<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Afternoon Open Thread</title> <atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/</link> <description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:58:52 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Kim Kardashian bikini</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/comment-page-1/#comment-823563</link> <dc:creator>Kim Kardashian bikini</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 00:52:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=17999#comment-823563</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Kim Kardashian Sex Tape...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]whenever you look at the kardashian sex video. Were looking forward to bring in you video recordings, kim kardashian nude fakes and much more. Playboy magazine finished photographic meetings using kim on their magazine a little time back yet it&#039;s...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kim Kardashian Sex Tape&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]whenever you look at the kardashian sex video. Were looking forward to bring in you video recordings, kim kardashian nude fakes and much more. Playboy magazine finished photographic meetings using kim on their magazine a little time back yet it&#8217;s&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: garment daily business reports</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/comment-page-1/#comment-750683</link> <dc:creator>garment daily business reports</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:23:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=17999#comment-750683</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Recommeneded websites...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]…...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Recommeneded websites&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]…&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Yeast infection cure</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/comment-page-1/#comment-710725</link> <dc:creator>Yeast infection cure</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:32:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=17999#comment-710725</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Great website...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]…...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Great website&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]…&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Digital watch</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/comment-page-1/#comment-667294</link> <dc:creator>Digital watch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 02:23:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=17999#comment-667294</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Gems form the internet...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]…...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gems form the internet&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]…&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: forta male enhancement</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/comment-page-1/#comment-540260</link> <dc:creator>forta male enhancement</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 00:28:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=17999#comment-540260</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;herbal erection...&lt;/strong&gt;[...It is true that most men find it embarrassing having very small-sized penises especially when they find the females not getting sexual satisfaction. That&#039;s why there are best tips for penis male enlargement meant to help all men who find it shamef...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>herbal erection&#8230;</strong></p><p>[&#8230;It is true that most men find it embarrassing having very small-sized penises especially when they find the females not getting sexual satisfaction. That&#8217;s why there are best tips for penis male enlargement meant to help all men who find it shamef&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Panic Away Review</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/comment-page-1/#comment-537927</link> <dc:creator>Panic Away Review</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:54:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=17999#comment-537927</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Recent Websites I Like...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]here are some other links to sites that I link to because I think they are really worth visiting: http://www.panicattackstreatmentcure.net/links/[...]...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Recent Websites I Like&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]here are some other links to sites that I link to because I think they are really worth visiting: <a href="http://www.panicattackstreatmentcure.net/links/....." rel="nofollow">http://www.panicattackstreatmentcure.net/links/&#8230;..</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: glissade</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/comment-page-1/#comment-335781</link> <dc:creator>glissade</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:35:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=17999#comment-335781</guid> <description>I am not saying that Tiger was calling her a slut, even though he was given that the dream made her to be a cheating kinky wife with 2 men. Can&#039;t say slut any louder there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; However, I was juxtaposing the suggestion that his dream was about him being loser vs. it being about him seeing her as just a whore.   