I just put Disquis on my blog, so when I write a new post, you'll be able to use your login that you use here, and people can rate your comments (as if people comment on my blog now. LOL, I've got to do better at promotion when I finish with this test)
lamh32
So, I've registered for my Grad classes, and I will be starting school late next month. I've also convinced my job to alter my schedule so that I can take classes with a freer schedule while still maintaining my full-time status (meaning I'll be working weekends for the whole Fall semester).
I seriously can't wait. It will give me something to do other than linger around on political blogs all the time (LOL!!!). It also gives me another "excuse" to not watch cable news anymore (not that I need an excuse, haven't watched it consistently for months, but especially haven't watched it at all since last weeks and the whole Gates-brouhaha).
Anyway, I'm counting the days 'til Aug 27.
MsKitty
Good luck with your studies
becca77
best wishes with school!
whiterosebuddy
"I've also convinced my job to alter my schedule so that I can take classes "
You sound like Willie Geist on MSNBC..he now has a show at 5:30AM..to accomodate his new infant and toddler (nursing and potty training)! lol
lamh32
Yeah, but unlike Geist, I gotta REAL JOB (LOL)
Seriously, this was actually a big deal. I haven't even told some of my co-workers who I actually lunch with yet. I probably won't tell 'em. I'll let the Supes tell 'em, or I'll just let them find out when the schedule comes out.
There is only 1 other person who I can remember who was actually allowed to to what I'm doing and they really liked him, so I guess they like me to. I also ain't told them that the Supes told me I was on the fast track to a promotion either.
They told me during a meeting, that they would like to fast track me to a higher position as soon as I'm trained. Which is good, but I kinda feel bad bout it, cause I'm not even sure if I will even stay at my current job once I finish school, and decide what professional program I'm gonna pursue.
whiterosebuddy
"Seriously, this was actually a big deal"
Yes, I am certain it was, wasn't trying to down play it.
, "that they would like to fast track me to a higher position as soon as I'm trained."
Yep, that is how it always work...they gotta want you and you have to have the potential do do more for them to cooperate; same with Willie.
It just don't usuallly work like that for us.
Go on with your BAD self...lamh...proud of it...that was a real hurdle and you best believe you bringing it..and they want you there...don't forget that.
Don't feel guilty..get your degree on their $$ and keep stepping you owe them nothing. You've EARNED IT!!
Set your goals high and achieve them!! I know you can.
Best of luck to you with your studies!!
rikyrah
good for you. school can be challenging at times.
djchefron
Potty training is a trip.Every 15 20 minutes all we hear is I want potty.I would have thought since she is the third one it would get easier.Oh well such is life.
spirit_55z
Rep. Maxine Waters: It's Hard For Rahm To Rein In Blue Dogs Because He Recruited Most Of Them
Powell On Gates: I've Been Racially Profiled "Many Times"
In an interview with CNN's Larry King, former Secretary of State Colin Powell suggested that both the Cambridge police and Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates were to blame for last week's incident.
Saying he has suffered from racial profiling "many times," the general suggested that Gates could have handled the situation differently. He urged young people confronted by the police to "cooperate. Don't make the situation more difficult."
Powell later added, "Do you get angry? Yes. Do you manifest that anger? You protest, you try to get things fixed, but it's kind of a better course of action to take it easy and don't let your anger make the current situation worse.
Rep. Thaddeus McCotter is a bonafide idiot....and he looks an awful lot like Lurch from The Addams Family.
Angelar
that explains why he has to do his fake righteousness bs against the president, only way he could get his mug in front of the cameras..
NMP1
I chose to go off-line the past week because 1) health care discussion got pushed to the back burner ; and 2) I knew ya’ll were not going to tolerate any dissention in your midst when you thought you had Bull Connor in your cross hairs. Anyone who knows me can tell you I’m usually the Negro with her racist radar on high alert, but I knew from the beginning that this was not a clear cut case of racial profiling. At the risk of still getting verbally fucked up, I came to the conclusion days ago that both Crowley acted stupidly and Dr. Gates overreacted. However, only one’s behavior is protected by the Constitution and MA state law: Dr. Gate's . For me, this case was more alarming from the standpoint of our growing complacency with the erosion of our civil liberties than race. My position would be no different if the professor was white and the officer was Black. I certainly would not be as passionate in my view but just as steadfast.
Do I believe that the cop was impolite when he approached Gate’s door? Yep! Do I believe it was reasonable for Gate’s to be alarmed and even angry at the cop’s demand to step out of his home without first stating his name and his reason for being there? ABSOLUTELY! Do I believe that the cop would have been more polite had Gates been white? I strongly suspect, but can’t prove it. Do I believe that Gates was obligated to comply with the officer’s demands? Hell no! But it would have been smart to comply and call his attorney (see he has one at his disposal unlike most Negros). Do I believe that the cop was racially profiling Gates? There is no evidence to support that. Do I believe that the cop abused his authority? HELL YES!
This case is not about race or at least not enough about race to have garnered this much attention and certainly not such an egregious clear cut example of racial profiling for the President to risk his (our) agenda and the future of his presidency on it.
Let me be clear, I am not saying the cop isn’t racist. There is just not sufficient evidence to conclude he is. True enough, the cop probably was rude but come on he wasn’t patrolling the neighborhood, spotted Gates in his kitchen and decided to knock on his door and demand that he come outside for no reason. That would be a clear cut case of racial profiling. He was responding to a 911 call. Certainly, he should have given his name before demanding Dr. Gates step outside and he certainly should have left after determining that no crime had taken place; Dr. Gates was lawfully in his own home; and his continued presence was exacerbating the situation. That’s stupid. Bad policing. But no evidence of racial profiling.
To be honest, even if it was racial profiling, I’d be PISSED but I would be comforted by the FACT Dr. Gates is a well connected Black man that could sue the police report and have the cop removed from the force. I would still maintain that it did not warrant diverting attention from the health care debate. At minimum, it shouldn’t have diverted the President’s attention from health care. Absent a video of the cop beating Dr. Gates with his cane, the President should have stayed out of it. It may have heartened us to know the President hadn’t forgotten he was a Black man, but it disheartened white folks that it seemed he needed to remind them he was.
I worked for years for a crime victims’ advocacy organization and one of the hardest things I had to come to terms with was the “good victim” standard. The public has but so much tolerance for “victimology ” of any kind. So when you present a victim to the public that you want to use as an example of why things need to change, you better be sure s/he is a “good victim.” The ironic thing is Dr. Gates would have been a “good victim” for the ACLU to put forth as an example of the growing overuse of police power and encroachment on civil liberties had we allowed this to play out , but he is a “bad victim” for racial profiling.
Conor Friedersdorf of the Daily Beast says it best, “President Obama deems this "a teachable moment." In fact, Glenn Loury is correct when he notes that "the contretemps shed no relevant light on the plight of the millions of black men on society’s margins who bear the brunt of police scrutiny." Innocents among them remain jailed and without any prominent advocate in American politics. How politically conservative is a president who defends only esteemed, nationally known professors? Change on this issue requires advocacy in cases where misconduct by police or prosecutors gravely wrongs those without power.”
