<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saturday Open Thread</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/</link>
	<description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:56:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TruthSeeker</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/comment-page-3/#comment-244807</link>
		<dc:creator>TruthSeeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=13304#comment-244807</guid>
		<description>The fact very few people attempt to MAKE their hair kinky suggests that it doesn&#039;t generally feel good...if kinky hair was naturally soft, manageable and tacitly appealing, I think more people would want it.   The fact most hair products are geared toward softening and smoothing hair suggests that those qualities are what women want...regardless of race.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the problem is in associating kinky hair with blackness and our being, rather than seeing it as genetic expression...like round eyes, or a large nose..etc.   Would you define yourself by a large nose?   When I write &quot;kinky&quot; you see it as &quot;black&quot;.   If I say kinky hair is generally hard to control, you see as as &quot;black is inferior&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even women with kinky hair use products to soften it.   They&#039;re a gazillion products for kinky hair these days...if it&#039;s &quot;natural&quot; state was so desirable..then why use products to change it in any way?   Why not leave your hair the way it is when you exit your mother&#039;s womb?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Funny you should say that..I got hit on by a white guy in the supermarket checkout line the other day..seems like he liked my blackness just fine.   I - on the other hand - did not covet his massive height.    You may say, this man wouldn&#039;t want to BE black...  And I would respond by saying that I wouldn&#039;t want to BE white.    Not because there&#039;s anything intrinsically wrong with whiteness, but because I like who I am.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I&#039;m getting at here...is that this line of thinking is not based on fact.   In addition, I can&#039;t see how it is beneficial for black women to burden themselves with restrictions that other women are not burdened with.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Black women need to know that they are loved..straight or kinky hair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact very few people attempt to MAKE their hair kinky suggests that it doesn&#39;t generally feel good&#8230;if kinky hair was naturally soft, manageable and tacitly appealing, I think more people would want it.   The fact most hair products are geared toward softening and smoothing hair suggests that those qualities are what women want&#8230;regardless of race.</p>
<p>I think the problem is in associating kinky hair with blackness and our being, rather than seeing it as genetic expression&#8230;like round eyes, or a large nose..etc.   Would you define yourself by a large nose?   When I write &#8220;kinky&#8221; you see it as &#8220;black&#8221;.   If I say kinky hair is generally hard to control, you see as as &#8220;black is inferior&#8221;.</p>
<p>Even women with kinky hair use products to soften it.   They&#39;re a gazillion products for kinky hair these days&#8230;if it&#39;s &#8220;natural&#8221; state was so desirable..then why use products to change it in any way?   Why not leave your hair the way it is when you exit your mother&#39;s womb?</p>
<p>Funny you should say that..I got hit on by a white guy in the supermarket checkout line the other day..seems like he liked my blackness just fine.   I &#8211; on the other hand &#8211; did not covet his massive height.    You may say, this man wouldn&#39;t want to BE black&#8230;  And I would respond by saying that I wouldn&#39;t want to BE white.    Not because there&#39;s anything intrinsically wrong with whiteness, but because I like who I am.</p>
<p>What I&#39;m getting at here&#8230;is that this line of thinking is not based on fact.   In addition, I can&#39;t see how it is beneficial for black women to burden themselves with restrictions that other women are not burdened with.</p>
<p>Black women need to know that they are loved..straight or kinky hair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TruthSeeker</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/comment-page-3/#comment-244738</link>
		<dc:creator>TruthSeeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=13304#comment-244738</guid>
		<description>Specifically speaking, no one fully agrees on exactly what &quot;a good Christian life&quot; constitutes.    But for Jehovah&#039;s Witnesses...it means certain things...and it would be impossible for a Jehovah&#039;s Witness to be happy if they didn&#039;t want to do those things.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Generally speaking...it is impossible to be happy when your actions, beliefs and feelings are being directed by others.   It is antithetical to life itself....    There is a reason why you are separate from me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Specifically speaking, no one fully agrees on exactly what &#8220;a good Christian life&#8221; constitutes.    But for Jehovah&#39;s Witnesses&#8230;it means certain things&#8230;and it would be impossible for a Jehovah&#39;s Witness to be happy if they didn&#39;t want to do those things.</p>
<p>Generally speaking&#8230;it is impossible to be happy when your actions, beliefs and feelings are being directed by others.   It is antithetical to life itself&#8230;.    There is a reason why you are separate from me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: windswept</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/comment-page-3/#comment-243454</link>
		<dc:creator>windswept</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 05:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=13304#comment-243454</guid>
