<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Evening Open Thread</title> <atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/</link> <description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:58:52 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator> <item><title>By: vdrome</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/comment-page-1/#comment-346009</link> <dc:creator>vdrome</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:16:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16279#comment-346009</guid> <description>Speaking of marriage--new study&#039;s point to the success of interracial marriages involving black women: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There&#039;s a very recent study that was released that puts to ret some of the lies about black women being poor choices for mates. This is from the National Council on Family Relations. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We compared NH Black/ White unions to NH Black/NH Black marriages, which showed a persistently higher risk of divorce than White/White unions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;White husband/NH Black wife couples were 44% less likely to divorce than White/White couples, and White husband/NH Asian wife couples were only 4% more likely to divorce by Year 10.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Compared to White/White couples, White female/Black male, and White female/Asian male marriages were more prone to divorce; meanwhile, those involving non-White females and White males and Hispanics and non-Hispanic persons had similar or lower risks of divorce. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Conversely, White men/ non-White women couples show either very little or no differences in divorce rates; or, as in the case of White men and Black women, are substantially less likely than White/White couples to divorce by their 10th year.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of marriage&#8211;new study&#39;s point to the success of interracial marriages involving black women:</p><p>There&#39;s a very recent study that was released that puts to ret some of the lies about black women being poor choices for mates. This is from the National Council on Family Relations.</p><p>We compared NH Black/ White unions to NH Black/NH Black marriages, which showed a persistently higher risk of divorce than White/White unions.</p><p>White husband/NH Black wife couples were 44% less likely to divorce than White/White couples, and White husband/NH Asian wife couples were only 4% more likely to divorce by Year 10.</p><p>Compared to White/White couples, White female/Black male, and White female/Asian male marriages were more prone to divorce; meanwhile, those involving non-White females and White males and Hispanics and non-Hispanic persons had similar or lower risks of divorce.</p><p>Conversely, White men/ non-White women couples show either very little or no differences in divorce rates; or, as in the case of White men and Black women, are substantially less likely than White/White couples to divorce by their 10th year.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: vdrome</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/comment-page-1/#comment-309246</link> <dc:creator>vdrome</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:16:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16279#comment-309246</guid> <description>Speaking of marriage--new study&#039;s point to the success of interracial marriages involving black women: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There&#039;s a very recent study that was released that puts to ret some of the lies about black women being poor choices for mates. This is from the National Council on Family Relations. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We compared NH Black/ White unions to NH Black/NH Black marriages, which showed a persistently higher risk of divorce than White/White unions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;White husband/NH Black wife couples were 44% less likely to divorce than White/White couples, and White husband/NH Asian wife couples were only 4% more likely to divorce by Year 10.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Compared to White/White couples, White female/Black male, and White female/Asian male marriages were more prone to divorce; meanwhile, those involving non-White females and White males and Hispanics and non-Hispanic persons had similar or lower risks of divorce. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Conversely, White men/ non-White women couples show either very little or no differences in divorce rates; or, as in the case of White men and Black women, are substantially less likely than White/White couples to divorce by their 10th year.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of marriage&#8211;new study&#39;s point to the success of interracial marriages involving black women:</p><p>There&#39;s a very recent study that was released that puts to ret some of the lies about black women being poor choices for mates. This is from the National Council on Family Relations.</p><p>We compared NH Black/ White unions to NH Black/NH Black marriages, which showed a persistently higher risk of divorce than White/White unions.</p><p>White husband/NH Black wife couples were 44% less likely to divorce than White/White couples, and White husband/NH Asian wife couples were only 4% more likely to divorce by Year 10.</p><p>Compared to White/White couples, White female/Black male, and White female/Asian male marriages were more prone to divorce; meanwhile, those involving non-White females and White males and Hispanics and non-Hispanic persons had similar or lower risks of divorce.</p><p>Conversely, White men/ non-White women couples show either very little or no differences in divorce rates; or, as in the case of White men and Black women, are substantially less likely than White/White couples to divorce by their 10th year.