This case sheds no light on entrenched racism in the criminal justice system. In fact, it now gives permission to whites to turn the light off completely. The President forgot his own words written in the “Audacity of Hope,” white guilt is dead. If it was merely on life support the day before the election, it damn sure died on the day he was elected. In the minds of white folks, racism as a national cancer is dead. Certainly, no one is pollyannaish enough to believe that individual racists are not still substantial in number; they just don’t want to hear a black man they just elevated to the presidency making it a national issue, except in the most extreme circumstances. This was not it.
Oh, there's plenty of evidence to support claims that Crowley is a bigot.
The most compelling?
His falsified police report identifying two "black men with backpacks" when the caller never identified either man as Black and mentioned suitcases, suggesting the "gentlemen" might actually live in that house; his television interview after his crime where he stated Gates told him he would come outside and talk to his "mama" -- we know that's not true, but that didn't stop him from sayingit to conjure sympathy (mostly from white people), showing his contempt for black people; and his claim that he thought Gates was peculiar but even moreso when he realized how educated he was.
Crowley is a stupidass, abusive, bigot.
There's plenty of evidence to support that claim.
As for the Loury quote: I disagree with it. He's missing the forest for the trees.
The President of the United States mentioned racial profiling and the treatment Blacks and Latinos, particularly men, have to endure in a free society, in a prime time news conference.
If Loury, or anyone else, doesn't realize the import of that, then he's being too clever by half.
Or simply blind.
NMP1
Can you prove it? He'll contend that is what he remembers the witness telling him. He now has white America's sympathies. He can lie as much as he wants too now. He's white America's poster child for reverse racial profiling. Hell, even your liberal white buddies sympathize with him. Everything reported from this point on will be through that narrative. The witness helps and hurts Dr. Gates. Her attorney, whom I met years ago when I was still working in the victims' advocacy community, says that while her client disputes Crowley's claim that she described them as two Black men or even talking to him, she supports Crowley's report that you could hear Gates yelling from her vantage point on the street and that she never heard Crowley's voice. She cintradicts Crowley and Gates. As I said earlier, the real victims in this case will be the poor Black and Brown men who will continue to face the injustice of racial profiling but will never receive justice because we were just hell bent on making Skip, connected ass, Gates a poster child for racial profiling.
I don't need to prove anything. I simply said that there's compelling evidence to support the claim he's a stupid ass, abusive bigot.
I don't have to prove it.
But I presented the evidence that supports the claim and you're refuting it with "the way things work."
I know how they work, NMP. I know all too well how they work.
I'm a 41 year-old Black Man who's lived in Milwaukee, Boston, Cambridge, and Maine.
But that's got nothing to do with my claim: he's a stupidss abusive bigot and his behavior supports it.
I don't give a fuck what he says to defend himself.
As for what will happen henceforth, I'm going to hope it doesn't end quite as you put it. But I'm not naive.
NMP1
Craig, the cop is an asshole. And I would bet he is a bigot, but in a court of law or in this case the court of public opinion he's a victim of reverse racism. We know there us no such thing, but white folks believe it. That narrative unfortunately has now cemented. And the ones who will pay the price are brothas who don't have Dr. Gates' connections and resources.
I don't think this article was well written but I believe it states things in a way that isn't recognized honestly and think it addresses some of what NMP calls out.. (excerpts)
Angelar
"THERE is a war going on in America right now, and they are not taking any prisoners. It is a race war, but you would not know it.
Everyone involved couches their comments in clever, carefully disguised language that only the combatants know. Most of the incoming artillery is directed at President Barack Obama, the first African American to assume that high office. It is not about scoring points in the short run, although that would be nice.
No, those pushing the racial warfare have a far loftier goal in mind—rallying enough whites to believe that Obama is a lousy president because he is black, and almost certainly against the American way of life including gun ownership and freedom of speech."
Plantsmantx
...and saying nothing about what happened to Gates, or even excoriating him for "sassing back" a white cop...would have resulted in poor black and brown men not having to face racial profiling any more?
NMP1
We had an opportunity to make it a priority for the the Obama justice department. Trust, you will never hear racial profiling publicly addressed by anyone in this administration again.
spirit_55z
"Crowley is a stupid ass, abusive, bigot."
That's IT right there.
jelana
Agree with most of what you say. The irony of it is that it was Crowley's police report which made it racial with his claim of two black men with backpacks breaking into a home. This is what was reported on the news media. Now we know he lied.
NMP1
Having worked with DC's public defender service, I know what pathological liars police are, including Black cops who ironically are the ones patrolling poor minority communities and are as equally guilty of racial profiling as white cops. When I read Crowley's statement, I knew immediately a Black cop helped him write that shit, specifically the "I'll talk to your momma" bs. I believed Crowley, post arrest, feared he would not have the support of brass and wrote that report, with the help of a Black cop, in a way to justify his actions.
Today wasn't that bad once I got to the questions, there was one where I straight BSed my way through it, but I'm sure I made up the points on another one.
Tomorrow= 6 hours of multiple choice MBE questions ~sigh~
becca77
good luck...and we will just speak it and make it so...you passed!
Sepia
Think Positively! Good luck!
rikyrah
good luck
lamh32
Good luck.
Question for ya. Is there a discipline in law school that focuses on Health Care? I'm bandying about alot of different interest to settle on when I finish taking some Grad school classes, and Law School was something I was gonna look into. But, I am primarily interested in Health & Science, so I wasn't sure if there is a law School discipline for those subjects.
I'm pretty sure there's at least a CLASS on it or something like that (I didn't take any, I'll have to ask around). It probably depends on your school, but at my school that wasn't one of the concentrations.
MsKitty
Gotta get over the hump...
You'll get thru it okay, you have a lot of positive vibes coming your way.
Oops, that should be 1.5 days to go, can you tell my brain is fried? LOL
Val
You can do it Muzikal.
morphus
You can do it!!
sagittarius
Bar Exam Update: 1 day down 2.5 to go. . .
"Be water, my friend" -- Bruce Lee
Justice58
Yay, Muzikal!
You can do it!
Sending good vibes your way.
The_A
yeah! Go Muzikal203!! You know you can do this!
relax, relate release tonight so you can
do the dang thang again tomorrow!!!!
whiterosebuddy
Ten Dumbest Arguments Against Healthcare Reform:
ONE
This health reform is moving too fast. We've heard from lots of Republicans -- and a few conservative Democrats -- that the best thing to do is just take our time, lest we be too hasty about fixing our broken system. But there's a simple question I haven't heard asked: Why?
It isn't as though these GOP members of Congress have been pulling one all-nighter after another hammering out details of reform, and they just need a couple more weeks to get all their work done. Instead, the people making this argument are for the most part reform's bitterest opponents, who have no goal other than to kill the effort.
