<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Evening Open Thread</title> <atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/</link> <description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:58:52 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Cute Pictures</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/comment-page-1/#comment-545977</link> <dc:creator>Cute Pictures</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 07:47:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16330#comment-545977</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;I enjoyed reading this a lot...&lt;/strong&gt;I really hope to read more of your posts in the future, so I&#039;ve bookmarked your blog. But I couldn&#039;t just bookmark it, oh no.. When I see quality website&#039;s like this one, I like to share it with others So I&#039;ve created a backlink to your site (from ...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I enjoyed reading this a lot&#8230;</strong></p><p>I really hope to read more of your posts in the future, so I&#8217;ve bookmarked your blog. But I couldn&#8217;t just bookmark it, oh no.. When I see quality website&#8217;s like this one, I like to share it with others So I&#8217;ve created a backlink to your site (from &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: http://www.howtogetridofacnetreatments.com/{how</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/comment-page-1/#comment-535458</link> <dc:creator>http://www.howtogetridofacnetreatments.com/{how</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:10:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16330#comment-535458</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;I enjoyed reading this a lot...&lt;/strong&gt;I really hope to read more of your posts in the future, so I&#039;ve bookmarked your blog. But I couldn&#039;t just bookmark it, oh no.. When I see quality website&#039;s like this one, I like to share it with others So I&#039;ve created a backlink to your site (from ...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I enjoyed reading this a lot&#8230;</strong></p><p>I really hope to read more of your posts in the future, so I&#8217;ve bookmarked your blog. But I couldn&#8217;t just bookmark it, oh no.. When I see quality website&#8217;s like this one, I like to share it with others So I&#8217;ve created a backlink to your site (from &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: How to get rid of acne</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/comment-page-1/#comment-534350</link> <dc:creator>How to get rid of acne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 05:38:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16330#comment-534350</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;I enjoyed reading this a lot...&lt;/strong&gt;I really hope to read more of your posts in the future, so I&#039;ve bookmarked your blog. But I couldn&#039;t just bookmark it, oh no.. When I see quality website&#039;s like this one, I like to share it with others So I&#039;ve created a backlink to your site (from ...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I enjoyed reading this a lot&#8230;</strong></p><p>I really hope to read more of your posts in the future, so I&#8217;ve bookmarked your blog. But I couldn&#8217;t just bookmark it, oh no.. When I see quality website&#8217;s like this one, I like to share it with others So I&#8217;ve created a backlink to your site (from &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Special Needs Children</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/comment-page-1/#comment-534075</link> <dc:creator>Special Needs Children</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 07:00:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16330#comment-534075</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;I enjoyed reading this a lot...&lt;/strong&gt;I really hope to read more of your posts in the future, so I&#039;ve bookmarked your blog. But I couldn&#039;t just bookmark it, oh no.. When I see quality website&#039;s like this one, I like to share it with others So I&#039;ve created a backlink to your site (from ...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I enjoyed reading this a lot&#8230;</strong></p><p>I really hope to read more of your posts in the future, so I&#8217;ve bookmarked your blog. But I couldn&#8217;t just bookmark it, oh no.. When I see quality website&#8217;s like this one, I like to share it with others So I&#8217;ve created a backlink to your site (from &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Things to do when bored</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/comment-page-1/#comment-533850</link> <dc:creator>Things to do when bored</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:33:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16330#comment-533850</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;I enjoyed reading this a lot...&lt;/strong&gt;I really hope to read more of your posts in the future, so I&#039;ve bookmarked your blog. But I couldn&#039;t just bookmark it, oh no.. When I see quality website&#039;s like this one, I like to share it with others So I&#039;ve created a backlink to your site (from ...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I enjoyed reading this a lot&#8230;</strong></p><p>I really hope to read more of your posts in the future, so I&#8217;ve bookmarked your blog. But I couldn&#8217;t just bookmark it, oh no.. When I see quality website&#8217;s like this one, I like to share it with others So I&#8217;ve created a backlink to your site (from &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Product Reviews</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/comment-page-1/#comment-533213</link> <dc:creator>Product Reviews</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 22:18:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16330#comment-533213</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;I enjoyed reading this a lot...