IOW&#039;s...if we personalize the dream to what it says about him, it is not that he is a loser but that he sees her as one.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not saying that Tiger was calling her a slut, even though he was given that the dream made her to be a cheating kinky wife with 2 men. Can&#39;t say slut any louder there.</p><p> However, I was juxtaposing the suggestion that his dream was about him being loser vs. it being about him seeing her as just a whore.   IOW&#39;s&#8230;if we personalize the dream to what it says about him, it is not that he is a loser but that he sees her as one.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: glissade</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/comment-page-1/#comment-335780</link> <dc:creator>glissade</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:22:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=17999#comment-335780</guid> <description>&quot;You illustrate the asinine DC sense of entitlement and snotty-nosed-ness that I describe. &quot;Tradition&quot; my ass!! &quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hmmm, you don&#039;t like tradition?  Probably because you demonstrate the ignorance of illiteracy and no home training. No one ever taught you to respect anything so you don&#039;t, is that it?  Yet, you think you can demand respect for ignorance that you want to tout as somehow how &#039;it should be&#039;&lt;br&gt;No one except morons believe they can get something without bringing something first. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Your ignorance about the number of dinners/events that have been held outside the 150 seater state dining room by prior administrations tells me you are not interested in debating facts&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No, you simply have no facts. The topic and issue is STATE dinners, not dinners/events. Point of fact, if you took time to read, oops that would be the tradition way and we know you can&#039;t stand doing things according to tradition. But if you did, you would have read that I specifically stated they could give OFFICIAL dinners..see cause that too is how it is TRADITIONALLY done.  STATE DINNERS are entirely different they are not dinners/events.  So, stfu and go read up on it before you try to speak on it.  Oooops, again, that is what folks who are intelligent traditionally do.  Know the facts first before they try to dress down others.  But you want to get respect for things you deem respectable. Ha!  I need not engage at the level you set...after all debating with facts would be traditional...and you have no respect for rules, standards or traditions.  You don&#039;t even recognize how much of a hypocrite you are when you say shyt like:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;The last time I checked the First Lady is called Mrs. Michelle Obama&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wrong.  See that is not traditional at all. If anything the FirstLady would be called Mrs.BarackHusseinObama....got that?!  But hey, why EVER would you think you could insist on any traditional label whatsoEVER.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;remember...Tradition my ass!  Is your mantra....Perhaps, all those z&#039;s in your moniker have you zigandzag so much you dizzy and spew spittel about nothing.now go suck on an egg so you can stop sounding like a dumbshty who can&#039;t even remember their own assertions but think they can tell someone else which what tradition is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And if you failed to notice this.  I admire POTUS...his wife though ...like I said in the last post...leaves a lot to be desired when it comes to protocol, standards and traditions.  She is a lot like you..wants respect she hasn&#039;t earned while being dismissive of the very tradtions and protocols that would earn her respect. Talk about asinine. You too, seem not to understand that Michelle is no one other than the WIFE of the POTUS.  Got that?  There is no personal achievement or accomplishment that comes with that other than saying &quot;I do&#039;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; In short, you and Michelle are  ill-informed, by choice.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You illustrate the asinine DC sense of entitlement and snotty-nosed-ness that I describe. &#8220;Tradition&#8221; my ass!! &#8220;</p><p>Hmmm, you don&#39;t like tradition?  Probably because you demonstrate the ignorance of illiteracy and no home training. No one ever taught you to respect anything so you don&#39;t, is that it?  Yet, you think you can demand respect for ignorance that you want to tout as somehow how &#39;it should be&#39;<br />No one except morons believe they can get something without bringing something first.</p><p>&#8220;Your ignorance about the number of dinners/events that have been held outside the 150 seater state dining room by prior administrations tells me you are not interested in debating facts&#8221;</p><p>No, you simply have no facts. The topic and issue is STATE dinners, not dinners/events. Point of fact, if you took time to read, oops that would be the tradition way and we know you can&#39;t stand doing things according to tradition. But if you did, you would have read that I specifically stated they could give OFFICIAL dinners..see cause that too is how it is TRADITIONALLY done.  STATE DINNERS are entirely different they are not dinners/events.  