<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunday Open Thread</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/</link>
	<description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:56:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lilytiger</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/comment-page-5/#comment-160110</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilytiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3211#comment-160110</guid>
		<description>*snort. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He&#039;s also kind of of close to Michelle, too. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All joking aside, the picture of him looking at the two little girls shows that Joe is an engaged human who likes people..a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*snort. </p>
<p>He&#39;s also kind of of close to Michelle, too. </p>
<p>All joking aside, the picture of him looking at the two little girls shows that Joe is an engaged human who likes people..a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilytiger</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/comment-page-5/#comment-67385</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilytiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3211#comment-67385</guid>
		<description>*snort. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He&#039;s also kind of of close to Michelle, too. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All joking aside, the picture of him looking at the two little girls shows that Joe is an engaged human who likes people..a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*snort. </p>
<p>He&#39;s also kind of of close to Michelle, too. </p>
<p>All joking aside, the picture of him looking at the two little girls shows that Joe is an engaged human who likes people..a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evita</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/comment-page-5/#comment-67245</link>
		<dc:creator>evita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3211#comment-67245</guid>
		<description>Well said, especially last paragraph. I find it a hard pill to swallow that the last President was elected because so many voters felt like they would want to have a beer with him. I didn&#039;t. But truthfully, to me that says, &quot;he&#039;s just like me and that helps my trust and comfort with him.&quot; Why then, it is wrong for me to find that same quality appreciable when deciding upon Obama&#039;s candidacy? Because over and above all that he is an experienced leader and intellectual, and he is the only candidate that has shown sound judgment. He is the best candidate with the most potential to revitalize our nation and our international standing in ages. Ages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, especially last paragraph. I find it a hard pill to swallow that the last President was elected because so many voters felt like they would want to have a beer with him. I didn&#39;t. But truthfully, to me that says, &#8220;he&#39;s just like me and that helps my trust and comfort with him.&#8221; Why then, it is wrong for me to find that same quality appreciable when deciding upon Obama&#39;s candidacy? Because over and above all that he is an experienced leader and intellectual, and he is the only candidate that has shown sound judgment. He is the best candidate with the most potential to revitalize our nation and our international standing in ages. Ages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msmartin</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/comment-page-5/#comment-67238</link>
		<dc:creator>msmartin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3211#comment-67238</guid>
		<description>His mom has already said she doesn&#039;t know anything about this &quot;stuff&quot; she just hope her boy will be alright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His mom has already said she doesn&#39;t know anything about this &#8220;stuff&#8221; she just hope her boy will be alright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msmartin</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/comment-page-5/#comment-67237</link>
		<dc:creator>msmartin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3211#comment-67237</guid>
		<description>Average American women can wear affordable &quot;stylish&quot; clothes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Average American women can wear affordable &#8220;stylish&#8221; clothes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hustleandfloe</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/comment-page-5/#comment-67236</link>
		<dc:creator>hustleandfloe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3211#comment-67236</guid>
		<description>That woman looks like a classic case.  ...a grotesque distortion of Black évolué, you know the educated folk Frantz Fanon called out for tricking themselves into believing that degrees and nice clothes could cover their blackness and allow seamless assimilation.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A tired old game by now - try to look smart or &quot;real&quot; or &quot;not voting for him cos he&#039;s black&quot;  by downing O.  But, um, this one ain&#039;t even smart, and sitting the back row looking like she just woke up.    ...faux évolué?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...O is clearly the best candidate in ages.  ages.  That said, it just occured to me that one could reasonably vote for him just because he&#039;s black if only because you voted for all the other ones because they were white , the defacto first requirement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That woman looks like a classic case.  &#8230;a grotesque distortion of Black évolué, you know the educated folk Frantz Fanon called out for tricking themselves into believing that degrees and nice clothes could cover their blackness and allow seamless assimilation.  </p>