		<description>Yep, near Carmichael.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;rhoenix (at) gmail (dot) com is my email - hit me up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, near Carmichael.</p>
<p>rhoenix (at) gmail (dot) com is my email &#8211; hit me up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webb</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/comment-page-3/#comment-243415</link>
		<dc:creator>Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 04:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=13304#comment-243415</guid>
		<description>Your welcome windswept...you&#039;re in sacramento?  A brotha would like 2 holla at u.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your welcome windswept&#8230;you&#39;re in sacramento?  A brotha would like 2 holla at u.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webb</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/comment-page-3/#comment-243411</link>
		<dc:creator>Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 04:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=13304#comment-243411</guid>
		<description>As with most films, the books are always better than the films.  The same is true for Clancy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with most films, the books are always better than the films.  The same is true for Clancy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiterosebuddy</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/comment-page-3/#comment-242746</link>
		<dc:creator>whiterosebuddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=13304#comment-242746</guid>
		<description>As much as I agree with everyone about Eugene, the truth is he doesn&#039;t need to be the BLACK guy that gets fired for being right cause the white folks won&#039;t take on PAT for the EXACT same reason, they are KEEPING their jobs!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why Eugene got to stand up to Pat anymore than they do? Why does he have to stick his neck out when they REFUSE to corral one of their own.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would rather have Eugene with his &#039;weak&#039; commentary than not to have him at home.  He still makes points, albeit not as strongly as we would like...but if you NOTE even his tepid overtures are NOT followed up or conjoined by the rest of the white cable heads on MSNBC.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, I can&#039;t HATE on Eugene for that. Would I like to see him do more? You bet. But it ain&#039;t gonna happen.  Eugene did not get where he is by being a trailblazer, so it is foolish to think that he will be the one carrying the torch now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I agree with everyone about Eugene, the truth is he doesn&#39;t need to be the BLACK guy that gets fired for being right cause the white folks won&#39;t take on PAT for the EXACT same reason, they are KEEPING their jobs!!</p>
<p>Why Eugene got to stand up to Pat anymore than they do? Why does he have to stick his neck out when they REFUSE to corral one of their own.</p>
<p>I would rather have Eugene with his &#39;weak&#39; commentary than not to have him at home.  He still makes points, albeit not as strongly as we would like&#8230;but if you NOTE even his tepid overtures are NOT followed up or conjoined by the rest of the white cable heads on MSNBC.</p>
<p>So, I can&#39;t HATE on Eugene for that. Would I like to see him do more? You bet. But it ain&#39;t gonna happen.  Eugene did not get where he is by being a trailblazer, so it is foolish to think that he will be the one carrying the torch now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiterosebuddy</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/comment-page-3/#comment-242592</link>
		<dc:creator>whiterosebuddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=13304#comment-242592</guid>
		<description>&quot;When white women are perming their hair they are seeking to get curls which naturally appear with them&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, the same would be true for AA&#039;s who have naturally &#039;straight&#039; hair like Valerie Jarrett and Desiree Rogers. There are lots of Scandinavians who do not have natural curls and they get curly perms.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; It has nothing whatsoever to do with emulating Blackness.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why, not?  Who do you think they are emulating...where do you think those curls originated?  Not on the Asian continent, nor European continent...curls come straight out of Africa!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When white women are perming their hair they are seeking to get curls which naturally appear with them&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, the same would be true for AA&#39;s who have naturally &#39;straight&#39; hair like Valerie Jarrett and Desiree Rogers. There are lots of Scandinavians who do not have natural curls and they get curly perms.</p>
<p> It has nothing whatsoever to do with emulating Blackness.</p>
<p>Why, not?  Who do you think they are emulating&#8230;where do you think those curls originated?  Not on the Asian continent, nor European continent&#8230;curls come straight out of Africa!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiterosebuddy</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/comment-page-3/#comment-242588</link>
		<dc:creator>whiterosebuddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=13304#comment-242588</guid>
		<description>Yep...white folks have curly perms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep&#8230;white folks have curly perms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiterosebuddy</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/comment-page-3/#comment-242586</link>
		<dc:creator>whiterosebuddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=13304#comment-242586</guid>
