<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Cut to the Chase: Rahm Emmanuel&#8217;s Running Shyt</title> <atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/</link> <description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:07:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator> <item><title>By: roofing contractors Crestview Hills KY</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/comment-page-1/#comment-1058111</link> <dc:creator>roofing contractors Crestview Hills KY</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 09:01:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=14725#comment-1058111</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]…...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]…...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]…&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]…&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jailbreak</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/comment-page-1/#comment-1009371</link> <dc:creator>jailbreak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:37:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=14725#comment-1009371</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Cool sites...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]we came across a cool site that you might enjoy. Take a look if you want[...]…...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Cool sites&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]we came across a cool site that you might enjoy. Take a look if you want[...]…&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Timomass Copywriter</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/comment-page-1/#comment-988334</link> <dc:creator>Timomass Copywriter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:48:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=14725#comment-988334</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Blogs ou should be reading...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]Here is a Great Blog You Might Find Interesting that we Encourage You[...]…...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blogs ou should be reading&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]Here is a Great Blog You Might Find Interesting that we Encourage You[...]…&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: New York And Company Coupon</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/comment-page-1/#comment-972948</link> <dc:creator>New York And Company Coupon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 10:32:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=14725#comment-972948</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Online Article…...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]......</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Online Article…&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]&#8230;&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Foot Pain</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/comment-page-1/#comment-952126</link> <dc:creator>Foot Pain</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:49:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=14725#comment-952126</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Visitor recommendations...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]…...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Visitor recommendations&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]…&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: easytether</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/comment-page-1/#comment-948376</link> <dc:creator>easytether</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 19:15:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=14725#comment-948376</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Superb website...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]…...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Superb website&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]…&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: full seo service</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/comment-page-1/#comment-916520</link> <dc:creator>full seo service</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 11:50:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=14725#comment-916520</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Websites we think you should visit...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]although websites we backlink to below are considerably not related to ours, we feel they are actually worth a go through, so have a look[...]…...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Websites we think you should visit&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]although websites we backlink to below are considerably not related to ours, we feel they are actually worth a go through, so have a look[...]…&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bokmarniandend</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/comment-page-1/#comment-915162</link> <dc:creator>Bokmarniandend</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 00:34:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=14725#comment-915162</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Recommeneded websites...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]…...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Recommeneded websites&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]…&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: impropientantrismiko</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/comment-page-1/#comment-907365</link> <dc:creator>impropientantrismiko</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 01:57:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=14725#comment-907365</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;You should check this out...&lt;/strong&gt;[...] Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a few unrelated data, nevertheless really worth taking a look, whoa did one learn about Mid East has got more problerms as well [...]…...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>You should check this out&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...] Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a few unrelated data, nevertheless really worth taking a look, whoa did one learn about Mid East has got more problerms as well [...]…&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Related Resources</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/comment-page-1/#comment-542637</link> <dc:creator>Related Resources</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:11:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=14725#comment-542637</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Related Websites...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]some other related resources on the web that are worth viewing on this subject include[...]...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Related Websites&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]some other related resources on the web that are worth viewing on this subject include[...]&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hemroid Treatment</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/comment-page-1/#comment-539449</link> <dc:creator>Hemroid Treatment</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:20:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=14725#comment-539449</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Recommended Sites...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]below you&#039;ll see my links page http://www.hemorrhoidtreatmentcurerelief.com/my-favourite-sites/ with some fantastic websites that I think you should go visit[...]...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Recommended Sites&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]below you&#8217;ll see my links page <a href="http://www.hemorrhoidtreatmentcurerelief.com/my-favourite-sites/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hemorrhoidtreatmentcurerelief.com/my-favourite-sites/</a> with some fantastic websites that I think you should go visit[...]&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Article Geek</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/comment-page-1/#comment-530799</link> <dc:creator>Article Geek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:55:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=14725#comment-530799</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Popular Sites We Like...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]some interesting sites worth visitng. We recommend all our readers go and check these out[...]…...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Popular Sites We Like&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]some interesting sites worth visitng. We recommend all our readers go and check these out[...]…&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Constructive_Feedback</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/comment-page-1/#comment-343255</link> <dc:creator>Constructive_Feedback</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:08:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=14725#comment-343255</guid> <description>[quote]First I don’t see anyone has being fundamental in this context other than asking the elected official to hold to his core principle which he campaigned on and was his party’s platform.[/quote]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Aleth:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A better application of &quot;Progressive-Fundamentalism&quot; would be to not focus upon Obama who is &quot;one politician&quot; but rather to focus on the MACHINE which is leaning on him to do &quot;all things Progressive&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t believe that Obama has &quot;sold out&quot; since taking office.  He, more than his left wing base, is forced to see that there are consequences to making certain moves that seemed appleaing on the campaign trail.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is my opinion that a good portion of the disappointment that is currently suffered among this left wing base is due to the fact of their unattachment to any particular set of legislative processes, and again, the consequences of making such abrupt changes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for me - my scrutiny of the &quot;Progressive-Fundamentalist&quot; is focused on the areas where they&#039;ve gotten theri way, assuming political power and have implemented their policies.  Great promise was to be expressed in the schools, on the streets in the work places.  WIth them in solid control these points were implemented.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When the results did not turn out as expected many of you simply &quot;Expanded the Police Tape&quot; as you expanded the crime scene.  It became the &quot;state&#039;s fault&quot; or the &quot;federal government&#039;s neglect&quot; that caused the city that is in your hands to falter.  Only total control over all of the variables that bear upon you and complete suppression of your enemy will afford you the final victory.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[quote] That said, I wish I was a purist “progressive” or “progressive fundamentalist” but I’m not, therefore I rest my case on the fact that as a political system liberals or democrats or progressives [or whatever else you want to call it] &lt;b&gt;have been more equipped in aiding and protecting the general welfare of the people.&lt;/b&gt;[/quote]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that the Progressive have expressed more vocally THE INTENTION of helping the general welfare of the people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However - INTENTIONS do not translate into EFFECTIVE RESULTS upon the streets.   Go look at the University of Wisconsin study of hotspots on African-American unemployment.  Not surprisingly - where we live in our highest concentrations - the unemployment rates are highest.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unfortunately few will also factor in for the prevailing ideology and policies that are present in these same areas.  Uniformly these areas are dominated by Progressives and Democrats.   