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/comment-page-1/#comment-309055</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:25:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16279#comment-309055</guid> <description>Wednesday, November 04, 2009&lt;br&gt;GOP Senator Tom Coburn using secret hold to block bill on veterans benefits&lt;br&gt;by Joe Sudbay (DC) on 11/04/2009 07:54:00 PM&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We always knew &quot;support the troops&quot; didn&#039;t really mean anything to Republicans. It was a slogan, nothing more. And, that&#039;s being confirmed by Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) who is using the anonymous &quot;hold&quot; procedure in the Senate to prevent action on a bill designed to support veterans. Usually, these &quot;holds&quot; are secret, but the veterans have outed Coburn:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Thirteen major military and veterans groups have joined forces to try to force one senator — Republican Tom Coburn of Oklahoma — to release a hold that he has placed on a major veterans benefits bill.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Coburn has been identified by Senate aides as the lawmaker preventing consideration of S 1963, the Veterans’ Caregiver and Omnibus Health Benefits Act of 2009, by using an informal but legal practice of putting a hold on a bill.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe the Democrats should file a cloture motion on S. 1963 to force the GOP caucus to choose between Coburn and the vets. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americablog.com/2009/11/gop-senator-tom-coburn-using-secret.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.americablog.com/2009/11/gop-senator-...&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wednesday, November 04, 2009<br />GOP Senator Tom Coburn using secret hold to block bill on veterans benefits<br />by Joe Sudbay (DC) on 11/04/2009 07:54:00 PM</p><p>We always knew &#8220;support the troops&#8221; didn&#39;t really mean anything to Republicans. It was a slogan, nothing more. And, that&#39;s being confirmed by Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) who is using the anonymous &#8220;hold&#8221; procedure in the Senate to prevent action on a bill designed to support veterans. Usually, these &#8220;holds&#8221; are secret, but the veterans have outed Coburn:</p><p> Thirteen major military and veterans groups have joined forces to try to force one senator — Republican Tom Coburn of Oklahoma — to release a hold that he has placed on a major veterans benefits bill.</p><p> Coburn has been identified by Senate aides as the lawmaker preventing consideration of S 1963, the Veterans’ Caregiver and Omnibus Health Benefits Act of 2009, by using an informal but legal practice of putting a hold on a bill.</p><p>Maybe the Democrats should file a cloture motion on S. 1963 to force the GOP caucus to choose between Coburn and the vets.</p><p><a href="http://www.americablog.com/2009/11/gop-senator-tom-coburn-using-secret.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.americablog.com/2009/11/gop-senator-&#8230;</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Plantsmantx</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/comment-page-1/#comment-309038</link> <dc:creator>Plantsmantx</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:35:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16279#comment-309038</guid> <description>&lt;b&gt;New Business-Group Ad Has Racial Overtones, Union Alleges&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A new ad from the Chamber of Commerce and its allies attacking Democratic-led efforts to pass health care legislation includes a storyline that union critics say is rife with racial undertones.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The spot, titled &quot;Millions,&quot; asserts that health reform could &quot;wipe out even more jobs&quot; than those lost so far. But it does so in a peculiar and perhaps controversial way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The scenario of a distraught boss forced to fire an employee is illustrated by a white worker being summoned to the office as a black co-worker looks on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/04/new-chamber-of-commerce-a_n_345392.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/04/new-ch...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The video:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__ngB7uiNk4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__ngB7uiNk4&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>New Business-Group Ad Has Racial Overtones, Union Alleges</b></p><p>A new ad from the Chamber of Commerce and its allies attacking Democratic-led efforts to pass health care legislation includes a storyline that union critics say is rife with racial undertones.</p><p>The spot, titled &#8220;Millions,&#8221; asserts that health reform could &#8220;wipe out even more jobs&#8221; than those lost so far. But it does so in a peculiar and perhaps controversial way.</p><p>The scenario of a distraught boss forced to fire an employee is illustrated by a white worker being summoned to the office as a black co-worker looks on.</p><p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/04/new-chamber-of-commerce-a_n_345392.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/04/new-ch&#8230;</a></p><p>The video:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__ngB7uiNk4" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__ngB7uiNk4</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: chris_i_am</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/comment-page-1/#comment-309031</link> <dc:creator>chris_i_am</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:19:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16279#comment-309031</guid> <description>WORLD SERIES NEW YORK YANKEES&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;YES A EMPIRE STATE OF MIND!