<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday Open Thread</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/</link>
	<description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:18:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NJ Girl</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/comment-page-9/#comment-348603</link>
		<dc:creator>NJ Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3790#comment-348603</guid>
		<description>To personally meet the next president of the United States must have been a tremendous honor.  Only a few individuals get that chance in life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To personally meet the next president of the United States must have been a tremendous honor.  Only a few individuals get that chance in life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NJ Girl</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/comment-page-9/#comment-162131</link>
		<dc:creator>NJ Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3790#comment-162131</guid>
		<description>To personally meet the next president of the United States must have been a tremendous honor.  Only a few individuals get that chance in life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To personally meet the next president of the United States must have been a tremendous honor.  Only a few individuals get that chance in life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NJ Girl</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/comment-page-9/#comment-98963</link>
		<dc:creator>NJ Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3790#comment-98963</guid>
		<description>To personally meet the next president of the United States must have been a tremendous honor.  Only a few individuals get that chance in life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To personally meet the next president of the United States must have been a tremendous honor.  Only a few individuals get that chance in life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anovelista</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/comment-page-9/#comment-82786</link>
		<dc:creator>Anovelista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3790#comment-82786</guid>
		<description>I agree - it&#039;s one of my favorites.  In fact, I think I will post it on my own blog later this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; it&#39;s one of my favorites.  In fact, I think I will post it on my own blog later this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evita</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/comment-page-8/#comment-82782</link>
		<dc:creator>evita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3790#comment-82782</guid>
		<description>I did NOT see this but I&#039;m listening it to it now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THIS!  We should repost this! Speaks to his innovation and capacity to be a 21st Century President!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did NOT see this but I&#39;m listening it to it now.</p>
<p>THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THIS!  We should repost this! Speaks to his innovation and capacity to be a 21st Century President!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenLadyHere</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/comment-page-8/#comment-82405</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3790#comment-82405</guid>
		<description>rikyrah:  STATS/DATA from TPM:   Actually, I like the MAP!!  :&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/tpm_track_composite_obamas_lea_3.php&quot;&gt;http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;TPM Track Composite: Obama&#039;s Lead Expands Again&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;By Eric Kleefeld - October 21, 2008, 5:10PM&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Here&#039;s our daily composite of the six major national tracking polls. Barack Obama continues to lead John McCain by a healthy margin, with a slight dip in McCain&#039;s support today:&lt;br&gt;• Gallup: Obama 52%, McCain 42%, with a ±2% margin of error, compared to a 52%-43% Obama lead yesterday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• Rasmussen: Obama 50%, McCain 46%, with a ±2% margin of error, unchanged from yesterday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• ABC/Washington Post: Obama 53%, McCain 44%, with a ±3% margin of error, the same as yesterday&#039;s numbers. This is the second day of the ABC/WaPo tracking poll, and the first day we&#039;re including it in the Composite.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• Hotline/Diageo: Obama 47%, McCain 41%, with a ±3.4% margin of error, compared to a 47%-42% Obama lead from yesterday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• Research 2000: Obama 50%, McCain 42%, with a ±3% margin of error, unchanged from yesterday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• Zogby: Obama 50%, McCain 42%, with a ±2.9% margin of error, compared to a 50%-44% Obama lead yesterday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Adding these polls together and weighting them by the square roots of their sample sizes, Obama is ahead 50.5%-43.1%, a lead of 7.4 points, compared to the 50.5%-43.7% Obama lead from yesterday, when the ABC/WaPo numbers are included in yesterday&#039;s total.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whooooo!   Hoooo!  :&gt;)  [My scientific reaction!  :&gt;)]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OBAMA-BIDEN  &#039;08!!!   TRUST!&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rikyrah:  STATS/DATA from TPM:   Actually, I like the MAP!!  :&gt;)</p>
<p><a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/tpm_track_composite_obamas_lea_3.php"></a><a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com.." rel="nofollow">http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com..</a>.<br /><b>TPM Track Composite: Obama&#39;s Lead Expands Again</b><br />By Eric Kleefeld &#8211; October 21, 2008, 5:10PM</p>
