<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Blacks at Odds Over Scrutiny of President&#8230;..really?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/</link> <description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator> <item><title>By: southernbelle</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/comment-page-1/#comment-331840</link> <dc:creator>southernbelle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:27:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=10190#comment-331840</guid> <description>i am perplexed by the responses on here.  at what point did being inquisitorial or challenging a platform become synonymous with hatin’? it is unfair to state that because there are a body of people, who happen to be black, that have taken a pragmatic approach to looking at this presidency is absurd. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;when discussing accountability, it is natural to argue he hasn’t had time to make the changes he wants to see, that we all want to see. although he does exhibit this superhero quality, not on his own accord, no one in their right mind would think he could make immediate impact on the issues that are set before us. holding someone accountable before certain initiatives have been set or brought to completion doesn’t mean they are on this witch hunt or trying to push their own agenda. it means they are trying to delve into the administration’s platform and set a tone for expectations. if anything challenging a president; regardless off who is in office exhibits sagacity. i would be in utter agreement with many of you if the people mentioned in this article didn’t challenge other presidents or other political officials in the same manner. however, they have. thus it isn&#039;t a viable argument to say there is some vendetta. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;you can advocate someone and challenge them at the same time. this type of examination keeps balance and erects dialogue. dialogue spawns ideas. sincerely, i think many are sensitive because he is the first black president and they want to protect that image, and standards he has set thus far; rightly so. i still marvel at the fact that he is MY president; one that pushes ideologies that incites all races. when i  think about it long enough i still get chills. his presidency is more than a piece of our history. It is the foundation of everyone’s history. even in all of that, he still is a person that recognizes that he doesn’t have all of the answers and has made a concerted effort of putting individuals within his cabinet that will do exactly what some of the people in this article are doing, provoking and stimulating him. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;he and his cabinet are dealing with matters no other president has ever had to deal with, simultaneously I might add. as i type Obama and his cabinet are facing a defining test, their first national security test. i have no doubt that in something of this magnitude he wants those very same people he placed in his cabinet to test him and to challenge him to think outside of the box. certainly if he has surrounded himself by people with this type of acumen, we shouldn’t hesitate to also probe and question. when it is all said and done it merely upholds his proposition of change! if you truly want to bolster and promote obama&#039;s agenda try to examine WHAT is said, not who speaks it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am perplexed by the responses on here.  at what point did being inquisitorial or challenging a platform become synonymous with hatin’? it is unfair to state that because there are a body of people, who happen to be black, that have taken a pragmatic approach to looking at this presidency is absurd.</p><p>when discussing accountability, it is natural to argue he hasn’t had time to make the changes he wants to see, that we all want to see. although he does exhibit this superhero quality, not on his own accord, no one in their right mind would think he could make immediate impact on the issues that are set before us. holding someone accountable before certain initiatives have been set or brought to completion doesn’t mean they are on this witch hunt or trying to push their own agenda. it means they are trying to delve into the administration’s platform and set a tone for expectations. if anything challenging a president; regardless off who is in office exhibits sagacity. i would be in utter agreement with many of you if the people mentioned in this article didn’t challenge other presidents or other political officials in the same manner. however, they have. thus it isn&#39;t a viable argument to say there is some vendetta.</p><p>you can advocate someone and challenge them at the same time. this type of examination keeps balance and erects dialogue. dialogue spawns ideas. sincerely, i think many are sensitive because he is the first black president and they want to protect that image, and standards he has set thus far; rightly so. i still marvel at the fact that he is MY president; one that pushes ideologies that incites all races. when i  think about it long enough i still get chills. his presidency is more than a piece of our history. It is the foundation of everyone’s history. even in all of that, he still is a person that recognizes that he doesn’t have all of the answers and has made a concerted effort of putting individuals within his cabinet that will do exactly what some of the people in this article are doing, provoking and stimulating him.</p><p>he and his cabinet are dealing with matters no other president has ever had to deal with, simultaneously I might add. as i type Obama and his cabinet are facing a defining test, their first national security test. i have no doubt that in something of this magnitude he wants those very same people he placed in his cabinet to test him and to challenge him to think outside of the box. certainly if he has surrounded himself by people with this type of acumen, we shouldn’t hesitate to also probe and question. when it is all said and done it merely upholds his proposition of change! if you truly want to bolster and promote obama&#39;s agenda try to examine WHAT is said, not who speaks it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: southernbelle</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/comment-page-1/#comment-183779</link> <dc:creator>southernbelle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:27:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=10190#comment-183779</guid> <description>i am perplexed by the responses on here.  at what point did being inquisitorial or challenging a platform become synonymous with hatin’? it is unfair to state that because there are a body of people, who happen to be black, that have taken a pragmatic approach to looking at this presidency is absurd. