<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Going to St. Paul?  Be Warned&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/</link>
	<description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:04:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bigassbelle</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/comment-page-1/#comment-161920</link>
		<dc:creator>bigassbelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=2244#comment-161920</guid>
		<description>police state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>police state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/comment-page-1/#comment-161921</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=2244#comment-161921</guid>
		<description>I sent this comment to one of &quot;Caucus&quot; articles in the NYT....don&#039;t know if it will get printed.   But imagine if Obama had ever belonged to a group that advocated secession?     Palin could work in Obama&#039;s favor as more people find out her position on issues.   At realclearpolitics Obama gained a few more percentage points as of this morning and also a small gain in favorability over McCain.   I&#039;m praying and donating!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Angela&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;McCain has made a big issue of patriotism and &quot;Country First&quot; and then he selects a vp choice who knows little of foreign policy or national security and instead once belonged to Alaska Independence Party whose slogan is &quot;Alaska First.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will the press please ask McCain if this is how he defines patriotism and putting &quot;Country First&quot; by selecting someone who even recently, as governor, willingly addressed a fringe group advocating secession?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sent this comment to one of &#8220;Caucus&#8221; articles in the NYT&#8230;.don&#39;t know if it will get printed.   But imagine if Obama had ever belonged to a group that advocated secession?     Palin could work in Obama&#39;s favor as more people find out her position on issues.   At realclearpolitics Obama gained a few more percentage points as of this morning and also a small gain in favorability over McCain.   I&#39;m praying and donating!!</p>
<p>Angela</p>
<p>&#8220;McCain has made a big issue of patriotism and &#8220;Country First&#8221; and then he selects a vp choice who knows little of foreign policy or national security and instead once belonged to Alaska Independence Party whose slogan is &#8220;Alaska First.&#8221;</p>
<p>Will the press please ask McCain if this is how he defines patriotism and putting &#8220;Country First&#8221; by selecting someone who even recently, as governor, willingly addressed a fringe group advocating secession?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bianca78</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/comment-page-1/#comment-161922</link>
		<dc:creator>bianca78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=2244#comment-161922</guid>
		<description>Welcome to the Twin Citeis folks! Minnesotans don&#039;t deal very well with things that go of script and they are HUGE fans of impression management so they tend to over state the police EVERYWHERE. So if it looks like  too many people of color or &quot;radical ideas&quot; will be shares you can bet the police will be there in their full riot gear. And it&#039;s really funny becasue MN&#039;s REALLY beleive that they are ULTRA Liberal, that is until you move in thier neighborhood, attend thier schools, date their children, attend their church, seek equal treatmeant or pay  for the same work or bring attention to the fact that they really aren&#039;t as liberal as they would like to belive. Of course when you point that out to them, you have to be arrested becasue that is simply untrue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the Twin Citeis folks! Minnesotans don&#39;t deal very well with things that go of script and they are HUGE fans of impression management so they tend to over state the police EVERYWHERE. So if it looks like  too many people of color or &#8220;radical ideas&#8221; will be shares you can bet the police will be there in their full riot gear. And it&#39;s really funny becasue MN&#39;s REALLY beleive that they are ULTRA Liberal, that is until you move in thier neighborhood, attend thier schools, date their children, attend their church, seek equal treatmeant or pay  for the same work or bring attention to the fact that they really aren&#39;t as liberal as they would like to belive. Of course when you point that out to them, you have to be arrested becasue that is simply untrue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderkoo</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/comment-page-1/#comment-161923</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderkoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=2244#comment-161923</guid>
		<description>Can someone confirm whether, as I&#039;ve heard, it&#039;s the Anarchists who are provoking the police and that the peaceful demonstrators are catching the crossfire?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone confirm whether, as I&#39;ve heard, it&#39;s the Anarchists who are provoking the police and that the peaceful demonstrators are catching the crossfire?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotorCityBadBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/comment-page-1/#comment-161924</link>
		<dc:creator>MotorCityBadBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=2244#comment-161924</guid>
