Comments on: The End Of America’s Longest War? http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/the-end-of-americas-longest-war/ A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:07:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: home anxiety remedieshttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/the-end-of-americas-longest-war/comment-page-1/#comment-636820 home anxiety remedies Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:04:46 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=4185#comment-636820 <strong>My Recommended Websites...</strong>[...]some new websites on the web we love, even if they are not related to ours. Check them out[...]... My Recommended Websites…

[...]some new websites on the web we love, even if they are not related to ours. Check them out[...]…

]]> By: Googlehttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/the-end-of-americas-longest-war/comment-page-1/#comment-616960 Google Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:23:34 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=4185#comment-616960 <strong>Great Site…...</strong>Hey Admin , Extremely nice blog , if you need backlinks to your website I provide upto 10,000 high quality SEO backlinks for only $5. Check it out here :http://bit.ly/msweL2... Great Site……

Hey Admin , Extremely nice blog , if you need backlinks to your website I provide upto 10,000 high quality SEO backlinks for only $5. Check it out here :http://bit.ly/msweL2...

]]> By: property casualty insurance licensehttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/the-end-of-americas-longest-war/comment-page-1/#comment-557927 property casualty insurance license Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:00:12 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=4185#comment-557927 <strong>Great Site…...</strong>[...]check this out as this contains important information about[...]... Great Site……

[...]check this out as this contains important information about[...]…

]]> By: DmozZ Articaleshttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/the-end-of-americas-longest-war/comment-page-1/#comment-533048 DmozZ Articales Sat, 19 Mar 2011 21:53:16 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=4185#comment-533048 <strong>DmozZ Articales...</strong>Auto Trackback By DmozZ- Free Articles for Reprint.Follow us on Twitter (3sheerq)... DmozZ Articales…

Auto Trackback By DmozZ- Free Articles for Reprint.Follow us on Twitter (3sheerq)…

]]> By: DmozZ Articaleshttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/the-end-of-americas-longest-war/comment-page-1/#comment-532795 DmozZ Articales Fri, 18 Mar 2011 03:27:26 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=4185#comment-532795 <strong>{great|cool} {blog|site} {cheers|Thanx} {Posting|Showing us}...</strong>Really Good blog,Thank you very much for you effort in writing the posts.... {great|cool} {blog|site} {cheers|Thanx} {Posting|Showing us}…

Really Good blog,Thank you very much for you effort in writing the posts….

]]> By: sophicleshttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/the-end-of-americas-longest-war/comment-page-1/#comment-335653 sophicles Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:33:47 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=4185#comment-335653 It's well written piece...but wrong. It is not the old world that affects the USA. In fact, traditionally it has been the opposite. It's nice to want to be traditional in some regard, if indeed you have an "extemporaneous understanding of the past". <br>As civil rights figured into the equation back in 1875 when "black people were given their civil rights, it's true there were egregious errors made in the form of Jim Crow laws. But it was the fault of the US Supreme Court in 1895 over the "ruling about segregated railway seating". Thus was born the "separate but equal clause". <br>As James Madison put's forth in the Federalist document #10, while beseeching the New York legislature to ratify the constitution, "The constitution does not do away with the rabble in society but effectively "enshrines the rabble because they would always be with us". It's well written piece…but wrong. It is not the old world that affects the USA. In fact, traditionally it has been the opposite. It's nice to want to be traditional in some regard, if indeed you have an “extemporaneous understanding of the past”.
As civil rights figured into the equation back in 1875 when “black people were given their civil rights, it's true there were egregious errors made in the form of Jim Crow laws. But it was the fault of the US Supreme Court in 1895 over the “ruling about segregated railway seating”. Thus was born the “separate but equal clause”.
As James Madison put's forth in the Federalist document #10, while beseeching the New York legislature to ratify the constitution, “The constitution does not do away with the rabble in society but effectively “enshrines the rabble because they would always be with us”.