<p><i>Here&#39;s our daily composite of the six major national tracking polls. Barack Obama continues to lead John McCain by a healthy margin, with a slight dip in McCain&#39;s support today:<br />• Gallup: Obama 52%, McCain 42%, with a ±2% margin of error, compared to a 52%-43% Obama lead yesterday.</p>
<p>• Rasmussen: Obama 50%, McCain 46%, with a ±2% margin of error, unchanged from yesterday.</p>
<p>• ABC/Washington Post: Obama 53%, McCain 44%, with a ±3% margin of error, the same as yesterday&#39;s numbers. This is the second day of the ABC/WaPo tracking poll, and the first day we&#39;re including it in the Composite.</p>
<p>• Hotline/Diageo: Obama 47%, McCain 41%, with a ±3.4% margin of error, compared to a 47%-42% Obama lead from yesterday.</p>
<p>• Research 2000: Obama 50%, McCain 42%, with a ±3% margin of error, unchanged from yesterday.</p>
<p>• Zogby: Obama 50%, McCain 42%, with a ±2.9% margin of error, compared to a 50%-44% Obama lead yesterday.</p>
<p><b>Adding these polls together and weighting them by the square roots of their sample sizes, Obama is ahead 50.5%-43.1%, a lead of 7.4 points, compared to the 50.5%-43.7% Obama lead from yesterday, when the ABC/WaPo numbers are included in yesterday&#39;s total.</b></p>
<p>Whooooo!   Hoooo!  :&gt;)  [My scientific reaction!  :&gt;)]</p>
<p>OBAMA-BIDEN  &#39;08!!!   TRUST!</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justice58</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/comment-page-8/#comment-82384</link>
		<dc:creator>Justice58</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3790#comment-82384</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Lewis defends &#039;Wallace&#039; remarks&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/Lewis_defends_Wallace_remarks.html&quot;&gt;http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/Lew...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Rep. John Lewis defended his criticism of the tone of McCain’s attacks on Obama at a forum on the 1965 Voting Rights Act last night at the Paley Center for the Media in New York.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“My only reference was to the toxic language that reminded me of another period, and rather than using George Wallace’s name, I probably should have used Joe McCarthy’s, and they wouldn’t be accusing me of using race. But it&#039;s hate speech,&quot; he said in response to a question from Pat Mitchell, the head of the Paley Center, according to a transcript from the event.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He said of Obama: &quot;I see in this election as a down payment, as an installment, on making the dream of Martin Luther King Jr. and a dream of America real, moving us closer to a truly muliti-racial democracy to build in the beloved community. I think he is the personification of the hopes and dreams and aspirations of many, many people.”&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Congressman Lewis isn&#039;t backing down on sh%t!  Props Congressman Lewis!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Lewis defends &#39;Wallace&#39; remarks</b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/Lewis_defends_Wallace_remarks.html"></a><a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/Lew.." rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/Lew..</a>.</p>
<p><i>Rep. John Lewis defended his criticism of the tone of McCain’s attacks on Obama at a forum on the 1965 Voting Rights Act last night at the Paley Center for the Media in New York.</p>
<p>“My only reference was to the toxic language that reminded me of another period, and rather than using George Wallace’s name, I probably should have used Joe McCarthy’s, and they wouldn’t be accusing me of using race. But it&#39;s hate speech,&#8221; he said in response to a question from Pat Mitchell, the head of the Paley Center, according to a transcript from the event.</p>
<p>He said of Obama: &#8220;I see in this election as a down payment, as an installment, on making the dream of Martin Luther King Jr. and a dream of America real, moving us closer to a truly muliti-racial democracy to build in the beloved community. I think he is the personification of the hopes and dreams and aspirations of many, many people.”</i></p>
<p>Congressman Lewis isn&#39;t backing down on sh%t!  Props Congressman Lewis!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenLadyHere</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/comment-page-8/#comment-82382</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3790#comment-82382</guid>
		<description>rikyrah:  Went on  &quot;Field Trip&quot; to &lt;i&gt;MUDFLATS&lt;/i&gt; At first, I said  WHAT!!!??  &lt;br&gt;Then I READ the article and calmed down!  :&gt;)     :&gt;)   :&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/palins-national-numbers-soarup-to-55-from-50-two-weeks-ago/&quot;&gt;http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/palins...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Palin&#039;s National Numbers Soar Up to 55%  From 50% In Two Weeks&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;That’s right. In a national NBC/Wall Street Journal Poll 55% of Americans now feel that Sarah Palin is unqualified to be President, up from 50% two weeks ago. As we all know, breaking that 50% mark is pretty convincing. I think that we can now safely say, that according to Americans, Sarah Palin is not qualified.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We’ve been spreading the news since the morning of August 29, and it seems that it only took 54 days to convince the majority of the country. Not bad.