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;when discussing accountability, it is natural to argue he hasn’t had time to make the changes he wants to see, that we all want to see. although he does exhibit this superhero quality, not on his own accord, no one in their right mind would think he could make immediate impact on the issues that are set before us. holding someone accountable before certain initiatives have been set or brought to completion doesn’t mean they are on this witch hunt or trying to push their own agenda. it means they are trying to delve into the administration’s platform and set a tone for expectations. if anything challenging a president; regardless off who is in office exhibits sagacity. i would be in utter agreement with many of you if the people mentioned in this article didn’t challenge other presidents or other political officials in the same manner. however, they have. thus it isn&#039;t a viable argument to say there is some vendetta. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;youu can advocate someone and challenge them at the same time. this type of examination keeps balance and erects dialogue. dialogue spawns ideas. sincerely, i think many are sensitive because he is the first black president and they want to protect that image, and standards he has set thus far; rightly so. i still marvel at the fact that he is MY president; one that pushes ideologies that affect all races. i was talking with a friend and wheni  think about it long enough i still get chills. his presidency is more than a piece of our history. It is the foundation of everyone’s history. even in all of that, he still is a person that recognizes that he doesn’t have all of the answers and has made a concerted effort of putting individuals in his cabinet that will do exactly what some of the people in this article are doing, provoking and stimulating him. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;he and his cabinet are dealing with matters no other president has ever had to deal with, simultaneously I might add. as i type Obama and his cabinet are facing a defining test, their first national security test. i have no doubt that in something of this magnitude he wants those very same people he placed in his cabinet to test him and to challenge him to think outside of the box. certainly if he has surrounded himself by people with this type of acumen, we shouldn’t hesitate to also probe and question. when it is all said and done it merely upholds his proposition of change!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am perplexed by the responses on here.  at what point did being inquisitorial or challenging a platform become synonymous with hatin’? it is unfair to state that because there are a body of people, who happen to be black, that have taken a pragmatic approach to looking at this presidency is absurd.</p><p>when discussing accountability, it is natural to argue he hasn’t had time to make the changes he wants to see, that we all want to see. although he does exhibit this superhero quality, not on his own accord, no one in their right mind would think he could make immediate impact on the issues that are set before us. holding someone accountable before certain initiatives have been set or brought to completion doesn’t mean they are on this witch hunt or trying to push their own agenda. it means they are trying to delve into the administration’s platform and set a tone for expectations. if anything challenging a president; regardless off who is in office exhibits sagacity. i would be in utter agreement with many of you if the people mentioned in this article didn’t challenge other presidents or other political officials in the same manner. however, they have. thus it isn&#39;t a viable argument to say there is some vendetta.</p><p>youu can advocate someone and challenge them at the same time. this type of examination keeps balance and erects dialogue. dialogue spawns ideas. sincerely, i think many are sensitive because he is the first black president and they want to protect that image, and standards he has set thus far; rightly so. i still marvel at the fact that he is MY president; one that pushes ideologies that affect all races. i was talking with a friend and wheni  think about it long enough i still get chills. his presidency is more than a piece of our history. It is the foundation of everyone’s history. even in all of that, he still is a person that recognizes that he doesn’t have all of the answers and has made a concerted effort of putting individuals in his cabinet that will do exactly what some of the people in this article are doing, provoking and stimulating him.</p><p>he and his cabinet are dealing with matters no other president has ever had to deal with, simultaneously I might add. as i type Obama and his cabinet are facing a defining test, their first national security test. i have no doubt that in something of this magnitude he wants those very same people he placed in his cabinet to test him and to challenge him to think outside of the box. certainly if he has surrounded himself by people with this type of acumen, we shouldn’t hesitate to also probe and question. when it is all said and done it merely upholds his proposition of change!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NMP</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/comment-page-1/#comment-180192</link> <dc:creator>NMP</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:49:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=10190#comment-180192</guid> <description>He sure did!  I couldn&#039;t believe it.  He better be lucky our President is a class act b/c any other brother would have popped him in his mouth!  He simply replied, &quot;I married my wife because I love her and she&#039;s fine.&quot;  I guess what really bothered me was the implication that Michelle was not a &quot;get&quot; because she&#039;s dark skinned and that dark skinned women may be politically correct in our community but not beautiful by &quot;accepted&quot; beauty standards.  The question just messed my head up!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He sure did!  I couldn&#39;t believe it.  He better be lucky our President is a class act b/c any other brother would have popped him in his mouth!  He simply replied, &#8220;I married my wife because I love her and she&#39;s fine.&#8221;  I guess what really bothered me was the implication that Michelle was not a &#8220;get&#8221; because she&#39;s dark skinned and that dark skinned women may be politically correct in our community but not beautiful by &#8220;accepted&#8221; beauty standards.  The question just messed my head up!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: isonprize</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/comment-page-1/#comment-179842</link> <dc:creator>isonprize</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 06:06:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=10190#comment-179842</guid> <description>I don&#039;t know... looks like a suspicious lack of entries &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dickipedia.org/dick.php?title=Main_Page&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Got any suggestions?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t know&#8230; looks like a suspicious lack of entries <a href="http://www.dickipedia.org/dick.php?title=Main_Page" rel="nofollow"> here</a>.