		<description>Why the Republicans are failing.&lt;br&gt;The Republicans are failing now (and for the foreseeable future) because their voting blocks are becoming less numerous and more fractured.  Let&#039;s take a look at their traditional voters, demographic trends, and why they&#039;re having problems.&lt;br&gt;Traditionally, the voting blocks for Republicans are: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1.) Whites - &lt;br&gt;2.) Social conservatives&lt;br&gt;3.) Fiscal conservatives&lt;br&gt;4.) Southerners/Westerners&lt;br&gt;5.) The Rich&lt;br&gt;6.) Religious voters&lt;br&gt;7.) Small town/ Rural Voters&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The problem with this coalition is that these people have vastly different &lt;br&gt;Expectations of the role of government, and in this increasingly diverse country,&lt;br&gt;this particular grouping can&#039;t continue to deliver electoral victories.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1.) Whites - By 2042 (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nypost.com/seven/08142008/news/nationalnews/2042_to_see_a_white_minority_124404.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.nypost.com/seven/08142008/news/natio...&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;br&gt;whites will be in the minority in the United States.  They will&lt;br&gt;still be the largest ethnic group, but no longer above 50%... And the fact that almost half of  whites vote Democratic can&#039;t be a good sign for the Republicans.  If not for the (real or perceived) racism in their party, they could really make gains in the minority communities where many Blacks and Latinos (especially older) are very socially conservative. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2.) Social Conservatives - This is mostly the older Boomers and their parents.  As this group ages and dies off, the younger Boomers (born after 1960) and Generation X/Y will become the pivitol voting blocks.  This age group trends more liberal in their social philosophy (Exhibit A: Obama Voters) and are less likely to oppose abortion or gay marriage.  This group also doesn’t carry the scars of the civil rights movement, which has entrenched many older Boomers on one side or the other. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3.) Fiscal Conservatives - Bill Clinton&#039;s economy destroyed the old stereotype of &quot;tax and spend&quot; liberals.  Bush&#039;s mishandling of the economic policy has plunged the economy into a recession with record deficits.  Many attentive Republicans have taken notice and will not vote for more of the same.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4.) Sotherners/Westerners - As Southern/Western states (through migration mostly) have gotten more diverse and urban, voters have tended to vote more Democratic.  A few examples are North Carolina, Virginia, Colorado, and Nevada.  If these traditionally red states are in play, the Republicans are in really big trouble.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;5.  The Rich/Corporatists - These guys have done really well under Bush, and he really caters to them.  The problem is that there aren&#039;t enough of them to make a large enough voting block for a return on the political capital he spent courting them.  Sure, they donate and provide much needed financing for campaigns, but because of the campaign finance laws they&#039;re influence is somewhat checked. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;6.  Religious people – White Evangelicals are coming to the realization that they are being used by the Republicans for votes and volunteers while receiving nothing legislatively from the people they put in office.  The three main things they wanted from Bush when he got into office was:&lt;br&gt;1.) Legislation concerning prayer/creationism in schools, &lt;br&gt;2.) A Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage &lt;br&gt;3.) The overturning of Roe v. Wade  (They&#039;ll give lip service, but the Republicans will NEVER overturn Roe v. Wade - They&#039;d lose 2/3 of women&#039;s vote immediately, and they know it).&lt;br&gt;None of this has been accomplished,  with gay marriage becoming law in some states (not to mention the outing of gay Republican leaders). They also saw the disdain the GOP had for Mike Huckabee, who many felt was one of their own. The message many of them got was  “help us win this election and we’ll see you in four years.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;7.) Small town/Rural voters - This is a GOP mainstay, and one of their most loyal voting blocks, but again, they&#039;re numbers are small, plus now there is some influx of Latinos into many rural areas.  This group too sees that while the GOP are quick to demonize &quot;limousine liberals&quot;, most of the top GOP, NRA, political pundits and religious leaders live that same lifestyle.  These people may live in small towns but they aren&#039;t stupid.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Starting with Clinton, the Democrats have moved to the middle, while the GOP find themselves staking out the far right  positions in this country (hence the Sarah Palin nomination).  If the Republicans can&#039;t  find it in themselves to purge the racists and greedy corporatist outsourcers from their midst, they&#039;re going to go the way of the Whigs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the Republicans are failing.<br />The Republicans are failing now (and for the foreseeable future) because their voting blocks are becoming less numerous and more fractured.  Let&#39;s take a look at their traditional voters, demographic trends, and why they&#39;re having problems.<br />Traditionally, the voting blocks for Republicans are: </p>
<p>1.) Whites &#8211; <br />2.) Social conservatives<br />3.) Fiscal conservatives<br />4.) Southerners/Westerners<br />5.) The Rich<br />6.) Religious voters<br />7.) Small town/ Rural Voters</p>
<p>The problem with this coalition is that these people have vastly different <br />Expectations of the role of government, and in this increasingly diverse country,<br />this particular grouping can&#39;t continue to deliver electoral victories.  </p>
<p>1.) Whites &#8211; By 2042 (<a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/08142008/news/nationalnews/2042_to_see_a_white_minority_124404.htm" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/08142008/news/natio.." rel="nofollow">http://www.nypost.com/seven/08142008/news/natio..</a>.) <br />whites will be in the minority in the United States.  They will<br />still be the largest ethnic group, but no longer above 50%&#8230; And the fact that almost half of  whites vote Democratic can&#39;t be a good sign for the Republicans.  If not for the (real or perceived) racism in their party, they could really make gains in the minority communities where many Blacks and Latinos (especially older) are very socially conservative. </p>
<p>2.) Social Conservatives &#8211; This is mostly the older Boomers and their parents.  As this group ages and dies off, the younger Boomers (born after 1960) and Generation X/Y will become the pivitol voting blocks.  This age group trends more liberal in their social philosophy (Exhibit A: Obama Voters) and are less likely to oppose abortion or gay marriage.  This group also doesn’t carry the scars of the civil rights movement, which has entrenched many older Boomers on one side or the other. </p>
