<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defining &#8220;Electability&#8221; and the Dissing of Howard Dean</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/</link>
	<description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:33:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kewalo</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/comment-page-2/#comment-162666</link>
		<dc:creator>Kewalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=5883#comment-162666</guid>
		<description>I have been lurking here for months but feel driven to add to the chorus about Dean. I am appalled and angry that no one has given Dean the kudos he deserves for his 50 State Strategy. IMO we would not have won congress in 2006 or this year without him. There is no excuse for the disrespect he&#039;s being shown. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And want to add that everytime I see Emanuel getting credit it makes me cringe. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for your well thought out post. I couldn&#039;t agree with you more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been lurking here for months but feel driven to add to the chorus about Dean. I am appalled and angry that no one has given Dean the kudos he deserves for his 50 State Strategy. IMO we would not have won congress in 2006 or this year without him. There is no excuse for the disrespect he&#39;s being shown. </p>
<p>And want to add that everytime I see Emanuel getting credit it makes me cringe. </p>
<p>Thank you for your well thought out post. I couldn&#39;t agree with you more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPL</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/comment-page-2/#comment-162667</link>
		<dc:creator>CPL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=5883#comment-162667</guid>
		<description>thanks for the link and the props; it&#039;s greatly appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the link and the props; it&#39;s greatly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPL</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/comment-page-2/#comment-162669</link>
		<dc:creator>CPL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=5883#comment-162669</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;This is the same person, CPL, who keeps coming up with these outlandishly controversial articles - I presume he likes to get hits.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is an attack, Nathan, whether you think it is or not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People are free to disagree with my writings, but I will not stand for being called names as the previous trolls have done.  You can disagree without being disrespectful.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You may think you&#039;re not a troll, but your comments are evidence that you don&#039;t visit JJP much because if you did, you would recognize that all the writers on this blog are stating opinions and not reporting like the newspapers do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And you have NO RIGHT to tell people how they should write on a blog or what they should say or discuss.  If you disagree with what is posted - GET YOUR OWN BLOG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This is the same person, CPL, who keeps coming up with these outlandishly controversial articles &#8211; I presume he likes to get hits.</i></p>
<p>This is an attack, Nathan, whether you think it is or not.</p>
<p>People are free to disagree with my writings, but I will not stand for being called names as the previous trolls have done.  You can disagree without being disrespectful.</p>
<p>You may think you&#39;re not a troll, but your comments are evidence that you don&#39;t visit JJP much because if you did, you would recognize that all the writers on this blog are stating opinions and not reporting like the newspapers do.</p>
<p>And you have NO RIGHT to tell people how they should write on a blog or what they should say or discuss.  If you disagree with what is posted &#8211; GET YOUR OWN BLOG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/comment-page-2/#comment-162668</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=5883#comment-162668</guid>
		<description>Umm.  It&#039;s entirely possible that people are subscribed to TAGS and not the blog.  But I&#039;m curious... who is Harold?  Not trying to disrespect you, but anyone who staunchly disagrees with you . . . you are dismissing them as a hater.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are some serious concerns about some of the points you raise.  It seems like Jack and Jill have a lot of readers.  You can have opinionated pieces, just make sure they are responsible and based on proper research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm.  It&#39;s entirely possible that people are subscribed to TAGS and not the blog.  But I&#39;m curious&#8230; who is Harold?  Not trying to disrespect you, but anyone who staunchly disagrees with you . . . you are dismissing them as a hater.  </p>
<p>There are some serious concerns about some of the points you raise.  It seems like Jack and Jill have a lot of readers.  You can have opinionated pieces, just make sure they are responsible and based on proper research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kewalo</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/comment-page-2/#comment-120147</link>
		<dc:creator>Kewalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=5883#comment-120147</guid>
		<description>I have been lurking here for months but feel driven to add to the chorus about Dean. I am appalled and angry that no one has given Dean the kudos he deserves for his 50 State Strategy. IMO we would not have won congress in 2006 or this year without him. There is no excuse for the disrespect he&#039;s being shown. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And want to add that everytime I see Emanuel getting credit it makes me cringe. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for your well thought out post. I couldn&#039;t agree with you more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been lurking here for months but feel driven to add to the chorus about Dean. I am appalled and angry that no one has given Dean the kudos he deserves for his 50 State Strategy. IMO we would not have won congress in 2006 or this year without him. There is no excuse for the disrespect he&#39;s being shown. </p>
