<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Desiree&#8217;s Disarray</title> <atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/</link> <description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:22:54 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator> <item><title>By: nickwah22</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-339679</link> <dc:creator>nickwah22</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:38:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18153#comment-339679</guid> <description>I am getting soo annoyed with all the coverage around this.  Seeing as though the White House isn&#039;t talking about what was supposed to happen, the media definitely needs to reserve judgment on her and what she should have been doing.  Maybe Ms Rogers had all her ish together which is why she wasn&#039;t running around with a headset on.  Seeing as though she is the Social Secretary and has a STAFF, if anyone was to be running around, wouldn&#039;t it be her staff.  The secret service took the blame; why is it that certain folks keep attempting to dig into where Ms Rogers messed up?  I doubt she is trying to upstage the Obamas.  Clearly these people don&#039;t realize the caliber of the people working behind the First Fam or else it wouldn&#039;t even be a topic of conversation.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am getting soo annoyed with all the coverage around this.  Seeing as though the White House isn&#39;t talking about what was supposed to happen, the media definitely needs to reserve judgment on her and what she should have been doing.  Maybe Ms Rogers had all her ish together which is why she wasn&#39;t running around with a headset on.  Seeing as though she is the Social Secretary and has a STAFF, if anyone was to be running around, wouldn&#39;t it be her staff.  The secret service took the blame; why is it that certain folks keep attempting to dig into where Ms Rogers messed up?  I doubt she is trying to upstage the Obamas.  Clearly these people don&#39;t realize the caliber of the people working behind the First Fam or else it wouldn&#39;t even be a topic of conversation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: glissade</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-339680</link> <dc:creator>glissade</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:56:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18153#comment-339680</guid> <description>Hey Guns,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here&#039;s a real question, for you. Who do you think the folks on this site would blame for this breach if the head of the SecretService was black also?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Guns,</p><p>Here&#39;s a real question, for you. Who do you think the folks on this site would blame for this breach if the head of the SecretService was black also?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nickwah22</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-320799</link> <dc:creator>nickwah22</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:38:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18153#comment-320799</guid> <description>I am getting soo annoyed with all the coverage around this.  Seeing as though the White House isn&#039;t talking about what was supposed to happen, the media definitely needs to reserve judgment on her and what she should have been doing.  Maybe Ms Rogers had all her ish together which is why she wasn&#039;t running around with a headset on.  Seeing as though she is the Social Secretary and has a STAFF, if anyone was to be running around, wouldn&#039;t it be her staff.  The secret service took the blame; why is it that certain folks keep attempting to dig into where Ms Rogers messed up?  I doubt she is trying to upstage the Obamas.  Clearly these people don&#039;t realize the caliber of the people working behind the First Fam or else it wouldn&#039;t even be a topic of conversation.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am getting soo annoyed with all the coverage around this.  Seeing as though the White House isn&#39;t talking about what was supposed to happen, the media definitely needs to reserve judgment on her and what she should have been doing.  Maybe Ms Rogers had all her ish together which is why she wasn&#39;t running around with a headset on.  Seeing as though she is the Social Secretary and has a STAFF, if anyone was to be running around, wouldn&#39;t it be her staff.  The secret service took the blame; why is it that certain folks keep attempting to dig into where Ms Rogers messed up?  I doubt she is trying to upstage the Obamas.  Clearly these people don&#39;t realize the caliber of the people working behind the First Fam or else it wouldn&#39;t even be a topic of conversation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: glissade</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-320734</link> <dc:creator>glissade</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:56:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18153#comment-320734</guid> <description>Hey Guns,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here&#039;s a real question, for you. Who do you think the folks on this site would blame for this breach if the head of the SecretService was black also?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Guns,</p><p>Here&#39;s a real question, for you. Who do you think the folks on this site would blame for this breach if the head of the SecretService was black also?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Guns3000</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-320620</link> <dc:creator>Guns3000</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:34:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18153#comment-320620</guid> <description>Preach, call it how it is.  Follow protocol that&#039;s it.  Some of the females in here are just circling the wagons but a screw is a screw up no matter who it is.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preach, call it how it is.  Follow protocol that&#39;s it.  Some of the females in here are just circling the wagons but a screw is a screw up no matter who it is.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: roschelle</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-320619</link> <dc:creator>roschelle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:28:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18153#comment-320619</guid> <description>your opinion...thanks for sharing :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your opinion&#8230;thanks for sharing :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-320567</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:52:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18153#comment-320567</guid> <description>you forgot RICH. don&#039;t ever think that they don&#039;t know that Desiree doesn&#039;t need this, nor any other job, to pay the bills.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you forgot RICH. don&#39;t ever think that they don&#39;t know that Desiree doesn&#39;t need this, nor any other job, to pay the bills.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: RobM</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-320548</link> <dc:creator>RobM</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:25:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18153#comment-320548</guid> <description>You&#039;re wrong.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#39;re wrong.