TWO
What we really need is a "bipartisan" health-reform bill -- and if Democrats act properly, they could get one. The myth that "bipartisan" legislation works better than partisan legislation is widespread, but virtually no real evidence supports it. For every successful program passed with support from both parties, you can find another one that failed. There are also plenty of popular programs that enjoyed the support of only one side. Republicans aren't afraid to attack Medicare because some party members voted for it in 1965; they're afraid to attack Medicare because it has been hugely successful at achieving its goal of providing quality, affordable health care to seniors. The future popularity of the current health-care reform will be a function of whether the program works, not how many Republicans voted for it.
More important, Republicans are not going to vote for this health-care reform, no matter what the final bill looks like. Chances are it will get zero Republican votes in the House and maybe two Republican votes in the Senate, tops. Anyone who thinks more optimistically has been partaking of too many free samples from pharmaceutical lobbyists.
THREE
If this health reform passes, some bureaucrat might be able to dictate what care you can get, standing between you and your doctor. This may well be the most widespread and pernicious of all the dumb arguments against health-care reform. It certainly has some intuitive appeal, as long as you don't think about it for more than three or four seconds. Who wants some snotty bureaucrat telling my doctor what to do? That would be awful!
So true -- you'd never want a government bureaucrat getting between you and your doctor. Much better to have your care controlled by an entire team of insurance-company bureaucrats, whose bonuses and promotions depend on denying your claims and limiting your care. That is, if you have a plan in the first case, what with their denial of your pre-existing conditions and their attempts to kick you off your policy if you actually get sick. That's so much better than letting some government bureaucrat get involved.
FOUR
Reform is all well and good, but we need to make sure it doesn't increase the deficit. This is the argument made most notably by the "Blue Dog" conservative Democrats, and it should be called what it is: a charade. The Blue Dogs claim to be deeply concerned about fiscal responsibility, but the truth is that they are motivated almost entirely by ideology. Nothing wrong with that, but don't try to tell us their only concern is deficits. Were that the case, they would be pushing not just for a public option to be part of the bill but for it to be open to every American citizen or company that wants it, because that would save the most money. But of course, they aren't, because the public option is "big government," and they don't like that. And if they were only concerned about fiscal responsibility, they would have opposed the Bush tax cuts, supported tax increases to pay for the Iraq War, or opposed the war and its $2 trillion price tag entirely. But of course they didn't. What they oppose is progressive legislation that provides benefits to regular Americans.
FIVE
Reform might make me lose my current health coverage. Here is a list of some things that could make you completely lose your current health coverage: Losing your job. Leaving your job for a different one. Poor earnings for your employer, which makes them decide to cut benefits. Trying to start your own small business. Getting a serious illness.
You want to meet people who have absolutely no need to worry about losing their coverage? Talk to a senior on Medicare, or a veteran who gets his care from the V.A. Those rotten government programs don't kick people off.
Again it is just the failure of having a war room. Refuting things on blogs speaks to too few people.
djchefron
One-For over 60 years we have been trying to get a National Health Plan Two-Democrats won because rethugs are idiots and the American people haven spoken Three-Bureaucrats already ration your health care.They are known as the insurance industry whose only goal is their bottom line. Four-These same scalawags had no problem with the deficit when it came to tax cuts for the rich and a war that according to the Nuremberg trials is a crime against humanity. Five-Get sick and see how much your insurance is worth.
morphus
Amen
lamh32
Here's a good reason to buy an IPOD and never listen to the radio again.
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is still keeping mum about her future plans, but there's one much-discussed option that's open to her, and her team is reportedly looking into it.
Inside Radio reports that "Palin representatives have been quietly testing the waters to see how much interest radio syndicators have for her," though it adds that they're "not exactly shopping" her. (Hat-tip to GOP 12.)
Assuming Palin wants a future in national politics -- by no means a solid assumption, though she has appeared to be leaning that way -- a radio show could be a mixed blessing. It would keep her in touch with a devoted base, and keep her name in the news. But there's a lot of airtime to fill in a regular radio show, and a lot of ad-libbing: That could end up being a godsend for opposition researchers.
rikyrah
could you imagine listening to THAT VOICE day after day?
msmartin
Only if I were being tortured to gain some top-secret classified information. In that case, I would have to give it up.
lamh32
Girl, HELL TO THE NAW!!!!!
I rarely listen to the radio anymore. Only when I'm friving going to and from work. Morning I radio hop between TJMS, Kidd Kraddick, Rickey Smiley, and 2 other "local" stations here in Dallas. Afternoons is Michael Baisden, and this local sports show, that somehow has me hooked even though I don't really watch any organized sporting events.
I don't own a radio (only a clock alarm/radio), so at home if I listen to music, it's usually on my IPOD or videos on VH1Soul.
Welllll ..... there went the strawberry lemonade.....
zackboston
random question for you all about teen fashion. . .does anyone know about these buddy holly-like thick black oversized frames without lenses that teens are starting to wear?
one of our more imaginative youth teachers (afro caribbean) has been sporting a pair for over a month (along with an old cassette tape that he has put eye screws in and wears like a "bling" necklace). he told me "it's my style." I thought it was rather random until today, when two other young black teens came in to use the computer center wearing the glasses as well.
Sometimes the glasses are solid black. Sometimes they have this ivory ridged band across the nosepiece. But NO lenses, not even clear ones. Can anyone enlighten me about this trend? Have you seen any other youth wearing them or know how they got to be a fashion. One of my staff thought it might be a throwback to 80s hip hop. . . I am curious about them. . .
caligirl
sounds nuts. must be a regional thing. haven't seen it here in so. cal.
The_A
Its geek chic
a subtrend that has been working like fetch to go mainstream for a few years now
If I remember correctly JayZ even hit those rims a while back.
• Above all others, the real celebrity here has been Rush Limbaugh. He's done this kind of thing before -- remember the "Barack, The Magic Negro" song? But in the wake of the Gates incident, he's managed to become even more hard-edged about it. "Here you have a black president trying to destroy a white policeman," Limbaugh declared this past Friday. Yesterday, he shared a dream he's had about the dangers to capitalism: "I had a dream that I was a slave building a sphinx in a desert that looked like Obama." And he joked that food-safety advocates will go after all the unhealthy foods people like to eat, one by one -- but they'll have to wait until Obama is out of office to ban Oreos.
• Glenn Beck said this today on Fox News: "This president, I think, has exposed himself as a guy, over and over and over again, who has a deep-seated hatred for white people, or the white culture. I don't what it is. You can't sit in a pew with Jeremiah Wright for 20 years and not hear some of that stuff, and not have it wash over."
• During his new crusade of Birtherism, Lou Dobbs suggested on his radio show this past Wednesday, right before the Gates flare-up, that Obama could be an illegal immigrant, tying this into his usual preoccupation. "I'm starting to think we have a document issue," Dobbs said. "You suppose he's un-- no, I won't even use the word 'undocumented,' it wouldn't be right."