So, stfu and go read up on it before you try to speak on it.  Oooops, again, that is what folks who are intelligent traditionally do.  Know the facts first before they try to dress down others.  But you want to get respect for things you deem respectable. Ha!  I need not engage at the level you set&#8230;after all debating with facts would be traditional&#8230;and you have no respect for rules, standards or traditions.  You don&#39;t even recognize how much of a hypocrite you are when you say shyt like:</p><p>&#8220;The last time I checked the First Lady is called Mrs. Michelle Obama&#8221;</p><p>Wrong.  See that is not traditional at all. If anything the FirstLady would be called Mrs.BarackHusseinObama&#8230;.got that?!  But hey, why EVER would you think you could insist on any traditional label whatsoEVER.</p><p>remember&#8230;Tradition my ass!  Is your mantra&#8230;.Perhaps, all those z&#39;s in your moniker have you zigandzag so much you dizzy and spew spittel about nothing.now go suck on an egg so you can stop sounding like a dumbshty who can&#39;t even remember their own assertions but think they can tell someone else which what tradition is.</p><p>And if you failed to notice this.  I admire POTUS&#8230;his wife though &#8230;like I said in the last post&#8230;leaves a lot to be desired when it comes to protocol, standards and traditions.  She is a lot like you..wants respect she hasn&#39;t earned while being dismissive of the very tradtions and protocols that would earn her respect. Talk about asinine. You too, seem not to understand that Michelle is no one other than the WIFE of the POTUS.  Got that?  There is no personal achievement or accomplishment that comes with that other than saying &#8220;I do&#39;</p><p> In short, you and Michelle are  ill-informed, by choice.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: glissade</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/comment-page-1/#comment-320235</link> <dc:creator>glissade</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:35:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=17999#comment-320235</guid> <description>I am not saying that Tiger was calling her a slut, even though he was given that the dream made her to be a cheating kinky wife with 2 men. Can&#039;t say slut any louder there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; However, I was juxtaposing the suggestion that his dream was about him being loser vs. it being about him seeing her as just a whore.   IOW&#039;s...if we personalize the dream to what it says about him, it is not that he is a loser but that he sees her as one.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not saying that Tiger was calling her a slut, even though he was given that the dream made her to be a cheating kinky wife with 2 men. Can&#39;t say slut any louder there.</p><p> However, I was juxtaposing the suggestion that his dream was about him being loser vs. it being about him seeing her as just a whore.   IOW&#39;s&#8230;if we personalize the dream to what it says about him, it is not that he is a loser but that he sees her as one.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: glissade</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/comment-page-1/#comment-320234</link> <dc:creator>glissade</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:22:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=17999#comment-320234</guid> <description>&quot;You illustrate the asinine DC sense of entitlement and snotty-nosed-ness that I describe. &quot;Tradition&quot; my ass!! &quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hmmm, you don&#039;t like tradition?  Probably because you demonstrate the ignorance of illiteracy and no home training. No one ever taught you to respect anything so you don&#039;t, is that it?  Yet, you think you can demand respect for ignorance that you want to tout as somehow how &#039;it should be&#039;&lt;br&gt;No one except morons believe they can get something without bringing something first. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Your ignorance about the number of dinners/events that have been held outside the 150 seater state dining room by prior administrations tells me you are not interested in debating facts&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No, you simply have no facts. The topic and issue is STATE dinners, not dinners/events. Point of fact, if you took time to read, oops that would be the tradition way and we know you can&#039;t stand doing things according to tradition. But if you did, you would have read that I specifically stated they could give OFFICIAL dinners..see cause that too is how it is TRADITIONALLY done.  STATE DINNERS are entirely different they are not dinners/events.  So, stfu and go read up on it before you try to speak on it.  Oooops, again, that is what folks who are intelligent traditionally do.  Know the facts first before they try to dress down others.  But you want to get respect for things you deem respectable. Ha!  I need not engage at the level you set...after all debating with facts would be traditional...and you have no respect for rules, standards or traditions.  You don&#039;t even recognize how much of a hypocrite you are when you say shyt like:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;The last time I checked the First Lady is called Mrs. Michelle Obama&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wrong.  See that is not traditional at all. If anything the FirstLady would be called Mrs.BarackHusseinObama....got that?!  But hey, why EVER would you think you could insist on any traditional label whatsoEVER.