It is ONLY WHEN our people begin to focus upon the PERMANENT INTERESTS and the policies necessary to actually have them expressed rather than what feels most comfortable to you as an ideological preference during your time of aggrievement will the necessary policy prescriptions be adopted to turn INTENTIONS into EFFECTIVE RESULTS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My definition of Fundamentalism is to have beliefs and biases so strong that no amount of evidence on the street to the contrary will afford one the ability to alter their core assumptions in pursuit of their ultimate goal above the retention of their present beliefs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Instead of &quot;Keeping Conservatives On Trial&quot; it might be a worthy exercise to do some introspection.  Incumebency of a power must translate into accountability of that same power.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote]First I don’t see anyone has being fundamental in this context other than asking the elected official to hold to his core principle which he campaigned on and was his party’s platform.[/quote]</p><p>Aleth:</p><p>A better application of &#8220;Progressive-Fundamentalism&#8221; would be to not focus upon Obama who is &#8220;one politician&#8221; but rather to focus on the MACHINE which is leaning on him to do &#8220;all things Progressive&#8221;.</p><p>I don&#39;t believe that Obama has &#8220;sold out&#8221; since taking office.  He, more than his left wing base, is forced to see that there are consequences to making certain moves that seemed appleaing on the campaign trail.</p><p>It is my opinion that a good portion of the disappointment that is currently suffered among this left wing base is due to the fact of their unattachment to any particular set of legislative processes, and again, the consequences of making such abrupt changes.</p><p>As for me &#8211; my scrutiny of the &#8220;Progressive-Fundamentalist&#8221; is focused on the areas where they&#39;ve gotten theri way, assuming political power and have implemented their policies.  Great promise was to be expressed in the schools, on the streets in the work places.  WIth them in solid control these points were implemented.</p><p>When the results did not turn out as expected many of you simply &#8220;Expanded the Police Tape&#8221; as you expanded the crime scene.  It became the &#8220;state&#39;s fault&#8221; or the &#8220;federal government&#39;s neglect&#8221; that caused the city that is in your hands to falter.  Only total control over all of the variables that bear upon you and complete suppression of your enemy will afford you the final victory.</p><p>[quote] That said, I wish I was a purist “progressive” or “progressive fundamentalist” but I’m not, therefore I rest my case on the fact that as a political system liberals or democrats or progressives [or whatever else you want to call it] <b>have been more equipped in aiding and protecting the general welfare of the people.</b>[/quote]</p><p>I agree that the Progressive have expressed more vocally THE INTENTION of helping the general welfare of the people.</p><p>However &#8211; INTENTIONS do not translate into EFFECTIVE RESULTS upon the streets.   Go look at the University of Wisconsin study of hotspots on African-American unemployment.  Not surprisingly &#8211; where we live in our highest concentrations &#8211; the unemployment rates are highest.</p><p>Unfortunately few will also factor in for the prevailing ideology and policies that are present in these same areas.  Uniformly these areas are dominated by Progressives and Democrats.   It is ONLY WHEN our people begin to focus upon the PERMANENT INTERESTS and the policies necessary to actually have them expressed rather than what feels most comfortable to you as an ideological preference during your time of aggrievement will the necessary policy prescriptions be adopted to turn INTENTIONS into EFFECTIVE RESULTS.</p><p>My definition of Fundamentalism is to have beliefs and biases so strong that no amount of evidence on the street to the contrary will afford one the ability to alter their core assumptions in pursuit of their ultimate goal above the retention of their present beliefs.</p><p>Instead of &#8220;Keeping Conservatives On Trial&#8221; it might be a worthy exercise to do some introspection.  Incumebency of a power must translate into accountability of that same power.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Constructive_Feedback</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/comment-page-1/#comment-279159</link> <dc:creator>Constructive_Feedback</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:08:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=14725#comment-279159</guid> <description>[quote]First I don’t see anyone has being fundamental in this context other than asking the elected official to hold to his core principle which he campaigned on and was his party’s platform.[/quote]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Aleth:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A better application of &quot;Progressive-Fundamentalism&quot; would be to not focus upon Obama who is &quot;one politician&quot; but rather to focus on the MACHINE which is leaning on him to do &quot;all things Progressive&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t believe that Obama has &quot;sold out&quot; since taking office.  He, more than his left wing base, is forced to see that there are consequences to making certain moves that seemed appleaing on the campaign trail.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is my opinion that a good portion of the disappointment that is currently suffered among this left wing base is due to the fact of their unattachment to any particular set of legislative processes, and again, the consequences of making such abrupt changes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for me - my scrutiny of the &quot;Progressive-Fundamentalist&quot; is focused on the areas where they&#039;ve gotten theri way, assuming political power and have implemented their policies.  Great promise was to be expressed in the schools, on the streets in the work places.  WIth them in solid control these points were implemented.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When the results did not turn out as expected many of you simply &quot;Expanded the Police Tape&quot; as you expanded the crime scene.  It became the &quot;state&#039;s fault&quot; or the &quot;federal government&#039;s neglect&quot; that caused the city that is in your hands to falter.  Only total control over all of the variables that bear upon you and complete suppression of your enemy will afford you the final victory.