<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Senator Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/</link>
	<description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:02:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TruthSeeker</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-166306</link>
		<dc:creator>TruthSeeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1772#comment-166306</guid>
		<description>Darn, I missed this post!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe he should consult with those &quot;Funny or Die&quot; guys....  If they could work with the more experienced election ad people...  Then he should get a couple psychologists/behavioral researchers on board.  O needs some some young, innovative film-makers with fresh ideas.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One of the best ad&#039;s I&#039;ve seen is the &quot;Politics of Parsing&quot; from Edwards against Hillary.  It was simple and devastating.  Just text and clips:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qggO5yY7RAo&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.youtube.com/watch?v=qggO5yY7RAo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He should light some fire under the butt&#039;s of the communication people, no more lukewarm responses!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darn, I missed this post!</p>
<p>Maybe he should consult with those &#8220;Funny or Die&#8221; guys&#8230;.  If they could work with the more experienced election ad people&#8230;  Then he should get a couple psychologists/behavioral researchers on board.  O needs some some young, innovative film-makers with fresh ideas.</p>
<p>One of the best ad&#39;s I&#39;ve seen is the &#8220;Politics of Parsing&#8221; from Edwards against Hillary.  It was simple and devastating.  Just text and clips:<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qggO5yY7RAo" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qggO5yY7RAo</a></p>
<p>He should light some fire under the butt&#39;s of the communication people, no more lukewarm responses!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TruthSeeker</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-40334</link>
		<dc:creator>TruthSeeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1772#comment-40334</guid>
		<description>Darn, I missed this post!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe he should consult with those &quot;Funny or Die&quot; guys....  If they could work with the more experienced election ad people...  Then he should get a couple psychologists/behavioral researchers on board.  O needs some some young, innovative film-makers with fresh ideas.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One of the best ad&#039;s I&#039;ve seen is the &quot;Politics of Parsing&quot; from Edwards against Hillary.  It was simple and devastating.  Just text and clips:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qggO5yY7RAo&quot;&gt;www.youtube.com/watch?v=qggO5yY7RAo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He should light some fire under the butt&#039;s of the communication people, no more lukewarm responses!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darn, I missed this post!</p>
<p>Maybe he should consult with those &#8220;Funny or Die&#8221; guys&#8230;.  If they could work with the more experienced election ad people&#8230;  Then he should get a couple psychologists/behavioral researchers on board.  O needs some some young, innovative film-makers with fresh ideas.</p>
<p>One of the best ad&#39;s I&#39;ve seen is the &#8220;Politics of Parsing&#8221; from Edwards against Hillary.  It was simple and devastating.  Just text and clips:<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qggO5yY7RAo">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qggO5yY7RAo</a></p>
<p>He should light some fire under the butt&#39;s of the communication people, no more lukewarm responses!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnthonyMason</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-40309</link>
		<dc:creator>AnthonyMason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1772#comment-40309</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s another problem O&#039;s facing: 60% of the Democratic establishment cannot (and shouldn&#039;t be) trusted.  I wouldnt trust a Carveille or Begala carrying water for Obama.  &lt;br&gt;Again, as it has been said here before: Obama&#039;s not just fighting the repubs; he&#039;s also fighting the dems as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s another problem O&#39;s facing: 60% of the Democratic establishment cannot (and shouldn&#39;t be) trusted.  I wouldnt trust a Carveille or Begala carrying water for Obama.  <br />Again, as it has been said here before: Obama&#39;s not just fighting the repubs; he&#39;s also fighting the dems as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caligirl</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-40327</link>
		<dc:creator>caligirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1772#comment-40327</guid>
		<description>i agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micheline</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-40311</link>
		<dc:creator>Micheline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1772#comment-40311</guid>
		<description>May be because people were curious about those stupid ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May be because people were curious about those stupid ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-40310</link>
		<dc:creator>s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1772#comment-40310</guid>
		<description>McCain takes lead on YouTube hits: &quot;Mr. McCain has beat Mr. Obama&#039;s channel for seven straight days and 11 of the past 14 days, in a signal he intends to compete for the YouTube vote. That is a giant reversal. Mr. Obama had been quadrupling Mr. McCain&#039;s YouTube views and beat him every day since February, according to TubeMogul, which tracks online video viewing.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washtimes.com/news/2008/aug/07/mccain-takes-lead-on-youtube-hits/&quot;&gt;http://www.washtimes.com/news/2008/aug/07/mccai...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain takes lead on YouTube hits: &#8220;Mr. McCain has beat Mr. Obama&#39;s channel for seven straight days and 11 of the past 14 days, in a signal he intends to compete for the YouTube vote. That is a giant reversal. Mr. Obama had been quadrupling Mr. McCain&#39;s YouTube views and beat him every day since February, according to TubeMogul, which tracks online video viewing.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washtimes.com/news/2008/aug/07/mccain-takes-lead-on-youtube-hits/"></a><a href="http://www.washtimes.com/news/2008/aug/07/mccai.." rel="nofollow">http://www.washtimes.com/news/2008/aug/07/mccai..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sepia</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-40331</link>