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;remember...Tradition my ass!  Is your mantra....Perhaps, all those z&#039;s in your moniker have you zigandzag so much you dizzy and spew spittel about nothing.now go suck on an egg so you can stop sounding like a dumbshty who can&#039;t even remember their own assertions but think they can tell someone else which what tradition is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And if you failed to notice this.  I admire POTUS...his wife though ...like I said in the last post...leaves a lot to be desired when it comes to protocol, standards and traditions.  She is a lot like you..wants respect she hasn&#039;t earned while being dismissive of the very tradtions and protocols that would earn her respect. Talk about asinine. You too, seem not to understand that Michelle is no one other than the WIFE of the POTUS.  Got that?  There is no personal achievement or accomplishment that comes with that other than saying &quot;I do&#039;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; In short, you and Michelle are  ill-informed, by choice.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You illustrate the asinine DC sense of entitlement and snotty-nosed-ness that I describe. &#8220;Tradition&#8221; my ass!! &#8220;</p><p>Hmmm, you don&#39;t like tradition?  Probably because you demonstrate the ignorance of illiteracy and no home training. No one ever taught you to respect anything so you don&#39;t, is that it?  Yet, you think you can demand respect for ignorance that you want to tout as somehow how &#39;it should be&#39;<br />No one except morons believe they can get something without bringing something first.</p><p>&#8220;Your ignorance about the number of dinners/events that have been held outside the 150 seater state dining room by prior administrations tells me you are not interested in debating facts&#8221;</p><p>No, you simply have no facts. The topic and issue is STATE dinners, not dinners/events. Point of fact, if you took time to read, oops that would be the tradition way and we know you can&#39;t stand doing things according to tradition. But if you did, you would have read that I specifically stated they could give OFFICIAL dinners..see cause that too is how it is TRADITIONALLY done.  STATE DINNERS are entirely different they are not dinners/events.  So, stfu and go read up on it before you try to speak on it.  Oooops, again, that is what folks who are intelligent traditionally do.  Know the facts first before they try to dress down others.  But you want to get respect for things you deem respectable. Ha!  I need not engage at the level you set&#8230;after all debating with facts would be traditional&#8230;and you have no respect for rules, standards or traditions.  You don&#39;t even recognize how much of a hypocrite you are when you say shyt like:</p><p>&#8220;The last time I checked the First Lady is called Mrs. Michelle Obama&#8221;</p><p>Wrong.  See that is not traditional at all. If anything the FirstLady would be called Mrs.BarackHusseinObama&#8230;.got that?!  But hey, why EVER would you think you could insist on any traditional label whatsoEVER.</p><p>remember&#8230;Tradition my ass!  Is your mantra&#8230;.Perhaps, all those z&#39;s in your moniker have you zigandzag so much you dizzy and spew spittel about nothing.now go suck on an egg so you can stop sounding like a dumbshty who can&#39;t even remember their own assertions but think they can tell someone else which what tradition is.</p><p>And if you failed to notice this.  I admire POTUS&#8230;his wife though &#8230;like I said in the last post&#8230;leaves a lot to be desired when it comes to protocol, standards and traditions.  She is a lot like you..wants respect she hasn&#39;t earned while being dismissive of the very tradtions and protocols that would earn her respect. Talk about asinine. You too, seem not to understand that Michelle is no one other than the WIFE of the POTUS.  Got that?  There is no personal achievement or accomplishment that comes with that other than saying &#8220;I do&#39;</p><p> In short, you and Michelle are  ill-informed, by choice.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pjamma</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/comment-page-1/#comment-319418</link> <dc:creator>pjamma</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:57:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=17999#comment-319418</guid> <description>This goes out to my boy Tiger.  Number four and counting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZ6EV6I-ZMI&amp;feature=related&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZ6EV6I-ZMI&amp;feat...&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This goes out to my boy Tiger.  Number four and counting.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZ6EV6I-ZMI&#038;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZ6EV6I-ZMI&#038;feat&#8230;</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mothsmoke</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/comment-page-1/#comment-319349</link> <dc:creator>Mothsmoke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:37:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=17999#comment-319349</guid> <description>Since that is his &quot;sexy&quot; talk, I&#039;m thinking it has more to do with getting off on the idea of her with other men. I would imagine that a man with a paramour, keeps that relationship cool. In other words, you don&#039;t call the woman a slut or tell her she isn&#039;t ish because part of the reason he&#039;s entered an extramarital relationship is because he trying to create another life without arguments, martial problems, and screaming kids. Calling her a slut is a sure fire way to cause an argument and to have her bounce. Look at who this woman has been with -- she&#039;s not KiKi who lucked up on a celeb. She dates celebs on the regular. They run in the same circles -- There WILL be another Tiger in her life. In other words, she&#039;s not pressed.