<p>A tired old game by now &#8211; try to look smart or &#8220;real&#8221; or &#8220;not voting for him cos he&#39;s black&#8221;  by downing O.  But, um, this one ain&#39;t even smart, and sitting the back row looking like she just woke up.    &#8230;faux évolué?</p>
<p>&#8230;O is clearly the best candidate in ages.  ages.  That said, it just occured to me that one could reasonably vote for him just because he&#39;s black if only because you voted for all the other ones because they were white , the defacto first requirement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msmartin</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/comment-page-5/#comment-67233</link>
		<dc:creator>msmartin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3211#comment-67233</guid>
		<description>I asked this months ago.  There are probably quite a few up and coming black designers in Chicago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I asked this months ago.  There are probably quite a few up and coming black designers in Chicago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TruthSeeker</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/comment-page-5/#comment-67232</link>
		<dc:creator>TruthSeeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3211#comment-67232</guid>
		<description>...I think she meant he&#039;s too &quot;intellectual&quot;..but she wasn&#039;t articulate enough to express it    ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;I think she meant he&#39;s too &#8220;intellectual&#8221;..but she wasn&#39;t articulate enough to express it    ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evita</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/comment-page-5/#comment-67226</link>
		<dc:creator>evita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3211#comment-67226</guid>
		<description>What the hell was up with the indep voter- Vet, woman, black? Obama was too articulate? And he has to appeal more to women- cuz he&#039;s not doing it for her?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What the f was she smoking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the hell was up with the indep voter- Vet, woman, black? Obama was too articulate? And he has to appeal more to women- cuz he&#39;s not doing it for her?</p>
<p>What the f was she smoking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TruthSeeker</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/comment-page-5/#comment-67224</link>
		<dc:creator>TruthSeeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3211#comment-67224</guid>
		<description>Another clip of Luntz Focus Group...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama Won the Debate! Frank Luntz Focus Group&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=36KsLl4qS-w&quot;&gt;http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=36KsLl4qS-w&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another clip of Luntz Focus Group&#8230;</p>
<p>Obama Won the Debate! Frank Luntz Focus Group<br /><a href="http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=36KsLl4qS-w">http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=36KsLl4qS-w</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msmartin</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/comment-page-5/#comment-67218</link>
		<dc:creator>msmartin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3211#comment-67218</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like the dresses she&#039;s been wearing lately either.  Maybe it&#039;s strategic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t like the dresses she&#39;s been wearing lately either.  Maybe it&#39;s strategic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evita</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/comment-page-5/#comment-67202</link>
		<dc:creator>evita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3211#comment-67202</guid>
		<description>New Sarah Palin SNL skit&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/27/tina-fey-as-sarah-palin-k_n_129956.html&quot;&gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/27/tina-f...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Sarah Palin SNL skit</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/27/tina-fey-as-sarah-palin-k_n_129956.html"></a><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/27/tina-f.." rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/27/tina-f..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TruthSeeker</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/comment-page-5/#comment-67201</link>
		<dc:creator>TruthSeeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3211#comment-67201</guid>
		<description>***Video***&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;McCain on This Week Talking About the Bailout&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=FPWM0LbtYWM&quot;&gt;http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=FPWM0LbtYWM&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>***Video***<br /><b>McCain on This Week Talking About the Bailout</b><br /><a href="http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=FPWM0LbtYWM">http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=FPWM0LbtYWM</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msmartin</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/comment-page-5/#comment-67196</link>
		<dc:creator>msmartin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3211#comment-67196</guid>
		<description>I did that already - last January.  Poof - gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did that already &#8211; last January.  Poof &#8211; gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenLadyHere</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/comment-page-5/#comment-67195</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3211#comment-67195</guid>