</p><p>Got any suggestions?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikyrah</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/comment-page-1/#comment-179745</link> <dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 01:58:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=10190#comment-179745</guid> <description>I know you don&#039;t like to me, but..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUS? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;If you don&#039;t mind, may I add no Negro who would ask then candiate Obama in an interview on BET if he married his wife because she is dark skinned and to gain credibility in the Black community can&#039;t say sh*t to me about anything, let alone my President.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No.he.didn&#039;t.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No.he.didn&#039;t. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fuck him.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know you don&#39;t like to me, but..</p><p>ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUS?</p><p><i>If you don&#39;t mind, may I add no Negro who would ask then candiate Obama in an interview on BET if he married his wife because she is dark skinned and to gain credibility in the Black community can&#39;t say sh*t to me about anything, let alone my President.<br /></i></p><p>No.he.didn&#39;t.</p><p>No.he.didn&#39;t.</p><p>Fuck him.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: heartsandflowers</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/comment-page-1/#comment-179679</link> <dc:creator>heartsandflowers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 23:12:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=10190#comment-179679</guid> <description>I thought you might misinterpret that I was referring to the WaPo article not you.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought you might misinterpret that I was referring to the WaPo article not you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: caligirl65</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/comment-page-1/#comment-179668</link> <dc:creator>caligirl65</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:59:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=10190#comment-179668</guid> <description>you bring up an excellent point.  these years are gonna be challenging.  we (black people)  will have to summon every ounce of inner strength we have in order to make it through successfully.  this is--in many ways--our national &#039;rosewood&#039; moment.  and i have a feeling that we&#039;ll make it!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you bring up an excellent point.  these years are gonna be challenging.  we (black people)  will have to summon every ounce of inner strength we have in order to make it through successfully.  this is&#8211;in many ways&#8211;our national &#39;rosewood&#39; moment.  and i have a feeling that we&#39;ll make it!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: caligirl65</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/comment-page-1/#comment-179666</link> <dc:creator>caligirl65</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:55:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=10190#comment-179666</guid> <description>idiotic?  wow.  what happened to the hearts, flowers, lollipops and rainbows and stuff...?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>idiotic?  wow.  what happened to the hearts, flowers, lollipops and rainbows and stuff&#8230;?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NMP</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/comment-page-1/#comment-179624</link> <dc:creator>NMP</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:54:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=10190#comment-179624</guid> <description>&quot;First of all, no Negro that collects a check from BET needs to tell me ANYTHING about how to be a critical thinker about The President.&quot;  LOVE IT!  LOVE IT!  LOVE IT!  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you don&#039;t mind, may I add no Negro who would ask then candiate Obama in an interview on BET if he married his wife because she is dark skinned and to gain credibility in the Black community can&#039;t say sh*t to me about anything, let alone my President.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;First of all, no Negro that collects a check from BET needs to tell me ANYTHING about how to be a critical thinker about The President.&#8221;  LOVE IT!  LOVE IT!  LOVE IT!</p><p>If you don&#39;t mind, may I add no Negro who would ask then candiate Obama in an interview on BET if he married his wife because she is dark skinned and to gain credibility in the Black community can&#39;t say sh*t to me about anything, let alone my President.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kalagenesis</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/comment-page-1/#comment-179567</link> <dc:creator>kalagenesis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:22:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=10190#comment-179567</guid> <description>Correct this is all about jealousy under the guise of critique.These so called Black coon shuffling self hating fools have as much love for the Black community as the devil has for holy water.It amazes me how many people so called care about the community but 70% of all youth polled in the poorest communities say that no one cares about them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct this is all about jealousy under the guise of critique.These so called Black coon shuffling self hating fools have as much love for the Black community as the devil has for holy water.It amazes me how many people so called care about the community but 70% of all youth polled in the poorest communities say that no one cares about them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Booky</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/comment-page-1/#comment-179551</link> <dc:creator>Booky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:49:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=10190#comment-179551</guid> <description>The black commentators know they only way they are going to continue getting a paycheck from the White Wing Media is to say the things the White Wing Media thinks but can&#039;t say out loud.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The black commentators know they only way they are going to continue getting a paycheck from the White Wing Media is to say the things the White Wing Media thinks but can&#39;t say out loud.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Val</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/comment-page-1/#comment-179537</link> <dc:creator>Val</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:56:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=10190#comment-179537</guid> <description>co-signing moja31</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>co-signing moja31</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Val</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/comment-page-1/#comment-179534</link> <dc:creator>Val</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:52:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=10190#comment-179534</guid> <description>and there you have it.  