Comments on: Afternoon Open Thread http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/ A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:52:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Googlehttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/comment-page-1/#comment-617147 Google Wed, 06 Jul 2011 21:14:39 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=11604#comment-617147 <strong>The best website…...</strong>Hey Websmaster , Awesome blog , if you need backlinks to your website I provide upto 10,000 high quality SEO backlinks for only $5. Check it out here :http://bit.ly/msweL2... The best website……

Hey Websmaster , Awesome blog , if you need backlinks to your website I provide upto 10,000 high quality SEO backlinks for only $5. Check it out here :http://bit.ly/msweL2...

]]> By: Acai berry selecthttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/comment-page-1/#comment-599820 Acai berry select Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:58:42 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=11604#comment-599820 <strong>maybe you just copy and paste the youtube video html code to your wordpress blog...</strong>http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/photosmash-galleries/ try this... maybe you just copy and paste the youtube video html code to your wordpress blog…

http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/photosmash-galleries/ try this…

]]> By: Venaprohttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/comment-page-1/#comment-575383 Venapro Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:48:23 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=11604#comment-575383 <strong>Wordpress is great platform for something like that, it's a super easy to install and us for a CMS. You'll be happy with it....</strong>You shouldn't have a problem. It's an editor. It will work. You don't need anything fancy to work with a wordpress theme. Notepad will do.... WordPress is great platform for something like that, it’s a super easy to install and us for a CMS. You’ll be happy with it….

You shouldn’t have a problem. It’s an editor. It will work. You don’t need anything fancy to work with a wordpress theme. Notepad will do….

]]> By: Valhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/comment-page-1/#comment-338577 Val Wed, 27 May 2009 04:41:13 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=11604#comment-338577 lol lol

]]> By: Valhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/comment-page-1/#comment-338576 Val Wed, 27 May 2009 04:34:07 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=11604#comment-338576 raotflmao. well said and all true. hahaha.<br><br>blessings Truth. Enjoy your day! raotflmao. well said and all true. hahaha.

blessings Truth. Enjoy your day!

]]> By: TruthSeekerhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/comment-page-1/#comment-338575 TruthSeeker Wed, 27 May 2009 04:08:57 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=11604#comment-338575 Yeah, they're lying, racist, sexist sacks of shit, and the party that put a black man on the supreme court who had serious allegations of sexual harassment of black women leveled against him...couldn't they find anybody else? ...no one? Yeah, they're lying, racist, sexist sacks of shit, and the party that put a black man on the supreme court who had serious allegations of sexual harassment of black women leveled against him…couldn't they find anybody else? …no one?

]]> By: Valhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/comment-page-1/#comment-338574 Val Wed, 27 May 2009 03:47:30 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=11604#comment-338574 :-) lolol Truthseeker. Why you have me laughing? lol EVERYONE has something valuable to offer. It took me a while and I have to dig deep these days because their principles don't seem to apply to their own platform these days. lol<br><br>The Republican platform is supposed to be based on <a href="http://platform.gop.com/2008Platform.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://platform.gop.com/2008Platform.pdf</a><br>I agree with the concept of Oversight (see page 17)<br>I agree with some of their tax policies (see page 24) Specifically: American families with children are the<br>hardest hit during any economic downturn.<br>Republicans will lower their tax burden by<br>doubling the exemption for dependents.<br>• New technology should not occasion more<br>taxation. We will permanently ban internet<br>access taxes and stop all new cell phone<br>taxes.<br>• For the sake of family farms and small businesses,<br>we will continue our fight against the<br>federal death tax.<br>• The Alternative Minimum Tax, a stealth levy<br>on the middle-class that unduly targets large<br>families, must be repealed.<br>and I agree with some of their Energy policies<br>I agree with some of their education platform (i.e. STEM programs) but I don't agree with school vouchers<br>I agree with some of their Immigration and National Security policies. There's more but you get the gist. <br><br>You didn't ask for this but here is what I don't like: <br>I don't agree with the propensity to fight like children and politicize every little thing.<br>I don't agree with them twisting the facts as it relates to the Democratic party. Very petty can't stand that.<br>I don't agree with ANY of their healthcare policies<br>I don't agree with their plans to handle medicare/medicaid and social security. <br>I don't agree with the way most of these republicans that we see everday on the MSM and listen to on the radio embrace bigotry, race baiting and express the desire to be exclusive to anyone "not like them"<br>I don't like the ease with which they argue just for the sake of arguing even if it is something they agreed with yesterday.<br>I don't like these "talking points' that circulate daily focused on gossiping about the Democratic Party vs. focused on what they are offering.<br>I dont like the fact that they find it easy to lie to the public regardless of the fact that they are completely aware that their comments will be proven as lies as soon as the words leave their lips. <br>I don't like the fact that they simply ignore reality and they are okay with chronically lying "just because"<br>I dont agree with grown men making the decision to say "NO" because they feel like it<br>I don't agree with them putting their egos before the people they are supposed to serve<br>I don't agree with the refusal to participate in discussions with the senate, house, or the president just because they are the minority party and see nothing wrong with pouting, picking up their ball and going home.<br>I don't like the fact that they are quick to kick folks out of their party or bad mouth people just because they disagree with them on a particular issue<br>The list of things I don't like is endless and I won't bore you but you get it the idea. :-) lolol Truthseeker. Why you have me laughing? lol EVERYONE has something valuable to offer. It took me a while and I have to dig deep these days because their principles don't seem to apply to their own platform these days. lol