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[quote] That said, I wish I was a purist “progressive” or “progressive fundamentalist” but I’m not, therefore I rest my case on the fact that as a political system liberals or democrats or progressives [or whatever else you want to call it] &lt;b&gt;have been more equipped in aiding and protecting the general welfare of the people.&lt;/b&gt;[/quote]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that the Progressive have expressed more vocally THE INTENTION of helping the general welfare of the people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However - INTENTIONS do not translate into EFFECTIVE RESULTS upon the streets.   Go look at the University of Wisconsin study of hotspots on African-American unemployment.  Not surprisingly - where we live in our highest concentrations - the unemployment rates are highest.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unfortunately few will also factor in for the prevailing ideology and policies that are present in these same areas.  Uniformly these areas are dominated by Progressives and Democrats.   It is ONLY WHEN our people begin to focus upon the PERMANENT INTERESTS and the policies necessary to actually have them expressed rather than what feels most comfortable to you as an ideological preference during your time of aggrievement will the necessary policy prescriptions be adopted to turn INTENTIONS into EFFECTIVE RESULTS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My definition of Fundamentalism is to have beliefs and biases so strong that no amount of evidence on the street to the contrary will afford one the ability to alter their core assumptions in pursuit of their ultimate goal above the retention of their present beliefs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Instead of &quot;Keeping Conservatives On Trial&quot; it might be a worthy exercise to do some introspection.  Incumebency of a power must translate into accountability of that same power.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote]First I don’t see anyone has being fundamental in this context other than asking the elected official to hold to his core principle which he campaigned on and was his party’s platform.[/quote]</p><p>Aleth:</p><p>A better application of &#8220;Progressive-Fundamentalism&#8221; would be to not focus upon Obama who is &#8220;one politician&#8221; but rather to focus on the MACHINE which is leaning on him to do &#8220;all things Progressive&#8221;.</p><p>I don&#39;t believe that Obama has &#8220;sold out&#8221; since taking office.  He, more than his left wing base, is forced to see that there are consequences to making certain moves that seemed appleaing on the campaign trail.</p><p>It is my opinion that a good portion of the disappointment that is currently suffered among this left wing base is due to the fact of their unattachment to any particular set of legislative processes, and again, the consequences of making such abrupt changes.</p><p>As for me &#8211; my scrutiny of the &#8220;Progressive-Fundamentalist&#8221; is focused on the areas where they&#39;ve gotten theri way, assuming political power and have implemented their policies.  Great promise was to be expressed in the schools, on the streets in the work places.  WIth them in solid control these points were implemented.</p><p>When the results did not turn out as expected many of you simply &#8220;Expanded the Police Tape&#8221; as you expanded the crime scene.  It became the &#8220;state&#39;s fault&#8221; or the &#8220;federal government&#39;s neglect&#8221; that caused the city that is in your hands to falter.  Only total control over all of the variables that bear upon you and complete suppression of your enemy will afford you the final victory.</p><p>[quote] That said, I wish I was a purist “progressive” or “progressive fundamentalist” but I’m not, therefore I rest my case on the fact that as a political system liberals or democrats or progressives [or whatever else you want to call it] <b>have been more equipped in aiding and protecting the general welfare of the people.</b>[/quote]</p><p>I agree that the Progressive have expressed more vocally THE INTENTION of helping the general welfare of the people.</p><p>However &#8211; INTENTIONS do not translate into EFFECTIVE RESULTS upon the streets.   Go look at the University of Wisconsin study of hotspots on African-American unemployment.  Not surprisingly &#8211; where we live in our highest concentrations &#8211; the unemployment rates are highest.</p><p>Unfortunately few will also factor in for the prevailing ideology and policies that are present in these same areas.  Uniformly these areas are dominated by Progressives and Democrats.   It is ONLY WHEN our people begin to focus upon the PERMANENT INTERESTS and the policies necessary to actually have them expressed rather than what feels most comfortable to you as an ideological preference during your time of aggrievement will the necessary policy prescriptions be adopted to turn INTENTIONS into EFFECTIVE RESULTS.</p><p>My definition of Fundamentalism is to have beliefs and biases so strong that no amount of evidence on the street to the contrary will afford one the ability to alter their core assumptions in pursuit of their ultimate goal above the retention of their present beliefs.</p><p>Instead of &#8220;Keeping Conservatives On Trial&#8221; it might be a worthy exercise to do some introspection.  Incumebency of a power must translate into accountability of that same power.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/comment-page-1/#comment-278931</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 02:23:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=14725#comment-278931</guid> <description>CPL,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i liked it even more the second read around. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;don&#039;t like rahm. never did. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i&#039;ve already staked out my position -healthcare is it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;if he doesn&#039;t come through with it, i&#039;m done. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;he&#039;s not well-served by some of his choices, and he&#039;s just not that slick.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CPL,</p><p>i liked it even more the second read around.