<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Afternoon Open Thread</title> <atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/</link> <description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:58:52 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator> <item><title>By: hoist fitness</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/comment-page-1/#comment-715408</link> <dc:creator>hoist fitness</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 06:40:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18320#comment-715408</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Fantastic Site...&lt;/strong&gt;[..] I Stumbled accross this great blog post and thought you guys would love it.[..]...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fantastic Site&#8230;</strong></p><p>[..] I Stumbled accross this great blog post and thought you guys would love it.[..]&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Angelar</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/comment-page-1/#comment-332414</link> <dc:creator>Angelar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:34:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18320#comment-332414</guid> <description>reading my mind</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reading my mind</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Angelar</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/comment-page-1/#comment-321444</link> <dc:creator>Angelar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:34:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18320#comment-321444</guid> <description>reading my mind</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reading my mind</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: morphus</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/comment-page-1/#comment-321406</link> <dc:creator>morphus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:51:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18320#comment-321406</guid> <description>&lt;i&gt;Does anyone find the CBC choice to hold up the Bank regulation bill as a protest as opposed to another bill a little suspect?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Did you find tens of thousands of lobbyists writing legislation and over $600 million flying around D.C. during the health care debate a little suspect too?&lt;hr&gt;Regarding CDC:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Call it the $4 billion boycott.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By boycotting a key House committee vote last week and threatening to abandon support for banking regulations, members of the Congressional Black Caucus got $4 billion added to legislation to overhaul government oversight of Wall Street.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;House Financial Services Committee&lt;/b&gt; Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass., &lt;b&gt;this week inserted $3 billion to the legislation to provide low-interest loans to unemployed homeowners in danger of foreclosure. He added $1 billion for neighborhood revitalization programs&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091210/ap_on_go_co/us_black_caucus_financial_overhaul&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; After walkout, black caucus gets what it wanted&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;br&gt;The amendment offered by Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) &lt;b&gt;created Consumer Financial Protection Oversight Board&lt;/b&gt; that would need to include five members from the “fields of consumer protection, fair lending and civil rights, representatives of depository institutions that primarily serve under-served communities or representatives of communities that have been significantly impacted by higher-priced mortgage loans.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/71407-bachmann-acorn-could-regulate-the-financial-sector&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bachmann: ACORN could regulate the financial sector&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Does anyone find the CBC choice to hold up the Bank regulation bill as a protest as opposed to another bill a little suspect?</i></p><p>Did you find tens of thousands of lobbyists writing legislation and over $600 million flying around D.C. during the health care debate a little suspect too?<br /><hr />Regarding CDC:</p><p>Call it the $4 billion boycott.</p><p>By boycotting a key House committee vote last week and threatening to abandon support for banking regulations, members of the Congressional Black Caucus got $4 billion added to legislation to overhaul government oversight of Wall Street.</p><p><b>House Financial Services Committee</b> Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass., <b>this week inserted $3 billion to the legislation to provide low-interest loans to unemployed homeowners in danger of foreclosure. He added $1 billion for neighborhood revitalization programs</b>.</p><p><b><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091210/ap_on_go_co/us_black_caucus_financial_overhaul" rel="nofollow"> After walkout, black caucus gets what it wanted</a></b><br /><hr />The amendment offered by Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) <b>created Consumer Financial Protection Oversight Board</b> that would need to include five members from the “fields of consumer protection, fair lending and civil rights, representatives of depository institutions that primarily serve under-served communities or representatives of communities that have been significantly impacted by higher-priced mortgage loans.”</p><p><b><a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/71407-bachmann-acorn-could-regulate-the-financial-sector" rel="nofollow">Bachmann: ACORN could regulate the financial sector</a></b></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: morphus</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/comment-page-1/#comment-321404</link> <dc:creator>morphus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:29:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18320#comment-321404</guid> <description>With local government projects minority construction businesses are cornered in the sense they are not able to put up the bonds.  So, most must enter into agreement as subcontractors with preferred contractors.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With local government projects minority construction businesses are cornered in the sense they are not able to put up the bonds.  So, most must enter into agreement as subcontractors with preferred contractors.