The Republican platform is supposed to be based on http://platform.gop.com/2008Platform.pdf
I agree with the concept of Oversight (see page 17)
I agree with some of their tax policies (see page 24) Specifically: American families with children are the
hardest hit during any economic downturn.
Republicans will lower their tax burden by
doubling the exemption for dependents.
• New technology should not occasion more
taxation. We will permanently ban internet
access taxes and stop all new cell phone
taxes.
• For the sake of family farms and small businesses,
we will continue our fight against the
federal death tax.
• The Alternative Minimum Tax, a stealth levy
on the middle-class that unduly targets large
families, must be repealed.
and I agree with some of their Energy policies
I agree with some of their education platform (i.e. STEM programs) but I don't agree with school vouchers
I agree with some of their Immigration and National Security policies. There's more but you get the gist.

You didn't ask for this but here is what I don't like:
I don't agree with the propensity to fight like children and politicize every little thing.
I don't agree with them twisting the facts as it relates to the Democratic party. Very petty can't stand that.
I don't agree with ANY of their healthcare policies
I don't agree with their plans to handle medicare/medicaid and social security.
I don't agree with the way most of these republicans that we see everday on the MSM and listen to on the radio embrace bigotry, race baiting and express the desire to be exclusive to anyone “not like them”
I don't like the ease with which they argue just for the sake of arguing even if it is something they agreed with yesterday.
I don't like these “talking points' that circulate daily focused on gossiping about the Democratic Party vs. focused on what they are offering.
I dont like the fact that they find it easy to lie to the public regardless of the fact that they are completely aware that their comments will be proven as lies as soon as the words leave their lips.
I don't like the fact that they simply ignore reality and they are okay with chronically lying “just because”
I dont agree with grown men making the decision to say “NO” because they feel like it
I don't agree with them putting their egos before the people they are supposed to serve
I don't agree with the refusal to participate in discussions with the senate, house, or the president just because they are the minority party and see nothing wrong with pouting, picking up their ball and going home.
I don't like the fact that they are quick to kick folks out of their party or bad mouth people just because they disagree with them on a particular issue
The list of things I don't like is endless and I won't bore you but you get it the idea.

]]> By: PTCruiserhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/comment-page-1/#comment-338580 PTCruiser Wed, 27 May 2009 03:16:08 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=11604#comment-338580 Yes, it would be if the president making the proposal to be granted the authority to indefinitely detain people is Barack Obama. Their position might be different if it were George Bush or John McCain. Yes, it would be if the president making the proposal to be granted the authority to indefinitely detain people is Barack Obama. Their position might be different if it were George Bush or John McCain.

]]> By: Plantsmantxhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/comment-page-1/#comment-338579 Plantsmantx Wed, 27 May 2009 02:48:41 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=11604#comment-338579 I used to ask a question of people I encountered (mostly) online who would call Mediamatters "far left". I would simply ask them to cite the policy positions that show Mediamatters to be "far left", as opposed to liberal or just left-of-center. No one could cite those policy positions. I'd like to ask a similar question here- who are these people, and which of their policy positions reveal them to be "far left"? Is opposition to "preventive detentions" a "far left" stance? I used to ask a question of people I encountered (mostly) online who would call Mediamatters “far left”. I would simply ask them to cite the policy positions that show Mediamatters to be “far left”, as opposed to liberal or just left-of-center. No one could cite those policy positions. I'd like to ask a similar question here- who are these people, and which of their policy positions reveal them to be “far left”? Is opposition to “preventive detentions” a “far left” stance?