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AxelFoley</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-320515</link> <dc:creator>AxelFoley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:40:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18153#comment-320515</guid> <description>SMH&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The freaks come out at night.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SMH</p><p>The freaks come out at night.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Shanti2</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-320507</link> <dc:creator>Shanti2</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:25:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18153#comment-320507</guid> <description>LMBAO!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMBAO!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Town</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-320500</link> <dc:creator>Town</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:10:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18153#comment-320500</guid> <description>Another day, another screen name change.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another day, another screen name change.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Flash1</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-320494</link> <dc:creator>Flash1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:33:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18153#comment-320494</guid> <description>Dems reach deal to dump public option&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091209/ap_on_bi_ge/us_health_care_overhaul&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091209/ap_on_bi_ge...&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dems reach deal to dump public option</p><p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091209/ap_on_bi_ge/us_health_care_overhaul" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091209/ap_on_bi_ge&#8230;</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: roschelle</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-320493</link> <dc:creator>roschelle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:29:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18153#comment-320493</guid> <description>this has been sensationalized far too much. The Secret Service dropped the ball. End of story!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this has been sensationalized far too much. The Secret Service dropped the ball. End of story!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lisa M</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-320483</link> <dc:creator>Lisa M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:43:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18153#comment-320483</guid> <description>Whatev!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatev!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Admiral_Komack</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-320481</link> <dc:creator>Admiral_Komack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:30:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18153#comment-320481</guid> <description>WARNING: OFF TOPIC&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Former House Speaker Charged With Felony Assault After Sexual Encounter&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Zachary Roth &#124; December 8, 2009, 3:24PM&lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;The former speaker of the Missouri House has been charged with a felony after what looks like a bout of sado-masochistic sex that went way too far. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Details are still unconfirmed, we should note. But a woman appears to have suggested to police that Rod Jetton, a Republican who now works as a political consultant, may have slipped something into her drink, then beat her up during sex, after she failed to use the safe word they had agreed upon as a signal to calm things down.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here&#039;s what we know: The woman, who lives in Sikeston, Missouri, told police that Jetton and she spoke by phone on November 15th about their plans to have sex that night, according to the blog of a TV station. Several hours later, she says, he went to her home with two bottles of wine. According to the woman, Jetton poured the wine in the kitchen, out of her view. He then returned to the living room and handed her a glass. While they were watching a football game, the woman says, she started &#039;fading&#039; in and out and lost consciousness several times. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The woman added that she and Jetton had agreed on the phrase &quot;green balloons&quot; as a &quot;safe word&quot; that she could use if things got too rough during sex. That&#039;s not uncommon among people who enjoy sex that involves dominance and submission.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But somehow things seem to have gotten way out of hand. The police report continues:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[The woman] recalls Jetton hitting her on the face very hard. She then remembers waking up, lying on the floor and Jetton was choking her. [The woman] said she did not know what happened with her memory because she had been drunk but had never had the blank spots in her memory.&lt;br&gt;According to the formal complaint filed against Jetton, he &quot;recklessly caused serious physical injury&quot; to the woman &quot;by hitting her on the head, and choking her resulting in unconsciousness and the loss of the function of part of her body.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jetton then stayed the night, says the woman. When he woke up, she says, he kissed her and said, &quot;You should have said green balloons.&quot; He then left and hasn&#039;t returned.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to the Riverfront Times, a St.Louis alternative weekly, police reportedly have photos that show bruises on the woman&#039;s thighs and breasts but not on her face. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jetton, 42, was elected to the House of Representatives in 2000, and became speaker in 2005. He was term limited out in 2008. According to Wikipedia, he and his wife divorced in October after over 20 years of marriage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/12/former_house_speaker_charged_after_rough_sex.php?ref=fpblg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/...&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WARNING: OFF TOPIC</p><p><b>Former House Speaker Charged With Felony Assault After Sexual Encounter</b><br />Zachary Roth | December 8, 2009, 3:24PM</p><p>The former speaker of the Missouri House has been charged with a felony after what looks like a bout of sado-masochistic sex that went way too far.</p><p>Details are still unconfirmed, we should note. But a woman appears to have suggested to police that Rod Jetton, a Republican who now works as a political consultant, may have slipped something into her drink, then beat her up during sex, after she failed to use the safe word they had agreed upon as a signal to calm things down.</p><p>Here&#39;s what we know: The woman, who lives in Sikeston, Missouri, told police that Jetton and she spoke by phone on November 15th about their plans to have sex that night, according to the blog of a TV station. Several hours later, she says, he went to her home with two bottles of wine. According to the woman, Jetton poured the wine in the kitchen, out of her view. He then returned to the living room and handed her a glass. While they were watching a football game, the woman says, she started &#39;fading&#39; in and out and lost consciousness several times.