Jack & Jill Politics

I fired up my laptop tonight just to come back and see your translation. As always, well done (LOL).

“still create government and community structures that more fully support families of all kinds”

My problem with this is why should our tax dollars and resources go to proping up families where individuals have chosen to live a non-traditional lifestyle? Why must society pay for their errors in judgment? Particularly, when they are so quick to assert that their families are just as able to raise children well and develop their full human potential, when we know the outcomes completely refute that?

Individuals need to be told that their choices are wrong, that their children will suffer and they themselves will likely end up impoverished all because they choose to be a single female head of household. Are there exceptions to this, certainly. But 90% of those families where the single female head of household made this choice aren't. Society is paying for poor individual decision making.

Single mothers can't give their kids the opportunities Barack had because it was an entirely unique non-reproducible situation. Which is generally, the case with single female heads of households, each situation is different, each child is different and what the parent brings to the table in terms of their own individual developed is highly variable.

“still create government and community structures that more fully support families of all kinds”

My problem with this is why should our tax dollars and resources go to proping up families where individuals have chosen to live a non-traditional lifestyle? Why must society pay for their errors in judgment? Particularly, when they are so quick to assert that their families are just as able to raise children well and develop their full human potential, when we know the outcomes completely refute that?

Individuals need to be told that their choices are wrong, that their children will suffer and they themselves will likely end up impoverished all because they choose to be a single female head of household. Are there exceptions to this, certainly. But 90% of families where the single female head of household made this choice aren't. Society is paying for poor individual decision making.

Single mothers can't give their kids the opportunities Barack had because it was an entirely unique non-reproducible situation. Which is generally, the case with single female heads of households, each situation is different, each child is different and what the parent brings to the table in terms of their own individual development is highly variable.

Stanley Dunham was raised in a two parent household and she obviously valued that enough when it came to raising children to marry twice. Many, many, many of the single female heads of household today, in our community were not only not raised in 2 parent households but they see no reason to marry or raise their children in one. It is generational, now. The females are adamant that they not only do not need a husband but that their kids don't need daddies, given that they were raised 'just fine' and they didn't know their fathers either.

It is a socio-pathology that is destroying black children and leaving the children severely disadvantaged. And despite there being an avalanche of data to show how deleterious single parenting is on developing children, folks simply focus on their own narcissitic needs vs. the children.