<p>And want to add that everytime I see Emanuel getting credit it makes me cringe. </p>
<p>Thank you for your well thought out post. I couldn&#39;t agree with you more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPL</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/comment-page-2/#comment-120138</link>
		<dc:creator>CPL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=5883#comment-120138</guid>
		<description>thanks for the link and the props; it&#039;s greatly appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the link and the props; it&#39;s greatly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPL</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/comment-page-2/#comment-120131</link>
		<dc:creator>CPL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=5883#comment-120131</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;This is the same person, CPL, who keeps coming up with these outlandishly controversial articles - I presume he likes to get hits.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is an attack, Nathan, whether you think it is or not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People are free to disagree with my writings, but I will not stand for being called names as the previous trolls have done.  You can disagree without being disrespectful.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You may think you&#039;re not a troll, but your comments are evidence that you don&#039;t visit JJP much because if you did, you would recognize that all the writers on this blog are stating opinions and not reporting like the newspapers do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And you have NO RIGHT to tell people how they should write on a blog or what they should say or discuss.  If you disagree with what is posted - GET YOUR OWN BLOG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This is the same person, CPL, who keeps coming up with these outlandishly controversial articles &#8211; I presume he likes to get hits.</i></p>
<p>This is an attack, Nathan, whether you think it is or not.</p>
<p>People are free to disagree with my writings, but I will not stand for being called names as the previous trolls have done.  You can disagree without being disrespectful.</p>
<p>You may think you&#39;re not a troll, but your comments are evidence that you don&#39;t visit JJP much because if you did, you would recognize that all the writers on this blog are stating opinions and not reporting like the newspapers do.</p>
<p>And you have NO RIGHT to tell people how they should write on a blog or what they should say or discuss.  If you disagree with what is posted &#8211; GET YOUR OWN BLOG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/comment-page-2/#comment-120107</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=5883#comment-120107</guid>
		<description>Umm.  It&#039;s entirely possible that people are subscribed to TAGS and not the blog.  But I&#039;m curious... who is Harold?  Not trying to disrespect you, but anyone who staunchly disagrees with you . . . you are dismissing them as a hater.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are some serious concerns about some of the points you raise.  It seems like Jack and Jill have a lot of readers.  You can have opinionated pieces, just make sure they are responsible and based on proper research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm.  It&#39;s entirely possible that people are subscribed to TAGS and not the blog.  But I&#39;m curious&#8230; who is Harold?  Not trying to disrespect you, but anyone who staunchly disagrees with you . . . you are dismissing them as a hater.  </p>
<p>There are some serious concerns about some of the points you raise.  It seems like Jack and Jill have a lot of readers.  You can have opinionated pieces, just make sure they are responsible and based on proper research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MODI</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/comment-page-2/#comment-120027</link>
		<dc:creator>MODI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 04:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=5883#comment-120027</guid>
		<description>nice breakdow.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Okay, there is absolutely no question that the media -- ALL media -- railroaded Dean with his &quot;I Have a Scream&quot; speech. I wanted Dean to win at the time, also liked Edwards... , and didn&#039;t care for Kerry 9who really did?). HOWEVER, it is very hard to believe that Dean had any shot at winning in the general. Wrong climate. Obama himself would likely have gotten crushed in 2004. Bush wasn&#039;t hated across the board yet. I say all that to say that yes, Dean got railroaded, but I understand why.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In any case, his 50 state strategy was the smartest short-term and longterm plan the Dems have done in years, and while i can&#039;r answer the question about why he was offered no position, I sort of like him in the very spot that he is in right now. Perhaps Obama is thinking the same thing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice breakdow.</p>
<p>Okay, there is absolutely no question that the media &#8212; ALL media &#8212; railroaded Dean with his &#8220;I Have a Scream&#8221; speech. I wanted Dean to win at the time, also liked Edwards&#8230; , and didn&#39;t care for Kerry 9who really did?). HOWEVER, it is very hard to believe that Dean had any shot at winning in the general. Wrong climate. Obama himself would likely have gotten crushed in 2004. Bush wasn&#39;t hated across the board yet. I say all that to say that yes, Dean got railroaded, but I understand why.</p>