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AM2k9</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/comment-page-1/#comment-321399</link> <dc:creator>AM2k9</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:12:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18320#comment-321399</guid> <description>Well, I dont think Defense contractors would consider this administration a failure....neither will the Wall Street Bankers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, other than the &quot;Sarah P. would be Fckng up even worse&quot; argument, you have no much of an argument there.  I know it&#039;s only been 11 months...but Wall Street got bailed out; why not peoples? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;you know what&#039;s really pissing me off? If this was John Edwards at the helm (or Hillary Clinton for that matter), some of us would be holding pitchforks on Pennsylvania Ave.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I dont think Defense contractors would consider this administration a failure&#8230;.neither will the Wall Street Bankers.</p><p>But, other than the &#8220;Sarah P. would be Fckng up even worse&#8221; argument, you have no much of an argument there.  I know it&#39;s only been 11 months&#8230;but Wall Street got bailed out; why not peoples?</p><p>you know what&#39;s really pissing me off? If this was John Edwards at the helm (or Hillary Clinton for that matter), some of us would be holding pitchforks on Pennsylvania Ave.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: chris_i_am</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/comment-page-1/#comment-321397</link> <dc:creator>chris_i_am</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:56:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18320#comment-321397</guid> <description>Parasites???? You&#039;re such an idiot...I&#039;m assuming you have some PHAT &amp; DEEP pockets!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parasites???? You&#39;re such an idiot&#8230;I&#39;m assuming you have some PHAT &#038; DEEP pockets!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: chris_i_am</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/comment-page-1/#comment-321396</link> <dc:creator>chris_i_am</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:55:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18320#comment-321396</guid> <description>Well since some of you are so Obama is a failure. Then vote WHITEY back in there and lets see how much he cares about your BLACK ASS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Give the mothefucker a chance to do something. It&#039;s only 11 months. I don&#039;t recall motherfuckers screwing BUSH, CLINTON, BUSH, REAGAN like this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;DAMN sometimes some Black folks give me gas! All of white America and their reporters now feel in the subliminal that now your Nigger ass got it. Now do what we couldn&#039;t do. It&#039;s going to take time folks. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And if you don&#039;t like him...There is always Sarah who don&#039;t s FUCK about Black people!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You always have options.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well since some of you are so Obama is a failure. Then vote WHITEY back in there and lets see how much he cares about your BLACK ASS.</p><p>Give the mothefucker a chance to do something. It&#39;s only 11 months. I don&#39;t recall motherfuckers screwing BUSH, CLINTON, BUSH, REAGAN like this.</p><p>DAMN sometimes some Black folks give me gas! All of white America and their reporters now feel in the subliminal that now your Nigger ass got it. Now do what we couldn&#39;t do. It&#39;s going to take time folks.</p><p>And if you don&#39;t like him&#8230;There is always Sarah who don&#39;t s FUCK about Black people!</p><p>You always have options.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Plantsmantx</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/comment-page-1/#comment-321368</link> <dc:creator>Plantsmantx</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:42:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18320#comment-321368</guid> <description>It&#039;s interesting that you criticize the Congressional conservative, then suggest that people push their state legislators rather than those convervative Democrats, who apparently are immune to pushing. I&#039;ve seen this a lot, and it alomst seems as if they&#039;re being protected...shielded by the people who constantly say, &quot;Well, we can&#039;t push them to do anything&quot;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s interesting that you criticize the Congressional conservative, then suggest that people push their state legislators rather than those convervative Democrats, who apparently are immune to pushing. I&#39;ve seen this a lot, and it alomst seems as if they&#39;re being protected&#8230;shielded by the people who constantly say, &#8220;Well, we can&#39;t push them to do anything&#8221;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: case123</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/comment-page-1/#comment-321364</link> <dc:creator>case123</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:28:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18320#comment-321364</guid> <description>The over emphasis on the Presidency is major issue affecting the lefts accomplishment ratio.  Feels like a broken record with every issue: &quot;If Obama had just pushed harder we would have had a better result.&quot; Really?  Does it really seem that Blue Dogs and Conserva-dems give a flying ---- about what Obama is pushing.  They have taken every opportunity to show their constituency that they are barely Democrats.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A concerted effort to push reps at district and state levels will accomplish far more than these now common place but pointless liberal rant against Obama.  But everyone always seems to think their rep is great, its the other guy.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, Does anyone find the CBC choice to hold up the Bank regulation bill as a protest as opposed to another bill a little suspect?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The over emphasis on the Presidency is major issue affecting the lefts accomplishment ratio.  Feels like a broken record with every issue: &#8220;If Obama had just pushed harder we would have had a better result.&#8221; Really?  Does it really seem that Blue Dogs and Conserva-dems give a flying &#8212;- about what Obama is pushing.  They have taken every opportunity to show their constituency that they are barely Democrats.</p><p>A concerted effort to push reps at district and state levels will accomplish far more than these now common place but pointless liberal rant against Obama.  