</p><p>don&#39;t like rahm. never did.</p><p>i&#39;ve already staked out my position -healthcare is it.</p><p>if he doesn&#39;t come through with it, i&#39;m done.</p><p>he&#39;s not well-served by some of his choices, and he&#39;s just not that slick.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 897ash</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/comment-page-1/#comment-278871</link> <dc:creator>897ash</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:19:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=14725#comment-278871</guid> <description>STOP THW WHINING rahm isn&#039;t running shyt. Pres. Obama is. Several of you have said it already; Pres Obama is a pragmatist. He will get HCR w/ a public option done this year. WE must push him and the Dems and hold them accountable if we want it.&lt;br&gt;I love Van Jones, but he had to go. You cannot sign something from loons like &lt;a href=&quot;http://9/11truth.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;9/11truth.org&lt;/a&gt; and work in any WH, Democratic or Republican. Van was a distraction the Pres did not need this week.&lt;br&gt;AGAIN, STOP WHINING nad get to work , make some calss right some he emails hold the Pres and Congress accountable.&lt;br&gt;It is called citizenship.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STOP THW WHINING rahm isn&#39;t running shyt. Pres. Obama is. Several of you have said it already; Pres Obama is a pragmatist. He will get HCR w/ a public option done this year. WE must push him and the Dems and hold them accountable if we want it.<br />I love Van Jones, but he had to go. You cannot sign something from loons like <a href="http://9/11truth.org" rel="nofollow">9/11truth.org</a> and work in any WH, Democratic or Republican. Van was a distraction the Pres did not need this week.<br />AGAIN, STOP WHINING nad get to work , make some calss right some he emails hold the Pres and Congress accountable.<br />It is called citizenship.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: parvenu</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/comment-page-1/#comment-278784</link> <dc:creator>parvenu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 20:45:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=14725#comment-278784</guid> <description>Let me add an important update to this important post. Obama has  selected Michael Taylor, the former chief lobbyist for Monsanto, as the new &quot;food safety czar&quot; at the U.S. Food and Drug Adminstration (FDA). Taylor is the guy who has been the point man for Monsanto on all of the dangerous genetically modified seeds and hormones that are appearing as staples in the food we eat. These hormones are showing up in beef, cheese and yogurt to name a few. WTF!! Who the F**** in the White House thinks that this lawyer and professional lobbyist is the best choice to safeguard American&#039;s food safety. This is a glaring example of WTF is wrong with choice of appointmants being made by the Obama White House. Is this really &quot;Change We Can Believe In&quot;? CTS!! A serious wakeup call needs to be sent to the White House to get rid of Emmanuel and stop this bull shyt.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me add an important update to this important post. Obama has  selected Michael Taylor, the former chief lobbyist for Monsanto, as the new &#8220;food safety czar&#8221; at the U.S. Food and Drug Adminstration (FDA). Taylor is the guy who has been the point man for Monsanto on all of the dangerous genetically modified seeds and hormones that are appearing as staples in the food we eat. These hormones are showing up in beef, cheese and yogurt to name a few. WTF!! Who the F**** in the White House thinks that this lawyer and professional lobbyist is the best choice to safeguard American&#39;s food safety. This is a glaring example of WTF is wrong with choice of appointmants being made by the Obama White House. Is this really &#8220;Change We Can Believe In&#8221;? CTS!! A serious wakeup call needs to be sent to the White House to get rid of Emmanuel and stop this bull shyt.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/comment-page-1/#comment-278721</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 19:16:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=14725#comment-278721</guid> <description>you are on spot</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are on spot</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mon_dieu_ishmael</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/comment-page-1/#comment-278718</link> <dc:creator>mon_dieu_ishmael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 19:13:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=14725#comment-278718</guid> <description>Massachusetts health care costs are running 20% over projections.  They are trying to get a handle on them but are finding out that if people have healthcare insurance, they will use it and in the process drive up costs.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Massachusetts health care costs are running 20% over projections.  They are trying to get a handle on them but are finding out that if people have healthcare insurance, they will use it and in the process drive up costs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: icebergslim</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/09/cut-to-the-chase-rahm-emmanuels-running-shyt/comment-page-1/#comment-278704</link> <dc:creator>icebergslim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 18:55:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=14725#comment-278704</guid> <description>I wrote about this a week or so ago.  And said the problem was the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/8/22/771072/-Obama-White-House,-In-1990s-Mode...&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Obama White House is Clinton REDUX&lt;/a&gt;, if I wanted that, I would have voted for HIllary.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote about this a week or so ago.  And said the problem was the <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/8/22/771072/-Obama-White-House,-In-1990s-Mode..." rel="nofollow">Obama White House is Clinton REDUX</a>, if I wanted that, I would have voted for HIllary.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 596/600 objects using apc

Served from: www.jackandjillpolitics.com @ 2012-02-10 14:38:32 -->