<p>In any case, his 50 state strategy was the smartest short-term and longterm plan the Dems have done in years, and while i can&#39;r answer the question about why he was offered no position, I sort of like him in the very spot that he is in right now. Perhaps Obama is thinking the same thing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madfloridian</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/comment-page-2/#comment-120020</link>
		<dc:creator>madfloridian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 04:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=5883#comment-120020</guid>
		<description>Great post, much needed defense of Dean.    Too much silence about his accomplishments for the party.  Thanks for posting it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is linked here favorably.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&amp;address=389x4762370&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/du...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, much needed defense of Dean.    Too much silence about his accomplishments for the party.  Thanks for posting it. </p>
<p>It is linked here favorably.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&#038;address=389x4762370" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/du.." rel="nofollow">http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/du..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spirit_55z</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/comment-page-2/#comment-119938</link>
		<dc:creator>spirit_55z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 00:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=5883#comment-119938</guid>
		<description>CPL, let&#039;s just say that since this election seasn, I &#039;ve taken off the rose-colored glasses and keep the tin foil hat on standby.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Being a nurse, I have a deep respect for Dr. Dean and his work  to assist  Americans in achieving qualty health care.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I want to believe that PEO and Howard Dean have had discussions on how he can serve in his administration; even if  it is behind the scenes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yu questions is indeed a good one for contemplation and discussion.  Thank you.  Please keep it coming!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;JJP informs, engages, and enlightens.  I &#039;m looking forward to further post , debate and discussion on this topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CPL, let&#39;s just say that since this election seasn, I &#39;ve taken off the rose-colored glasses and keep the tin foil hat on standby.</p>
<p>Being a nurse, I have a deep respect for Dr. Dean and his work  to assist  Americans in achieving qualty health care.</p>
<p>I want to believe that PEO and Howard Dean have had discussions on how he can serve in his administration; even if  it is behind the scenes.</p>
<p>Yu questions is indeed a good one for contemplation and discussion.  Thank you.  Please keep it coming!</p>
<p>JJP informs, engages, and enlightens.  I &#39;m looking forward to further post , debate and discussion on this topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPL</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/comment-page-2/#comment-119910</link>
		<dc:creator>CPL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 23:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=5883#comment-119910</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t hide behind Pie to refute my arguments - STAND ON YOUR OWN KEYBOARD, DAMMIT.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All I need is time and opportunity - you engaged in name calling and I called you out for being a TROLL.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;NOW who&#039;s being sensitive?  TROLL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#39;t hide behind Pie to refute my arguments &#8211; STAND ON YOUR OWN KEYBOARD, DAMMIT.</p>
<p>All I need is time and opportunity &#8211; you engaged in name calling and I called you out for being a TROLL.</p>
<p>NOW who&#39;s being sensitive?  TROLL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPL</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/comment-page-2/#comment-119909</link>
		<dc:creator>CPL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 23:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=5883#comment-119909</guid>
		<description>Yep, Yep, Yep&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dean was phine.....LOL&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kinda had that George Clooney vibe going on before George Clooney had it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, Yep, Yep</p>
<p>Dean was phine&#8230;..LOL</p>
<p>Kinda had that George Clooney vibe going on before George Clooney had it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zulu426</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/comment-page-2/#comment-119880</link>
		<dc:creator>zulu426</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=5883#comment-119880</guid>
		<description>CPL, right on point.  I&#039;m not, however, surprised by the vitriol you have been receiving.  We both know, regrettably, that the more you distance yourself from the mundane crowd, the better target you are.  Keep telling it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CPL, right on point.  I&#39;m not, however, surprised by the vitriol you have been receiving.  We both know, regrettably, that the more you distance yourself from the mundane crowd, the better target you are.  Keep telling it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blksista</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/comment-page-2/#comment-119869</link>
		<dc:creator>blksista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=5883#comment-119869</guid>
		<description>CPL and Amanda:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dean2004.bmgbiz.net/valentine.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This is how Dean looked in college when he was rooming with the brother.&lt;/a&gt;  This was passed around Dems in 2003-2004.  Had a lotta Dem women swooning.  Hell, it even makes me pant now.  Yummy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A man with principles and pulchritude, at any age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CPL and Amanda:</p>