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;GO YANKEES.....LOVE YOU RIKYRAH! MUAH SMILE BOO!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WORLD SERIES NEW YORK YANKEES</p><p>YES A EMPIRE STATE OF MIND!!!</p><p>GO YANKEES&#8230;..LOVE YOU RIKYRAH! MUAH SMILE BOO!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/comment-page-1/#comment-309030</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:16:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16279#comment-309030</guid> <description>congratulations...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[this is the best that I can do]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>congratulations&#8230;</p><p>[this is the best that I can do]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lisa M</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/comment-page-1/#comment-309025</link> <dc:creator>Lisa M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:16:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16279#comment-309025</guid> <description>YANKEES WIN!!! YANKEES WIN!!! WOOOOOO HOOOOO!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YANKEES WIN!!! YANKEES WIN!!! WOOOOOO HOOOOO!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: texascowgirl</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/comment-page-1/#comment-309019</link> <dc:creator>texascowgirl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:46:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16279#comment-309019</guid> <description>I guess she has enough crazy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess she has enough crazy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: texascowgirl</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/comment-page-1/#comment-309018</link> <dc:creator>texascowgirl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:41:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16279#comment-309018</guid> <description>BWAHAHAHAHAHA! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Looks like little miss Christian California has a sex tape!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/04/carrie-prejean-sex-tape-settlement-miss-california-usa-pagneat/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/04/carrie-prejean-se...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Prejean Sex Tape Triggers Settlement&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Posted Nov 4th 2009 5:00PM by TMZ Staff&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Carrie Prejean Sex TapeCarrie Prejean demanded more than a million dollars during her settlement negotiations with Miss California USA Pageant officials -- that is, until the lawyer for the Pageant showed Carrie an XXX home video of her handiwork.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The video the lawyer showed Carrie is extremely graphic and has never been released publicly. We know that, because TMZ obtained the video months ago but decided not to post it because it was so racy. Let&#039;s just say, Carrie has a promising solo career.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We&#039;re told it took about 15 seconds for Carrie to jettison her demand and essentially walk away with nothing. As we first reported, the Pageant is paying around $100,000 to her lawyers and publicist -- a fraction of her bills. She pockets nothing in the settlement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Read more: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/04/carrie-prejean-sex-tape-settlement-miss-california-usa-pagneat/#ixzz0VxO1697l&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/04/carrie-prejean-se...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don&#039;t ya&#039;ll just love those conservative family values? LOL!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BWAHAHAHAHAHA!</p><p>Looks like little miss Christian California has a sex tape!</p><p><a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/04/carrie-prejean-sex-tape-settlement-miss-california-usa-pagneat/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/04/carrie-prejean-se&#8230;</a></p><p>Prejean Sex Tape Triggers Settlement</p><p>Posted Nov 4th 2009 5:00PM by TMZ Staff</p><p>Carrie Prejean Sex TapeCarrie Prejean demanded more than a million dollars during her settlement negotiations with Miss California USA Pageant officials &#8212; that is, until the lawyer for the Pageant showed Carrie an XXX home video of her handiwork.</p><p>The video the lawyer showed Carrie is extremely graphic and has never been released publicly. We know that, because TMZ obtained the video months ago but decided not to post it because it was so racy. Let&#39;s just say, Carrie has a promising solo career.</p><p>We&#39;re told it took about 15 seconds for Carrie to jettison her demand and essentially walk away with nothing. As we first reported, the Pageant is paying around $100,000 to her lawyers and publicist &#8212; a fraction of her bills. She pockets nothing in the settlement.</p><p>Read more: <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/04/carrie-prejean-sex-tape-settlement-miss-california-usa-pagneat/#ixzz0VxO1697l" rel="nofollow">http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/04/carrie-prejean-se&#8230;</a></p><p>Don&#39;t ya&#39;ll just love those conservative family values? LOL!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: texascowgirl</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/comment-page-1/#comment-309017</link> <dc:creator>texascowgirl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:38:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16279#comment-309017</guid> <description>The internet and our own anecdotal experiences cause us to have myopic views of almost everything.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The internet and our own anecdotal experiences cause us to have myopic views of almost everything.