<p>3.) Fiscal Conservatives &#8211; Bill Clinton&#39;s economy destroyed the old stereotype of &#8220;tax and spend&#8221; liberals.  Bush&#39;s mishandling of the economic policy has plunged the economy into a recession with record deficits.  Many attentive Republicans have taken notice and will not vote for more of the same.</p>
<p>4.) Sotherners/Westerners &#8211; As Southern/Western states (through migration mostly) have gotten more diverse and urban, voters have tended to vote more Democratic.  A few examples are North Carolina, Virginia, Colorado, and Nevada.  If these traditionally red states are in play, the Republicans are in really big trouble.</p>
<p>5.  The Rich/Corporatists &#8211; These guys have done really well under Bush, and he really caters to them.  The problem is that there aren&#39;t enough of them to make a large enough voting block for a return on the political capital he spent courting them.  Sure, they donate and provide much needed financing for campaigns, but because of the campaign finance laws they&#39;re influence is somewhat checked. </p>
<p>6.  Religious people – White Evangelicals are coming to the realization that they are being used by the Republicans for votes and volunteers while receiving nothing legislatively from the people they put in office.  The three main things they wanted from Bush when he got into office was:<br />1.) Legislation concerning prayer/creationism in schools, <br />2.) A Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage <br />3.) The overturning of Roe v. Wade  (They&#39;ll give lip service, but the Republicans will NEVER overturn Roe v. Wade &#8211; They&#39;d lose 2/3 of women&#39;s vote immediately, and they know it).<br />None of this has been accomplished,  with gay marriage becoming law in some states (not to mention the outing of gay Republican leaders). They also saw the disdain the GOP had for Mike Huckabee, who many felt was one of their own. The message many of them got was  “help us win this election and we’ll see you in four years.”</p>
<p>7.) Small town/Rural voters &#8211; This is a GOP mainstay, and one of their most loyal voting blocks, but again, they&#39;re numbers are small, plus now there is some influx of Latinos into many rural areas.  This group too sees that while the GOP are quick to demonize &#8220;limousine liberals&#8221;, most of the top GOP, NRA, political pundits and religious leaders live that same lifestyle.  These people may live in small towns but they aren&#39;t stupid.  </p>
<p>Starting with Clinton, the Democrats have moved to the middle, while the GOP find themselves staking out the far right  positions in this country (hence the Sarah Palin nomination).  If the Republicans can&#39;t  find it in themselves to purge the racists and greedy corporatist outsourcers from their midst, they&#39;re going to go the way of the Whigs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MsKitty</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/comment-page-1/#comment-161926</link>
		<dc:creator>MsKitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=2244#comment-161926</guid>
		<description>Fish in a barrel baby, fish in a barrel.  Even so, I know most folks have enough sense not to touch this with a 39 1/2 foot pole.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, I&#039;m just gonna quietly sit back with my bowl of Orville Redenbacher&#039;s and see what other skeletons come tumbling out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fish in a barrel baby, fish in a barrel.  Even so, I know most folks have enough sense not to touch this with a 39 1/2 foot pole.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#39;m just gonna quietly sit back with my bowl of Orville Redenbacher&#39;s and see what other skeletons come tumbling out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elmauter</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/comment-page-1/#comment-161925</link>
		<dc:creator>elmauter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=2244#comment-161925</guid>
		<description>Your best bets for Twin Cities independent media coverage of the RNC are &lt;a href=&quot;http://theuptake.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Uptake&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://mnindy.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Minnesota Independent&lt;/a&gt;. They&#039;ve done a phenomenal job of covering the raids over the weekend and the protest (and police) activity yesterday. And they&#039;re all credentialed so they&#039;ll be inside the convention as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your best bets for Twin Cities independent media coverage of the RNC are <a href="http://theuptake.org" rel="nofollow">The Uptake</a> and the <a href="http://mnindy.com" rel="nofollow">Minnesota Independent</a>. They&#39;ve done a phenomenal job of covering the raids over the weekend and the protest (and police) activity yesterday. And they&#39;re all credentialed so they&#39;ll be inside the convention as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigassbelle</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/comment-page-1/#comment-46236</link>
		<dc:creator>bigassbelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=2244#comment-46236</guid>
		<description>police state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>police state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigassbelle</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/comment-page-1/#comment-55772</link>
		<dc:creator>bigassbelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=2244#comment-55772</guid>
		<description>police state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>police state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/comment-page-1/#comment-46142</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=2244#comment-46142</guid>