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    The one candidate whose popularity has fallen is Gov. Palin, the Republican vice-presidential nominee. Voters are less likely to see her in a positive light, and much more likely to report negative feelings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Fifty-five percent of voters say Gov. Palin isn’t qualified to be president if the need arises, up from 50% two weeks ago. And when given a list of possible concerns about Sen. McCain, voters were by far most likely to say they worry about Gov. Palin’s qualification to be president.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SKIP&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other numbers on the rise?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People who think the country is on the wrong track is at a new high of 78%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People who rated their interest in this election as a 10 on a scale of 1-10 is at a new high of 81%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are many more interesting nuggets to be found in the poll data HERE.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;HAH!!    :&gt;)   :&gt;)  &quot;Virtual &#039;DAP&#039;&quot; to anyone with their hand up!!  :&gt;)   :&gt;)&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rikyrah:  Went on  &#8220;Field Trip&#8221; to <i>MUDFLATS</i> At first, I said  WHAT!!!??  <br />Then I READ the article and calmed down!  :&gt;)     :&gt;)   :&gt;)</p>
<p><a href="http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/palins-national-numbers-soarup-to-55-from-50-two-weeks-ago/"></a><a href="http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/palins.." rel="nofollow">http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/palins..</a>.<br /><b>Palin&#39;s National Numbers Soar Up to 55%  From 50% In Two Weeks</p>
<p><i><b>That’s right. In a national NBC/Wall Street Journal Poll 55% of Americans now feel that Sarah Palin is unqualified to be President, up from 50% two weeks ago. As we all know, breaking that 50% mark is pretty convincing. I think that we can now safely say, that according to Americans, Sarah Palin is not qualified.</b></p>
<p>We’ve been spreading the news since the morning of August 29, and it seems that it only took 54 days to convince the majority of the country. Not bad.</p>
<p>    The one candidate whose popularity has fallen is Gov. Palin, the Republican vice-presidential nominee. Voters are less likely to see her in a positive light, and much more likely to report negative feelings.</p>
<p>    Fifty-five percent of voters say Gov. Palin isn’t qualified to be president if the need arises, up from 50% two weeks ago. And when given a list of possible concerns about Sen. McCain, voters were by far most likely to say they worry about Gov. Palin’s qualification to be president.</p>
<p>SKIP</p>
<p>Other numbers on the rise?</p>
<p>People who think the country is on the wrong track is at a new high of 78%.</p>
<p>People who rated their interest in this election as a 10 on a scale of 1-10 is at a new high of 81%.</p>
<p>There are many more interesting nuggets to be found in the poll data HERE.</i></p>
<p>HAH!!    :&gt;)   :&gt;)  &#8220;Virtual &#39;DAP&#39;&#8221; to anyone with their hand up!!  :&gt;)   :&gt;)</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenLadyHere</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/comment-page-8/#comment-82379</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3790#comment-82379</guid>
		<description>MsKitty:  Ya mean  -  THIS ONE!??    :&gt;)    :&gt;)  This VIDEO is annotated  - and 2 long!  :&gt;)   :&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MsKitty:  Ya mean  &#8211;  THIS ONE!??    :&gt;)    :&gt;)  This VIDEO is annotated  &#8211; and 2 long!  :&gt;)   :&gt;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenLadyHere</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/comment-page-8/#comment-82377</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3790#comment-82377</guid>
		<description>rikyrah:  Keith O. on Palin who&#039;s NOT onto what the VP does  - YET!!   :&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blueherald.com/2008/10/keith-olbermann-special-campaign-comment-102108/&quot;&gt;http://blueherald.com/2008/10/keith-olbermann-s...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Keith O. - On Palin Re VP  -  VIDEO&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rikyrah:  Keith O. on Palin who&#39;s NOT onto what the VP does  &#8211; YET!!   :&gt;)</p>
<p><a href="http://blueherald.com/2008/10/keith-olbermann-special-campaign-comment-102108/"></a><a href="http://blueherald.com/2008/10/keith-olbermann-s.." rel="nofollow">http://blueherald.com/2008/10/keith-olbermann-s..</a>.<br /><b>Keith O. &#8211; On Palin Re VP  &#8211;  VIDEO</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carolinagirl</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/comment-page-8/#comment-82374</link>
		<dc:creator>carolinagirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3790#comment-82374</guid>
		<description>Hey, now I resent that!! ;0) Happy birthday Teacher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, now I resent that!! ;0) Happy birthday Teacher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenLadyHere</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/comment-page-8/#comment-82373</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3790#comment-82373</guid>
		<description>Justice58:  THANKS!  My extreme pleasure!!  :&gt;)  :&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justice58:  THANKS!  My extreme pleasure!!  :&gt;)  :&gt;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenLadyHere</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/comment-page-8/#comment-82371</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3790#comment-82371</guid>
