I saw this really good post today. Was very interesting….

“You might want to put a link to your blog in your question since it depends on the contents. You may want to put a link in a related forum or facebook group.”…

“You shouldn’t have a problem. It’s an editor. It will work. You don’t need anything fancy to work with a wordpress theme. Notepad will do.”…

“try thesis theme”…

[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]…

http://www.gorillamedicalsales.com

http://www.gorillamedicalsales.com/blog

I told a friend that I found it very curious that all of Clinton loyalists have been all over the television crapping all over Obama of late. She thought I was about to start ripping into the Clintons again (she loves them both but isn't a loyalist, so she can be persuaded) and told me to give it up. I told her the only thing worse than the Clintons are their blind followers who seek to take down anyone who has ever done their king and queen any wrong. As they perceive it, of course. They smile in your face and stab you in your back. All of them can jump into the fire pit.

When Lanny Davis showed up on the Ed Show, I knew it was time to turn off politics again.

THAT is the core issue, not whether black voters are enthusiastic for Deeds or not. WHITE VOTERS are not enthusiastic for Deeds and they never were from the time he won the primary. So all of this “black folks won't vote for Deeds” smacks of the same racism that led people to say “Black folks are only voting 9 to 1 for Obama because he's black” even though Black folks vote 9 to 1 for whoever the Democratic nominee is, regardless of color. Last time I checked, Al Gore was a pasty, stiff white guy and he got 90% of the black vote when he ran back in '00. In fact he got more of the black vote than Clinton did either time he ran.

So I need for “white progressives” to stop blaming Deeds' loss on “black folks not voting for him” and get real as to why THEY won't vote for him.

excellent point. That is the core the issue.

This is from Ambinder's column. Again the stage is being set that when/if Deeds loses on Tuesday, the blame will be heaped on black Virginians. Where is the evidence that black people don't like Deeds and won't vote for him? Because Sheila Johnson and Doug Wilder say so? Most people are not checking for Doug Wilder these days and Sheila Johnson doesn't spend her time with black folks, she spends her time schmoozing it up with the white folks in Horse Country. If you ask the average black person about “Sheila Johnson” they will not know who you are talking about, and if they do she will be referred to as “that BET lady.”

The bailout of the banking industry was the result of decades of Reagan policy making carried out by both Democratic and Republican neoliberals that shifted risk from corporations to the American public. It is only the tip of iceberg. This shifting of risk is the flip side of the coin to wage stagnation and deflation that acts to increase the debt and loses of the American people.

To understand, why this is the case requires an understanding of what risk is. This is not an easy task. However, to have a working definition, let's just say that risk is the chance in any given transaction for one to be a winner or a loser. It is the concept of working the odds. What are the odds that you will obtain a job that will cover your debt from college? What are the odds that you will have enough money to pay for health care premiums and save money? What are odds of bank failure if they are too big to fail?
Read More
http://www.mydd.com/story/2009/10/26/105459/11