&lt;/strong&gt;I really hope to read more of your posts in the future, so I&#039;ve bookmarked your blog. But I couldn&#039;t just bookmark it, oh no.. When I see quality website&#039;s like this one, I like to share it with others So I&#039;ve created a backlink to your site (from ...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I enjoyed reading this a lot&#8230;</strong></p><p>I really hope to read more of your posts in the future, so I&#8217;ve bookmarked your blog. But I couldn&#8217;t just bookmark it, oh no.. When I see quality website&#8217;s like this one, I like to share it with others So I&#8217;ve created a backlink to your site (from &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Micheline</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/comment-page-1/#comment-345981</link> <dc:creator>Micheline</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:47:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16330#comment-345981</guid> <description>Everyone knows that the Wall Street op-eds are extremely bias to  the point so why use that as a source.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone knows that the Wall Street op-eds are extremely bias to  the point so why use that as a source.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/comment-page-1/#comment-345978</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:08:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16330#comment-345978</guid> <description>Republican Strategy for Killing Healthcare Reform Stays Constant: Delay, Delay, Delay Hotlist&lt;br&gt;by mcjoan&lt;br&gt;Digg this! Share this on Twitter - Republican Strategy for Killing Healthcare Reform Stays Constant: Delay, Delay, DelayTweet this submit to reddit Share This&lt;br&gt;Mon Nov 02, 2009 at 04:46:04 PM PST&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not very creative, those Republicans. From Roll Call [sub req.]:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Acknowledging they can’t stop the Senate from bringing up a health care reform bill, Republicans have mapped out a strategy to draw out the debate, attack the measure’s core components and force difficult votes on vulnerable Democrats.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Republicans have no illusions of substantively altering the Senate bill. But they plan to use targeted amendments to attack the legislation issue by issue, offering detailed GOP alternatives in a concerted bid to turn the public against the measure and to try to set the table for electoral gains in 2010....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Republican Senate aides and operatives familiar with the leadership’s floor strategy say leadership will put different Senators in charge of various themes. Their responsibilities will include messaging and spearheading Republican amendments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Finance ranking member Chuck Grassley (Iowa) will probably handle all things tax-related; Sen. Susan Collins (Maine), a former state insurance regulator, will likely deal with health care premiums; Budget ranking member Judd Gregg (N.H.) will tackle the bill’s deficit implications; Cornyn will focus on malpractice reform.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good thing Baucus spent so much time negotiating with Grassley, huh? As if we needed more evidence that those negotiations were not done in good faith on the Republican side. And what about Susan Collins, that great moderate that Olympia Snowe was supposed to be able to bring around. The article also points out that Nebraska Republican Mike Johanns will be conducting town meetings in Nebraska during the floor debate, undoubtedly an effort to try to put Ben Nelson in a bind, an effort that&#039;s unlikely to do much to sway Nelson, or whip up much angry froth against him back home. Nebraskans don&#039;t really seem to work that way. But Johanns may as well knock himself out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/11/2/799732/-Republican-Strategy-for-Killing-Healthcare-Reform-Stays-Constant:-Delay%2C-Delay%2C-Delay&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/11/2/799732/...&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican Strategy for Killing Healthcare Reform Stays Constant: Delay, Delay, Delay Hotlist<br />by mcjoan<br />Digg this! Share this on Twitter &#8211; Republican Strategy for Killing Healthcare Reform Stays Constant: Delay, Delay, DelayTweet this submit to reddit Share This<br />Mon Nov 02, 2009 at 04:46:04 PM PST</p><p>Not very creative, those Republicans. From Roll Call [sub req.]:</p><p> Acknowledging they can’t stop the Senate from bringing up a health care reform bill, Republicans have mapped out a strategy to draw out the debate, attack the measure’s core components and force difficult votes on vulnerable Democrats.</p><p> Republicans have no illusions of substantively altering the Senate bill. But they plan to use targeted amendments to attack the legislation issue by issue, offering detailed GOP alternatives in a concerted bid to turn the public against the measure and to try to set the table for electoral gains in 2010&#8230;.</p><p> Republican Senate aides and operatives familiar with the leadership’s floor strategy say leadership will put different Senators in charge of various themes. Their responsibilities will include messaging and spearheading Republican amendments.</p><p> Finance ranking member Chuck Grassley (Iowa) will probably handle all things tax-related; Sen. Susan Collins (Maine), a former state insurance regulator, will likely deal with health care premiums; Budget ranking member Judd Gregg (N.H.) will tackle the bill’s deficit implications; Cornyn will focus on malpractice reform.