<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women&#8217;s History Month Daily Thread</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/</link>
	<description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:09:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CraigHickman</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/comment-page-5/#comment-333376</link>
		<dc:creator>CraigHickman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=9132#comment-333376</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m playing wait and see. I don&#039;t think these are obstructionists. We&#039;ll find out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is politics. These people are posturing for their constituents. What&#039;s wrong with that?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The DLC has no power. These folks are trying to capitalize on the success of the Democrats. So what.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If they vote against the president&#039;s agenda, I&#039;ll know better. So far they haven&#039;t.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But Claire McCaskill is gold. She&#039;s not going to stab Obama in the back.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let&#039;s not assume anything until we know the facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m playing wait and see. I don&#39;t think these are obstructionists. We&#39;ll find out.</p>
<p>This is politics. These people are posturing for their constituents. What&#39;s wrong with that?</p>
<p>The DLC has no power. These folks are trying to capitalize on the success of the Democrats. So what.</p>
<p>If they vote against the president&#39;s agenda, I&#39;ll know better. So far they haven&#39;t.</p>
<p>But Claire McCaskill is gold. She&#39;s not going to stab Obama in the back.</p>
<p>Let&#39;s not assume anything until we know the facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malletgirl02</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/comment-page-5/#comment-333377</link>
		<dc:creator>malletgirl02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=9132#comment-333377</guid>
		<description>Mark Warner is one of my senators. I am very disappointed. He held on tightly to Obama&#039;s coattails and we get this.Me to Mark Warner: We voted for you for a reason we wanted a Democrat in office to vote with the Democratic party. If we wanted a Republican we would have elected the Republican.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Warner is one of my senators. I am very disappointed. He held on tightly to Obama&#39;s coattails and we get this.Me to Mark Warner: We voted for you for a reason we wanted a Democrat in office to vote with the Democratic party. If we wanted a Republican we would have elected the Republican.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CraigHickman</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/comment-page-5/#comment-168018</link>
		<dc:creator>CraigHickman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=9132#comment-168018</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m playing wait and see. I don&#039;t think these are obstructionists. We&#039;ll find out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is politics. These people are posturing for their constituents. What&#039;s wrong with that?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If they vote against the president&#039;s agenda, I&#039;ll know etter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But Claire McCaskill is gold. She&#039;s not going to stab Obama in the back.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let&#039;s not assume anything until we know the facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m playing wait and see. I don&#39;t think these are obstructionists. We&#39;ll find out.</p>
<p>This is politics. These people are posturing for their constituents. What&#39;s wrong with that?</p>
<p>If they vote against the president&#39;s agenda, I&#39;ll know etter.</p>
<p>But Claire McCaskill is gold. She&#39;s not going to stab Obama in the back.</p>
<p>Let&#39;s not assume anything until we know the facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malletgirl02</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/comment-page-5/#comment-167991</link>
		<dc:creator>malletgirl02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=9132#comment-167991</guid>
		<description>Mark Warner is one of my senators. I am very disappointed. He held on tightly to Obama&#039;s coattails and we get this.Me to Mark Warner: We voted for you for a reason we wanted a Democrat in office to vote with the Democratic party. If we wanted a Republican we would have elected the Republican.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Warner is one of my senators. I am very disappointed. He held on tightly to Obama&#39;s coattails and we get this.Me to Mark Warner: We voted for you for a reason we wanted a Democrat in office to vote with the Democratic party. If we wanted a Republican we would have elected the Republican.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CraigHickman</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/comment-page-5/#comment-167428</link>
		<dc:creator>CraigHickman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=9132#comment-167428</guid>
		<description>Perfect analogy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect analogy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: predacious</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/comment-page-5/#comment-167142</link>
		<dc:creator>predacious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=9132#comment-167142</guid>
		<description>I have not been watching the TV for a month and I have begun to take 2-3 days off from political blogs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am finding it is just like the day time soaps...no matter when you tune back in..it takes less than 2 days to catch up on the entire shyt and gaboodle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not been watching the TV for a month and I have begun to take 2-3 days off from political blogs.</p>
