<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Dems Go After Antitrust Exemption For Insurers</title> <atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/dems-go-after-antitrust-exemption-for-insurers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/dems-go-after-antitrust-exemption-for-insurers/</link> <description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:36:05 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Mothsmoke</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/dems-go-after-antitrust-exemption-for-insurers/comment-page-1/#comment-344226</link> <dc:creator>Mothsmoke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:04:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16009#comment-344226</guid> <description>Well...we&#039;ll see where this goes but I must say it&#039;s eyebrow raising.  The conventional wisdom is that with competition, there are lower prices -- it&#039;s better for the consumer.  If there was to be a wholesale reform of the healthcare reform, why is it that it took the healthcare lobby going off of the rails before this exemption was attacked?  The exemption should have been on the chopping block from the get go. This is purely a retaliatory move which makes me wonder if the bluster about it will die down -- or completely go away --if the insurance lobby gets back on message.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;we&#39;ll see where this goes but I must say it&#39;s eyebrow raising.  The conventional wisdom is that with competition, there are lower prices &#8212; it&#39;s better for the consumer.  If there was to be a wholesale reform of the healthcare reform, why is it that it took the healthcare lobby going off of the rails before this exemption was attacked?  The exemption should have been on the chopping block from the get go. This is purely a retaliatory move which makes me wonder if the bluster about it will die down &#8212; or completely go away &#8211;if the insurance lobby gets back on message.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mothsmoke</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/10/dems-go-after-antitrust-exemption-for-insurers/comment-page-1/#comment-304074</link> <dc:creator>Mothsmoke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:04:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=16009#comment-304074</guid> <description>Well...we&#039;ll see where this goes but I must say it&#039;s eyebrow raising.  The conventional wisdom is that with competition, there are lower prices -- it&#039;s better for the consumer.  If there was to be a wholesale reform of the healthcare reform, why is it that it took the healthcare lobby going off of the rails before this exemption was attacked?  The exemption should have been on the chopping block from the get go. This is purely a retaliatory move which makes me wonder if the bluster about it will die down -- or completely go away --if the insurance lobby gets back on message.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;we&#39;ll see where this goes but I must say it&#39;s eyebrow raising.  The conventional wisdom is that with competition, there are lower prices &#8212; it&#39;s better for the consumer.  If there was to be a wholesale reform of the healthcare reform, why is it that it took the healthcare lobby going off of the rails before this exemption was attacked?  The exemption should have been on the chopping block from the get go. This is purely a retaliatory move which makes me wonder if the bluster about it will die down &#8212; or completely go away &#8211;if the insurance lobby gets back on message.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 272/276 objects using apc

Served from: www.jackandjillpolitics.com @ 2012-02-10 12:25:31 -->
