My response was to DNA stating the original post on this subject was on point and good on DNA for trying to be fair and provide both sides.

So I did in my original response the same thing that Tapper has been doing to our President which is to focus more on making mountains out of molehills. I took this simple incident and escalated it 500% i.e. comparison of Tapper not wanting to read any dissenting opinions to the current President's handling of his administration and tying the similarities to how Bush handled his. Then I stated I was being sarcastic.

” if youre so worried about wasting time on stupid stories like this why are you spending so much time writing about it?”
Did I say I was wasting time on stupid stories? I did not. You called me a moron. I am wasting my time writing to you because I plan on getting it out of my system otherwise I may waste my time focusing on getting your IP address so we can finish this conversation face to face.

you dont POST to someone's tweets. people's tweets are just to that person or to their followers, not to the twitterworld at large.

and valerie, if youre so worried about wasting time on stupid stories like this why are you spending so much time writing about it?

tapper didnt want to be annoyed with adams messages- would you want, say, me being able to send you messages? i bet not.

Short version: Tapper – “You have to agree with me otherwise you can't post to my Tweets.”
(school bell rings, recess is over and kids now get in line to go back to Ms. Moore's 2nd grade class).

That aside — Did you read my entire post? I said my comment was a snark. Based on the ridiculous focus on the President from Tapper on inane topics that normal people could give a shit about. This Twitter crap is also inane bullshit that noone gives a crap about.

So fuck you and the horse you rode in on.

My response was to DNA stating the original post on this subject was on point and good on DNA for trying to be fair and provide both sides.

So I did in my original response the same thing that Tapper has been doing to our President which is to focus more on making mountains out of molehills. I took this simple incident and escalated it 500% i.e. comparison of Tapper not wanting to read any dissenting opinions to the current President's handling of his administration and tying the similarities to how Bush handled his. Then I stated I was being sarcastic.

” if youre so worried about wasting time on stupid stories like this why are you spending so much time writing about it?”
Did I say I was wasting time on stupid stories? I did not. You called me a moron. I am wasting my time writing to you because if I plan on getting it out of my system otherwise I may waste my time focusing on getting you IP address so we can finish this conversation face to face.

you dont POST to someone's tweets. people's tweets are just to that person or to their followers, not to the twitterworld at large.

and valerie, if youre so worried about wasting time on stupid stories like this why are you spending so much time writing about it?

tapper didnt want to be annoyed with adams messages- would you want, say, me being able to send you messages? i bet not.

Did you read my entire post? I said my comment was a snark. Based on the ridiculous focus on the President from Tapper on inane topics that normal people could give a shit about. This Twitter crap is also inane bullshit that noone gives a crap about.

So fuck you and the horse you rode in on.

Tapper is speaking out the side of his neck. He handled his Tweets the same way Bush handled his administration. He did what he wanted to do, some things he let the people know on an as needed basis but he didn't care to know what they thought about it.