		<description>I sent this comment to one of &quot;Caucus&quot; articles in the NYT....don&#039;t know if it will get printed.   But imagine if Obama had ever belonged to a group that advocated secession?     Palin could work in Obama&#039;s favor as more people find out her position on issues.   At realclearpolitics Obama gained a few more percentage points as of this morning and also a small gain in favorability over McCain.   I&#039;m praying and donating!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Angela&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;McCain has made a big issue of patriotism and &quot;Country First&quot; and then he selects a vp choice who knows little of foreign policy or national security and instead once belonged to Alaska Independence Party whose slogan is &quot;Alaska First.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will the press please ask McCain if this is how he defines patriotism and putting &quot;Country First&quot; by selecting someone who even recently, as governor, willingly addressed a fringe group advocating secession?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sent this comment to one of &#8220;Caucus&#8221; articles in the NYT&#8230;.don&#39;t know if it will get printed.   But imagine if Obama had ever belonged to a group that advocated secession?     Palin could work in Obama&#39;s favor as more people find out her position on issues.   At realclearpolitics Obama gained a few more percentage points as of this morning and also a small gain in favorability over McCain.   I&#39;m praying and donating!!</p>
<p>Angela</p>
<p>&#8220;McCain has made a big issue of patriotism and &#8220;Country First&#8221; and then he selects a vp choice who knows little of foreign policy or national security and instead once belonged to Alaska Independence Party whose slogan is &#8220;Alaska First.&#8221;</p>
<p>Will the press please ask McCain if this is how he defines patriotism and putting &#8220;Country First&#8221; by selecting someone who even recently, as governor, willingly addressed a fringe group advocating secession?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/comment-page-1/#comment-55773</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=2244#comment-55773</guid>
		<description>I sent this comment to one of &quot;Caucus&quot; articles in the NYT....don&#039;t know if it will get printed.   But imagine if Obama had ever belonged to a group that advocated secession?     Palin could work in Obama&#039;s favor as more people find out her position on issues.   At realclearpolitics Obama gained a few more percentage points as of this morning and also a small gain in favorability over McCain.   I&#039;m praying and donating!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Angela&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;McCain has made a big issue of patriotism and &quot;Country First&quot; and then he selects a vp choice who knows little of foreign policy or national security and instead once belonged to Alaska Independence Party whose slogan is &quot;Alaska First.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will the press please ask McCain if this is how he defines patriotism and putting &quot;Country First&quot; by selecting someone who even recently, as governor, willingly addressed a fringe group advocating secession?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sent this comment to one of &#8220;Caucus&#8221; articles in the NYT&#8230;.don&#39;t know if it will get printed.   But imagine if Obama had ever belonged to a group that advocated secession?     Palin could work in Obama&#39;s favor as more people find out her position on issues.   At realclearpolitics Obama gained a few more percentage points as of this morning and also a small gain in favorability over McCain.   I&#39;m praying and donating!!</p>
<p>Angela</p>
<p>&#8220;McCain has made a big issue of patriotism and &#8220;Country First&#8221; and then he selects a vp choice who knows little of foreign policy or national security and instead once belonged to Alaska Independence Party whose slogan is &#8220;Alaska First.&#8221;</p>
<p>Will the press please ask McCain if this is how he defines patriotism and putting &#8220;Country First&#8221; by selecting someone who even recently, as governor, willingly addressed a fringe group advocating secession?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bianca78</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/comment-page-1/#comment-46120</link>
		<dc:creator>bianca78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=2244#comment-46120</guid>
		<description>Welcome to the Twin Citeis folks! Minnesotans don&#039;t deal very well with things that go of script and they are HUGE fans of impression management so they tend to over state the police EVERYWHERE. So if it looks like  too many people of color or &quot;radical ideas&quot; will be shares you can bet the police will be there in their full riot gear. And it&#039;s really funny becasue MN&#039;s REALLY beleive that they are ULTRA Liberal, that is until you move in thier neighborhood, attend thier schools, date their children, attend their church, seek equal treatmeant or pay  for the same work or bring attention to the fact that they really aren&#039;t as liberal as they would like to belive. Of course when you point that out to them, you have to be arrested becasue that is simply untrue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the Twin Citeis folks! Minnesotans don&#39;t deal very well with things that go of script and they are HUGE fans of impression management so they tend to over state the police EVERYWHERE. So if it looks like  too many people of color or &#8220;radical ideas&#8221; will be shares you can bet the police will be there in their full riot gear. And it&#39;s really funny becasue MN&#39;s REALLY beleive that they are ULTRA Liberal, that is until you move in thier neighborhood, attend thier schools, date their children, attend their church, seek equal treatmeant or pay  for the same work or bring attention to the fact that they really aren&#39;t as liberal as they would like to belive. Of course when you point that out to them, you have to be arrested becasue that is simply untrue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bianca78</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/comment-page-1/#comment-55774</link>
		<dc:creator>bianca78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=2244#comment-55774</guid>