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: texascowgirl</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/comment-page-1/#comment-309015</link> <dc:creator>texascowgirl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:36:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16279#comment-309015</guid> <description>Well if you can&#039;t blame the whole black community (Maine doesn&#039;t really have one) blame the black president. It&#039;s always the gay hating negroes dontcha know?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if you can&#39;t blame the whole black community (Maine doesn&#39;t really have one) blame the black president. It&#39;s always the gay hating negroes dontcha know?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: EarthTone</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/comment-page-1/#comment-309005</link> <dc:creator>EarthTone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:03:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16279#comment-309005</guid> <description>Two items for consideration:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• Political Miscellany @ 11/4/2009: Is the Obama Coalition “Portable” to Other Democratic Races?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;~ This asks if the coalition that elected Obama will be a force in Democratic elections where Obama is not on the ballot.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://allotherpersons.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/political-miscellany-1142009-is-the-obama-coalition-portable-to-other-democratic-races/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://allotherpersons.wordpress.com/2009/11/04...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• In Louisiana, a Great Racial Divide&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is a look at the very sad condition of black folks in the state of Louisiana... emphasis on very sad:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://allotherpersons.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/in-louisiana-a-great-racial-divide/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://allotherpersons.wordpress.com/2009/10/12...&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two items for consideration:</p><p>• Political Miscellany @ 11/4/2009: Is the Obama Coalition “Portable” to Other Democratic Races?</p><p>~ This asks if the coalition that elected Obama will be a force in Democratic elections where Obama is not on the ballot.</p><p><a href="http://allotherpersons.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/political-miscellany-1142009-is-the-obama-coalition-portable-to-other-democratic-races/" rel="nofollow">http://allotherpersons.wordpress.com/2009/11/04&#8230;</a></p><p>• In Louisiana, a Great Racial Divide</p><p>This is a look at the very sad condition of black folks in the state of Louisiana&#8230; emphasis on very sad:</p><p><a href="http://allotherpersons.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/in-louisiana-a-great-racial-divide/" rel="nofollow">http://allotherpersons.wordpress.com/2009/10/12&#8230;</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lamh32</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/comment-page-1/#comment-309002</link> <dc:creator>lamh32</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:01:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16279#comment-309002</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/11/bachmanns-chief-of-staff-quits.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;Michelle Bachmann&#039;s Chief Of Staff Quits&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Rep. Michele Bachmann&#039;s (R-MN) chief of staff Michelle Marston, a long-time veteran of Capitol Hill who has guided Bachmann in her much-increased national TV presence this year, has quit her post.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/11/bachmanns-chief-of-staff-quits.php" rel="nofollow">&lt;Michelle Bachmann&#39;s Chief Of Staff Quits</a><br /><blockquote>Rep. Michele Bachmann&#39;s (R-MN) chief of staff Michelle Marston, a long-time veteran of Capitol Hill who has guided Bachmann in her much-increased national TV presence this year, has quit her post.</p></blockquote> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: trose1</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/comment-page-1/#comment-309003</link> <dc:creator>trose1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:00:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16279#comment-309003</guid> <description>What did they want the President to say?  I don&#039;t agree with gay marriage but I want the people of Maine to approve of something I don&#039;t.  WTF.&lt;br&gt;Is it me or are these people just NUTS?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What did they want the President to say?  I don&#39;t agree with gay marriage but I want the people of Maine to approve of something I don&#39;t.  WTF.<br />Is it me or are these people just NUTS?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Monie</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/comment-page-1/#comment-308982</link> <dc:creator>Monie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:29:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16279#comment-308982</guid> <description>so let&#039;s see now....after Prop  8, exactly one year ago, it&#039;s passage was the fault of Black folk.  Now it is the Black President&#039;s fault in a majority white state.  It is interesting that some very prominent gay figures want an endorsement of a man who they have trashed, criticized, and washed their hands clean of this past year. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, they want the support of the person they consider non-supportive.....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so let&#39;s see now&#8230;.after Prop  8, exactly one year ago, it&#39;s passage was the fault of Black folk.  Now it is the Black President&#39;s fault in a majority white state.  