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;With a fling, you can indulge in the very risque -- the forbidden you&#039;re not allowed in your home. Do you honestly think the mother of his two children is playing along with the I dreamed of you with two men last night dream? I don&#039;t. Combined with the other texts, e-mails and other evidence of his relationship with these women, I think we can agree that Tiger is a freak to the nth degree and nothing we&#039;ve heard about these relationships suggests that he treated them anything but well. I don&#039;t agree that he&#039;s saying he&#039;s all that and she &quot;ain&#039;t shyt&quot; or that he is a loser or insecure -- it&#039;s fantasy, pure and simple and maybe that&#039;s why he was with her.&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since that is his &#8220;sexy&#8221; talk, I&#39;m thinking it has more to do with getting off on the idea of her with other men. I would imagine that a man with a paramour, keeps that relationship cool. In other words, you don&#39;t call the woman a slut or tell her she isn&#39;t ish because part of the reason he&#39;s entered an extramarital relationship is because he trying to create another life without arguments, martial problems, and screaming kids. Calling her a slut is a sure fire way to cause an argument and to have her bounce. Look at who this woman has been with &#8212; she&#39;s not KiKi who lucked up on a celeb. She dates celebs on the regular. They run in the same circles &#8212; There WILL be another Tiger in her life. In other words, she&#39;s not pressed.</p><p>With a fling, you can indulge in the very risque &#8212; the forbidden you&#39;re not allowed in your home. Do you honestly think the mother of his two children is playing along with the I dreamed of you with two men last night dream? I don&#39;t. Combined with the other texts, e-mails and other evidence of his relationship with these women, I think we can agree that Tiger is a freak to the nth degree and nothing we&#39;ve heard about these relationships suggests that he treated them anything but well. I don&#39;t agree that he&#39;s saying he&#39;s all that and she &#8220;ain&#39;t shyt&#8221; or that he is a loser or insecure &#8212; it&#39;s fantasy, pure and simple and maybe that&#39;s why he was with her.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: zizi2</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/comment-page-1/#comment-319332</link> <dc:creator>zizi2</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:23:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=17999#comment-319332</guid> <description>Thanks. I really had to get that off my chest. The pile of bS coming out of the villagers needs to be treated to a good dose of &quot;Rid septic tank treatment&quot;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. I really had to get that off my chest. The pile of bS coming out of the villagers needs to be treated to a good dose of &#8220;Rid septic tank treatment&#8221;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: zizi2</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/comment-page-1/#comment-319331</link> <dc:creator>zizi2</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:21:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=17999#comment-319331</guid> <description>Coming from you, Town, the ultimate master of breakdowns, I blush. Thanks. I always enjoy your breakdowns and your sharp nose for detecting BS.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming from you, Town, the ultimate master of breakdowns, I blush. Thanks. I always enjoy your breakdowns and your sharp nose for detecting BS.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: zizi2</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/comment-page-1/#comment-319330</link> <dc:creator>zizi2</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:19:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=17999#comment-319330</guid> <description>You illustrate the asinine DC sense on entitlement and snotty-nosed-ness that I describe. &quot;Tradition&quot; my ass!! You mean the DC beltway nonsense that kept the real people out? Sure.  Your ignorance about the number of dinners/events that have been held outside the 150 seater state dining room by prior administrations tells me you are not interested in debating facts. The last time I checked the First Lady is called Mrs. Michelle Obama. Your insistence on snidely calling her by her natal name says a lot more about your craven animus than anything else. Anyway, Thankfully none of the principals at the White House have to listen to your drivel. Pace your animus &#039;cuz this Obama administration is just getting started, and you have a long 7 years two months to go.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You illustrate the asinine DC sense on entitlement and snotty-nosed-ness that I describe. &#8220;Tradition&#8221; my ass!! You mean the DC beltway nonsense that kept the real people out? Sure.  Your ignorance about the number of dinners/events that have been held outside the 150 seater state dining room by prior administrations tells me you are not interested in debating facts. The last time I checked the First Lady is called Mrs. Michelle Obama. Your insistence on snidely calling her by her natal name says a lot more about your craven animus than anything else. Anyway, Thankfully none of the principals at the White House have to listen to your drivel. Pace your animus &#39;cuz this Obama administration is just getting started, and you have a long 7 years two months to go.