		<dc:creator>Sepia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1772#comment-40331</guid>
		<description>Co-signing the co-signer! This suggestions need to be heard/read by The Obama Campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Co-signing the co-signer! This suggestions need to be heard/read by The Obama Campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jed</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-40312</link>
		<dc:creator>jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1772#comment-40312</guid>
		<description>As someone who will be voting for whichever C-list candidate has the last name that is most difficult for school children to spell, I would sign that (with a few edits). However...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The real guts of either candidate&#039;s campaign will not begin much before their respective conventions. Everything up to now has been establishing range and windage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who will be voting for whichever C-list candidate has the last name that is most difficult for school children to spell, I would sign that (with a few edits). However&#8230;</p>
<p>The real guts of either candidate&#39;s campaign will not begin much before their respective conventions. Everything up to now has been establishing range and windage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micheline</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-40313</link>
		<dc:creator>Micheline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1772#comment-40313</guid>
		<description>For weeks people have been saying  he needs another communications team. My problem is that they don&#039;t know when to  take advantage an opportunity  for example Phil Gram&#039;s comment.  It seems to me that they are one track  minded: they are focusing on organizing at the expense of messaging when both areas are important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For weeks people have been saying  he needs another communications team. My problem is that they don&#39;t know when to  take advantage an opportunity  for example Phil Gram&#39;s comment.  It seems to me that they are one track  minded: they are focusing on organizing at the expense of messaging when both areas are important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dear Senator Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-23876</link>
		<dc:creator>Dear Senator Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1772#comment-23876</guid>
		<description>[...] Original The Googlization of Everything [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original The Googlization of Everything [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-40315</link>
		<dc:creator>s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1772#comment-40315</guid>
		<description>McCain is seizing Obama&#039;s territory, center-left, swing voters. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Center-left swing voters want change, but may not be willing to risk it with an inexperienced, until now, little known, candidate. McCain is looking to be an acceptable, bi-partisan, experienced candidate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He is cashing in on his &quot;Maverick&quot; brand and taking away the &quot;McBush&quot; line of attack&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama&#039;s comments about &quot;America no longer being what it once was&quot; is enough to drive the far right to the polls and  vote against him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain is seizing Obama&#39;s territory, center-left, swing voters. </p>
<p>Center-left swing voters want change, but may not be willing to risk it with an inexperienced, until now, little known, candidate. McCain is looking to be an acceptable, bi-partisan, experienced candidate.</p>
<p>He is cashing in on his &#8220;Maverick&#8221; brand and taking away the &#8220;McBush&#8221; line of attack</p>
<p>Obama&#39;s comments about &#8220;America no longer being what it once was&#8221; is enough to drive the far right to the polls and  vote against him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admiral_Komack</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-40314</link>
		<dc:creator>Admiral_Komack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1772#comment-40314</guid>
		<description>&quot;Obama needs to be more positive, like he was in the beginning of this campaign.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;This cannot help:&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Obama: “America is no longer what it once was”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-You mean positive like John McCain?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;McCain&#039;s new TV ad is critical of Bush and Obama&lt;br&gt;THE ASSOCIATED PRESS &lt;br&gt;August 6, 2008 &lt;br&gt;RAPID CITY, S.D. - John McCain conceded in a new television commercial yesterday that &quot;we&#039;re worse off than we were four years ago,&quot; and said he is the candidate best positioned to usher in an era of change. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Washington&#039;s broken. John McCain knows it,&quot; says the commercial, which is implicitly critical of both President George W. Bush and Barack Obama. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is unusual for a presidential candidate to part company with an administration of the same party, but McCain has little choice, with public opinion polls showing the public is eager for change after eight years of the Bush administration. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsday.com/services/newspaper/printedition/wednesday/nation/ny-usmcca065790572aug06%2C0%2C4847089.story&quot;&gt;http://www.newsday.com/services/newspaper/print...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Obama needs to be more positive, like he was in the beginning of this campaign.&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;This cannot help:&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Obama: “America is no longer what it once was”</p>