• As we reported last week, a high-profile conservative activist against Obama on health care was circulating an e-mail that photoshopped Obama's face onto a witch-doctor's body. This e-mail had been circulating before the Gates incident, but still fits into the overall environment of Obama's ratings having started to flag.
Town
So how is it they can listen to Pat Buchanan for 20 years and not have it wash over?
Tiah
I'm not shocked at all by there behavior...It's the Republican way!!!!
what do you think it means? don't know about you but i don't befriend just anyone who wants to add me as a friend on FB. and does the head of the rnc really need to establish any kind of connection to a woman who has called for armed rebellion?
but you already knew the answer to that didn't you?
Don't you think he should considering this woman is also the lawyer for the reservist who sued Obama because he didn't want to go to Afghanistan?
The difference between you and Steele is that you are a private citizen who doesn't have to answer to the Republican Committee. No one is going to ask you to explain your FB contact list, but they just might ask Steele too. Remember the chick who was running for the headship of the Young Republicans?
He's got a lot of the Tea Party Patriots as friends as well, but you don't hear anyone talking about that.
Up until the whole Cook incident, no one really knew who this lady was. Now that it's established she's a Birther, it's a big deal that her/Steele are friends on FB.
Created controversy...again.
Yeah...the one who said some stupid stuff on her wall?
Town
But I thought the Tea Party people were "non-racist?" So why would it be a problem for Steele to have them as friends?
birther-ness is a whole new plateau of crazy compared to the tea party stuff. whether there will be an actual controversy remains to be seen. but the republicans are getting hammered concerning it and for someone who craves approval as much as steele does, it doesn't do him well to be linked with people who are claiming the president's illegitimacy.
these birthers are like the drunk pest at the club: you can't be the least bit nice to them, otherwise they'll never leave you alone and start claiming you're their man.
danadevin74
don't know how stupid they look just keep hanging around hoping you will change your mind and invite them to your house LOL
i wonder what M.C Steele's wife thinks? it's really embarassing but you have to give him credit he's hanging in there
Val
I just hope he doesn't have school aged children. You know they are getting beat down on the regular.
This morning on Fox and Friends, Fox host Glenn Beck accused President Obama of being "a racist."
The group was discussing the recent Gates controversy, and Beck exclaimed that Obama has "over and over again" exposed himself as "a guy who has a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture. I don't know what it is..."
When Fox's Brian Kilmeadeon pointed out that many people in Obama's administration are white, so "you can't say he doesn't like white people," Beck pressed on. "I'm not saying he doesn't like white people, I'm saying he has a problem," Beck said. "This guy is, I believe, a racist."
Geez! Can Beck get anymore stupid? I mean really!
Town
Consider the source: this is the same guy who claimed he can't be friends with black people because when he says racist stuff they'll get mad at him and he just doesn't want to deal with that headache.
State officials in Hawaii on Monday said they have once again checked and confirmed that President Barack Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen, and therefore meets a key constitutional requirement for being president.
They hoped to stem a recent surge in the number of inquiries about Obama's birthplace.
"I ... have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen," Health Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino said in a brief statement. "I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago..."
Town
Well you know that Chiyome is a foreigner name and all them foreigners stick together. Why can't a REAL American verify Obama is a citizen?
Another metaphysical possibility demonstrating that Obama is not a citizen is Norse Mythology. Prominent in Norse myth is the God Loki, who is a trickster god associated with fire and magic. Loki, like other gods, has enormous power over the universe. Indeed, in the Marvel Comics saga Ultimates 2, it was revealed that Loki has the power to shuffle the very fabric of space and time itself, making things disappear from perception. Loki used these powers in the Ultimates 2 saga to ensure that Thor was captured and imprisoned so that he could not interfere with Loki’s conquest of Asgard.
Clearly, Loki could have used his powers to change the fabric of space-time in order to make it appear that Obama was born in Hawaii when he, in fact, wasn’t. But why would Loki do such a thing? Simple. Loki is fated, according to Norse myth, to bring about Ragnarok–the end of the world. However, it is clear from the sagas that Ragnarok must be preceded by Fimbulvetr, the winter of winters. Fimbulvetr is described as being three years of winter with no summer in between.
morphus
Somebody got too much time on their hands. Norse? Loki?
Justice58
Geez, people!
Justice58
Here We Go Again, Y'all!
And the racism continues: Grand Prairie officers forced to take leave over racist emails
GRAND PRAIRIE — Four Grand Prairie police officers and a dispatcher are on paid administrative leave after a racist e-mail about President Barack Obama was circulated, and the local NAACP chapter is asking whether a recent round of diversity training was for naught.
The e-mail came from outside the department, but the officers opened and/or forwarded it, said Detective John Brimmer, a Grand Prairie police spokesman.
The department was "forced to go through diversity training two years ago, and this is what we get," Preston Dixon, vice president of the Grand Prairie chapter of the NAACP, said at a news conference Wednesday.
"Since they’ve gone through diversity training, then they knew better and should be fired," he said. Dixon’s wife, a Police Department employee, has filed an unrelated discrimination suit against the department.
Police did not release the e-mail. "These are some good officers who have worked at the department for a long time that made a serious lapse in judgment," Brimmer said. "You can’t do much about an unsolicited e-mail, but what you do after you open it is on you."
The officers appear to have violated a department policy that forbids employees from using city-owned computers for personal business, Brimmer said.
They should release the email so we know what was being passed around. The fact that these bozos were suspended means that it had to be pretty horrible.
morphus
Its always a "good" officer/person/doctor/councilman found forwarding racists email.
morphus
For the past week, city councilors say they have been kept in the dark about the details of the Henry Louis Gates, Jr. case and decisions City Manager Bob Healy has made on behalf of Cambridge. On Monday night, a handful of councilors took Healy and Cambridge Police Commissioner Robert Haas to task for not keeping them informed about past press conferences and in the loop about the decision to form a committee to investigate the city’s police department.
Councilors also said they were not given the recently released tapes of the 911 call and radio transmissions made during the July 16 incident. The tapes were made public to the media Monday afternoon after a press conference.
“I am concerned that I had to learn about the city’s steps through the media,” said Councilor Marjorie Decker. “It leaves us out in the dark in a way that is unacceptable and inappropriate. The city council has not been talking because we have not been properly briefed.”
Healy, in his defense, said this past week has been “hellacious” for the city, and it was not his intent to offend councilors by not keeping them informed.
“The police commissioner and I have been working nonstop for the greater good of this city,” he said. “If I did not serve some city councilors in a way that they thought I should, then I apologize… I have been silent this whole week in the media. It was time that Bob Healy [said] something.”
Gates was arrested on July 16 after a woman reported she saw a suspicious male trying to get his way into a Ware Street home. It turns out the home belonged to Gates, who had just returned to Cambridge from a trip to China. Gates was arrested and charged with disorderly conduct by Police Sgt. James Crowley, who said Gates was yelling and making a scene. The charges were dismissed last Tuesday.