]]> By: TruthSeekerhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/comment-page-1/#comment-338573 TruthSeeker Wed, 27 May 2009 02:46:20 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=11604#comment-338573 You see things of value in the Republican Party, Val??!!!<br><br>What on earth could those things be? You see things of value in the Republican Party, Val??!!!

What on earth could those things be?

]]> By: PTCruiserhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/comment-page-1/#comment-338578 PTCruiser Wed, 27 May 2009 02:23:11 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=11604#comment-338578 <i>wow....that is........surreal....really...wow</i><br><br>Yes, I agree with you. Your position is indeed stereotypical. wow….that is……..surreal….really…wow

Yes, I agree with you. Your position is indeed stereotypical.

]]> By: Valhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/comment-page-1/#comment-205753 Val Wed, 27 May 2009 00:41:13 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=11604#comment-205753 lol lol

]]> By: Valhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/comment-page-1/#comment-205749 Val Wed, 27 May 2009 00:34:07 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=11604#comment-205749 raotflmao. well said and all true. hahaha.<br><br>blessings Truth. Enjoy your day! raotflmao. well said and all true. hahaha.

blessings Truth. Enjoy your day!

]]> By: TruthSeekerhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/comment-page-1/#comment-205724 TruthSeeker Wed, 27 May 2009 00:08:57 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=11604#comment-205724 Yeah, they're lying, racist, sexist sacks of shit, and the party that put a black man on the supreme court who had serious allegations of sexual harassment of black women leveled against him...couldn't they find anybody else? ...no one? Yeah, they're lying, racist, sexist sacks of shit, and the party that put a black man on the supreme court who had serious allegations of sexual harassment of black women leveled against him…couldn't they find anybody else? …no one?

]]> By: Valhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/comment-page-1/#comment-205713 Val Tue, 26 May 2009 23:47:30 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=11604#comment-205713 :-) lolol Truthseeker. why you have me laughing? lol EVERYONE has something valuable to offer. I have to dig deep these days Truth because their principles don't seem to apply to their own platform these days. lol<br><br>Their platform is supposed to be based on <a href="http://platform.gop.com/2008Platform.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://platform.gop.com/2008Platform.pdf</a><br>I agree with the concept of Oversight (see page 17)<br>I agree with some of their tax policies (see page 24) Specifically: American families with children are the<br>hardest hit during any economic downturn.<br>Republicans will lower their tax burden by<br>doubling the exemption for dependents.<br>• New technology should not occasion more<br>taxation. We will permanently ban internet<br>access taxes and stop all new cell phone<br>taxes.<br>• For the sake of family farms and small businesses,<br>we will continue our fight against the<br>federal death tax.<br>• The Alternative Minimum Tax, a stealth levy<br>on the middle-class that unduly targets large<br>families, must be repealed.<br>and I agree with some of their Energy policies<br>I agree with some of their education platform (i.e. STEM programs) but I don't agree with school vouchers<br>I agree with some of their Immigration and National Security policies. There's more but you get the gist. <br><br>You didn't ask for this but here is what I don't like: <br>I don't agree with the propensity to fight like children and politicize every little thing.<br>I don't agree with them twisting the facts as it relates to the Democratic party. Very petty can't stand that.<br>I don't agree with ANY of their healthcare policies<br>I don't agree with their plans to handle medicare/medicaid and social security. <br>I don't agree with the way most of these republicans that we see everday on the MSM and listen to on the radio embrace bigotry, race baiting and express the desire to be exclusive to anyone "not like them"<br>I don't like the ease with which they argue just for the sake of arguing even if it is something they agreed with yesterday.<br>I don't like these "talking points' that circulate daily focused on gossiping about the Democratic Party vs. focused on what they are offering.<br>I dont like the fact that they find it easy to lie to the public regardless of the fact that they are completely aware that their comments will be proven as lies as soon as the words leave their lips. <br>I don't like the fact that they simply ignore reality and they are okay with chronically lying "just because" :-) lolol Truthseeker. why you have me laughing? lol EVERYONE has something valuable to offer. I have to dig deep these days Truth because their principles don't seem to apply to their own platform these days. lol