But everyone always seems to think their rep is great, its the other guy.</p><p>Finally, Does anyone find the CBC choice to hold up the Bank regulation bill as a protest as opposed to another bill a little suspect?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AM2k9</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/comment-page-1/#comment-321355</link> <dc:creator>AM2k9</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:22:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18320#comment-321355</guid> <description>Well, I&#039;ll be waiting for the &quot;progressive&quot; foreign policy...oh, wait, at this point, we&#039;ll be lucky if he doesnt bomb Iran!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#39;ll be waiting for the &#8220;progressive&#8221; foreign policy&#8230;oh, wait, at this point, we&#39;ll be lucky if he doesnt bomb Iran!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mon_dieu_ishmael</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/comment-page-1/#comment-321354</link> <dc:creator>mon_dieu_ishmael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:21:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18320#comment-321354</guid> <description>Just about the time that the Medicare buy-in goes into effect - Medicare is predicted to go broke.  So we are going to add to Medicare a bunch of self employed pplz with pre-existed conditions who cannot get/afford regular health insurance - yep, real smart.  Or Medicare will get a bunch of early retirees who will be parasites, contributing nothing to the national wealth.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just about the time that the Medicare buy-in goes into effect &#8211; Medicare is predicted to go broke.  So we are going to add to Medicare a bunch of self employed pplz with pre-existed conditions who cannot get/afford regular health insurance &#8211; yep, real smart.  Or Medicare will get a bunch of early retirees who will be parasites, contributing nothing to the national wealth.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AM2k9</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/comment-page-1/#comment-321352</link> <dc:creator>AM2k9</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:12:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18320#comment-321352</guid> <description>You know, I have come to the conclusion that to a number of Obama supporters an expose like the one Matt wrote wont matter. Some Obama supporters are living a fairy tale in which the only thing that matters is how marvelous Michelle Obama looks. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I remember seeing him in Delaware, and seeing how hopeful folks were....finally things were going to change.I remember weeping after Iowa and New Hampshire....and after casting my primary and election date votes.  I remember election night and inauguration.  Yeah, I remember.&lt;br&gt;But like Lt. Daniels said in The Wire: F*ck me once, shane on you.  F*ck me twice, shame on me.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I have come to the conclusion that to a number of Obama supporters an expose like the one Matt wrote wont matter. Some Obama supporters are living a fairy tale in which the only thing that matters is how marvelous Michelle Obama looks.</p><p>I remember seeing him in Delaware, and seeing how hopeful folks were&#8230;.finally things were going to change.I remember weeping after Iowa and New Hampshire&#8230;.and after casting my primary and election date votes.  I remember election night and inauguration.  Yeah, I remember.<br />But like Lt. Daniels said in The Wire: F*ck me once, shane on you.  F*ck me twice, shame on me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bigassbelle</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/comment-page-1/#comment-321350</link> <dc:creator>bigassbelle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:04:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18320#comment-321350</guid> <description>Barack Obama&#039;s trojan horse full of Wall Street pirates. Read it and weep. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/31234647/obamas_big_sellout/print&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/3123...&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama&#39;s trojan horse full of Wall Street pirates. Read it and weep.</p><p><a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/31234647/obamas_big_sellout/print" rel="nofollow">http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/3123&#8230;</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/comment-page-1/#comment-321349</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:02:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18320#comment-321349</guid> <description>don&#039;t agree with this - at all. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I luv Glee.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#39;t agree with this &#8211; at all.</p><p>I luv Glee.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lamh32</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/comment-page-1/#comment-321348</link> <dc:creator>lamh32</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:58:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18320#comment-321348</guid> <description>No I don&#039;t agree with this article at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And no offense, but if you&#039;ve never watched the show, maybe you should before taking what this writer says at face value.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is a pet peeve of mine, and why I try not to read articles/reviews/commentaries on things I plan to see or hear like movie/tv/music, cause once you do, it colors your own perception of the movies/tv/etc.  In other words, if you&#039;ve never seen the show, and read that article, if you watch the show now, then you would be subconsciously looking for the supposed &quot;racist&quot; elements that this author speaks of.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No I don&#39;t agree with this article at all.</p><p>And no offense, but if you&#39;ve never watched the show, maybe you should before taking what this writer says at face value.</p><p>This is a pet peeve of mine, and why I try not to read articles/reviews/commentaries on things I plan to see or hear like movie/tv/music, cause once you do, it colors your own perception of the movies/tv/etc.  In other words, if you&#39;ve never seen the show, and read that article, if you watch the show now, then you would be subconsciously looking for the supposed &#8220;racist&#8221; elements that this author speaks of.