<p>I am finding it is just like the day time soaps&#8230;no matter when you tune back in..it takes less than 2 days to catch up on the entire shyt and gaboodle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: predacious</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/comment-page-5/#comment-167140</link>
		<dc:creator>predacious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=9132#comment-167140</guid>
		<description>I see.&lt;br&gt;I did see that one threat he made over on HuffPo..where he smacked that congressman back in the mouth and told them he was too big to let go down with all the money they had already poured him...it was a helluva backhand...I was like OMG..this man is ARROGANT and unrepetant.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He was like phuck with me if you want...it&#039;s your money that will be sunk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see.<br />I did see that one threat he made over on HuffPo..where he smacked that congressman back in the mouth and told them he was too big to let go down with all the money they had already poured him&#8230;it was a helluva backhand&#8230;I was like OMG..this man is ARROGANT and unrepetant.</p>
<p>He was like phuck with me if you want&#8230;it&#39;s your money that will be sunk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: predacious</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/comment-page-5/#comment-167135</link>
		<dc:creator>predacious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=9132#comment-167135</guid>
		<description>Um, sorry Moth, I was trying to see if we knew identities at the Fed, I wasn&#039;t clear.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So was Bernanke and Geithner who Liddy was referring to you think?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is a whole lot of CYA going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, sorry Moth, I was trying to see if we knew identities at the Fed, I wasn&#39;t clear.</p>
<p>So was Bernanke and Geithner who Liddy was referring to you think?</p>
<p>There is a whole lot of CYA going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobM</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/comment-page-5/#comment-167102</link>
		<dc:creator>RobM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=9132#comment-167102</guid>
		<description>Force Majeure. Gets rid of  CDS. saves alot of taxpayer money. You&#039;ll close down AIG London and sell the insurance comapnies to the public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Force Majeure. Gets rid of  CDS. saves alot of taxpayer money. You&#39;ll close down AIG London and sell the insurance comapnies to the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vulcan_girl</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/comment-page-5/#comment-167025</link>
		<dc:creator>vulcan_girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=9132#comment-167025</guid>
		<description>I work for you.  If you don&#039;t like how I&#039;m doing it, vote me out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work for you.  If you don&#39;t like how I&#39;m doing it, vote me out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mothsmoke</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/comment-page-5/#comment-167018</link>
		<dc:creator>Mothsmoke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=9132#comment-167018</guid>
		<description>He recused himself once he was tapped to be Sec. of Treasury.  He was head of the New York Federal Reserve and oversaw the $85B loan to AIG from the NY Federal Reserve in Sept. &#039;08.  He was still head of the Federal Reserve when they gave AIG the next $37B loan in Oct. &#039;08.  There were no conditions placed on this money re bonuses even though it was known that the bonuses existed.  AIG also put this info in their SEC filing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He recused himself once he was tapped to be Sec. of Treasury.  He was head of the New York Federal Reserve and oversaw the $85B loan to AIG from the NY Federal Reserve in Sept. &#39;08.  He was still head of the Federal Reserve when they gave AIG the next $37B loan in Oct. &#39;08.  There were no conditions placed on this money re bonuses even though it was known that the bonuses existed.  AIG also put this info in their SEC filing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justice58</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/comment-page-5/#comment-166992</link>
		<dc:creator>Justice58</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=9132#comment-166992</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s calling bullsh%t on that &quot;doing too much&quot; meme! BAM!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#39;s calling bullsh%t on that &#8220;doing too much&#8221; meme! BAM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rikyrah</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/comment-page-5/#comment-166984</link>
		<dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=9132#comment-166984</guid>
		<description>EVENING THREAD IS UP!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EVENING THREAD IS UP!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sepia</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/comment-page-5/#comment-166983</link>
		<dc:creator>Sepia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=9132#comment-166983</guid>
		<description>I read that he recused himself from the AIG stuff, so how could he have been in on the meetings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read that he recused himself from the AIG stuff, so how could he have been in on the meetings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mothsmoke</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/comment-page-5/#comment-166979</link>
		<dc:creator>Mothsmoke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=9132#comment-166979</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still trying to figure out why Bernake didn&#039;t speak up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m still trying to figure out why Bernake didn&#39;t speak up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Val</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/comment-page-5/#comment-166976</link>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=9132#comment-166976</guid>