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: glissade</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/comment-page-1/#comment-319308</link> <dc:creator>glissade</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:07:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=17999#comment-319308</guid> <description>&quot;Why would a hostess have to &quot;be&quot; at each table for the duration of the evening? The planners are all over the place - I&#039;ve never heard of anybody but the serving staff being assigned to tables.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps, you haven&#039;t heard of it because you do not know basic etiquette. Especially given that it is standard to have hostesses of tables of tables. Just like CAPD told you. Host are typically this highest ranking, whether that be in private industry or politics at the table. They are the ones who keep the conversation flowing and know about the bkgrds of all the people at the table.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, just cause you don&#039;t go to functions like that doesn&#039;t mean that is not protocol.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;O, that&#039;s right...I forgot you like Michelle...don&#039;t know shyt about protocol, standards or etiquette..so you think you can just make up rules as you go along.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You might need to learn more about protocol or standards, so you do not post commentary that makes you look this uninformed.  While it is alright not to know your trying to come off as if you don&#039;t know it, it can&#039;t be so, means you are showing your ignorance.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why would a hostess have to &#8220;be&#8221; at each table for the duration of the evening? The planners are all over the place &#8211; I&#39;ve never heard of anybody but the serving staff being assigned to tables.&#8221;</p><p>Perhaps, you haven&#39;t heard of it because you do not know basic etiquette. Especially given that it is standard to have hostesses of tables of tables. Just like CAPD told you. Host are typically this highest ranking, whether that be in private industry or politics at the table. They are the ones who keep the conversation flowing and know about the bkgrds of all the people at the table.</p><p>Now, just cause you don&#39;t go to functions like that doesn&#39;t mean that is not protocol.</p><p>O, that&#39;s right&#8230;I forgot you like Michelle&#8230;don&#39;t know shyt about protocol, standards or etiquette..so you think you can just make up rules as you go along.</p><p>Not.</p><p>You might need to learn more about protocol or standards, so you do not post commentary that makes you look this uninformed.  While it is alright not to know your trying to come off as if you don&#39;t know it, it can&#39;t be so, means you are showing your ignorance.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: glissade</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/comment-page-1/#comment-319298</link> <dc:creator>glissade</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:46:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=17999#comment-319298</guid> <description>&quot;If any man envisions their woman sleeping with another man he is a sucka&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I get your point, but OTHOH, isn&#039;t 2 men with a woman about being trashy especially if you married and in your own home. Doesn&#039;t it say that Rachel has scum?  IOW&#039;s isn&#039;t it possible that the dream was about how Rachel was simply a ho and that is what he could expect?  I mean, it is one thing to envision her with 2 men, it is another to say she was your wife when she did it.  Isn&#039;t it possible that he just was indicating how untrustworthy she would be?  Is it possible that he was really saying Rachel was not wife material?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That has more to do with him Tiger saying &#039;he&#039;s all that and she ain&#039;t shyt&#039; than him being a loser or insecure.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If any man envisions their woman sleeping with another man he is a sucka&#8221;</p><p>I get your point, but OTHOH, isn&#39;t 2 men with a woman about being trashy especially if you married and in your own home. Doesn&#39;t it say that Rachel has scum?  IOW&#39;s isn&#39;t it possible that the dream was about how Rachel was simply a ho and that is what he could expect?  I mean, it is one thing to envision her with 2 men, it is another to say she was your wife when she did it.  Isn&#39;t it possible that he just was indicating how untrustworthy she would be?  Is it possible that he was really saying Rachel was not wife material?</p><p>That has more to do with him Tiger saying &#39;he&#39;s all that and she ain&#39;t shyt&#39; than him being a loser or insecure.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: glissade</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/comment-page-1/#comment-319291</link> <dc:creator>glissade</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:24:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=17999#comment-319291</guid> <description>ICAM!!&lt;br&gt;thank you.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ICAM!!