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Shazza</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/comment-page-1/#comment-321333</link> <dc:creator>Shazza</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:36:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18320#comment-321333</guid> <description>Now I admit I&#039;ve never watched Glee but is this article right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.popmatters.com/pm/post/117255-is-glee-a-little-bit-racist/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.popmatters.com/pm/post/117255-is-gle...&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I admit I&#39;ve never watched Glee but is this article right?<br /><a href="http://www.popmatters.com/pm/post/117255-is-glee-a-little-bit-racist/" rel="nofollow">http://www.popmatters.com/pm/post/117255-is-gle&#8230;</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lamh32</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/comment-page-1/#comment-321317</link> <dc:creator>lamh32</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:14:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18320#comment-321317</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/health-care/godfather-of-public-option-endorses-medicare-buy-in/#comments&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Godfather Of Public Option Hails Medicare Buy-In&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;This is significant: Jacob Hacker, a kind of godfather of the public option, basically endorsed the Medicare buy-in compromise in an interview, describing it as a public option on its own terms and an “enormous positive”:&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;The way I would describe it is, in sort of Dickensian terms, is it’s a tale of two public options. Public option one, the public option that was going to be within the exchange and available to Americans on day one to create competition for private insurance plans to give people a choice, that public option has been replaced, in my mind, with an inadequate substitute, a national system of private plans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But public option two, which was never on the agenda before, a buy-in to the actual Medicare program for 55- to 64-year-olds, is an enormous positive development. It’s actually the original idea, if you will, for the public option, simply letting people get into the Medicare program that provides broad, secure coverage at an affordable price.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hacker did temper his praise a bit for the overall Senate compromise, saying that the plan for a national nonprofit was unlikely to “provide the choice and competition that President Obama spoke about.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still, Hacker’s seal of approval on the Medicare buy-in — and his description of it as a public option in its own right — could make easier for liberals to swallow the compromise as a legit substitute for the public plan upon which they have staked so much prestige and political capital.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/health-care/godfather-of-public-option-endorses-medicare-buy-in/#comments" rel="nofollow">Godfather Of Public Option Hails Medicare Buy-In</a><br /><blockquote>This is significant: Jacob Hacker, a kind of godfather of the public option, basically endorsed the Medicare buy-in compromise in an interview, describing it as a public option on its own terms and an “enormous positive”:<br /><blockquote>The way I would describe it is, in sort of Dickensian terms, is it’s a tale of two public options. Public option one, the public option that was going to be within the exchange and available to Americans on day one to create competition for private insurance plans to give people a choice, that public option has been replaced, in my mind, with an inadequate substitute, a national system of private plans.</p><p>But public option two, which was never on the agenda before, a buy-in to the actual Medicare program for 55- to 64-year-olds, is an enormous positive development. It’s actually the original idea, if you will, for the public option, simply letting people get into the Medicare program that provides broad, secure coverage at an affordable price.</p></blockquote><p>Hacker did temper his praise a bit for the overall Senate compromise, saying that the plan for a national nonprofit was unlikely to “provide the choice and competition that President Obama spoke about.”</p><p>Still, Hacker’s seal of approval on the Medicare buy-in — and his description of it as a public option in its own right — could make easier for liberals to swallow the compromise as a legit substitute for the public plan upon which they have staked so much prestige and political capital.</p></blockquote> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: RobM</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/comment-page-1/#comment-321312</link> <dc:creator>RobM</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:05:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18320#comment-321312</guid> <description>If you pass shit it catches up w/you. If you refuse to recognize there are problems w/ legislation so you leave it to the next guy you&#039;re a coward. That&#039;s what Bush and the Republicans did. If you run on change don&#039;t you think you have a obligation to stop making shit. Sometimes you have to take a stand.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you pass shit it catches up w/you. If you refuse to recognize there are problems w/ legislation so you leave it to the next guy you&#39;re a coward. That&#39;s what Bush and the Republicans did. If you run on change don&#39;t you think you have a obligation to stop making shit. Sometimes you have to take a stand.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lamh32</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-235/comment-page-1/#comment-321293</link> <dc:creator>lamh32</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:41:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=18320#comment-321293</guid> <description>Okay Glee fans out there,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;NBC is throwing us a bone &#039;til Glee comes back on.  It&#039;s called the &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nbc.com/sing-off/video/clips/the-sing-off-premieres/1180950/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sing Off&lt;/a&gt;&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay Glee fans out there,</p><p>NBC is throwing us a bone &#39;til Glee comes back on.  It&#39;s called the &#8220;<a href="http://www.nbc.com/sing-off/video/clips/the-sing-off-premieres/1180950/" rel="nofollow">Sing Off</a>&#8220;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 596/600 objects using apc

Served from: www.jackandjillpolitics.com @ 2012-02-10 11:19:28 -->