</p><p>The woman added that she and Jetton had agreed on the phrase &#8220;green balloons&#8221; as a &#8220;safe word&#8221; that she could use if things got too rough during sex. That&#39;s not uncommon among people who enjoy sex that involves dominance and submission.</p><p>But somehow things seem to have gotten way out of hand. The police report continues:</p><p>[The woman] recalls Jetton hitting her on the face very hard. She then remembers waking up, lying on the floor and Jetton was choking her. [The woman] said she did not know what happened with her memory because she had been drunk but had never had the blank spots in her memory.<br />According to the formal complaint filed against Jetton, he &#8220;recklessly caused serious physical injury&#8221; to the woman &#8220;by hitting her on the head, and choking her resulting in unconsciousness and the loss of the function of part of her body.&#8221;</p><p>Jetton then stayed the night, says the woman. When he woke up, she says, he kissed her and said, &#8220;You should have said green balloons.&#8221; He then left and hasn&#39;t returned.</p><p>According to the Riverfront Times, a St.Louis alternative weekly, police reportedly have photos that show bruises on the woman&#39;s thighs and breasts but not on her face.</p><p>Jetton, 42, was elected to the House of Representatives in 2000, and became speaker in 2005. He was term limited out in 2008. According to Wikipedia, he and his wife divorced in October after over 20 years of marriage.</p><p><a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/12/former_house_speaker_charged_after_rough_sex.php?ref=fpblg" rel="nofollow">http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/&#8230;</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Admiral_Komack</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-320480</link> <dc:creator>Admiral_Komack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:22:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18153#comment-320480</guid> <description>She should have worn Daisy Dukes, to give the haters something else to bitch about.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;April Ryan: &quot;Why was Rogers wearing shorts at a state dinner?&quot;&lt;br&gt;Press Secretary: &quot;Because she COULD.&quot;&lt;br&gt;April Ryan: &quot;Don&#039;t play with me.&quot;&lt;br&gt;Press Secretary: &quot;Whatever.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She should have worn Daisy Dukes, to give the haters something else to bitch about.</p><p>April Ryan: &#8220;Why was Rogers wearing shorts at a state dinner?&#8221;<br />Press Secretary: &#8220;Because she COULD.&#8221;<br />April Ryan: &#8220;Don&#39;t play with me.&#8221;<br />Press Secretary: &#8220;Whatever.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: glissade</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-320475</link> <dc:creator>glissade</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:08:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18153#comment-320475</guid> <description>&quot;They are used to Rosalyn Carter types. As tall as she is she doesnt&#039; quite have to try to be seen; she sticks out wherever she goes I&#039;m sure.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What are you saying here? We are talking about the social secretary Rogers, how in the heck can she compare to a FLOTUS?!  Seeee, just the very idea you would make this comparison highlights why Rogers profile is waaaay to high. Can you name the social secretary for Roslyn Carter?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I didn&#039;t think so.  And therein lies the entire problem. Rogers brought hate on her own self for not knowing how to keep a low profile.  She deserves every ounce of reprimand she is getting.  She tried to run with the big dogs, when her place was on the porch, in the kitchen, in the back making sure the job was done well...and not mismanaged.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If for damn sure has nothing to do with her height. She sticks out cause she chooses to draw attention to herself. She should have been working instead of trying to sit down in that damn tent she concocted for a visting head of state. Such that the PrimeMinister of Indias constiuents were bemoaning the social sleight of their head of state not even eating in the White House but on the damn LAWN....what a real faux pas!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They are used to Rosalyn Carter types. As tall as she is she doesnt&#39; quite have to try to be seen; she sticks out wherever she goes I&#39;m sure.&#8221;</p><p>What are you saying here? We are talking about the social secretary Rogers, how in the heck can she compare to a FLOTUS?!  Seeee, just the very idea you would make this comparison highlights why Rogers profile is waaaay to high. Can you name the social secretary for Roslyn Carter?</p><p>I didn&#39;t think so.  And therein lies the entire problem. Rogers brought hate on her own self for not knowing how to keep a low profile.  She deserves every ounce of reprimand she is getting.  She tried to run with the big dogs, when her place was on the porch, in the kitchen, in the back making sure the job was done well&#8230;and not mismanaged.</p><p>If for damn sure has nothing to do with her height. She sticks out cause she chooses to draw attention to herself. She should have been working instead of trying to sit down in that damn tent she concocted for a visting head of state. Such that the PrimeMinister of Indias constiuents were bemoaning the social sleight of their head of state not even eating in the White House but on the damn LAWN&#8230;.what a real faux pas!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mon_dieu_ishmael</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-320467</link> <dc:creator>mon_dieu_ishmael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:37:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18153#comment-320467</guid> <description>She was a brides maid - she should have worn something not as nice a Michele but still presentable at a State DInner.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She was a brides maid &#8211; she should have worn something not as nice a Michele but still presentable at a State DInner.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Shanti2</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-320466</link> <dc:creator>Shanti2</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:36:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18153#comment-320466</guid> <description>LMBAO@ &quot;Next time tell the kitchen to make them a plate and wrap it in waxed paper and foil for them to take home.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMBAO@ &#8220;Next time tell the kitchen to make them a plate and wrap it in waxed paper and foil for them to take home.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: glissade</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/desirees-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-320464</link> <dc:creator>glissade</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:28:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18153#comment-320464</guid> <description>Escada</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Escada</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 596/600 objects using apc

Served from: www.jackandjillpolitics.com @ 2012-02-10 10:27:13 -->