<br />thank you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: glissade</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/comment-page-1/#comment-319289</link> <dc:creator>glissade</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:23:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=17999#comment-319289</guid> <description>&quot;Now the Queen of the krewe&#039;s(sorry I earlier identified her as a lab rat apologizes to those that are) doesn&#039;t have enough sense to make sure someone is at the gate to check the guest list for the most threatened President in the history of the US is not calpable of incompetence for letting two criminals is BS.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is the core issue.  All that other drivel zizi is spewing is no different from the trumped up mess she attributes to the &#039;villagers&#039;.  Rogers at the direction of the FirstLady phucked up. They flaunted decades of tradition and protocol. Despite them wanting to rest on the laurels of their traditionally prestigious degrees.  See, you can&#039;t be someone based on tradition and flaunt it simultaneously.  Just doesn&#039;t work that way. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; RogersandRobinson think they can just throw out the rules and create their own and not expect to run into criticisms or problems those tradtions and protocol are meant to prevent.Rogers fired the one  individual who had the expertise to do the job that ultimately made both her and Michelle look horribly deficient &amp; incompetent.  They just need to step up to the plate and accept responsibility for that. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; It was sheer arrogance that made Rogers and Robinson, darn near triple the number of guests that attend state dinners. A list so large the dinner could not be held in the STATE Dining Room in the WH. I guess they thought State room was about a Governor, and not head of state.  It was their thumbing of their noses at the whys and wherefores, that created this entire problem. It was their ivy league degrees that made them believe they could ignore the strict protocol for state dinners. Worst of all there was an entire staff and group of advisers with impeccable ability to carry off a StateDinner at their disposable. But you see these two,  Robinson and Rogers attempted to turn into some BLOCK party, like they were the new rich folks gonna invite all the commoners and show everyone how it is done.  Instead they went so far aflung  bad that security was breached. But RobinsonandRogers didn&#039;t care about how they were making the job difficult for security. They felt that was SS problems, not theirs.  IOW&#039;s they didn&#039;t give a damn about protecting the President..afterall, he is just a spouse and friend to them. And nothing trumps that relationship, not even his being POTUS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If Michelle and Desiree wanted to throw a party then they should have done so on the President&#039;s dime. Not the taxpayers.  We the people pay for StateDinners. The Obama&#039;s pay for official dinners, and that is when they get to add all the flourish and ostentaciousness they choose. On their dime. The nation does not watch official dinners, the US Embassy and military are not involved.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Instead, Michelle and Desiree took a formal event with set diplomatic protocol and tried to turn it into some adult gala. Desiree hinted at making the state dinner a circus back in Feb when she suggested holding a sweepstakes for invites to the StateDinner. gmafb For all her executive know how, I am certain she would not have dared breach protocol or suggest such ignorance at a corporate board meeting where they were to host a visting titan of business. Nope.  Michelle too would never have dared to mismanage a social event for SidleyAustin when she worked in that law firm.  Michelle in her eagerness to be inclusive, completely dismisses the very activities that gave access to the common man. Such as hosting a TV special with the florist and chef along with heads of the departments involved in hosting a StateDinner, like the Chief Diplomat to India along with the Secretary of State. Like giving camera access during the reception and dinner. Noooo, Michelle just ignored that and had her mentees there, and closed camera access.  A very nice gesture, but Michelle wound up excluding more people than in the past.  She left out Americans all over the nation eager to see and participate vicariously through television because she chose not to recognize the StateDinner for all it&#039;s historical and cultural significance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;RogersandRobinson will go down in history for degrading and demeaning the significance of StateDinners. The very idea that it was not hosted inside the WH is the biggest insult to the visiting dignitary and that host country willnot forget the snub. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Americans who hold this nation and many of its traditions in esteem will not forget either how MichelleObama set such a low benchmark for future StateDinners for this administration, she has nowhere to go but up.  Hopefully, her and Desiree will know this and next time show that they are competent enough to do it right.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All they have to do is follow protocol.