It is interesting that some very prominent gay figures want an endorsement of a man who they have trashed, criticized, and washed their hands clean of this past year.</p><p>So, they want the support of the person they consider non-supportive&#8230;..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: LTMidnight</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/comment-page-1/#comment-308979</link> <dc:creator>LTMidnight</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:26:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16279#comment-308979</guid> <description>You know I was actually halfway kidding when I said on another blog earlier today &quot;Have the GLBT actually learned the lesson they didn&#039;t learn from Prop 8 in California, or will they just somehow blame Obama.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These people are pathetic.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know I was actually halfway kidding when I said on another blog earlier today &#8220;Have the GLBT actually learned the lesson they didn&#39;t learn from Prop 8 in California, or will they just somehow blame Obama.&#8221;</p><p>These people are pathetic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: caribgirl</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/comment-page-1/#comment-308976</link> <dc:creator>caribgirl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:24:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16279#comment-308976</guid> <description>I watch the online clips of Olberman&#039;s show everyday and I can&#039;t recall him focusing on that gay marriage initiative in Maine, especially in the last few weeks. It&#039;s interesting how he can get someone on to talk about it after it has failed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watch the online clips of Olberman&#39;s show everyday and I can&#39;t recall him focusing on that gay marriage initiative in Maine, especially in the last few weeks. It&#39;s interesting how he can get someone on to talk about it after it has failed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: RobM</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/comment-page-1/#comment-308975</link> <dc:creator>RobM</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:23:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16279#comment-308975</guid> <description>Savage is a teabagging pile of shit. You can&#039;t blame AA&#039;s for the voting population in ME is so small as to be neglible. He showed his true colors after Prop 8.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Savage is a teabagging pile of shit. You can&#39;t blame AA&#39;s for the voting population in ME is so small as to be neglible. He showed his true colors after Prop 8.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Amaya</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/comment-page-1/#comment-308961</link> <dc:creator>Amaya</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:04:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16279#comment-308961</guid> <description>That&#039;s funny, cuz online progressives didn&#039;t want Obama in the first place. Or the second place.  Or the third place.  I&#039;&#039;d like to say don&#039;t mind online progressives, because they want Obama to be someone he never campaigned to be....... someone in their own image.    But that would be nearsighted of me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The gallup poll is interesting however.  I don&#039;t know which is mirage and which is real.  I&#039;ll take whatever is happening outside of the echo chambers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s funny, cuz online progressives didn&#39;t want Obama in the first place. Or the second place.  Or the third place.  I&#39;&#39;d like to say don&#39;t mind online progressives, because they want Obama to be someone he never campaigned to be&#8230;&#8230;. someone in their own image.    But that would be nearsighted of me.</p><p>The gallup poll is interesting however.  I don&#39;t know which is mirage and which is real.  I&#39;ll take whatever is happening outside of the echo chambers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lamh32</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/evening-open-thread-123/comment-page-1/#comment-308959</link> <dc:creator>lamh32</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:03:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16279#comment-308959</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/11/alexander_hamilton_hip-hop_tri.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Alexander Hamilton hip-hop tribute&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Because Alexander Hamilton has always been my favorite Founding Father; because I am in the &quot;actually writing&quot; mode and otherwise away from the internet; because no one else on the Atlantic&#039;s team has yet called attention to this; and because it is a very diverting four-minute interlude, here is Lin-Manuel Miranda&#039;s tribute to Hamilton from the &quot;White House Evening of Poetry, Music, and the Spoken Word&quot; this past May. In case you have missed it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/11/alexander_hamilton_hip-hop_tri.php" rel="nofollow">Alexander Hamilton hip-hop tribute</a><br /><blockquote>Because Alexander Hamilton has always been my favorite Founding Father; because I am in the &#8220;actually writing&#8221; mode and otherwise away from the internet; because no one else on the Atlantic&#39;s team has yet called attention to this; and because it is a very diverting four-minute interlude, here is Lin-Manuel Miranda&#39;s tribute to Hamilton from the &#8220;White House Evening of Poetry, Music, and the Spoken Word&#8221; this past May. In case you have missed it.</p></blockquote> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 596/600 objects using apc

Served from: www.jackandjillpolitics.com @ 2012-02-10 11:05:27 -->