</p><p>Good thing Baucus spent so much time negotiating with Grassley, huh? As if we needed more evidence that those negotiations were not done in good faith on the Republican side. And what about Susan Collins, that great moderate that Olympia Snowe was supposed to be able to bring around. The article also points out that Nebraska Republican Mike Johanns will be conducting town meetings in Nebraska during the floor debate, undoubtedly an effort to try to put Ben Nelson in a bind, an effort that&#39;s unlikely to do much to sway Nelson, or whip up much angry froth against him back home. Nebraskans don&#39;t really seem to work that way. But Johanns may as well knock himself out.</p><p><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/11/2/799732/-Republican-Strategy-for-Killing-Healthcare-Reform-Stays-Constant:-Delay%2C-Delay%2C-Delay" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/11/2/799732/&#8230;</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/comment-page-1/#comment-345980</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:55:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16330#comment-345980</guid> <description>ok, I&#039;ll say it..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Bitch, Please.&lt;/i&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, I&#39;ll say it..</p><p><i>Bitch, Please.</i></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/comment-page-1/#comment-345979</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:53:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16330#comment-345979</guid> <description>one of my favorite episodes on The Boondocks was on last night.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LUV &lt;br&gt;&#039;THE ITIS&#039;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;admit it, you know that episode is a classic.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one of my favorite episodes on The Boondocks was on last night.</p><p>LUV <br />&#39;THE ITIS&#39;.</p><p>admit it, you know that episode is a classic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Micheline</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/comment-page-1/#comment-308127</link> <dc:creator>Micheline</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:47:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16330#comment-308127</guid> <description>Everyone knows that the Wall Street op-eds are extremely bias to  the point so why use that as a source.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone knows that the Wall Street op-eds are extremely bias to  the point so why use that as a source.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/comment-page-1/#comment-308102</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 05:08:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16330#comment-308102</guid> <description>Republican Strategy for Killing Healthcare Reform Stays Constant: Delay, Delay, Delay Hotlist&lt;br&gt;by mcjoan&lt;br&gt;Digg this! Share this on Twitter - Republican Strategy for Killing Healthcare Reform Stays Constant: Delay, Delay, DelayTweet this submit to reddit Share This&lt;br&gt;Mon Nov 02, 2009 at 04:46:04 PM PST&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not very creative, those Republicans. From Roll Call [sub req.]:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Acknowledging they can’t stop the Senate from bringing up a health care reform bill, Republicans have mapped out a strategy to draw out the debate, attack the measure’s core components and force difficult votes on vulnerable Democrats.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Republicans have no illusions of substantively altering the Senate bill. But they plan to use targeted amendments to attack the legislation issue by issue, offering detailed GOP alternatives in a concerted bid to turn the public against the measure and to try to set the table for electoral gains in 2010....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Republican Senate aides and operatives familiar with the leadership’s floor strategy say leadership will put different Senators in charge of various themes. Their responsibilities will include messaging and spearheading Republican amendments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Finance ranking member Chuck Grassley (Iowa) will probably handle all things tax-related; Sen. Susan Collins (Maine), a former state insurance regulator, will likely deal with health care premiums; Budget ranking member Judd Gregg (N.H.) will tackle the bill’s deficit implications; Cornyn will focus on malpractice reform.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good thing Baucus spent so much time negotiating with Grassley, huh? As if we needed more evidence that those negotiations were not done in good faith on the Republican side. And what about Susan Collins, that great moderate that Olympia Snowe was supposed to be able to bring around. The article also points out that Nebraska Republican Mike Johanns will be conducting town meetings in Nebraska during the floor debate, undoubtedly an effort to try to put Ben Nelson in a bind, an effort that&#039;s unlikely to do much to sway Nelson, or whip up much angry froth against him back home. Nebraskans don&#039;t really seem to work that way. But Johanns may as well knock himself out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/11/2/799732/-Republican-Strategy-for-Killing-Healthcare-Reform-Stays-Constant:-Delay%2C-Delay%2C-Delay&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/11/2/799732/...