Comments on: The Supreme Court sides with the ‘ little people’? http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/the-supreme-court-sides-with-the-little-people/ A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:32:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Miranda http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/the-supreme-court-sides-with-the-little-people/comment-page-1/#comment-337279 Miranda Thu, 02 Jul 2009 04:56:55 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=12711#comment-337279 Unca Clarence has some serious issues, I dont care what anybody says...this man is really ill. Unca Clarence has some serious issues, I dont care what anybody says…this man is really ill.

]]> By: Miranda http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/the-supreme-court-sides-with-the-little-people/comment-page-1/#comment-337276 Miranda Thu, 02 Jul 2009 04:55:39 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=12711#comment-337276 This is MAJOR. This is MAJOR.

]]> By: RobM http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/the-supreme-court-sides-with-the-little-people/comment-page-1/#comment-337277 RobM Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:18:27 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=12711#comment-337277 I believe if the states AG's are going to do something they had better act fast. Given the legislation that has come down from the WH and Capital Hill to date, I suspect that the new consumer protection agency act will have restrictions on what the state AG's can do against the bank w/ no real protection.<br>Cuomo, I like to believe, is already filing papers based on what they had started. If he gains any traction before the consumer bill look at. I believe if the states AG's are going to do something they had better act fast. Given the legislation that has come down from the WH and Capital Hill to date, I suspect that the new consumer protection agency act will have restrictions on what the state AG's can do against the bank w/ no real protection.
Cuomo, I like to believe, is already filing papers based on what they had started. If he gains any traction before the consumer bill look at.

]]> By: spirit_55z http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/the-supreme-court-sides-with-the-little-people/comment-page-1/#comment-337278 spirit_55z Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:13:03 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=12711#comment-337278 Well, well, well, Unca Clarence is at it again. There isn't a woodshed big enough to hold this slave-catching coon.<br><br>Is this the reason why the LAWN JOCKEY dissented?<br><br>"The Supreme Court ruling will likely free state prosecutors to bring cases against national banks for alleged violations of fair-lending laws, such as charging minorities more money for loans or refusing to offer loans in certain neighborhoods, a practice known as “red-lining.” The ruling could also allow courts to issue search warrants that allow state attorneys general to search for records at national banks."<br><br>Now it's up to the citizens and local elected officials of our grand 50 to hold these banks feet to the fire for any fuck ups. Well, well, well, Unca Clarence is at it again. There isn't a woodshed big enough to hold this slave-catching coon.

Is this the reason why the LAWN JOCKEY dissented?

“The Supreme Court ruling will likely free state prosecutors to bring cases against national banks for alleged violations of fair-lending laws, such as charging minorities more money for loans or refusing to offer loans in certain neighborhoods, a practice known as “red-lining.” The ruling could also allow courts to issue search warrants that allow state attorneys general to search for records at national banks.”

Now it's up to the citizens and local elected officials of our grand 50 to hold these banks feet to the fire for any fuck ups.

]]> By: Miranda http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/the-supreme-court-sides-with-the-little-people/comment-page-1/#comment-226629 Miranda Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:56:55 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=12711#comment-226629 Unca Clarence has some serious issues, I dont care what anybody says...this man is really ill. Unca Clarence has some serious issues, I dont care what anybody says…this man is really ill.

]]> By: Miranda http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/the-supreme-court-sides-with-the-little-people/comment-page-1/#comment-226628 Miranda Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:55:39 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=12711#comment-226628 This is MAJOR. This is MAJOR.

]]> By: RobM http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/the-supreme-court-sides-with-the-little-people/comment-page-1/#comment-226516 RobM Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:18:27 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=12711#comment-226516 I believe if the states AG's are going to do something they had better act fast. Given the legislation that has come down from the WH and Capital Hill to date, I suspect that the new consumer protection agency act will have restrictions on what the state AG's can do against the bank w/ no real protection.<br>Cuomo, I like to believe, is already filing papers based on what they had started. If he gains any traction before the consumer bill look at. I believe if the states AG's are going to do something they had better act fast. Given the legislation that has come down from the WH and Capital Hill to date, I suspect that the new consumer protection agency act will have restrictions on what the state AG's can do against the bank w/ no real protection.
Cuomo, I like to believe, is already filing papers based on what they had started. If he gains any traction before the consumer bill look at.

]]> By: spirit_55z http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/the-supreme-court-sides-with-the-little-people/comment-page-1/#comment-226479 spirit_55z Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:13:03 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=12711#comment-226479 Well, well, well, Unca Clarence is at it again. There isn't a woodshed big enough to hold this slave-catching coon.<br><br>Is this the reason why the LAWN JOCKEY dissented?<br><br>"The Supreme Court ruling will likely free state prosecutors to bring cases against national banks for alleged violations of fair-lending laws, such as charging minorities more money for loans or refusing to offer loans in certain neighborhoods, a practice known as “red-lining.” The ruling could also allow courts to issue search warrants that allow state attorneys general to search for records at national banks."<br><br>Now it's up to the citizens and local elected officials of our grand 50 to hold these banks feet to the fire for any fuck ups. Well, well, well, Unca Clarence is at it again. There isn't a woodshed big enough to hold this slave-catching coon.

Is this the reason why the LAWN JOCKEY dissented?

“The Supreme Court ruling will likely free state prosecutors to bring cases against national banks for alleged violations of fair-lending laws, such as charging minorities more money for loans or refusing to offer loans in certain neighborhoods, a practice known as “red-lining.” The ruling could also allow courts to issue search warrants that allow state attorneys general to search for records at national banks.”

Now it's up to the citizens and local elected officials of our grand 50 to hold these banks feet to the fire for any fuck ups.

]]>