		<description>rikyrah: Well, somebody is beginning to use the &lt;b&gt;I-word&lt;/b&gt;  &lt;b&gt;IMPULSIVITY!!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/28/nyt-op-ed-dismisses-mccai_n_130022.html&quot;&gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/28/nyt-op...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Op-Ed Dismisses McCain as &quot;Impulsive, Impetuous and Impatient&quot;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;The McCain campaign has made it pretty clear in recent weeks that any or all criticism of their candidate from the New York Times is a product of being &quot;in the tank&quot; for Obama, but there&#039;s little doubt that today&#039;s column from Nicholas Kristof will bring the campaign some measure of dismay, following the &quot;foreign policy debate,&quot; especially since Kristof captures McCain as &quot;impulsive, impetuous and impatient.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FINALLY!  Reality is &quot;slowly&quot; emerging!!  NOT &quot;maverick&quot;, people!  IMPULSIVE!!!!  :&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama-Biden  &#039;08!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rikyrah: Well, somebody is beginning to use the <b>I-word</b>  <b>IMPULSIVITY!!</b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/28/nyt-op-ed-dismisses-mccai_n_130022.html"></a><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/28/nyt-op.." rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/28/nyt-op..</a>.<br /><b>Op-Ed Dismisses McCain as &#8220;Impulsive, Impetuous and Impatient&#8221;</b></p>
<p><i>The McCain campaign has made it pretty clear in recent weeks that any or all criticism of their candidate from the New York Times is a product of being &#8220;in the tank&#8221; for Obama, but there&#39;s little doubt that today&#39;s column from Nicholas Kristof will bring the campaign some measure of dismay, following the &#8220;foreign policy debate,&#8221; especially since Kristof captures McCain as &#8220;impulsive, impetuous and impatient.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>FINALLY!  Reality is &#8220;slowly&#8221; emerging!!  NOT &#8220;maverick&#8221;, people!  IMPULSIVE!!!!  :&gt;)</p>
<p>Obama-Biden  &#39;08!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msmartin</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/comment-page-5/#comment-67194</link>
		<dc:creator>msmartin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3211#comment-67194</guid>
		<description>Do you even know what the Sarbanes Oxley Act is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you even know what the Sarbanes Oxley Act is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenLadyHere</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/comment-page-5/#comment-67193</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3211#comment-67193</guid>
		<description>rikyrah:  From TPM:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/09/obama_way_ahead_in_todays_trac.php&quot;&gt;http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Obama Way Ahead in Todays Tracking Polls&quot;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yaaaaaaaaa!   :&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Here&#039;s a wrap-up of the four major national tracking polls for today. With one new day of post-debate data within the three-day tracking polls, Barack Obama&#039;s lead is growing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• Gallup: Obama 50%, McCain 42%, with a ±2% margin of error. Yesterday, Obama was up 49%-44%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• Rasmussen: Obama 50%, McCain 44%, with a ±2% margin of error, unchanged from yesterday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• Hotline/Diageo: Obama 47%, McCain 42%, with a ±3.2% margin of error, compared to a 48%-43% Obama lead yesterday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• Research 2000: Obama 50%, McCain 43%, with a ±3% margin of error. Yesterday, Obama was up 49%-43%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Adding these polls together and weighting them by sample sizes, Obama is ahead by a margin of &lt;b&gt;49.7%-42.9%, up from a lead yesterday of 49.3%-43.8%.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;FIRED UP!!  READY TO GO!!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama-Biden  &#039;08!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rikyrah:  From TPM:</p>
<p><a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/09/obama_way_ahead_in_todays_trac.php"></a><a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com.." rel="nofollow">http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com..</a>.<br /><b>Obama Way Ahead in Todays Tracking Polls&#8221;</b></p>
<p>Yaaaaaaaaa!   :&gt;)</p>
<p><i>Here&#39;s a wrap-up of the four major national tracking polls for today. With one new day of post-debate data within the three-day tracking polls, Barack Obama&#39;s lead is growing.</p>
<p>• Gallup: Obama 50%, McCain 42%, with a ±2% margin of error. Yesterday, Obama was up 49%-44%.</p>
<p>• Rasmussen: Obama 50%, McCain 44%, with a ±2% margin of error, unchanged from yesterday.</p>
<p>• Hotline/Diageo: Obama 47%, McCain 42%, with a ±3.2% margin of error, compared to a 48%-43% Obama lead yesterday.</p>
<p>• Research 2000: Obama 50%, McCain 43%, with a ±3% margin of error. Yesterday, Obama was up 49%-43%.</p>
<p>Adding these polls together and weighting them by sample sizes, Obama is ahead by a margin of <b>49.7%-42.9%, up from a lead yesterday of 49.3%-43.8%.</b></i></p>
<p><b>FIRED UP!!  READY TO GO!!</b></p>
<p>Obama-Biden  &#39;08!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msmartin</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/comment-page-5/#comment-67192</link>
		<dc:creator>msmartin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3211#comment-67192</guid>
		<description>No doubt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msmartin</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/comment-page-5/#comment-67191</link>
		<dc:creator>msmartin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3211#comment-67191</guid>