		<description>President Obama is on - live coverage on MSNBC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama is on &#8211; live coverage on MSNBC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monie</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/comment-page-5/#comment-166972</link>
		<dc:creator>Monie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=9132#comment-166972</guid>
		<description>Remember Sepia...nobody cared that $3.6 BILLION was given out in DECEMBER when GWBush was still a lame duck....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Week before last, the plummeting DOW was all Pres. Obama&#039;s fault.....now that it is rebounding somewhat, a convenient new scandal has erupted....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;you know how it works...we&#039;ve been here before...and yes, it will be a long freaking 4 years</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember Sepia&#8230;nobody cared that $3.6 BILLION was given out in DECEMBER when GWBush was still a lame duck&#8230;.</p>
<p>Week before last, the plummeting DOW was all Pres. Obama&#39;s fault&#8230;..now that it is rebounding somewhat, a convenient new scandal has erupted&#8230;.</p>
<p>you know how it works&#8230;we&#39;ve been here before&#8230;and yes, it will be a long freaking 4 years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sepia</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/comment-page-5/#comment-166969</link>
		<dc:creator>Sepia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=9132#comment-166969</guid>
		<description>From what I&#039;ve read, it was much a-do about nothing in the first place. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From a commentor at HuffPo:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;The proposal does not require a veteran who has service-related injuries to buy private health insurance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anybody who claims that is lying.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The proposal does not allow the VA to deny treatment to a veteran who has both private health insurance and a service-related disability.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anybody who claims that is lying.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The proposal would require a private insurer - they never give discounts to veterans who have service-related injuries - tp pay the VA for providing treatment for the service-related injury.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The proposal is not disgusting. The proposal does not disrespect veterans like my father:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;5 battle Stars&lt;br&gt;Navy Unit Commendation&lt;br&gt;Presidential Unit Citation&lt;br&gt;Silver Star&lt;br&gt;Purple Heart&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In any way, shape, or form.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All the proposal does is require my father&#039;s shiftless private insurer to help the United States of America pay to treat my fathers combat wounds in instead of just making an obscene profit on the $13,000 a year he pays the worthless bums for his private insurance.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#39;ve read, it was much a-do about nothing in the first place. </p>
<p>From a commentor at HuffPo:</p>
<p><i>The proposal does not require a veteran who has service-related injuries to buy private health insurance.</p>
<p>Anybody who claims that is lying.</p>
<p>The proposal does not allow the VA to deny treatment to a veteran who has both private health insurance and a service-related disability.</p>
<p>Anybody who claims that is lying.</p>
<p>The proposal would require a private insurer &#8211; they never give discounts to veterans who have service-related injuries &#8211; tp pay the VA for providing treatment for the service-related injury.</p>
<p>That&#39;s it.</p>
<p>The proposal is not disgusting. The proposal does not disrespect veterans like my father:</p>
<p>5 battle Stars<br />Navy Unit Commendation<br />Presidential Unit Citation<br />Silver Star<br />Purple Heart</p>
<p>In any way, shape, or form.</p>
<p>All the proposal does is require my father&#39;s shiftless private insurer to help the United States of America pay to treat my fathers combat wounds in instead of just making an obscene profit on the $13,000 a year he pays the worthless bums for his private insurance.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shazza</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/comment-page-5/#comment-166965</link>
		<dc:creator>Shazza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=9132#comment-166965</guid>
		<description>There were some very cool older guys on my block that used to call me &#039;Angela Davis&#039; when I was a kid-  I wore that moniker proudly. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/18/dodd-treasury-officials-i_n_176609.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/18/dodd-t...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wow, can you imagine if Dodd had been VP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were some very cool older guys on my block that used to call me &#39;Angela Davis&#39; when I was a kid-  I wore that moniker proudly. :)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/18/dodd-treasury-officials-i_n_176609.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/18/dodd-t.." rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/18/dodd-t..</a>.</p>
<p>Wow, can you imagine if Dodd had been VP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sepia</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/03/womens-history-month-daily-thread-17/comment-page-5/#comment-166964</link>
		<dc:creator>Sepia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=9132#comment-166964</guid>
		<description>Let me get this straight. Merrill Lynch gave out $3.6M in bonuses in Dec., but the media is harping about $165M in bonuses from AIG. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Uh-huh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me get this straight. Merrill Lynch gave out $3.6M in bonuses in Dec., but the media is harping about $165M in bonuses from AIG. </p>
<p>Uh-huh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