Monie.  my pet peeve as well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and there you have it.  Monie.  my pet peeve as well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: whiterosebuddy</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/comment-page-1/#comment-179371</link> <dc:creator>whiterosebuddy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:36:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=10190#comment-179371</guid> <description>Yes, spirit...this is a blatant attempt to discredit our opinions and blow them off as &#039;well of course YOU agree&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Very frustrating and annoying.  However, they did this throughout the campaign as well, trying to diminish the influence of his supporters by saying they &#039;drank the koolaid&#039;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The truth is they have nothing that counters his policies rationally so therefore they seek to smear and discredit those who do, because they have nothing else.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i.e. they are losers...simply trying to steal the victory from the winners</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, spirit&#8230;this is a blatant attempt to discredit our opinions and blow them off as &#39;well of course YOU agree&#8221;</p><p>Very frustrating and annoying.  However, they did this throughout the campaign as well, trying to diminish the influence of his supporters by saying they &#39;drank the koolaid&#39;.</p><p>The truth is they have nothing that counters his policies rationally so therefore they seek to smear and discredit those who do, because they have nothing else.</p><p>i.e. they are losers&#8230;simply trying to steal the victory from the winners</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: whiterosebuddy</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/comment-page-1/#comment-179369</link> <dc:creator>whiterosebuddy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=10190#comment-179369</guid> <description>I liked to see the support among the economic demographic of under $50K salary. Bet it is virtually the same.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked to see the support among the economic demographic of under $50K salary. Bet it is virtually the same.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: whiterosebuddy</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/comment-page-1/#comment-179368</link> <dc:creator>whiterosebuddy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:28:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=10190#comment-179368</guid> <description>More like stand at the back door.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More like stand at the back door.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Miranda</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/comment-page-1/#comment-179341</link> <dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 11:20:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=10190#comment-179341</guid> <description>This is another topic that is working my nerves, just like the damn clothes the First Lady wears. They are really trying us.....and it hasn&#039;t even been 100 days in. We need to break out the Tylenol....or the gin....because its gonna be a rocky 8 years of this kind of foolishness that &quot;us black folks jus to stoopid&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is another topic that is working my nerves, just like the damn clothes the First Lady wears. They are really trying us&#8230;..and it hasn&#39;t even been 100 days in. We need to break out the Tylenol&#8230;.or the gin&#8230;.because its gonna be a rocky 8 years of this kind of foolishness that &#8220;us black folks jus to stoopid&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Miranda</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/comment-page-1/#comment-179340</link> <dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 11:14:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=10190#comment-179340</guid> <description>ITA</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ITA</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: heartsandflowers</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/comment-page-1/#comment-179334</link> <dc:creator>heartsandflowers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 08:21:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=10190#comment-179334</guid> <description>Bob Johnson is whining before the FCC this week (Wed) about lack of diversity through a deal with white owned/run Ion Media trying to scam us and the FCC with some backroom deal to get another BET. The NABJ and other Black organizations who should be ashamed and DO know better have been supporting this. It would be BET2 and kill off all the POC competition including TV One. Now why hasn&#039;t JJP covered this? Go to What About Our Daughters because Gina has covered this from the beginning.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob Johnson is whining before the FCC this week (Wed) about lack of diversity through a deal with white owned/run Ion Media trying to scam us and the FCC with some backroom deal to get another BET. The NABJ and other Black organizations who should be ashamed and DO know better have been supporting this. It would be BET2 and kill off all the POC competition including TV One. Now why hasn&#39;t JJP covered this? Go to What About Our Daughters because Gina has covered this from the beginning.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: heartsandflowers</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/04/blacks-at-odds-over-scrutiny-of-presidentreally/comment-page-1/#comment-179332</link> <dc:creator>heartsandflowers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 08:09:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=10190#comment-179332</guid> <description>That&#039;s just idiotic. The people that actually care aren&#039;t using critique for the sake of being professional contrarians and derailing progress. They do it to elevate the discourse and hopefully we become more knowledgeable and strategic in how we wield power. Or acquire some period so we can end the reign of the fake (and useless)  Reverend racket.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s just idiotic. The people that actually care aren&#39;t using critique for the sake of being professional contrarians and derailing progress. They do it to elevate the discourse and hopefully we become more knowledgeable and strategic in how we wield power. Or acquire some period so we can end the reign of the fake (and useless)  Reverend racket.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 596/600 objects using apc

Served from: www.jackandjillpolitics.com @ 2012-02-10 12:35:19 -->