]]> By: sophicleshttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/the-end-of-americas-longest-war/comment-page-1/#comment-335654 sophicles Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:14:25 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=4185#comment-335654 ..."Culture war's [...that make...] rational politics elusive..." (?) I think such a statement belies the true nature of the individual who would ignorantly suggest such a thing. It shows the length and depth of the corruption of objective thinking because of being so centrically oriented. Indeed it is people who believe such statements that are the problem in the body politic. They are the type of people who look for the "political medium" in their popularly oriented contemporary desire to find the cause and reason for their own deep seated discontent, while giving definition to a "weltershunnge" (world view) that fits nicely in a compartmentalized box that can be juxtaposed and neatly and cleanly understood.<br>The civil war is and has been over for a very long time. While their may be from time to time egregious errors in society they are not the norm and have been relegated to being popular morees. What the real battle in politics that is the reason for so much partisanship is the "Bill of rights". It is the contention between state's rights and the Federal Government, (as explained by James Madison in the "Federalist Documents) as opposed to the original "Articles of Confederation" that had been in place in the original colonies. …”Culture war's [...that make...] rational politics elusive…” (?) I think such a statement belies the true nature of the individual who would ignorantly suggest such a thing. It shows the length and depth of the corruption of objective thinking because of being so centrically oriented. Indeed it is people who believe such statements that are the problem in the body politic. They are the type of people who look for the “political medium” in their popularly oriented contemporary desire to find the cause and reason for their own deep seated discontent, while giving definition to a “weltershunnge” (world view) that fits nicely in a compartmentalized box that can be juxtaposed and neatly and cleanly understood.
The civil war is and has been over for a very long time. While their may be from time to time egregious errors in society they are not the norm and have been relegated to being popular morees. What the real battle in politics that is the reason for so much partisanship is the “Bill of rights”. It is the contention between state's rights and the Federal Government, (as explained by James Madison in the “Federalist Documents) as opposed to the original “Articles of Confederation” that had been in place in the original colonies.

]]> By: sophicleshttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/the-end-of-americas-longest-war/comment-page-1/#comment-214883 sophicles Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:33:47 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=4185#comment-214883 It's well written piece...but wrong. It is not the old world that affects the USA. In fact, traditionally it has been the opposite. It's nice to want to be traditional in some regard, if indeed you have an "extemporaneous understanding of the past". <br>As civil rights figured into the equation back in 1875 when "black people were given their civil rights, it's true there were egregious errors made in the form of Jim Crow laws. But it was the fault of the US Supreme Court in 1895 over the "ruling about segregated railway seating". Thus was born the "separate but equal clause". <br>As James Madison put's forth in the Federalist document #10, while beseeching the New York legislature to ratify the constitution, "The constitution does not do away with the rabble in society but effectively "enshrines the rabble because they would always be with us". It's well written piece…but wrong. It is not the old world that affects the USA. In fact, traditionally it has been the opposite. It's nice to want to be traditional in some regard, if indeed you have an “extemporaneous understanding of the past”.
As civil rights figured into the equation back in 1875 when “black people were given their civil rights, it's true there were egregious errors made in the form of Jim Crow laws. But it was the fault of the US Supreme Court in 1895 over the “ruling about segregated railway seating”. Thus was born the “separate but equal clause”.
As James Madison put's forth in the Federalist document #10, while beseeching the New York legislature to ratify the constitution, “The constitution does not do away with the rabble in society but effectively “enshrines the rabble because they would always be with us”.