The decision to drop the disorderly conduct charge against Gates and halt any prosecution against the Harvard professor was made after a discussion with Haas, District Attorney Gerry Leone, and Walter Prince, an attorney representing Gates at the time. It was made for the “global good,” according to Healy.
“It was in the best interest of the city and all parties involved,” Healy said Monday night. “It was an attempt to put the matter behind us.”
Councilors argued that if they were kept on the same page with Healy, they would have been able to address the hundreds of e-mails from concerned citizens sent to them over the past week more properly.
“We should have been notified,” Councilor Tim Toomey. “I think we have done a disservice to the citizens.”
Even Mayor Denise Simmons wasn’t notified about this Monday’s press conference at the Cambridge Police station until less than an hour before it occurred, Councilor Ken Reeves said.
Seems like the police dept is marching to its own tune.
The_A
in the key of G
O-P
Val
watchg the whitehouse live streaming on Strategic & Economic Dialogue with Chinese Delegations
Can anyone explain why the Chinese Delegates kept repeating how important the media was?
Val
lol have no idea.
lamh32
Everyone keeps saying that Lou Dobbs is married to a Hispanic woman, where the hell is she. Is this an urban legend? Is he keeping the poor woman locked up ala "Misery"? WTH!
Letter in full: As America’s “Most Trusted Name in News,” CNN has a responsibility to its viewers to provide commentary and analysis that is substantive and accurate. However, those promoting conspiracy theories about President Obama’s citizenship, the threat of leprosy from immigrants and other falsehoods should be held accountable for spreading misinformation.
America’s Voice is writing you today to express our urgent concern about the quality of reporting on Lou Dobbs Tonight. Anchor Lou Dobbs enjoys regular opportunities to make inaccurate comments on matters of immigration and national origin, without apparent oversight by CNN. Most recently, Dobbs has repeatedly claimed on both his television and radio shows that President Obama has failed to address the claims of “birther” conspiracy theorists. He has said that Obama needs to “produce a birth certificate” and that the birth certificate the president posted online more than a year ago has “some issues.” He never has retracted the outrageous and inaccurate claim, peddled by a known white nationalist, that immigrants are responsible for 7,000 cases of leprosy in the U.S. each year.
CNN should hold their anchors, news producers and researchers to a very high standard of accuracy. By allowing Mr. Dobbs to operate with impunity and with little regard for journalistic standards, CNN is tarnishing its brand as the “Most Trusted Name in News.”
morphus
The letters must keep coming until he is gone.
Justice58
Lou has to go! He has sit in that chair & spewed his hatred enough. Time to go!
morphus
Between him and the other nuts out there, they create a hate filled echo chamber.
Black Men and Crime, What's The Story: Each day, the New York Police Department announces major crimes, including most homicides, in the five boroughs. If we believe these statistics to be true, in the majority of the crime committed in New York City the perpetrator is of color. It is by now common knowledge that POC are for over represented in the prison population relative to the percentage of the population that they make up. Whites are quick to point to statistics like above to justify racial profiling in police work; to them it only seems common sense to target POC because statistically they/we are the criminals.
morphus
The recent outrage in response to the Cambridge Police Department’s arrest of prominent Harvard Professor Henry Louis “Skip” Gates was not the first time that the Cambridge Police Department was nationally embarrassed amidst a racial incident.
Ten years ago, the Cambridge Police commissioner and mayor issued a public apology after a story by this reporter exposed racially offensive teachings and language by Cambridge police officers during an interview about the use of pepper spray.
Though a decade has passed, last week’s incident in which Gates was arrested for disorderly conduct in his own home was a stark reminder of the ugliness of racial stereotyping and profiling in Cambridge and across the country. It also reminded America of the longevity of friction between police and people of color.
“It’s a national problem and we haven’t been able to really control it in a rational way,” says Harvard Law Professor Charles Ogletree in an NNPA interview. Ogletree, the lawyer for Gates, says he is glad the incident has sparked a national discussion that began in Cambridge but could have far-reaching and long-term ramifications.
<snip>
The incident brought back memories.
A headline on the website of this week’s Cambridge Chronicle reminds, “Not the first time Cambridge Police Department faced with race allegations.”
It was early August 1999. A group of White Cambridge police officers – including a use of force trainer - sat around a desk inside the police department talking to this reporter.
They were confident and boisterous in the taped interview as they told how their police academy trained their officers that Mexicans and other people who may have grown up eating or working with a lot of cayenne peppers were immune to the affects of pepper spray.
''The people that it doesn't affect are people who have consumed cayenne peppers from the time they are small children, and this generally breaks into ethnic categories,” Officer Frank Gutoski, a trainer in the academy, told this reporter, who at that time was working a summer job for the Cambridge Chronicle.
“Every year, I teach this,” Gutoski was quoted in the Aug. 19, 1999 story headlined, “Pepper Spray Theory Stings Some Minorities.”
He named Mexican-Americans, Pakistani Indian and Cajuns as examples of people who are more likely tolerant to the chemical-like spray that causes intense burning in the eyes and face and closing of air passages. Two other officers in the room excitedly agreed during the openly taped interview. Emergency room doctors gasped at the police theory: ''This is absolutely not true,'' said Dr. Michael Burns, emergency medicine attending physician and medical toxicologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. ''Most police have no medical background and there is absolutely no scientific evidence whatsoever to support this.''
The story was picked up by news mediums around the country, including the Boston Globe, which reported that “Many doctors and law enforcement specialists say it sounds crazy.”
Amidst community outrage and embarrassment, Cambridge police and city leaders immediately issued a public apology for the racially offensive and medically unfounded statements.
''It is unfortunate that these comments were made,” said then Cambridge Police Commissioner Ronnie Watson. ''There is no empirical or scientific evidence to support these statements.”
Then Mayor Francis H. Duehay said, ''It is inconceivable in this day and age that the training program for police officers in Cambridge would contain information which has no scientific basis and slanders the Latino community … I apologize for the misinformation about pepper spray which has been communicated and for the ethnic slur it contains.''
In the Gates incident, there were no such apologies forthcoming. Police stood firmly behind Crowley who insisted he was correct in his actions despite public outrage.
The Chronicle recounted the 1999 incident after even President Obama weighed in on the Gates arrest. In a nationally televised press conference July 22, Obama said the police department “acted stupidly” in the arrest. But, he later softened the criticism, saying he did not mean to disparage Sgt. Crowley or the department and invited the officer and Gates to the White House for a beer this week.
Ogletree, executive director of Harvard’s Charles Hamilton Institute for Race and Justice, hopes the conversations will go much further than just beers at the White House.