&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican Strategy for Killing Healthcare Reform Stays Constant: Delay, Delay, Delay Hotlist<br />by mcjoan<br />Digg this! Share this on Twitter &#8211; Republican Strategy for Killing Healthcare Reform Stays Constant: Delay, Delay, DelayTweet this submit to reddit Share This<br />Mon Nov 02, 2009 at 04:46:04 PM PST</p><p>Not very creative, those Republicans. From Roll Call [sub req.]:</p><p> Acknowledging they can’t stop the Senate from bringing up a health care reform bill, Republicans have mapped out a strategy to draw out the debate, attack the measure’s core components and force difficult votes on vulnerable Democrats.</p><p> Republicans have no illusions of substantively altering the Senate bill. But they plan to use targeted amendments to attack the legislation issue by issue, offering detailed GOP alternatives in a concerted bid to turn the public against the measure and to try to set the table for electoral gains in 2010&#8230;.</p><p> Republican Senate aides and operatives familiar with the leadership’s floor strategy say leadership will put different Senators in charge of various themes. Their responsibilities will include messaging and spearheading Republican amendments.</p><p> Finance ranking member Chuck Grassley (Iowa) will probably handle all things tax-related; Sen. Susan Collins (Maine), a former state insurance regulator, will likely deal with health care premiums; Budget ranking member Judd Gregg (N.H.) will tackle the bill’s deficit implications; Cornyn will focus on malpractice reform.</p><p>Good thing Baucus spent so much time negotiating with Grassley, huh? As if we needed more evidence that those negotiations were not done in good faith on the Republican side. And what about Susan Collins, that great moderate that Olympia Snowe was supposed to be able to bring around. The article also points out that Nebraska Republican Mike Johanns will be conducting town meetings in Nebraska during the floor debate, undoubtedly an effort to try to put Ben Nelson in a bind, an effort that&#39;s unlikely to do much to sway Nelson, or whip up much angry froth against him back home. Nebraskans don&#39;t really seem to work that way. But Johanns may as well knock himself out.</p><p><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/11/2/799732/-Republican-Strategy-for-Killing-Healthcare-Reform-Stays-Constant:-Delay%2C-Delay%2C-Delay" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/11/2/799732/&#8230;</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/comment-page-1/#comment-308100</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:55:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16330#comment-308100</guid> <description>ok, I&#039;ll say it..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Bitch, Please.&lt;/i&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, I&#39;ll say it..</p><p><i>Bitch, Please.</i></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/comment-page-1/#comment-308099</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:53:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16330#comment-308099</guid> <description>one of my favorite episodes on The Boondocks was on last night.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LUV &lt;br&gt;&#039;THE ITIS&#039;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;admit it, you know that episode is a classic.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one of my favorite episodes on The Boondocks was on last night.</p><p>LUV <br />&#39;THE ITIS&#39;.</p><p>admit it, you know that episode is a classic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Town</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/comment-page-1/#comment-308096</link> <dc:creator>Town</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:18:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16330#comment-308096</guid> <description>Or Michelle can give Silly Sally the Hillary Clinton treatment.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or Michelle can give Silly Sally the Hillary Clinton treatment.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mon_dieu_ishmael</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/comment-page-1/#comment-308095</link> <dc:creator>mon_dieu_ishmael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:14:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16330#comment-308095</guid> <description>A right renal autotransplant secondary to trauma is a one and done operation.  He does not require immunosuppressive drugs like Cellcept or Prograf.  It should have little impact on his ability to get insurance as it is not the type of pre-exisiting condition that generally requres further treatment.&lt;br&gt;If he has COPD, a history of cancer, diabetes, congestive heart failure, severe hypertension, heart disease (other than CHF), or a myriad of less common diseases, than he might have trouble finding insurance.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A right renal autotransplant secondary to trauma is a one and done operation.  He does not require immunosuppressive drugs like Cellcept or Prograf.  It should have little impact on his ability to get insurance as it is not the type of pre-exisiting condition that generally requres further treatment.<br />If he has COPD, a history of cancer, diabetes, congestive heart failure, severe hypertension, heart disease (other than CHF), or a myriad of less common diseases, than he might have trouble finding insurance.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/comment-page-1/#comment-308094</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:12:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16330#comment-308094</guid> <description>Monday, November 02, 2009&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     &lt;br&gt;    Uh Oh&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    by digby&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    The queen bee&#039;s got her stinger out:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Today:&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;        The sense that the Obamas are flirting with disaster by parading their happy family life was magnified by Michelle’s Marie Antoinette-like appearance this week on the cover of Glamour magazine — at a time when many Americans continue to lose their homes or jobs every month.