		<description>&#039;whether race is merely a set of beliefs, and the state of mind those beliefs engender..rather than the colour of skin.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are absolutely correct. Race is a sociologic construct. Not biologic, there is not enough genetic variance with the human species for their to be races. There is only one race the human race.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Race/racism and with all the stereotypes it denotes is what the viewer seeks to impose on you. i.e. in the eye of the beholder</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#39;whether race is merely a set of beliefs, and the state of mind those beliefs engender..rather than the colour of skin.&#8221;</p>
<p>You are absolutely correct. Race is a sociologic construct. Not biologic, there is not enough genetic variance with the human species for their to be races. There is only one race the human race.</p>
<p>Race/racism and with all the stereotypes it denotes is what the viewer seeks to impose on you. i.e. in the eye of the beholder</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiterosebuddy</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/comment-page-3/#comment-242582</link>
		<dc:creator>whiterosebuddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=13304#comment-242582</guid>
		<description>What about ReeseWitherspoon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about ReeseWitherspoon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiterosebuddy</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/comment-page-3/#comment-242576</link>
		<dc:creator>whiterosebuddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=13304#comment-242576</guid>
		<description>&quot;we&#039;re getting close to reaching it, where there are going to be more African Americans in this country who never experienced anything remotely close to Jim Crow than those who lived under Jim Crow. That, obviously, changes perspectives.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This generational shift has a profound and significant impact on the AA community.The thing that was the clue for the majority of AA&#039;s was the &quot;separatebutequal&quot; indignities. A entire generation not experiencing that shifts the focus to poverty. Overcoming poverty however necessitates values and ambitons. Instead, in all too many cases, the AA community has chosen to develop a sub-culture that glorifies the ignorance of impoverishment and embraces drugs and crime, in too many instances.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How the NAACP shifts it&#039;s focus to address these problems is key. Obama has started the dialogue that too many folks want to ignore, and that is the return to values for the young folk born after the 80s.This is the generation that was suppose to reap the gains of affirmative action from their parents, but far too many have been incarcerated and fatherless, and those twin variables have &#039;ghettoized&#039; the AA community.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama has no choice but to focus on the impact of those variables, if we as a community are going to move forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;we&#39;re getting close to reaching it, where there are going to be more African Americans in this country who never experienced anything remotely close to Jim Crow than those who lived under Jim Crow. That, obviously, changes perspectives.&#8221;</p>
<p>This generational shift has a profound and significant impact on the AA community.The thing that was the clue for the majority of AA&#39;s was the &#8220;separatebutequal&#8221; indignities. A entire generation not experiencing that shifts the focus to poverty. Overcoming poverty however necessitates values and ambitons. Instead, in all too many cases, the AA community has chosen to develop a sub-culture that glorifies the ignorance of impoverishment and embraces drugs and crime, in too many instances.</p>
<p>How the NAACP shifts it&#39;s focus to address these problems is key. Obama has started the dialogue that too many folks want to ignore, and that is the return to values for the young folk born after the 80s.This is the generation that was suppose to reap the gains of affirmative action from their parents, but far too many have been incarcerated and fatherless, and those twin variables have &#39;ghettoized&#39; the AA community.</p>
<p>Obama has no choice but to focus on the impact of those variables, if we as a community are going to move forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordSmith</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/comment-page-3/#comment-242572</link>
		<dc:creator>WordSmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=13304#comment-242572</guid>
		<description>And they VOLUNTEERED.  A call was issued for attorneys with specific trial/law experience and/or areas of expertise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And they VOLUNTEERED.  A call was issued for attorneys with specific trial/law experience and/or areas of expertise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordSmith</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/comment-page-3/#comment-242571</link>
		<dc:creator>WordSmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=13304#comment-242571</guid>
		<description>I think cats are strange and wonderful.  How else do you explain the connection between you &amp; Phantom so you &#039;figured out&#039; the sink, the towel, and showering?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I connect with this cat. I&#039;d take him everywhere I go if I could - if he wasn&#039;t such a fraidy-cat.  Here&#039;s a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/rpiuiFqF_mrZzJbo8ooFkA?feat=directlink&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Khaos&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think cats are strange and wonderful.  How else do you explain the connection between you &#038; Phantom so you &#39;figured out&#39; the sink, the towel, and showering?  </p>