BlackAmericanPrincess
That link isn't working for me for some reason. Can you possibly repost it as I want to send this to everyone I know. Thanks!! :)
It can be dicey after 9/11 for most people, but for immigrants, even completely legal ones, the odds of trouble are higher. The total power the authorities have - especially over Latinos - would give Lou Dobbs a dangerous case of priapism. One simple story:
The son of a decorated Vietnam veteran, Hector Veloz is a U.S. citizen, but in 2007 immigration officials mistook him for an illegal immigrant and locked him in an Arizona prison for 13 months. Veloz had to prove his citizenship from behind bars. An aunt helped him track down his father's birth certificate and his own, his parents' marriage certificate, his father's school, military and Social Security records. After nine months, a judge determined that he was a citizen, but immigration authorities appealed the decision. He was detained for five more months before he found legal help and a judge ordered his case dropped.
Compare this with the plight of Skip Gates and a little perspective emerges. Immigrants or immigrant suspects are at the mercy of anyone with a badge and a gun in America. If immigrants or legal natural-born citizens with the wrong skin color have no money and can't afford a lawyer, they are no match for a bureaucracy like Immigration and Customs Enforcement. And there is no due process:
In immigration detention it falls to the detainees to prove their citizenship. But detainees don't have the constitutional protections, such as the right to legal counsel, that would help them prove their case...
morphus
The actions/raids separating families, the false imprisonment to support the PIC, the federal funding to local law enforcement that support raids/incarceration, detention centers for families, the abandonment of children, all under the name of law is sickening.
It is the U.S. Constitution, and not some competitive agglomeration of communities or constituencies, that makes a citizen the sovereign of his own home and privacy. There is absolutely no legal requirement to be polite in the defense of this right. And such rights cannot be negotiated away over beer.
I think that is true as rikyrah and many stated here, but in an unfair world, the right thing to do depends on many things. ………………………… via DF
oh i see. but that wasn't my intent to equate atheism with drunkeness. i was really describing how hitchens is. he is an atheist, he's a bit of a snob, and he does like to hit the bottle more than few times. that's all.
again, i like the fellow. he's quite a character. anyone who can make bill o'reilly babble and spittle on his own show gets a gold star from me.
RobM
I'm posting Snob's article in it's entirety. This discussion is vital to the community. Once upon a time, not very long ago, my mother had a conversation with a friend about teaching children about sex. My mother had just signed a permission slip for me to watch a video about puberty presented by my health teacher and my mother's friend was shocked Mama Snob had allowed this transgression to take place.
"But if you teach them about it they'll want to do it!" she shrieked to my mother's dismay.
And she wasn't the only parent shrieking.
More after the jump.
I was 12-years-old at the time. In my young life I already knew the difference between a so-called "slut" and a "virgin." Most of my peers cursed like sailors, but largely for show. The boys and girls had been separated on the playground because two boys and a girl decided to play "doctor" on the hooded part of the plaground equipment. Most of my peers had seen all the R-rated movies I wasn't allowed to see (if Disney didn't make it, I didn't watch it in the 80s). And everyone giggled when someone said "sex."
My mother, not wanting me to get my sex-ed from the playground, taught me about puberty and basic sexual function when I was only nine years old. She wasn't exactly worried about me having sex because I knew what a penis was and the proper terms for body parts. She was worried about all the pressure and misinformation floating about among my peers. She wanted to empower me with correct information. This was part of her extensive, sometimes painful plan (for me) to ensure that none of her daughters got pregnant out of wedlock.
The plan must have worked pretty well. Though all the Snob sisters are grown and single-to-mingle, none of us have kids. (We're ages 35, 31 and 28 respectively.) All of us have information though. Enough information that we'd honestly have no excuses if we got knocked up. It's not like by age 15 we didn't have an armada of facts and figures telling us how to say no and how to protect ourselves. Not to mention a mother who had "a plan" that worked all too well.
(That plan included no R-rated movies until the oldest sister was old enough to chaperone us to them. A limited amount of television. An overload of books. Not being allowed to go to sleep overs and not being allowed to date until we were 18 and even then she had to know both the boy and his parents. This was all topped of with a constant push of how we were all going to college and pregnancy could really mess that up.)
But too many people didn't have a plan. And that's why my friend's mother was of the mindset that somehow watching a video about puberty would harm her son. And it shouldn't shock anyone that her son wound up impregnating another girl when he was a teen. After all, they never talked about sex, but sex was everywhere to be found. On TV. On the radio. Amongst our peers. Sex was everywhere and unavoidable.
Black children start sexual activity on average earlier than other children. In a study of inner city teens it was found that black girls average age of first sexual intercourse is around 13. The national average is 17. Black girls also have a higher rate of STDs than their counterparts. A recent study found that half of black teens between the ages of 14 to 19 were infected with some form of STD. For white teenagers it's 20 percent.
I believe these figures are so high due to an overall lack of sexual health education in the black community, especially among our youth, but it crosses over into adults as well who were also never educated properly.
There has always been sex, but as far as I can tell, there has never been a true "sexual revolution" in thinking among many blacks. There is a twoness of either you're chaste and virginal or you're promiscuious with a voracious sexual appetite and there is no inbetween. You could blame it on the music, but black music going back to blues has always had an overtly sexual under and overtone to it. There's always been a level of raunch whether we're talking about bump n' grind, R. Kelly style, or bump n' grind, old dirty bluesman style. Whether we're having "Birthday Sex" or "Strokin'" with Clarence Carter.
There is a celebration of the most lascivious in that can be seen gyrating in rap videos or in the braggadocio of a Jay Z lyric. Sex often appears apropos of nothing in our pop art as if we've never escaped the Mandigo/Big Black Buck/Hottentot Venus/Black Wench stereotypes we were given after we were used to "breed" and make more slaves as part of the "Peculiar Institution."
Living on a diet of sexual laden music and television can take a toll on the psyche.
(H)eavy exposure to sexual content on television related strongly to teens’ initiation of intercourse or their progression to more advanced sexual activities (such as “making out” or oral sex) apart from intercourse in the following year. Youths who viewed the greatest amounts of sexual content were two times more likely than those who viewed the smallest amount to initiate sexual intercourse during the following year (see figure) or to progress to more-advanced levels of other sexual activity. In effect, youths who watched the most sexual content “acted older”: a 12-year-old at the highest levels of exposure behaved like a 14- or 15-year-old at the lowest levels.
But realistically, our children aren't having an academic discussion, processing the images they see and aligning them with history. They're just consuming them as pro-sex endorsements, symbols of adulthood and liberation, devoid of responsibility and consequences. And while music and media do play a role in influencing views of sex on impressionable youth, the real motivator has always been other youth.
In a study presented at a meeting of the American Public Health Association (APHA), researchers at the University of Kentucky followed 950 teenagers at 17 high schools in Kentucky and Ohio from 9th to 11th grades. They found evidence that teens who have intercourse tend to think their friends are too, even if they're not. "You're 2.5 times more likely to have sex by the 9th grade if you think your friends are having sex -- whether or not they really are," says Katharine Atwood, assistant professor at the Kentucky School of Public Health. Plus, teens tended to overestimate how many of their friends were sexually active. Only 33 percent of kids in the study had had sex by the 9th grade, but 31 percent said that most or all of their friends had had sex. "If you can persuade them that fewer are having sex than they think," she says, "that can have a significant impact on their behavior." (Psychology Today)
There is a confusing crudeness in how many blacks view sexuality. It's depicted as bad on one hand, and you have parents afraid of engaging in talks about sex with their children as if their off-spring lived in a bubble. On the other, you have the former BET show "Uncut" that played what passed for softcore porn on cable television in long-video form. You have rapper Snoop Dogg selling commercially friendly products to youth and you have the same Snoop Dogg who once hosted a porno. We seem to have the worst of America's love-hate relationship with sex in the black community where you can proudly see it all hang out, while another side desperately tries to tuck it back in and no one ever cracks opens a book and learns how their bodies are supposed to work in the first place.