<p>-You mean positive like John McCain?</p>
<p>McCain&#39;s new TV ad is critical of Bush and Obama<br />THE ASSOCIATED PRESS <br />August 6, 2008 <br />RAPID CITY, S.D. &#8211; John McCain conceded in a new television commercial yesterday that &#8220;we&#39;re worse off than we were four years ago,&#8221; and said he is the candidate best positioned to usher in an era of change. </p>
<p>&#8220;Washington&#39;s broken. John McCain knows it,&#8221; says the commercial, which is implicitly critical of both President George W. Bush and Barack Obama. </p>
<p>It is unusual for a presidential candidate to part company with an administration of the same party, but McCain has little choice, with public opinion polls showing the public is eager for change after eight years of the Bush administration. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.newsday.com/services/newspaper/printedition/wednesday/nation/ny-usmcca065790572aug06%2C0%2C4847089.story"></a><a href="http://www.newsday.com/services/newspaper/print.." rel="nofollow">http://www.newsday.com/services/newspaper/print..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dear Senator Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-23875</link>
		<dc:creator>Dear Senator Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1772#comment-23875</guid>
		<description>[...] Original Consumer Shopping [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original Consumer Shopping [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenLadyHere</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-40330</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1772#comment-40330</guid>
		<description>BAP:  CO-SIGN!!!  :&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BAP:  CO-SIGN!!!  :&gt;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rawdawgbuffalo</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-40316</link>
		<dc:creator>rawdawgbuffalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1772#comment-40316</guid>
		<description>I figure neither McCain nor Obama has a clue about the common man son &lt;a href=&#039;http://rawdawgb.blogspot.com/2008/08/label-me-cow.html&#039;&gt;Label me Cow&lt;/a&gt; because I got beef with them both</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figure neither McCain nor Obama has a clue about the common man son <a href=&#39;http://rawdawgb.blogspot.com/2008/08/label-me-cow.html&#39;>Label me Cow</a> because I got beef with them both</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-40317</link>
		<dc:creator>s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1772#comment-40317</guid>
		<description>Obama needs to be more positive, like he was in the beginning of this campaign. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This cannot help:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama: “America is no longer what it once was”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;When presidential candidates answer questions from children about why they want the job, most will give an answer that uplifts the child and the candidate.  Not Barack Obama.  At a campaign stop in Elkhart, Indiana, a seven-year-old girl asked the Democrat why he wants to be President — and he told her that America has gone downhill:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    “America is …, uh, is no longer, uh … what it could be, what it once was. And I say to myself, I don’t want that future for my children.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sound familiar? Michelle Obama sounded similar themes earlier in the campaign:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    “Sometimes it’s easier to hold onto your own stereotypes and misconceptions. It makes you feel justified in your ignorance. That’s America.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    “Let me tell you something. For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country, because it feels like hope is making a comeback.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everyone feels that we can improve ourselves, but we don’t usually cast it in terms of the country no longer being what it once was. Coming from the Obamas, that doesn’t even make sense. They have talked about how difficult it was to break through barriers, not without some justification, to reach this point in their lives and American history.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Doesn’t that speak to the point that we continue to grow and to learn? And if not, which “good old days” did Obama mean? The 1980s? I doubt it, and if he means the Clinton era, then why did he run against Hillary in the first place?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Once again, Obama got off the teleprompter and put his foot directly in his mouth. He’s not selling Hope, he’s selling Despair, and himself as the snake oil that will cure us of all our ills.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama needs to be more positive, like he was in the beginning of this campaign. </p>
<p>This cannot help:</p>
<p>Obama: “America is no longer what it once was”</p>
<p>&#8220;When presidential candidates answer questions from children about why they want the job, most will give an answer that uplifts the child and the candidate.  Not Barack Obama.  At a campaign stop in Elkhart, Indiana, a seven-year-old girl asked the Democrat why he wants to be President — and he told her that America has gone downhill:</p>
<p>    “America is …, uh, is no longer, uh … what it could be, what it once was. And I say to myself, I don’t want that future for my children.”</p>
<p>Sound familiar? Michelle Obama sounded similar themes earlier in the campaign:</p>
<p>    “Sometimes it’s easier to hold onto your own stereotypes and misconceptions. It makes you feel justified in your ignorance. That’s America.”</p>
<p>    “Let me tell you something. For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country, because it feels like hope is making a comeback.”</p>
<p>Everyone feels that we can improve ourselves, but we don’t usually cast it in terms of the country no longer being what it once was. Coming from the Obamas, that doesn’t even make sense. They have talked about how difficult it was to break through barriers, not without some justification, to reach this point in their lives and American history.</p>
<p>Doesn’t that speak to the point that we continue to grow and to learn? And if not, which “good old days” did Obama mean? The 1980s? I doubt it, and if he means the Clinton era, then why did he run against Hillary in the first place?</p>