<p><a href="http://dean2004.bmgbiz.net/valentine.jpg" rel="nofollow">This is how Dean looked in college when he was rooming with the brother.</a>  This was passed around Dems in 2003-2004.  Had a lotta Dem women swooning.  Hell, it even makes me pant now.  Yummy.</p>
<p>A man with principles and pulchritude, at any age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mskate</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/comment-page-2/#comment-119867</link>
		<dc:creator>Mskate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=5883#comment-119867</guid>
		<description>PiePie -- thank you for this response, I couldn&#039;t have said it better.  Seems as though CPL is extremely sensitive and prone to name-calling when posts challnge or disagree with the position s/he puts forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PiePie &#8212; thank you for this response, I couldn&#39;t have said it better.  Seems as though CPL is extremely sensitive and prone to name-calling when posts challnge or disagree with the position s/he puts forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPL</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/comment-page-2/#comment-119866</link>
		<dc:creator>CPL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=5883#comment-119866</guid>
		<description>You know it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sometimes, circumstances force people to take action when they would otherwise leave the heavy lifting to someone else.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That dog don&#039;t hunt, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know it.</p>
<p>Sometimes, circumstances force people to take action when they would otherwise leave the heavy lifting to someone else.</p>
<p>That dog don&#39;t hunt, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPL</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/comment-page-2/#comment-119862</link>
		<dc:creator>CPL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=5883#comment-119862</guid>
		<description>Girl, Bruce Dixon and Glen Ford were warning us about Clinton before the Bushes even came on the scene.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And we were too drunk on Clinton&#039;s kool-aid to see we were being SET UP.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I worked for the Government during Clinton&#039;s Administration - the attacks on Civil Rights would have made MLK come out of his grave for the sole purpose of bitch-slapping Clinton as a result of the roll-backs, just because Clinton was trying to stay ahead of the ReThugs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We had more enforcement authority under Bush SR than Clinton and Bush JR COMBINED.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You didn&#039;t hear about Ward Connerly or Shelby Steele until the Democrats lost both house of Congress after Clinton was elected.  He was too busy slinging Lani Guinier and Joycelyn Elders to the wolves to be concerned about it until Newt Gingrich gamed his ass with that &quot;Contract For America&quot; bullshyt.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That project should have been named &quot;Contract ON America&quot; from all the people it took out.  Straight up Gangsta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Girl, Bruce Dixon and Glen Ford were warning us about Clinton before the Bushes even came on the scene.</p>
<p>And we were too drunk on Clinton&#39;s kool-aid to see we were being SET UP.</p>
<p>I worked for the Government during Clinton&#39;s Administration &#8211; the attacks on Civil Rights would have made MLK come out of his grave for the sole purpose of bitch-slapping Clinton as a result of the roll-backs, just because Clinton was trying to stay ahead of the ReThugs.</p>
<p>We had more enforcement authority under Bush SR than Clinton and Bush JR COMBINED.</p>
<p>You didn&#39;t hear about Ward Connerly or Shelby Steele until the Democrats lost both house of Congress after Clinton was elected.  He was too busy slinging Lani Guinier and Joycelyn Elders to the wolves to be concerned about it until Newt Gingrich gamed his ass with that &#8220;Contract For America&#8221; bullshyt.</p>
<p>That project should have been named &#8220;Contract ON America&#8221; from all the people it took out.  Straight up Gangsta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rikyrah</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/comment-page-2/#comment-119856</link>
		<dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=5883#comment-119856</guid>
		<description>EVENING THREAD IS UP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EVENING THREAD IS UP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heartsandflowers</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/01/defining-electability-and-the-dissing-of-howard-dean/comment-page-2/#comment-119854</link>
		<dc:creator>heartsandflowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=5883#comment-119854</guid>
		<description>Yes and as we are starting to see it&#039;s going to be to this country&#039;s demise. A quick stop gap measure that Obama will try is still going to take almost a year to kick in AND it doesn&#039;t solve anything. Maybe the continued economic problems will force enough people to be politically engaged to the point some real CHANGE actually happens, despite efforts by those that don&#039;t want it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes and as we are starting to see it&#39;s going to be to this country&#39;s demise. A quick stop gap measure that Obama will try is still going to take almost a year to kick in AND it doesn&#39;t solve anything. Maybe the continued economic problems will force enough people to be politically engaged to the point some real CHANGE actually happens, despite efforts by those that don&#39;t want it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