There's no sexual revolution in black America, just sex. Confused, fun, dangerous, illicit, guilt-filled sex. Very few people are acting from a place of maturity and confidence, not in themselves or their sexuality. We're living in a place where it's become acceptable to have a kid or several out of wedlock and act like it's impossible to make it to 30 without this happening. We're silent about the AIDS epidemic disproportionately ravaging black women. No one wants to talk about sex, but everyone seems to want to do it, desperately, without protection and in seductive ignorance of the cruel realties of their undertakings.
I was in the mall once and a man, about my age, began to flirt with me and asked me if I had any kids. I said no and he was taken aback. He wondered if I liked kids. Then he wondered how I'd managed to make it to 31 and not get pregnant. I was taken aback and looked at him and said, point black, "Um ... it was pretty easy. Birth control. Don't have sex. Condoms."
He smirked and conceded that I had a point. Of course, he had kids and they had seemed unavoidable for him. I'm sure they were when you choose the short-lived joy of unprotected sex over a revolution of thought
Karmi - you should really consider taking advantage of your health insurance and go get yourself some help. I clicked on your link and I felt compelled to help you out.
Soylent Green is a 1973 dystopian science fiction movie depicting a future in which overpopulation leads to depleted resources, which in turn leads to widespread unemployment and poverty. Real fruit, vegetables, and meat are rare, commodities are expensive, and much of the population survives on processed food rations, including "soylent green" wafers.
Plot Set in the year 2022, Soylent Green depicts a dystopian future in which the population has grown to forty million in New York City alone. Most housing is dilapidated and overcrowded, and the impoverished homeless fill the streets and line the fire escapes and stairways of buildings. Food as we know it today–including fruit, vegetables, and meat–is a rare and expensive commodity. Half of the world's population survives on processed rations produced by the massive Soylent Corporation (Portmanteau from soy(bean) + lent(il)), including Soylent Red and Soylent Yellow, which are advertised as "high-energy vegetable concentrates". The newest product is Soylent Green - a small green wafer which is advertised as being produced from "high-energy plankton". It is much more nutritious and palatable than the red and yellow varieties, but it is—like most other food—in short supply, which often leads to riots.
Processed "Soylent Green" ration wafersRobert Thorn (Charlton Heston) is a New York City police detective who lives in a dilapidated, cramped one-room apartment with his aged partner Sol Roth (Edward G. Robinson). Roth is a former professor who searches through the now-disordered remnants of written records and books to help Thorn's investigations. Roth and his like are known as "books". He tells Thorn about the times before the ecological disaster and population crisis, when real food was plentiful, although Thorn is generally not interested in the "stories".
Thorn is assigned to investigate the murder of William R. Simonson (Joseph Cotten). When he goes to the crime scene, he finds Simonson lying in a pool of blood from being struck multiple times in the back of the head. Instead of looking for clues, the poorly-paid detective helps himself to some of the wealthy man's food, liquor, soap, and books. He also questions Shirl (Leigh Taylor-Young), an attractive 24-year old prostitute (euphemistically known as "furniture") who comes with the luxury apartment, and Simonson's bodyguard, Tab Fielding (Chuck Connors), who claims that he was told to escort Shirl on a shopping trip when the attack took place.
Returning to his apartment, he gives Roth two large books he took from Simonson's apartment, the two-volume Soylent Oceanographic Survey Report, 2015 to 2019. Thorn returns to work and talks to the Chief of Detectives, telling him that he suspects it may have been an assassination, since nothing was stolen from the apartment and the murder seemed professional. He finds it odd that the luxury apartment's sophisticated alarm and monitoring electronics happened to be inoperative on the night of the murder, and his bodyguard just happened to be out of the apartment at the time. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soylent_Green
Now what does this have to do with the Obama administration and healthcare?
Absolutely nothing. . . .get some help Karmi. Really.
Sounds like you are the one in need of help. Soylent Green was about the Government controlling and rationing food. ObamaCare is about the Government controlling and rationing our healthcare…so far, i.e. so far there is nothing in it about turning humans into food. If you are old, Obama says you should take pain pills instead of having expensive surgical procedures, since you will be dead soon anyway. If you are fat, then you get no healthcare...perhaps you are too skinny or too tall or too short, etc. The Government makes the choice for you...
Val
aaahhh Karmi - I am going to pretend you didn't just write that foolishness about the President, old people and pain pills. Instead I am going to focus on the plot in the movie you cited. The government didnt control the food. They helped to ration it because why Karmi -- based on the SCI-FI MOVIE (you know make believe, pretend, not real) based on the movie OVERPOPULATION led to depleted resources, which in turn leads to widespread unemployment and poverty. Real fruit, vegetables, and meat are rare, commodities are expensive, and much of the population SURVIVES on what? Karmi. . . follow the script. . . they survived on on processed food rations, including "soylent green" wafers.
P.S. if you are going to link us to something that could be considered "not quite sane" . . . you may want to read the entire thing.
Perhaps it is best that Obama supporters keep their heads in the sand...
Val
Karmi - you are the one using science fiction movies as if it is fact and it isn't about being an Obama supporter. It is about what is best for the American people.
We need healthcare and a lot of people don't have it or can't afford it. So we need all options on the table so folks can choose and not go bankrupt if they or a family member gets sick.
Val
hmmmm now where did I put that magic wand . . . .
MsKitty
"Soylent green is people!"
(sorry, couldn't help myself LOL)
whiterosebuddy
Yes, they were eating humans.
Val
gurrrllll These people done lost their minds. lolol
morphus
The concept of using biometric data, such as fingerprints and retina scans, to verify if employees are eligible to work in the United States is fueling fresh debate.
The concept of using biometric data, such as fingerprints and retina scans, to verify if employees are eligible to work in the United States is fueling fresh debate among employment and immigration attorneys.
Lawyers are expressing both skepticism and criticism about the concept, which was formally announced during a congressional hearing last week.
Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., who chairs the Senate Immigration Subcommittee, said that he would like to pursue a biometric workplace verification tool that would replace or enhance the current E-Verify system, the online system that lets employers check the eligibility status of workers. Schumer, who believes E-Verify doesn't work and plans to file a biometrics bill in the fall, stated at Tuesday's hearing: "The only way to stop illegal immigration is to stop employers from hiring illegal immigrants. We must...adopt a system that relies upon objective, rather than subjective, criteria to prove identity and legal status. The system must be non-forgeable and airtight."