<p>Once again, Obama got off the teleprompter and put his foot directly in his mouth. He’s not selling Hope, he’s selling Despair, and himself as the snake oil that will cure us of all our ills.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CraigHickman</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-40318</link>
		<dc:creator>CraigHickman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1772#comment-40318</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;He can&#039;t worry about...being seen as the big, Black predator. We&#039;re past that. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;::&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We&#039;re never past that, RonnieB.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Never.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>He can&#39;t worry about&#8230;being seen as the big, Black predator. We&#39;re past that. </i></p>
<p>::</p>
<p>We&#39;re never past that, RonnieB.</p>
<p>Never.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CraigHickman</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-40321</link>
		<dc:creator>CraigHickman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1772#comment-40321</guid>
		<description>The media is pushing the overexposure results big time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps his vacation is perfectly timed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media is pushing the overexposure results big time.</p>
<p>Perhaps his vacation is perfectly timed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RonnieB</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-40319</link>
		<dc:creator>RonnieB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1772#comment-40319</guid>
		<description>First of all, not only is the MSM advancing this meme, so are Black Republicans and others of that ilk.  But I guess those folks are one in the same as it relates to Barack.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to the criticism of Barack, I was just talking to a (white, former Hillary-supporting) co-worker about this very thing.  Barack has got to dispatch his people much faster.  McCain is throwing all the mud, which means that &lt;i&gt;he&#039;s&lt;/i&gt; driving the media cycles.  And the media are glad to have it that way, because it makes a horse race of what should be a horse vs. donkey race.   On the one hand, it&#039;s low-brow and shameful the way the McCain is allowing his campaign to be run.  But on the other hand, the common voter is much less high-minded and much more low-brow than ever before.  This is a fight and the voters (and the media) are the judges.  And if they see that one fighter is doing all the punching--even if the punches aren&#039;t landing--they&#039;re gonna give the fight to the aggressor.  Barack cannot afford to let McCain be the aggressor.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s time to take the fight to McCain.  Not a dirty fight, but a tactical one where he is the obvious aggressor; where all of his blows are decisive; and where he strikes fear with his ever move.  He can&#039;t worry about hurting McCain or being seen as the big, Black predator.  We&#039;re past that.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is for all of our futures.  And he&#039;s gotta start fighting like that&#039;s what at stake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, not only is the MSM advancing this meme, so are Black Republicans and others of that ilk.  But I guess those folks are one in the same as it relates to Barack.</p>
<p>As to the criticism of Barack, I was just talking to a (white, former Hillary-supporting) co-worker about this very thing.  Barack has got to dispatch his people much faster.  McCain is throwing all the mud, which means that <i>he&#39;s</i> driving the media cycles.  And the media are glad to have it that way, because it makes a horse race of what should be a horse vs. donkey race.   On the one hand, it&#39;s low-brow and shameful the way the McCain is allowing his campaign to be run.  But on the other hand, the common voter is much less high-minded and much more low-brow than ever before.  This is a fight and the voters (and the media) are the judges.  And if they see that one fighter is doing all the punching&#8211;even if the punches aren&#39;t landing&#8211;they&#39;re gonna give the fight to the aggressor.  Barack cannot afford to let McCain be the aggressor.</p>
<p>It&#39;s time to take the fight to McCain.  Not a dirty fight, but a tactical one where he is the obvious aggressor; where all of his blows are decisive; and where he strikes fear with his ever move.  He can&#39;t worry about hurting McCain or being seen as the big, Black predator.  We&#39;re past that.  </p>
<p>This is for all of our futures.  And he&#39;s gotta start fighting like that&#39;s what at stake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rikyrah</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/dear-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-40333</link>
		<dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1772#comment-40333</guid>
		<description>I believe Obama&#039;s done the best he could with what he has. I believe he&#039;s decided to stick with loyalty above quality. When he first started out, he couldn&#039;t get &#039;the best&#039;, because &#039; the best&#039; thought he didn&#039;t have a chance in hell. Well, now that hell has frozen over, I &#039;m in a quandry as to what he should do, because I would no more trust a lot of those folks than I would trust any GOP operative. That&#039;s a tough spot to be in - needing the quality of someone you fundamentally can&#039;t trust. And no, I don&#039;t think Obama could trust those folks, which is why I haven&#039;t come down on him for sticking with loyalty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Obama&#39;s done the best he could with what he has. I believe he&#39;s decided to stick with loyalty above quality. When he first started out, he couldn&#39;t get &#39;the best&#39;, because &#39; the best&#39; thought he didn&#39;t have a chance in hell. Well, now that hell has frozen over, I &#39;m in a quandry as to what he should do, because I would no more trust a lot of those folks than I would trust any GOP operative. That&#39;s a tough spot to be in &#8211; needing the quality of someone you fundamentally can&#39;t trust. And no, I don&#39;t think Obama could trust those folks, which is why I haven&#39;t come down on him for sticking with loyalty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
