Jack & Jill Politics

You're way fairer than you needed to be.

I am so sick and tired of this twitter stuff, Tapper is trying to make name for himself in a crowded field of so called main stream media and, this silly, childish Tweeting is his only way to do as he can't do it the old fashioned way of, who, what, when, why and where.

Why are you refusing to post what i wrote, adam? cant take the heat indeed!!!

tapper didnt stamp out a voice of dissent, Val, you moron. anyone who wants to read what he writes can read it, it's all there. obviously he just didnt want to read the insufferable bulls**t of adam, who is one of the classic bourgeoisie brothers who sells us out by giving a crap about twitter instead of writing about issues that are important. like the wars or the economy or poverty or AIDS in DC. pathetic.

do you have any idea how twitter works? obviously not. this is your perfect audience, adam — a complete shithead who has no idea what he or she is talking about!!!

you dont POST to someone's tweets. people's tweets are just to that person or to their followers, not to the twitterworld at large.

and valerie, if youre so worried about wasting time on stupid stories like this why are you spending so much time writing about it?

tapper didnt want to be annoyed with adams messages- would you want, say, me being able to send you messages? i bet not.

Aaaahhh idiot — Tweets are text based posts that allows registered folks to send and read each other’s commentaries/updates via a social network networking service. Sooooo post/blog/respond whatever.

My response was to DNA stating the original post on this subject was on point and good on DNA for trying to be fair and provide both sides.

So I did in my original response the same thing that Tapper has been doing to our President which is to focus more on making mountains out of molehills. I took this simple incident and escalated it 500% i.e. comparison of Tapper not wanting to read any dissenting opinions to the current President's handling of his administration and tying the similarities to how Bush handled his. Then I stated I was being sarcastic.

” if youre so worried about wasting time on stupid stories like this why are you spending so much time writing about it?”
Did I say I was wasting time on stupid stories? I did not. You called me a moron. I am wasting my time writing to you because if I plan on getting it out of my system otherwise I may waste my time focusing on getting you IP address so we can finish this conversation face to face.

Jake “I Can't Take The Heat” Tapper.

just fyi, wrote a post critical of adam and he refuses to post it!! what a hypocrite. and u cant even compare to twitter — tapper obviously just didnt wantt o be annoyed by your bulls**t

TheAntildiot – YOU are the moron. Technically he did stamp out any opportunity for dissent. Per Tapper — “I want this way to talk to people. The only people who have been blocked are people who make ad hominem attacks. They’re still fully able to read my Tweets — I just don’t care to read theirs.”

Short version: Tapper – “You have to agree with me otherwise you can't post to my Tweets.”
(school bell rings, recess is over and kids now get in line to go back to Ms. Moore's 2nd grade class).

That aside — Did you read my entire post? I said my comment was a snark. Based on the ridiculous focus on the President from Tapper on inane topics that normal people could give a shit about. This Twitter crap is also inane bullshit that noone gives a crap about.

So fuck you and the horse you rode in on.

I am a classic bougie brother. But this is Jack and Jill politics, and I don't really think that's a fair characterization of my work.

Thank you. His answer sounded like a whole lot of BS for someone who loves to talk about transparency..