		<description>Welcome to the Twin Citeis folks! Minnesotans don&#039;t deal very well with things that go of script and they are HUGE fans of impression management so they tend to over state the police EVERYWHERE. So if it looks like  too many people of color or &quot;radical ideas&quot; will be shares you can bet the police will be there in their full riot gear. And it&#039;s really funny becasue MN&#039;s REALLY beleive that they are ULTRA Liberal, that is until you move in thier neighborhood, attend thier schools, date their children, attend their church, seek equal treatmeant or pay  for the same work or bring attention to the fact that they really aren&#039;t as liberal as they would like to belive. Of course when you point that out to them, you have to be arrested becasue that is simply untrue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the Twin Citeis folks! Minnesotans don&#39;t deal very well with things that go of script and they are HUGE fans of impression management so they tend to over state the police EVERYWHERE. So if it looks like  too many people of color or &#8220;radical ideas&#8221; will be shares you can bet the police will be there in their full riot gear. And it&#39;s really funny becasue MN&#39;s REALLY beleive that they are ULTRA Liberal, that is until you move in thier neighborhood, attend thier schools, date their children, attend their church, seek equal treatmeant or pay  for the same work or bring attention to the fact that they really aren&#39;t as liberal as they would like to belive. Of course when you point that out to them, you have to be arrested becasue that is simply untrue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderkoo</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/comment-page-1/#comment-45885</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderkoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=2244#comment-45885</guid>
		<description>Can someone confirm whether, as I&#039;ve heard, it&#039;s the Anarchists who are provoking the police and that the peaceful demonstrators are catching the crossfire?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone confirm whether, as I&#39;ve heard, it&#39;s the Anarchists who are provoking the police and that the peaceful demonstrators are catching the crossfire?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderkoo</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/comment-page-1/#comment-55775</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderkoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=2244#comment-55775</guid>
		<description>Can someone confirm whether, as I&#039;ve heard, it&#039;s the Anarchists who are provoking the police and that the peaceful demonstrators are catching the crossfire?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone confirm whether, as I&#39;ve heard, it&#39;s the Anarchists who are provoking the police and that the peaceful demonstrators are catching the crossfire?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotorCityBadBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/comment-page-1/#comment-45817</link>
		<dc:creator>MotorCityBadBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=2244#comment-45817</guid>
		<description>Why the Republicans are failing.&lt;br&gt;The Republicans are failing now (and for the foreseeable future) because their voting blocks are becoming less numerous and more fractured.  Let&#039;s take a look at &lt;br&gt;their traditional voters, demographic trends, and why they&#039;re having problems.&lt;br&gt;Traditionally, the voting blocks for Republicans are: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1.) Whites - &lt;br&gt;2.) Social conservatives&lt;br&gt;3.) Fiscal conservatives&lt;br&gt;4.) Southerners/Westerners&lt;br&gt;5.) The Rich&lt;br&gt;6.) Religious voters&lt;br&gt;7.) Small town/ Rural Voters&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The problem with this coalition is that these people have vastly different &lt;br&gt;Expectations of the role of government, and in this increasingly diverse country,&lt;br&gt;this particular grouping can&#039;t continue to deliver electoral victories.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1.) Whites - By 2042 (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nypost.com/seven/08142008/news/nationalnews/2042_to_see_a_white_minority_124404.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.nypost.com/seven/08142008/news/natio...&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;br&gt;whites will be in the minority in the United States.  They will&lt;br&gt;still be the largest ethnic group, but no longer above 50%... And the fact that almost&lt;br&gt;half of  whites vote Democratic can&#039;t be a good sign for the Republicans.  If not &lt;br&gt;for the (real or perceived) racism in their party, they could really make gains in the minority communities where many Blacks and Latinos (especially older) are very socially conservative. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2.) Social Conservatives - This is mostly the older Boomers and their parents.  As this group ages and dies off, the younger Boomers (born after 1960) and Generation X/Y will become the pivitol voting blocks.  This age group trends more liberal in their social philosophy (Exhibit A: Obama Voters) and are less likely to oppose abortion or gay marriage.  This group also doesn’t carry the scars of the civil rights movement, which has entrenched many older Boomers on one side or the other. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3.) Fiscal Conservatives - Bill Clinton&#039;s economy destroyed the old stereotype of tax&lt;br&gt;and spend liberals.  Bush&#039;s mishandling of the economic policy has plunged the economy into a recession with record deficits.  Many attentive Republicans have taken notice and will not vote for more of the same.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4.) Sotherners/Westerners - As Southern/Western states (through migration mostly) have gotten more diverse and urban, voters have tended to vote more Democratic.  A few examples are North Carolina, Virginia, Colorado, and Nevada.  If these traditionally red states are in play, the Republicans are in really big trouble.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;5.  The Rich/Corporatists - These guys have done really well under Bush, and he really caters to them.  The problem is that there aren&#039;t enough of them to make a large enough voting block for a return on the political capital he spent courting them.  Sure, they donate and provide much needed financing for campaigns, but because of the campaign finance laws they&#039;re influence is somewhat checked. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;6.  Religious people – White Evangelicals are coming to the realization that they are being used by the Republicans for votes and volunteers while receiving nothing legislatively from the people they put in office.  The three main things they wanted from Bush when he got into office was:&lt;br&gt;1.) Legislation concerning prayer/creationism in schools, &lt;br&gt;2.) A Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage &lt;br&gt;3.) The overturning of Roe v. Wade.  &lt;br&gt;None of this has been accomplished, with gay marriage becoming law in some states (not to mention the outing of gay Republican leaders). They also saw the disdain the GOP had for Mike Huckabee, who many felt was one of their own. The message many of them got was  “help us win this election and we’ll see you in four years.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;7.) Small town/Rural voters - This is a GOP mainstay, and one of their most loyal voting blocks, but again, they&#039;re numbers are small, plus now there is some influx of Latinos into many rural areas.  This group too sees that while the GOP are quick to demonize &quot;limousine liberals&quot;, most of the top GOP, NRA, political pundits and religious leaders live that same lifestyle.  These people may live in small towns but they aren&#039;t stupid.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Starting with Clinton, the Democrats have moved to the middle, while the GOP find themselves staking out the far right  positions in this country (hence the Sarah Palin nomination).  If the Republicans can&#039;t  find it in themselves to purge the racists and greedy corporatist outsourcers from their midst, they&#039;re going to go the way of the Whigs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the Republicans are failing.<br />The Republicans are failing now (and for the foreseeable future) because their voting blocks are becoming less numerous and more fractured.  Let&#39;s take a look at <br />their traditional voters, demographic trends, and why they&#39;re having problems.<br />Traditionally, the voting blocks for Republicans are: </p>
<p>1.) Whites &#8211; <br />2.) Social conservatives<br />3.) Fiscal conservatives<br />4.) Southerners/Westerners<br />5.) The Rich<br />6.) Religious voters<br />7.) Small town/ Rural Voters</p>
<p>The problem with this coalition is that these people have vastly different <br />Expectations of the role of government, and in this increasingly diverse country,<br />this particular grouping can&#39;t continue to deliver electoral victories.  </p>
<p>1.) Whites &#8211; By 2042 (<a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/08142008/news/nationalnews/2042_to_see_a_white_minority_124404.htm"></a><a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/08142008/news/natio.." rel="nofollow">http://www.nypost.com/seven/08142008/news/natio..</a>.) <br />whites will be in the minority in the United States.  They will<br />still be the largest ethnic group, but no longer above 50%&#8230; And the fact that almost<br />half of  whites vote Democratic can&#39;t be a good sign for the Republicans.  If not <br />for the (real or perceived) racism in their party, they could really make gains in the minority communities where many Blacks and Latinos (especially older) are very socially conservative. </p>
<p>2.) Social Conservatives &#8211; This is mostly the older Boomers and their parents.  As this group ages and dies off, the younger Boomers (born after 1960) and Generation X/Y will become the pivitol voting blocks.  This age group trends more liberal in their social philosophy (Exhibit A: Obama Voters) and are less likely to oppose abortion or gay marriage.  This group also doesn’t carry the scars of the civil rights movement, which has entrenched many older Boomers on one side or the other. </p>
<p>3.) Fiscal Conservatives &#8211; Bill Clinton&#39;s economy destroyed the old stereotype of tax<br />and spend liberals.  Bush&#39;s mishandling of the economic policy has plunged the economy into a recession with record deficits.  Many attentive Republicans have taken notice and will not vote for more of the same.</p>
<p>4.) Sotherners/Westerners &#8211; As Southern/Western states (through migration mostly) have gotten more diverse and urban, voters have tended to vote more Democratic.  A few examples are North Carolina, Virginia, Colorado, and Nevada.  If these traditionally red states are in play, the Republicans are in really big trouble.</p>
<p>5.  The Rich/Corporatists &#8211; These guys have done really well under Bush, and he really caters to them.  The problem is that there aren&#39;t enough of them to make a large enough voting block for a return on the political capital he spent courting them.  Sure, they donate and provide much needed financing for campaigns, but because of the campaign finance laws they&#39;re influence is somewhat checked. </p>
<p>6.  Religious people – White Evangelicals are coming to the realization that they are being used by the Republicans for votes and volunteers while receiving nothing legislatively from the people they put in office.  The three main things they wanted from Bush when he got into office was:<br />1.) Legislation concerning prayer/creationism in schools, <br />2.) A Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage <br />3.) The overturning of Roe v. Wade.  <br />None of this has been accomplished, with gay marriage becoming law in some states (not to mention the outing of gay Republican leaders). They also saw the disdain the GOP had for Mike Huckabee, who many felt was one of their own. The message many of them got was  “help us win this election and we’ll see you in four years.”</p>
<p>7.) Small town/Rural voters &#8211; This is a GOP mainstay, and one of their most loyal voting blocks, but again, they&#39;re numbers are small, plus now there is some influx of Latinos into many rural areas.  This group too sees that while the GOP are quick to demonize &#8220;limousine liberals&#8221;, most of the top GOP, NRA, political pundits and religious leaders live that same lifestyle.  These people may live in small towns but they aren&#39;t stupid.  </p>
<p>Starting with Clinton, the Democrats have moved to the middle, while the GOP find themselves staking out the far right  positions in this country (hence the Sarah Palin nomination).  If the Republicans can&#39;t  find it in themselves to purge the racists and greedy corporatist outsourcers from their midst, they&#39;re going to go the way of the Whigs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotorCityBadBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/comment-page-1/#comment-55776</link>
		<dc:creator>MotorCityBadBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=2244#comment-55776</guid>