Their platform is supposed to be based on http://platform.gop.com/2008Platform.pdf
I agree with the concept of Oversight (see page 17)
I agree with some of their tax policies (see page 24) Specifically: American families with children are the
hardest hit during any economic downturn.
Republicans will lower their tax burden by
doubling the exemption for dependents.
• New technology should not occasion more
taxation. We will permanently ban internet
access taxes and stop all new cell phone
taxes.
• For the sake of family farms and small businesses,
we will continue our fight against the
federal death tax.
• The Alternative Minimum Tax, a stealth levy
on the middle-class that unduly targets large
families, must be repealed.
and I agree with some of their Energy policies
I agree with some of their education platform (i.e. STEM programs) but I don't agree with school vouchers
I agree with some of their Immigration and National Security policies. There's more but you get the gist.

You didn't ask for this but here is what I don't like:
I don't agree with the propensity to fight like children and politicize every little thing.
I don't agree with them twisting the facts as it relates to the Democratic party. Very petty can't stand that.
I don't agree with ANY of their healthcare policies
I don't agree with their plans to handle medicare/medicaid and social security.
I don't agree with the way most of these republicans that we see everday on the MSM and listen to on the radio embrace bigotry, race baiting and express the desire to be exclusive to anyone “not like them”
I don't like the ease with which they argue just for the sake of arguing even if it is something they agreed with yesterday.
I don't like these “talking points' that circulate daily focused on gossiping about the Democratic Party vs. focused on what they are offering.
I dont like the fact that they find it easy to lie to the public regardless of the fact that they are completely aware that their comments will be proven as lies as soon as the words leave their lips.
I don't like the fact that they simply ignore reality and they are okay with chronically lying “just because”

]]> By: PTCruiserhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/comment-page-1/#comment-205689 PTCruiser Tue, 26 May 2009 23:16:08 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=11604#comment-205689 Yes, it would be if the president making the proposal to be granted the authority to indefinitely detain people is Barack Obama. Their position might be different if it were George Bush or John McCain. Yes, it would be if the president making the proposal to be granted the authority to indefinitely detain people is Barack Obama. Their position might be different if it were George Bush or John McCain.

]]> By: Plantsmantxhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/comment-page-1/#comment-205657 Plantsmantx Tue, 26 May 2009 22:48:41 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=11604#comment-205657 I used to ask a question of people I encountered (mostly) online who would call Mediamatters "far left". I would simply ask them to cite the policy positions that show Mediamatters to be "far left", as opposed to liberal or just left-of-center. No one could cite those policy positions. I'd like to ask a similar question here- who are these people, and which of their policy positions reveal them to be "far left"? Is opposition to "preventative detentions" a "far left" stance? I used to ask a question of people I encountered (mostly) online who would call Mediamatters “far left”. I would simply ask them to cite the policy positions that show Mediamatters to be “far left”, as opposed to liberal or just left-of-center. No one could cite those policy positions. I'd like to ask a similar question here- who are these people, and which of their policy positions reveal them to be “far left”? Is opposition to “preventative detentions” a “far left” stance?

]]> By: TruthSeekerhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/comment-page-1/#comment-205651 TruthSeeker Tue, 26 May 2009 22:46:20 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=11604#comment-205651 You see things of value in the Republican Party, Val??!!!<br><br>What on earth could those things be? You see things of value in the Republican Party, Val??!!!

What on earth could those things be?

]]> By: PTCruiserhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/comment-page-1/#comment-205618 PTCruiser Tue, 26 May 2009 22:23:11 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=11604#comment-205618 <i>wow....that is........surreal....really...wow</i><br><br>Yes, I agree with you. Your position is indeed stereotypical. wow….that is……..surreal….really…wow

Yes, I agree with you. Your position is indeed stereotypical.

]]> By: Mirandahttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/05/afternoon-open-thread-46/comment-page-1/#comment-205307 Miranda Tue, 26 May 2009 16:57:04 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=11604#comment-205307 "What is less clear, however, is what do people who actually have no real contact with the American political left mean when they refer to Obama's critics as being part of the far or fringe left."<br><br>wow....that is........surreal....really...wow “What is less clear, however, is what do people who actually have no real contact with the American political left mean when they refer to Obama's critics as being part of the far or fringe left.”

wow….that is……..surreal….really…wow

]]>