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Surely, those ivy league degrees mean they have the reading comprehension skills to do so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, if only they have the graciousness and class to do so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopefully, they learned a lesson...but I doubt it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Now the Queen of the krewe&#39;s(sorry I earlier identified her as a lab rat apologizes to those that are) doesn&#39;t have enough sense to make sure someone is at the gate to check the guest list for the most threatened President in the history of the US is not calpable of incompetence for letting two criminals is BS.&#8221;</p><p>This is the core issue.  All that other drivel zizi is spewing is no different from the trumped up mess she attributes to the &#39;villagers&#39;.  Rogers at the direction of the FirstLady phucked up. They flaunted decades of tradition and protocol. Despite them wanting to rest on the laurels of their traditionally prestigious degrees.  See, you can&#39;t be someone based on tradition and flaunt it simultaneously.  Just doesn&#39;t work that way.</p><p> RogersandRobinson think they can just throw out the rules and create their own and not expect to run into criticisms or problems those tradtions and protocol are meant to prevent.Rogers fired the one  individual who had the expertise to do the job that ultimately made both her and Michelle look horribly deficient &#038; incompetent.  They just need to step up to the plate and accept responsibility for that.</p><p> It was sheer arrogance that made Rogers and Robinson, darn near triple the number of guests that attend state dinners. A list so large the dinner could not be held in the STATE Dining Room in the WH. I guess they thought State room was about a Governor, and not head of state.  It was their thumbing of their noses at the whys and wherefores, that created this entire problem. It was their ivy league degrees that made them believe they could ignore the strict protocol for state dinners. Worst of all there was an entire staff and group of advisers with impeccable ability to carry off a StateDinner at their disposable. But you see these two,  Robinson and Rogers attempted to turn into some BLOCK party, like they were the new rich folks gonna invite all the commoners and show everyone how it is done.  Instead they went so far aflung  bad that security was breached. But RobinsonandRogers didn&#39;t care about how they were making the job difficult for security. They felt that was SS problems, not theirs.  IOW&#39;s they didn&#39;t give a damn about protecting the President..afterall, he is just a spouse and friend to them. And nothing trumps that relationship, not even his being POTUS.</p><p>If Michelle and Desiree wanted to throw a party then they should have done so on the President&#39;s dime. Not the taxpayers.  We the people pay for StateDinners. The Obama&#39;s pay for official dinners, and that is when they get to add all the flourish and ostentaciousness they choose. On their dime. The nation does not watch official dinners, the US Embassy and military are not involved.</p><p>Instead, Michelle and Desiree took a formal event with set diplomatic protocol and tried to turn it into some adult gala. Desiree hinted at making the state dinner a circus back in Feb when she suggested holding a sweepstakes for invites to the StateDinner. gmafb For all her executive know how, I am certain she would not have dared breach protocol or suggest such ignorance at a corporate board meeting where they were to host a visting titan of business. Nope.  Michelle too would never have dared to mismanage a social event for SidleyAustin when she worked in that law firm.  Michelle in her eagerness to be inclusive, completely dismisses the very activities that gave access to the common man. Such as hosting a TV special with the florist and chef along with heads of the departments involved in hosting a StateDinner, like the Chief Diplomat to India along with the Secretary of State. Like giving camera access during the reception and dinner. Noooo, Michelle just ignored that and had her mentees there, and closed camera access.  A very nice gesture, but Michelle wound up excluding more people than in the past.  She left out Americans all over the nation eager to see and participate vicariously through television because she chose not to recognize the StateDinner for all it&#39;s historical and cultural significance.</p><p>RogersandRobinson will go down in history for degrading and demeaning the significance of StateDinners. The very idea that it was not hosted inside the WH is the biggest insult to the visiting dignitary and that host country willnot forget the snub.</p><p>Americans who hold this nation and many of its traditions in esteem will not forget either how MichelleObama set such a low benchmark for future StateDinners for this administration, she has nowhere to go but up.  Hopefully, her and Desiree will know this and next time show that they are competent enough to do it right.</p><p>All they have to do is follow protocol.</p><p>Surely, those ivy league degrees mean they have the reading comprehension skills to do so.</p><p>Now, if only they have the graciousness and class to do so.</p><p>Hopefully, they learned a lesson&#8230;but I doubt it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Miranda</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/12/afternoon-open-thread-231/comment-page-1/#comment-319262</link> <dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:38:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=17999#comment-319262</guid> <description>TELL IT.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TELL IT.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 596/600 objects using apc

Served from: www.jackandjillpolitics.com @ 2012-02-10 11:14:28 -->