		<description>Why the Republicans are failing.&lt;br&gt;The Republicans are failing now (and for the foreseeable future) because their voting blocks are becoming less numerous and more fractured.  Let&#039;s take a look at their traditional voters, demographic trends, and why they&#039;re having problems.&lt;br&gt;Traditionally, the voting blocks for Republicans are: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1.) Whites - &lt;br&gt;2.) Social conservatives&lt;br&gt;3.) Fiscal conservatives&lt;br&gt;4.) Southerners/Westerners&lt;br&gt;5.) The Rich&lt;br&gt;6.) Religious voters&lt;br&gt;7.) Small town/ Rural Voters&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The problem with this coalition is that these people have vastly different &lt;br&gt;Expectations of the role of government, and in this increasingly diverse country,&lt;br&gt;this particular grouping can&#039;t continue to deliver electoral victories.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1.) Whites - By 2042 (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nypost.com/seven/08142008/news/nationalnews/2042_to_see_a_white_minority_124404.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.nypost.com/seven/08142008/news/natio...&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;br&gt;whites will be in the minority in the United States.  They will&lt;br&gt;still be the largest ethnic group, but no longer above 50%... And the fact that almost half of  whites vote Democratic can&#039;t be a good sign for the Republicans.  If not for the (real or perceived) racism in their party, they could really make gains in the minority communities where many Blacks and Latinos (especially older) are very socially conservative. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2.) Social Conservatives - This is mostly the older Boomers and their parents.  As this group ages and dies off, the younger Boomers (born after 1960) and Generation X/Y will become the pivitol voting blocks.  This age group trends more liberal in their social philosophy (Exhibit A: Obama Voters) and are less likely to oppose abortion or gay marriage.  This group also doesnâ€™t carry the scars of the civil rights movement, which has entrenched many older Boomers on one side or the other. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3.) Fiscal Conservatives - Bill Clinton&#039;s economy destroyed the old stereotype of &quot;tax and spend&quot; liberals.  Bush&#039;s mishandling of the economic policy has plunged the economy into a recession with record deficits.  Many attentive Republicans have taken notice and will not vote for more of the same.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4.) Sotherners/Westerners - As Southern/Western states (through migration mostly) have gotten more diverse and urban, voters have tended to vote more Democratic.  A few examples are North Carolina, Virginia, Colorado, and Nevada.  If these traditionally red states are in play, the Republicans are in really big trouble.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;5.  The Rich/Corporatists - These guys have done really well under Bush, and he really caters to them.  The problem is that there aren&#039;t enough of them to make a large enough voting block for a return on the political capital he spent courting them.  Sure, they donate and provide much needed financing for campaigns, but because of the campaign finance laws they&#039;re influence is somewhat checked. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;6.  Religious people â€“ White Evangelicals are coming to the realization that they are being used by the Republicans for votes and volunteers while receiving nothing legislatively from the people they put in office.  The three main things they wanted from Bush when he got into office was:&lt;br&gt;1.) Legislation concerning prayer/creationism in schools, &lt;br&gt;2.) A Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage &lt;br&gt;3.) The overturning of Roe v. Wade  (They&#039;ll give lip service, but the Republicans will NEVER overturn Roe v. Wade - They&#039;d lose 2/3 of women&#039;s vote immediately, and they know it).&lt;br&gt;None of this has been accomplished,  with gay marriage becoming law in some states (not to mention the outing of gay Republican leaders). They also saw the disdain the GOP had for Mike Huckabee, who many felt was one of their own. The message many of them got was  â€œhelp us win this election and weâ€™ll see you in four years.â€&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;7.) Small town/Rural voters - This is a GOP mainstay, and one of their most loyal voting blocks, but again, they&#039;re numbers are small, plus now there is some influx of Latinos into many rural areas.  This group too sees that while the GOP are quick to demonize &quot;limousine liberals&quot;, most of the top GOP, NRA, political pundits and religious leaders live that same lifestyle.  These people may live in small towns but they aren&#039;t stupid.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Starting with Clinton, the Democrats have moved to the middle, while the GOP find themselves staking out the far right  positions in this country (hence the Sarah Palin nomination).  If the Republicans can&#039;t  find it in themselves to purge the racists and greedy corporatist outsourcers from their midst, they&#039;re going to go the way of the Whigs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the Republicans are failing.<br />The Republicans are failing now (and for the foreseeable future) because their voting blocks are becoming less numerous and more fractured.  Let&#39;s take a look at their traditional voters, demographic trends, and why they&#39;re having problems.<br />Traditionally, the voting blocks for Republicans are: </p>
<p>1.) Whites &#8211; <br />2.) Social conservatives<br />3.) Fiscal conservatives<br />4.) Southerners/Westerners<br />5.) The Rich<br />6.) Religious voters<br />7.) Small town/ Rural Voters</p>
<p>The problem with this coalition is that these people have vastly different <br />Expectations of the role of government, and in this increasingly diverse country,<br />this particular grouping can&#39;t continue to deliver electoral victories.  </p>
<p>1.) Whites &#8211; By 2042 (<a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/08142008/news/nationalnews/2042_to_see_a_white_minority_124404.htm"></a><a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/08142008/news/natio.." rel="nofollow">http://www.nypost.com/seven/08142008/news/natio..</a>.) <br />whites will be in the minority in the United States.  They will<br />still be the largest ethnic group, but no longer above 50%&#8230; And the fact that almost half of  whites vote Democratic can&#39;t be a good sign for the Republicans.  If not for the (real or perceived) racism in their party, they could really make gains in the minority communities where many Blacks and Latinos (especially older) are very socially conservative. </p>