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;        In the interview with Glamour, Michelle discussed her fashion choices and appeared to tease her husband: “One thing I’ve learnt about male role models is that they don’t hesitate to invest in themselves.” The timing and content of the piece prompted Sally Quinn, a veteran Washington style-watcher, to suggest that the first lady had been badly advised.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;        “I’m not sure if I had been her adviser I would have said for her to do the Glamour cover because it might begin to trivialise her and what her role is,” she said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;        The enthusiasm for the Obama family has until now obliged most Republicans to bite their tongues when discussing Michelle and the children, but there were mutterings last week that the president might be using his enviable private life as a diversion from awkward political realities — notably the prospect this week of Democratic defeats in elections for state governors in New Jersey and Virginia.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;        “Funny how every time there’s a crisis we end up reading about Michelle,” noted one Republican insider. “It’s great to see that the first couple have such a wonderful relationship,” added a Times website reader. “Now can the president please get down to solving the country’s problems?” &lt;br&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Yesterday:&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;br&gt;        According to society sources, Sally invited Hillary to a luncheon when the Clintons came to town in 1993. Sally stocked her guest list with her best buddies and prepared to usher the first lady into the capital&#039;s social whirl. Apparently, Hillary didn&#039;t accept. Miffed, Sally wrote a catty piece in the Post about Mrs. Clinton. Hillary made sure that Quinn rarely made it into the White House dinners or social events.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;        In return, Sally started talking trash about Hillary to her buddies, and her animus became a staple of the social scene. &quot;There&#039;s just something about her that pisses people off,&quot; Quinn is quoted as saying in a New Yorker article about Hillary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;        Quinn&#039;s antipathy to Hillary became the subject of a New York Observer piece in 1996 that turned the spotlight on Sally, now 56. &quot;No longer a journalistic star, Ms. Quinn seems restless and unsatisfied,&quot; wrote Mary Jacoby, &quot;despite her wealth and prominence and her Georgetown mansion with swimming pool and tennis court, not to mention her house in the Hamptons.&quot; Wondering about the roots of Quinn&#039;s spat with Mrs. Clinton, a younger and more powerful woman, Jacoby wondered if Quinn was &quot;frightened&quot; that her good looks were fading and &quot;bitter because she&#039;s no longer on center stage.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    I think we all know where all that led.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Sally and the rest of the village tabbies are very, very hard to please. By Democrats anyway. If it isn&#039;t that they are bringing down the morals of the country with their modern, serious, complicated marriages, they are being a little bit too uppity with their old-fashioned, fun uncomplicated marriages. They prefer something dull and lifeless like George and Laura&#039;s or Nancy and Ronnie&#039;s, where the president calls the first lady &quot;mommie&quot; and the first lady stares at the president like he&#039;s the cutest Jonas Brother. (One assumes that it helps if the couples have blue blood or are at least Hollywood Royalty --- the respectable, conservative kind, of course.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    I would suggest that Michelle get herself over to the Bradlee parlor and apologize for failing to consult the *right people* before this backbiting gets out of hand. She needs to realize that if she wants to survive in the sleepy little hamlet called Washington DC, she and her family belong to Sally. And Sally will not be ignored.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/uh-oh-by-digby-queen-bees-got-her.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/uh-oh-by...&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monday, November 02, 2009</p><p> Uh Oh</p><p> by digby</p><p> The queen bee&#39;s got her stinger out:</p><p> Today:<br /><b><br /> The sense that the Obamas are flirting with disaster by parading their happy family life was magnified by Michelle’s Marie Antoinette-like appearance this week on the cover of Glamour magazine — at a time when many Americans continue to lose their homes or jobs every month.</p><p> In the interview with Glamour, Michelle discussed her fashion choices and appeared to tease her husband: “One thing I’ve learnt about male role models is that they don’t hesitate to invest in themselves.” The timing and content of the piece prompted Sally Quinn, a veteran Washington style-watcher, to suggest that the first lady had been badly advised.</p><p> “I’m not sure if I had been her adviser I would have said for her to do the Glamour cover because it might begin to trivialise her and what her role is,” she said.</p><p> The enthusiasm for the Obama family has until now obliged most Republicans to bite their tongues when discussing Michelle and the children, but there were mutterings last week that the president might be using his enviable private life as a diversion from awkward political realities — notably the prospect this week of Democratic defeats in elections for state governors in New Jersey and Virginia.