<p>I connect with this cat. I&#39;d take him everywhere I go if I could &#8211; if he wasn&#39;t such a fraidy-cat.  Here&#39;s a look at <a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/rpiuiFqF_mrZzJbo8ooFkA?feat=directlink" rel="nofollow"> Khaos</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rikyrah</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/comment-page-3/#comment-242565</link>
		<dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=13304#comment-242565</guid>
		<description>Clancy was...well...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;but, good entertainment is good entertainment, and his books translated well to the screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clancy was&#8230;well&#8230;</p>
<p>but, good entertainment is good entertainment, and his books translated well to the screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rikyrah</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/comment-page-3/#comment-242563</link>
		<dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=13304#comment-242563</guid>
		<description>I actually saw Feast of Love in the movie theater - I enjoyed it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;have to look for Never Back Down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually saw Feast of Love in the movie theater &#8211; I enjoyed it. </p>
<p>have to look for Never Back Down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiterosebuddy</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/comment-page-3/#comment-242560</link>
		<dc:creator>whiterosebuddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=13304#comment-242560</guid>
		<description>The POWER of the minority vs. the POWERLESS majority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The POWER of the minority vs. the POWERLESS majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spirit_55z</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/comment-page-3/#comment-242533</link>
		<dc:creator>spirit_55z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=13304#comment-242533</guid>
		<description>LOL!  Clancy may have been a Regan-lover, but that doesn&#039;t stop me from enjoying reading his good works.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, I loved Denzel in X, but I preferred his role as Ron Hunter, Executive Officer in CT.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He was strong, commanding, intelligent, and didn&#039;t have to go &quot;nicca-full out.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!  Clancy may have been a Regan-lover, but that doesn&#39;t stop me from enjoying reading his good works.</p>
<p>Yes, I loved Denzel in X, but I preferred his role as Ron Hunter, Executive Officer in CT.</p>
<p>He was strong, commanding, intelligent, and didn&#39;t have to go &#8220;nicca-full out.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spirit_55z</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/comment-page-3/#comment-242531</link>
		<dc:creator>spirit_55z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=13304#comment-242531</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t you heard, WHITE MEN made America; there&#039;s NO need for all that rich, intense, and culturally intelligent history of POC!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#39;t you heard, WHITE MEN made America; there&#39;s NO need for all that rich, intense, and culturally intelligent history of POC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morphus</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/comment-page-3/#comment-242521</link>
		<dc:creator>morphus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=13304#comment-242521</guid>
		<description>The JAG Corp has been unsung heroes and heroines. Within the M$M there is little mention their efforts to savage the remains of what gw refers to as &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rense.com/general69/paper.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;just a goddam piece of paper&lt;/a&gt;&quot;.  Their efforts to me were successful because of the B___ admin efforts to control them.  Remember this? &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2007/12/15/control_sought_on_military_lawyers/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bush administration is pushing to take control of the promotions of military lawyers&lt;/a&gt;, escalating a conflict over the independence of uniformed attorneys who have repeatedly raised objections to the White House&#039;s policies toward prisoners in the war on terrorism.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The JAG Corp has been unsung heroes and heroines. Within the M$M there is little mention their efforts to savage the remains of what gw refers to as &#8220;<a href="http://www.rense.com/general69/paper.htm" rel="nofollow">just a goddam piece of paper</a>&#8220;.  Their efforts to me were successful because of the B___ admin efforts to control them.  Remember this? &#8220;<a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2007/12/15/control_sought_on_military_lawyers/" rel="nofollow">Bush administration is pushing to take control of the promotions of military lawyers</a>, escalating a conflict over the independence of uniformed attorneys who have repeatedly raised objections to the White House&#39;s policies toward prisoners in the war on terrorism.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobM</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/07/saturday-open-thread-53/comment-page-3/#comment-242495</link>
		<dc:creator>RobM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 13:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=13304#comment-242495</guid>
		<description>Credit default swaps were authorized under the Commodities Reform act of 2000 w/ legislation added by Sen Phil Gramm in the middle of the night. They are totally unregulated under this legislation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Credit default swaps were authorized under the Commodities Reform act of 2000 w/ legislation added by Sen Phil Gramm in the middle of the night. They are totally unregulated under this legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