		<description>There it is - everything we&#039;ve always known in writing - by a conservative paper.  This election has turned so unbelievably tacky on the part of the Republicans, a clear head finally prevailed to speak the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There it is &#8211; everything we&#39;ve always known in writing &#8211; by a conservative paper.  This election has turned so unbelievably tacky on the part of the Republicans, a clear head finally prevailed to speak the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenLadyHere</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/sunday-open-thread-19/comment-page-5/#comment-67187</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=3211#comment-67187</guid>
		<description>rikyrah:  &lt;i&gt;The Mudflats&lt;/i&gt;  just keep the presses rollin&#039;   -   ALL OVER &quot;McAncient&quot;/The Gov.:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.themudflats.net/2008/09/28/mccain-palin-how-low-will-they-go/&quot;&gt;http://www.themudflats.net/2008/09/28/mccain-pa...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;McCaIn-Palin:  How Low Will They Go?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;With every day bringing new cringe-worthy gaffes, inadequacies, and (R)evelations (Biblical and otherwise), the McCain campaign is getting desperate.  They’ve tried just about everything to postpone, or lessen the carnage of the looming bloodbath that will be the Vice Presidential debate this Thursday night.Plan A - Change the rules of the debate.  Give the candidates less time to talk, and less time to talk TO each other.  If Palin has 25% less time to talk, she will embarrass herself and her party…..25% less.  That’s the theory anyway.  Plan A has been implemented.Plan B - Economic meltdown.  Play it so that John McCain is “the only one” who can solve the crisis, and suspend the campaign so he can. Push for the Presidential debate to be moved forward to take the place of…..wait for it…..the Vice Presidential debate!  This allows for the VP debate to be postponed indefinitely!  It’s so crazy, it just might work…  Except it didn’t.  Barack Obama called McCain’s bluff, showed for the debate and forced McCain to participate or risk being upstaged by a nationally televised Obama Town Hall meeting.  (McCain campaign lifting collective fist to the sky…”Noooooooo!”)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plan C - While looking for another way to stall the debate, giving Palin more time to memorize those index cards of talking points, create a diversion for the press.  Because right now, the press is not a friend to the McCain campaign.  The Couric interview was an epic disaster. Obama won the first Presidential debate, according to most Americans.  McCain is looking dangerously physically run-down.   Even Alaskans have had it with their governor, and were out in droves Saturday, protesting the stonewalling of her ethics investigation. Op-ed pieces from the left and from the right have been unflattering to say the least. Hmmm….how to divert all this negative press coverage….*lightbulb*&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, I took a large &quot;SNIPPET&quot;; BUT I love the sarcastic writing style!   :&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is a picture of the &quot;pregnant/unmarried/less than happy&quot; couple!  :&gt;(  YUK!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let&#039;s hurry and get this election over so that we can all hold our food down!!  :&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama-Biden &#039;08!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rikyrah:  <i>The Mudflats</i>  just keep the presses rollin&#39;   &#8211;   ALL OVER &#8220;McAncient&#8221;/The Gov.:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.themudflats.net/2008/09/28/mccain-palin-how-low-will-they-go/"></a><a href="http://www.themudflats.net/2008/09/28/mccain-pa.." rel="nofollow">http://www.themudflats.net/2008/09/28/mccain-pa..</a>.<br /><b>McCaIn-Palin:  How Low Will They Go?</b></p>
<p><i>With every day bringing new cringe-worthy gaffes, inadequacies, and (R)evelations (Biblical and otherwise), the McCain campaign is getting desperate.  They’ve tried just about everything to postpone, or lessen the carnage of the looming bloodbath that will be the Vice Presidential debate this Thursday night.Plan A &#8211; Change the rules of the debate.  Give the candidates less time to talk, and less time to talk TO each other.  If Palin has 25% less time to talk, she will embarrass herself and her party…..25% less.  That’s the theory anyway.  Plan A has been implemented.Plan B &#8211; Economic meltdown.  Play it so that John McCain is “the only one” who can solve the crisis, and suspend the campaign so he can. Push for the Presidential debate to be moved forward to take the place of…..wait for it…..the Vice Presidential debate!  This allows for the VP debate to be postponed indefinitely!  It’s so crazy, it just might work…  Except it didn’t.  Barack Obama called McCain’s bluff, showed for the debate and forced McCain to participate or risk being upstaged by a nationally televised Obama Town Hall meeting.  (McCain campaign lifting collective fist to the sky…”Noooooooo!”)</p>
<p>Plan C &#8211; While looking for another way to stall the debate, giving Palin more time to memorize those index cards of talking points, create a diversion for the press.  Because right now, the press is not a friend to the McCain campaign.  The Couric interview was an epic disaster. Obama won the first Presidential debate, according to most Americans.  McCain is looking dangerously physically run-down.   Even Alaskans have had it with their governor, and were out in droves Saturday, protesting the stonewalling of her ethics investigation. Op-ed pieces from the left and from the right have been unflattering to say the least. Hmmm….how to divert all this negative press coverage….*lightbulb*</i></p>
<p>Well, I took a large &#8220;SNIPPET&#8221;; BUT I love the sarcastic writing style!   :&gt;)</p>
<p>There is a picture of the &#8220;pregnant/unmarried/less than happy&#8221; couple!  :&gt;(  YUK!</p>
<p>Let&#39;s hurry and get this election over so that we can all hold our food down!!  :&gt;)</p>
<p>Obama-Biden &#39;08!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