Biometrics, however, may not be the solution, countered lawyers and legal experts.
First, its just the immigrants, then it will be a requirement for everyone.
Val
there is some level of this going on right now. hubby is a programmer and he works on said project. You can find some of these equipment at airports and some of the borders. anyway can't say much else but the use of biometrics has been expanding over the last few years.
And you are right . . . I too suspect if they get this thing passed for immigrants then it will eventually be a requirement for everyone or at least some groups. Shoot. . .they may market it as a way to identify you child just in case your chld gets lost etc. Some groups have been trying to get DNAs on file for a while now and this is just another way to do it.
Morphus, I am with you I don't like it either.
morphus
The "immigrant concern" is a fallback position. Push for products targeting children, elderly, and workers seem to be failing. Our "lab rats", the military, have been under some form of biometrics for awhile. Several state legislatures have picked up on the drift of the technology and have passed legislation outright rejecting biometric use in the workplace. Unfortunately, DNA collection beginning at birth is on the lose and there is little hope that the growth of federally funded DNA banks across the country will retreat.
morphus
Lawyers who have a hard time keeping a poker face when they don't like a judge's ruling can take heart in a decision issued last week by the Georgia Court of Appeals.
A three-judge panel has tossed a ruling by a veteran Henry County Juvenile Court judge that found a lawyer in contempt for making what the judge called a "sarcastic" face at him. Chief Judge A.J. "Buddy" Welch Jr. had ordered Ella A. S. Hughes to jail for the offense, but on Tuesday an appeals panel reversed, in part on the grounds that the judge didn't give the lawyer an opportunity to fight a possible contempt finding.
When Welch had Hughes taken into custody last year, Hughes was in court representing a mother, Robyn Pressley Harris, facing jail time for her own contempt citation arising out of a deprivation case. Hughes, an Atlanta-area solo practitioner, had been a member of the Georgia Bar for less than a year. Welch, a former president of the Council of Superior Court Judges of Georgia, has been a juvenile court judge for more than three decades and is a senior partner at Smith, Welch & Brittain.
According to a separate Court of Appeals opinion issued Thursday in Harris' case, at the July 10, 2008, hearing, Welch expressed dissatisfaction with the level of cooperation Harris had provided the state Division of Family and Children Services. When Harris said she didn't have with her a contact number for the father of one of her children, Welch promptly found Harris in contempt and ordered her taken into custody for 20 days, saying she could get out of jail if she provided all of the requested information.
that judge should be removed for crimes against reason...
Val
Democrats have huge day with Latinos
Republicans’ dilemma in connecting with the growing Hispanic electorate will be on vivid display Tuesday: GOP members of the Senate Judiciary Committee will vote overwhelmingly against confirming Sonia Sotomayor, the first Latino nominee to the Supreme Court. And the Democratic Party chairman will address the nation’s largest Latino political group — partly in Spanish. No national GOP official is speaking.
That was the one right there! "GIVE US FREE!!!!!!!!"
LMAO!
lamh32
Hey D,
Hope ya'll in VA has a better "minority" outreach program than the national GOP. They really shoulda sent someone, but it's hard to send someone to speak at an organization your own party (who clamimed la Raza was a "racist" group") used to disparage the first Latino Supreme Court Justice, now can ya? Oh, BTW, the Dem Nat'l Chair will be there!
This one won’t help the GOP’s minority outreach efforts.
The National Council of La Raza, a top Latino civil rights group, is taking a shot at RNC chair Michael Steele and several prominent GOP figures for skipping its ongoing annual conference, saying it raises questions about the GOP’s interest in wooing Latinos.
NCLR spokesperson Marie Watteau confirms to me that Steele, along with three Republican governors, were all invited to its conference, which is concluding today with a big speech by DNC chair Tim Kaine. But Steele and the three governors — Mississippi’s Haley Barbour, Minnesota’s Tim Pawlenty, and Puerto Rico’s Luis Fortuno — all declined the invitations through the RNC, Watteau says.
Watteau adds that GOPers like Arnold Schwarzenegger, John McCain and both George Bushes have attended past conferences.
“You should certainly speak to the Republican Party about why they’re not here,” Watteau told me. “The Latino community is open to hearing from both sides, which is why both parties were invited. The Republican Party not being here may demonstrate a lack of commitment to our community.”
Making the optics of this worse, Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee were expected to vote overwhelmingly today against confirming Sonia Sotomayor as the first Hispanic Supreme Court justice. This, plus Kaine’s speech at the NCLR, have led Politico
If you're going to commit to throwing someone under the bus, you don't go visit them while they're there. Especially when there's a better than even chance that they're going to not listen to you anyway, because of said throwing.
And yes, we're doing pretty well here in VA...because we're not throwing people under the bus, and reaching out more to those who might not like us than those who do.
RonnieB
If I EVER run for political office, I will never allow political strategy to take precedence over respect of someone's community.
President Obama's election prompted African-American men to reflect. So did the recent controversial arrest of Henry Louis Gates, Jr. Author Ta-Nehisi Coates and former Assistant Attorney General Roger Wilkins open the floor to the African-American men in our audience.
One guy who called was something else. He had me stopping to listen.
whiterosebuddy
UM, could you give us a just a lil bit of why you stopped. Might make us listen.
Yeah, kinda ...he was talking about class somewhat and the separation between people because of earning power more than race. He talked about having an education, being employed in a place where the unemployment rate is so high for everyone, especially African Americans, and he also mentioned having been incarcerated.
If I find something compelling, wrb, I stop to listen and with this guy, it was the emotion in his telling. He was emotional; it was emotive.
from 12:00 - 19:00 michael...... I'm not saying I agree with all he was saying, just that I found his spot compelling.
Too many conservative senators like Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) and Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) are to blame for the GOP's downfall, one of their retiring Republican colleagues complained Monday.
"We got too many Jim DeMints and Tom Coburns," Sen. George Voinovich (R-Ohio) told the Columbus Dispatch. "It's the southerners."
Voinovich, a native Clevelander who retires after the 2010 election, continued after the southern elements of the GOP.
"They get on TV and go 'errrr, errrrr,'" he said. "People hear them and say, 'These people, they're southerners. The party's being taken over by southerners. What they hell they got to do with Ohio?'"
ch555x
LOL!!!
Myth
First Hairstylist and First Manicurist doing a wonderful job on First Grandmom!!
Myth
If I EVER see the po-lice bring Conrad Murray, M.D. out in handcuffs ima be too thru! RESPECT this physician...he is not a common criminal. Oh yeah, he still is black though.
This is a personal weblog which does not represent the views of the authors' employers, clients nor vendors.
Ain’t Like All The Rest
Jack and Jill Politics is not affiliated with Jack and Jill of America, Jack and Jill Magazine, "Jack and Jill Went Up the Hill to Fetch a Pail of Water" nor any of the other Jack and Jills out there on the Google. Just so's you know.