<p>2.) Social Conservatives &#8211; This is mostly the older Boomers and their parents.  As this group ages and dies off, the younger Boomers (born after 1960) and Generation X/Y will become the pivitol voting blocks.  This age group trends more liberal in their social philosophy (Exhibit A: Obama Voters) and are less likely to oppose abortion or gay marriage.  This group also doesnâ€™t carry the scars of the civil rights movement, which has entrenched many older Boomers on one side or the other. </p>
<p>3.) Fiscal Conservatives &#8211; Bill Clinton&#39;s economy destroyed the old stereotype of &#8220;tax and spend&#8221; liberals.  Bush&#39;s mishandling of the economic policy has plunged the economy into a recession with record deficits.  Many attentive Republicans have taken notice and will not vote for more of the same.</p>
<p>4.) Sotherners/Westerners &#8211; As Southern/Western states (through migration mostly) have gotten more diverse and urban, voters have tended to vote more Democratic.  A few examples are North Carolina, Virginia, Colorado, and Nevada.  If these traditionally red states are in play, the Republicans are in really big trouble.</p>
<p>5.  The Rich/Corporatists &#8211; These guys have done really well under Bush, and he really caters to them.  The problem is that there aren&#39;t enough of them to make a large enough voting block for a return on the political capital he spent courting them.  Sure, they donate and provide much needed financing for campaigns, but because of the campaign finance laws they&#39;re influence is somewhat checked. </p>
<p>6.  Religious people â€“ White Evangelicals are coming to the realization that they are being used by the Republicans for votes and volunteers while receiving nothing legislatively from the people they put in office.  The three main things they wanted from Bush when he got into office was:<br />1.) Legislation concerning prayer/creationism in schools, <br />2.) A Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage <br />3.) The overturning of Roe v. Wade  (They&#39;ll give lip service, but the Republicans will NEVER overturn Roe v. Wade &#8211; They&#39;d lose 2/3 of women&#39;s vote immediately, and they know it).<br />None of this has been accomplished,  with gay marriage becoming law in some states (not to mention the outing of gay Republican leaders). They also saw the disdain the GOP had for Mike Huckabee, who many felt was one of their own. The message many of them got was  â€œhelp us win this election and weâ€™ll see you in four years.â€</p>
<p>7.) Small town/Rural voters &#8211; This is a GOP mainstay, and one of their most loyal voting blocks, but again, they&#39;re numbers are small, plus now there is some influx of Latinos into many rural areas.  This group too sees that while the GOP are quick to demonize &#8220;limousine liberals&#8221;, most of the top GOP, NRA, political pundits and religious leaders live that same lifestyle.  These people may live in small towns but they aren&#39;t stupid.  </p>
<p>Starting with Clinton, the Democrats have moved to the middle, while the GOP find themselves staking out the far right  positions in this country (hence the Sarah Palin nomination).  If the Republicans can&#39;t  find it in themselves to purge the racists and greedy corporatist outsourcers from their midst, they&#39;re going to go the way of the Whigs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MsKitty</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/comment-page-1/#comment-45789</link>
		<dc:creator>MsKitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=2244#comment-45789</guid>
		<description>Fish in a barrel baby, fish in a barrel.  Even so, I know most folks have enough sense not to touch this with a 39 1/2 foot pole.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, I&#039;m just gonna quietly sit back with my bowl of Orville Redenbacher&#039;s and see what other skeletons come tumbling out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fish in a barrel baby, fish in a barrel.  Even so, I know most folks have enough sense not to touch this with a 39 1/2 foot pole.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#39;m just gonna quietly sit back with my bowl of Orville Redenbacher&#39;s and see what other skeletons come tumbling out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MsKitty</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/comment-page-1/#comment-55779</link>
		<dc:creator>MsKitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=2244#comment-55779</guid>
		<description>Fish in a barrel baby, fish in a barrel.  Even so, I know most folks have enough sense not to touch this with a 39 1/2 foot pole.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, I&#039;m just gonna quietly sit back with my bowl of Orville Redenbacher&#039;s and see what other skeletons come tumbling out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fish in a barrel baby, fish in a barrel.  Even so, I know most folks have enough sense not to touch this with a 39 1/2 foot pole.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#39;m just gonna quietly sit back with my bowl of Orville Redenbacher&#39;s and see what other skeletons come tumbling out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elmauter</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/09/going-to-st-paul-be-warned/comment-page-1/#comment-45784</link>
		<dc:creator>elmauter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=2244#comment-45784</guid>
		<description>Your best bets for Twin Cities independent media coverage of the RNC are &lt;a href=&quot;http://theuptake.org&quot;&gt;The Uptake&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://mnindy.com&quot;&gt;Minnesota Independent&lt;/a&gt;. They&#039;ve done a phenomenal job of covering the raids over the weekend and the protest (and police) activity yesterday. And they&#039;re all credentialed so they&#039;ll be inside the convention as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your best bets for Twin Cities independent media coverage of the RNC are <a href="http://theuptake.org">The Uptake</a> and the <a href="http://mnindy.com">Minnesota Independent</a>. They&#39;ve done a phenomenal job of covering the raids over the weekend and the protest (and police) activity yesterday. And they&#39;re all credentialed so they&#39;ll be inside the convention as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