]]> By: sophicleshttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/the-end-of-americas-longest-war/comment-page-1/#comment-214884 sophicles Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:14:25 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=4185#comment-214884 ..."Culture war's [...that make...] rational politics elusive..." (?) I think such a statement belies the true nature of the individual who would ignorantly suggest such a thing. It shows the length and depth of the corruption of objective thinking because of being so centrically oriented. Indeed it is people who believe such statements that are the problem in the body politic. They are the type of people who look for the "political medium" in their popularly oriented contemporary desire to find the cause and reason for their own deep seated discontent, while giving definition to a "weltershunnge" (world view) that fits nicely in a compartmentalized box that can be juxtaposed and neatly and cleanly understood.<br>The civil war is and has been over for a very long time. While their may be from time to time egregious errors in society they are not the norm and have been relegated to being popular morees. What the real battle in politics that is the reason for so much partisanship is the "Bill of rights". It is the contention between state's rights and the Federal Government, (as explained by James Madison in the "Federalist Documents) as opposed to the original "Articles of Confederation" that had been in place in the original colonies. …”Culture war's [...that make...] rational politics elusive…” (?) I think such a statement belies the true nature of the individual who would ignorantly suggest such a thing. It shows the length and depth of the corruption of objective thinking because of being so centrically oriented. Indeed it is people who believe such statements that are the problem in the body politic. They are the type of people who look for the “political medium” in their popularly oriented contemporary desire to find the cause and reason for their own deep seated discontent, while giving definition to a “weltershunnge” (world view) that fits nicely in a compartmentalized box that can be juxtaposed and neatly and cleanly understood.
The civil war is and has been over for a very long time. While their may be from time to time egregious errors in society they are not the norm and have been relegated to being popular morees. What the real battle in politics that is the reason for so much partisanship is the “Bill of rights”. It is the contention between state's rights and the Federal Government, (as explained by James Madison in the “Federalist Documents) as opposed to the original “Articles of Confederation” that had been in place in the original colonies.

]]> By: ljfhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/the-end-of-americas-longest-war/comment-page-1/#comment-162360 ljf Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:10:55 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=4185#comment-162360 I totally agree with the premise of the piece. The 60's were mainly about civil rights and how the American landscaped shifted. It was the final blow to JIm Crow and the beginning of Blacks defining the collective self and seizing power. The civil rights movement created spaces for others to achieve their rights (women, disabled, LGBT, Native American, Chicano, POC, etc.) <br><br>The civil rights movement was about making good on the Reconstruction Era promises. That was a prosperous time for Blacks in American history. However brief it was. <br> <br>Liberal whites were central in the passing of laws the that ended Jim Crow. Conservatives whites never forgave them. This is why the the whole Southern Strategy is revamped every president election cycle. The pick of Sarah Palin spearheaded the Southern Strategy this election cycle.<br><br>The South and her ideological descendants want things the way things were. They hijacked the Republican party after the Dixiecrats left the Democratic party in the 60's. <br><br>I believe that this will never be resolved. When the baby boomers will die out and the culture wars will be branded something else. I totally agree with the premise of the piece. The 60's were mainly about civil rights and how the American landscaped shifted. It was the final blow to JIm Crow and the beginning of Blacks defining the collective self and seizing power. The civil rights movement created spaces for others to achieve their rights (women, disabled, LGBT, Native American, Chicano, POC, etc.)

The civil rights movement was about making good on the Reconstruction Era promises. That was a prosperous time for Blacks in American history. However brief it was.

Liberal whites were central in the passing of laws the that ended Jim Crow. Conservatives whites never forgave them. This is why the the whole Southern Strategy is revamped every president election cycle. The pick of Sarah Palin spearheaded the Southern Strategy this election cycle.

The South and her ideological descendants want things the way things were. They hijacked the Republican party after the Dixiecrats left the Democratic party in the 60's.

I believe that this will never be resolved. When the baby boomers will die out and the culture wars will be branded something else.

]]> By: jelanahttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/the-end-of-americas-longest-war/comment-page-1/#comment-162361 jelana Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:37:39 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=4185#comment-162361 When Barack is sworn in, it will be powerful symbolism. It won't solve or change the dynamics of racism, but indeed it will be a start. When Barack is sworn in, it will be powerful symbolism. It won't solve or change the dynamics of racism, but indeed it will be a start.

]]> By: ochyminghttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/the-end-of-americas-longest-war/comment-page-1/#comment-162362 ochyming Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:34:45 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=4185#comment-162362 I am not this joyful.<br>I think the USA that Obama dreams already exist but I doubt that it is READY to make the sacrifice.<br>But maybe ONLY him could LEAD them to.<br><br>Conservatism is about preserving comfort, it engages NOT with challenges. So the road will be Tough!<br><br>But what is inevitable NEVER looks difficult. I am not this joyful.
I think the USA that Obama dreams already exist but I doubt that it is READY to make the sacrifice.
But maybe ONLY him could LEAD them to.