</p><p> “Funny how every time there’s a crisis we end up reading about Michelle,” noted one Republican insider. “It’s great to see that the first couple have such a wonderful relationship,” added a Times website reader. “Now can the president please get down to solving the country’s problems?” <br /></b></p><p> Yesterday:<br /><i><br /> According to society sources, Sally invited Hillary to a luncheon when the Clintons came to town in 1993. Sally stocked her guest list with her best buddies and prepared to usher the first lady into the capital&#39;s social whirl. Apparently, Hillary didn&#39;t accept. Miffed, Sally wrote a catty piece in the Post about Mrs. Clinton. Hillary made sure that Quinn rarely made it into the White House dinners or social events.</p><p> In return, Sally started talking trash about Hillary to her buddies, and her animus became a staple of the social scene. &#8220;There&#39;s just something about her that pisses people off,&#8221; Quinn is quoted as saying in a New Yorker article about Hillary.</p><p> Quinn&#39;s antipathy to Hillary became the subject of a New York Observer piece in 1996 that turned the spotlight on Sally, now 56. &#8220;No longer a journalistic star, Ms. Quinn seems restless and unsatisfied,&#8221; wrote Mary Jacoby, &#8220;despite her wealth and prominence and her Georgetown mansion with swimming pool and tennis court, not to mention her house in the Hamptons.&#8221; Wondering about the roots of Quinn&#39;s spat with Mrs. Clinton, a younger and more powerful woman, Jacoby wondered if Quinn was &#8220;frightened&#8221; that her good looks were fading and &#8220;bitter because she&#39;s no longer on center stage.&#8221;</i></p><p> I think we all know where all that led.</p><p> Sally and the rest of the village tabbies are very, very hard to please. By Democrats anyway. If it isn&#39;t that they are bringing down the morals of the country with their modern, serious, complicated marriages, they are being a little bit too uppity with their old-fashioned, fun uncomplicated marriages. They prefer something dull and lifeless like George and Laura&#39;s or Nancy and Ronnie&#39;s, where the president calls the first lady &#8220;mommie&#8221; and the first lady stares at the president like he&#39;s the cutest Jonas Brother. (One assumes that it helps if the couples have blue blood or are at least Hollywood Royalty &#8212; the respectable, conservative kind, of course.)</p><p> I would suggest that Michelle get herself over to the Bradlee parlor and apologize for failing to consult the *right people* before this backbiting gets out of hand. She needs to realize that if she wants to survive in the sleepy little hamlet called Washington DC, she and her family belong to Sally. And Sally will not be ignored.</p><p><a href="http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/uh-oh-by-digby-queen-bees-got-her.html" rel="nofollow">http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/uh-oh-by&#8230;</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ecthompson</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/comment-page-1/#comment-308091</link> <dc:creator>ecthompson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:59:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16330#comment-308091</guid> <description>According to a recent article in the Washington Post, many of the healthcare policy decisions that we think are being made in Washington, will instead be made in your state capital. Is this a good thing? I think not. In my opinion, politics is about not making decisions. Politicians almost never get voted out of office for indecision or inaction. Instead, politicians get voted out of office for making decisions that are unpopular. If you have a large enough constituency it really doesn&#039;t matter what decision you make someone&#039;s not to be happy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whereistheoutrage.net/wordpress/2009/11/02/opt-in-or-opt-out-lets-flip-a-coin/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;more...&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a recent article in the Washington Post, many of the healthcare policy decisions that we think are being made in Washington, will instead be made in your state capital. Is this a good thing? I think not. In my opinion, politics is about not making decisions. Politicians almost never get voted out of office for indecision or inaction. Instead, politicians get voted out of office for making decisions that are unpopular. If you have a large enough constituency it really doesn&#39;t matter what decision you make someone&#39;s not to be happy.</p><p><a href="http://www.whereistheoutrage.net/wordpress/2009/11/02/opt-in-or-opt-out-lets-flip-a-coin/" rel="nofollow">more&#8230;</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/comment-page-1/#comment-308090</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:58:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16330#comment-308090</guid> <description>and his new WIFE...lol</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and his new WIFE&#8230;lol</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lisa M</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-124/comment-page-1/#comment-308089</link> <dc:creator>Lisa M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:50:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16330#comment-308089</guid> <description>Perfect hair and perfect tan.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect hair and perfect tan.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 596/600 objects using apc

Served from: www.jackandjillpolitics.com @ 2012-02-10 11:07:59 -->