		<description>CPL:  &quot;Whycome&quot; U didn&#039;t let me know &#039;bout this sangin&#039; &#039;gagement??  I have a Choir Robe??  &quot;?_   &quot;?_</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CPL:  &#8220;Whycome&#8221; U didn&#39;t let me know &#39;bout this sangin&#39; &#39;gagement??  I have a Choir Robe??  &#8220;?_   &#8220;?_</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenLadyHere</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/comment-page-8/#comment-82368</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3790#comment-82368</guid>
		<description>YEAH!, Michelle.   I tried to warn her 2!  She betta RECOGNIZE!!  :&gt;)  :&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YEAH!, Michelle.   I tried to warn her 2!  She betta RECOGNIZE!!  :&gt;)  :&gt;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Val</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/comment-page-8/#comment-82367</link>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3790#comment-82367</guid>
		<description>RAOTFL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RAOTFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anovelista</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/comment-page-8/#comment-82366</link>
		<dc:creator>Anovelista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3790#comment-82366</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Maximize Your Influence In The Election&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lifehacker.com/5066604/maximize-your-influence-in-the-election&quot;&gt;http://lifehacker.com/5066604/maximize-your-inf...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;The problem with voting is that you only get one, no matter how passionate or apathetic you are about a particular candidate or issue. So how can you increase your influence on an election? (Legally?) I&#039;ve compiled a list of tips to help you freshen up since your tenth grade civics class—including some tricks they don&#039;t teach you in high school—with plenty of links for resources, inspiration and taking action.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Maximize Your Influence In The Election</b></p>
<p><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5066604/maximize-your-influence-in-the-election"></a><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5066604/maximize-your-inf.." rel="nofollow">http://lifehacker.com/5066604/maximize-your-inf..</a>.</p>
<p><i>The problem with voting is that you only get one, no matter how passionate or apathetic you are about a particular candidate or issue. So how can you increase your influence on an election? (Legally?) I&#39;ve compiled a list of tips to help you freshen up since your tenth grade civics class—including some tricks they don&#39;t teach you in high school—with plenty of links for resources, inspiration and taking action.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenLadyHere</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/comment-page-8/#comment-82365</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3790#comment-82365</guid>
		<description>Miranda:  Maybe she needs to give ONE of HER FROCKS to &quot;Joe&#039;s&quot; WIFE!! :&gt;)   :&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miranda:  Maybe she needs to give ONE of HER FROCKS to &#8220;Joe&#39;s&#8221; WIFE!! :&gt;)   :&gt;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Val</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/comment-page-8/#comment-82364</link>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3790#comment-82364</guid>
		<description>lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenLadyHere</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/comment-page-8/#comment-82361</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3790#comment-82361</guid>
		<description>Val:  YOU STRUCK GOLD!  :&gt;)  Errybody&#039;s TALKIN&#039; &#039;bout this!   :&gt;)  Go YOU!  :&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AzEY6ZqkuE&amp;feature=related&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AzEY6ZqkuE&amp;feat...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Everybody&#039;s Talkin&#039;&lt;/b&gt;  [kinda  :&gt;)  I know - all the words don&#039;t count!  Oh! Well!:&gt;)]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Val:  YOU STRUCK GOLD!  :&gt;)  Errybody&#39;s TALKIN&#39; &#39;bout this!   :&gt;)  Go YOU!  :&gt;)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AzEY6ZqkuE&#038;feature=related"></a><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AzEY6ZqkuE&#038;feat.." rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AzEY6ZqkuE&#038;feat..</a>.<br /><b>Everybody&#39;s Talkin&#39;</b>  [kinda  :&gt;)  I know - all the words don&#39;t count!  Oh! Well!:&gt;)]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anovelista</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/tuesday-open-thread-17/comment-page-8/#comment-82359</link>
		<dc:creator>Anovelista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3790#comment-82359</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Sarah Palin&#039;s college years left no lasting impression&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;In the five years of her collegiate career, spanning four universities in three states, Palin left behind few traces. Not many professors or students even remember her.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-palincollege21-2008oct21%2C0%2C1017744%2Cfull.story&quot;&gt;http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-pali...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Sarah Palin&#39;s college years left no lasting impression</b></p>
<p><i>In the five years of her collegiate career, spanning four universities in three states, Palin left behind few traces. Not many professors or students even remember her.</i></p>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-palincollege21-2008oct21%2C0%2C1017744%2Cfull.story"></a><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-pali.." rel="nofollow">http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-pali..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