Conservatism is about preserving comfort, it engages NOT with challenges. So the road will be Tough!

But what is inevitable NEVER looks difficult.

]]> By: Mayor of Concordhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/the-end-of-americas-longest-war/comment-page-1/#comment-162363 Mayor of Concord Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:50:42 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=4185#comment-162363 I'm still at a loss on this issue. I am glad that there are so many blogs helping explain this issue to me. I'm still at a loss on this issue. I am glad that there are so many blogs helping explain this issue to me.

]]> By: ljfhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/the-end-of-americas-longest-war/comment-page-1/#comment-91876 ljf Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:10:55 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=4185#comment-91876 I totally agree with the premise of the piece. The 60's were mainly about civil rights and how the American landscaped shifted. It was the final blow to JIm Crow and the beginning of Blacks defining the collective self and seizing power. The civil rights movement created spaces for others to achieve their rights (women, disabled, LGBT, Native American, Chicano, POC, etc.) <br><br>The civil rights movement was about making good on the Reconstruction Era promises. That was a prosperous time for Blacks in American history. However brief it was. <br> <br>Liberal whites were central in the passing of laws the that ended Jim Crow. Conservatives whites never forgave them. This is why the the whole Southern Strategy is revamped every president election cycle. The pick of Sarah Palin spearheaded the Southern Strategy this election cycle.<br><br>The South and her ideological descendants want things the way things were. They hijacked the Republican party after the Dixiecrats left the Democratic party in the 60's. <br><br>I believe that this will never be resolved. When the baby boomers will die out and the culture wars will be branded something else. I totally agree with the premise of the piece. The 60's were mainly about civil rights and how the American landscaped shifted. It was the final blow to JIm Crow and the beginning of Blacks defining the collective self and seizing power. The civil rights movement created spaces for others to achieve their rights (women, disabled, LGBT, Native American, Chicano, POC, etc.)

The civil rights movement was about making good on the Reconstruction Era promises. That was a prosperous time for Blacks in American history. However brief it was.

Liberal whites were central in the passing of laws the that ended Jim Crow. Conservatives whites never forgave them. This is why the the whole Southern Strategy is revamped every president election cycle. The pick of Sarah Palin spearheaded the Southern Strategy this election cycle.

The South and her ideological descendants want things the way things were. They hijacked the Republican party after the Dixiecrats left the Democratic party in the 60's.

I believe that this will never be resolved. When the baby boomers will die out and the culture wars will be branded something else.

]]> By: jelanahttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/the-end-of-americas-longest-war/comment-page-1/#comment-91857 jelana Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:37:39 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=4185#comment-91857 When Barack is sworn in, it will be powerful symbolism. It won't solve or change the dynamics of racism, but indeed it will be a start. When Barack is sworn in, it will be powerful symbolism. It won't solve or change the dynamics of racism, but indeed it will be a start.

]]> By: Deocliciano Okssipin Vieirahttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/the-end-of-americas-longest-war/comment-page-1/#comment-91854 Deocliciano Okssipin Vieira Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:34:45 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=4185#comment-91854 I am not this joyful.<br>I think the USA that Obama dreams already exist but I doubt that it is READY to make the sacrifice.<br>But maybe ONLY him could LEAD them to.<br><br>Conservatism is about preserving comfort, it engages NOT with challenges. So the road will be Tough!<br><br>But what is inevitable NEVER looks difficult. I am not this joyful.
I think the USA that Obama dreams already exist but I doubt that it is READY to make the sacrifice.
But maybe ONLY him could LEAD them to.

Conservatism is about preserving comfort, it engages NOT with challenges. So the road will be Tough!

But what is inevitable NEVER looks difficult.

]]> By: Mayor of Concordhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/10/the-end-of-americas-longest-war/comment-page-1/#comment-91821 Mayor of Concord Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:50:42 +0000 http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=4185#comment-91821 I'm still at a loss on this issue. I am glad that there are so many blogs helping explain this issue to me. I'm still at a loss on this issue. I am glad that there are so many blogs helping explain this issue to me.

]]>