ballot measures to protect their states from reform legislation or promised to spearhead such efforts if reform is enacted.</p><p>While it’s unlikely that conservatives and their health care industry allies could repeal health care reform, (they are more likely to water-down certain elements of reform), a successful challenge would devastate the populations suffering from the most pronounced health care crisis. A back-of-the envelope analysis conducted by ThinkProgress suggests that on average, the repealing states have experienced very substantial premium increases, high rates of uninsurance and annual percent growth in health care expenditures and higher insurance market concentration:</p><p> &#8211; 42% (9 of 21): have an uninsurance rate higher than the national average of 15.4%.</p><p> &#8211; 62% (13 of 21): have an average annual percent growth in health care expenditures that his higher than the national average of 6.7%.</p><p> &#8211; 62% (13 of 21): experienced premium increases of more than 75% between 2000 and 2007.</p><p> &#8211; 90% (19 of 21): are dominated by two insurers that control more than 50% of the health insurance market.</p><p>The effort to repeal health care reform “began at the conservative Goldwater Institute in Arizona” and was latter “picked up by the American Legislative Exchange Council [ALEC], a business-friendly conservative group that coordinates activity among statehouses.” As the New York Times points out, “five of the 24 members of its ‘free enterprise board’ are executives of drug companies and its health care ‘task force’ is overseen in part by a four-member panel composed of government-relations officials for the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association of insurers, the medical company Johnson &#038; Johnson and the drug makers Bayer and Hoffmann-La Roche.”</p><p><b><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/12/29/health-sector-state-opt/" rel="nofollow">Health Care Industry Coordinating Effort To Opt States Out Of Health Care Reform</a></b><br /><hr />If health insurance stock rallying on Wall Street was sign that they loved HCR, what is this a sign of?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 596/600 objects using apc

Served from: www.jackandjillpolitics.com @ 2012-02-10 10:15:49 -->
