[...]these are some other links to be able to web sites that people locate everyday so here are a handful of well-known websites we like now a days[...]…

[...]several brand new internet sites on the net we love to, even though they aren’t linked to our bait. Examine all of them out[...]…

[...]right here are some other hyperlinks in order to web sites that we find each day here are some well-known sites we like today[...]…

[...]some new websites on the web we love, even if they are not related to ours. Check them out[...]…

[...]http://www.panicattackstreatmentcure.net/links/ Below are some totally unrelated websites to mine, however, they are really worth checking out[...]…

While I agree that it won't happen immediately, I would like to see some sort of progress ASAP. The reality is that there is an increasing conservative backlash policy-wise to LGBT civil rights issues. I personally believe that DADT and ENDA are the least controversial policies that he could take up.

While I agree that it won't happen immediately, I would like to see some sort of progress ASAP. The reality is that there is an increasing conservative backlash policy-wise to LGBT civil rights issues. I personally believe that DADT and ENDA are the least controversial policies that he could take up.

While I agree that it won't happen immediately, I would like to see some sort of progress ASAP. The reality is that there is an increasing conservative backlash policy-wise to LGBT civil rights issues. I personally believe that DADT and ENDA are the least controversial policies that he could take up.

But no one has challenged the military in 40 years.

I really don't expect Barack to be the first. If the rumors about Hillary Clinton become fact, well, then…

Clinton actually campaigned on integrating the Armed Forces more fully – don't you remember how all Vietnam-Era vets got their shorts in a wad because Clinton didn't serve in the military, and were also afraid he'd implement a non-discrimination policy against LGBT?

Truman had already decided he'd do it – he just picked his time when to do it, and kind of did without a whole lot of fanfare. WWII had already depleted the ranks, and it wasn't until late 1948 or so – before the on set of the Korean Conflict, that full integration was actually being achieved.

You dropping knowledge, Craig – and it explains why there hasn't been another POTUS actually gunned down since Kennedy – no one else has challenged or taken on the military in over 40 years.

Barack will do it, I believe. But not a minute too soon.

Jack Kennedy was one of them…and Lincoln was, too.

“Discrimination on the basis of race, gender, ethnicity, religious or national origin, sexual orientation/choice/identity, will NOT BE TOLERATED within the ranks of any BRANCH of the ARMED FORCES, and any incident of discrimination in promotion, assignment, policy implementation, etc., WILL BE PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF THE LAW, UP TO AND INCLUDING termination, imprisonment and fines for any violation found therewith.”

Barack Obama has no more excuse than Bill Clinton did back in 1993. Lukewarm support = tacit consent to discriminate by the powers that be. The Chief sends the message AND sets the tone.

Look, Truman ignored his southern redneck buddies back in the 1950s and fully integrated the Armed Forces so that brothas, Latino brothas, Asian and Native American brothas could have the right to die in battle right alongside their rednecked Brethren. So, if Truman had the cajones to integrate the Armed Forces at the height of Jim Crow, as I've said, Clinton didn't have an excuse for his lukewarm support 15 years ago, and Obama would do well not to repeat Bill Clinton's mistakes.

Co-sign. If necessary, Barack should wait till 2014 (his last two years) to initiate (unless it percolates through the legislature as JunePearl has suggested).

As much as people hate on DADT, it's better than if nothing had been done at all. It would not have been necessary if Clinton had been a “more effective” politician. DADT and failed Healthcare Reform in 93 cost Democrats the Congress in 94. We need to keep Nancy and Harry in power beyond 2010.