<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Biden? Really???</title> <atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/</link> <description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator> <item><title>By: enter your email</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1092715</link> <dc:creator>enter your email</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 03:19:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1896#comment-1092715</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;rsvp dating...&lt;/strong&gt;below youโ€ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>rsvp dating&#8230;</strong></p><p>below youโ€ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: click here to continue</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1091067</link> <dc:creator>click here to continue</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 18:03:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1896#comment-1091067</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;christian dating...&lt;/strong&gt;although websites we backlink to below are considerably not related to ours, we feel they are actually worth a go through, so have a look...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>christian dating&#8230;</strong></p><p>although websites we backlink to below are considerably not related to ours, we feel they are actually worth a go through, so have a look&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: url</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/comment-page-1/#comment-1086216</link> <dc:creator>url</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:39:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1896#comment-1086216</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;dating personals...&lt;/strong&gt;Blogs ou should be reading......</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>dating personals&#8230;</strong></p><p>Blogs ou should be reading&#8230;&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Symptoms Of Low Vitamin D</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/comment-page-1/#comment-935348</link> <dc:creator>Symptoms Of Low Vitamin D</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 20:58:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1896#comment-935348</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Symptoms Of Low Vitamin D...&lt;/strong&gt;below you’ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Symptoms Of Low Vitamin D&#8230;</strong></p><p>below you’ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: test</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/comment-page-1/#comment-869131</link> <dc:creator>test</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:26:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1896#comment-869131</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;What&#039;s Mandatory When Choosing...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]When you have knowledge, skills and experience these are are crucial to make you happy at all things in life.[...]...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What&#8217;s Mandatory When Choosing&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]When you have knowledge, skills and experience these are are crucial to make you happy at all things in life.[...]&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: test</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/comment-page-1/#comment-864962</link> <dc:creator>test</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:51:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1896#comment-864962</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;T4st Blog...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]The discussion started here that could be help full to readers[...]...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>T4st Blog&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]The discussion started here that could be help full to readers[...]&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: http://eye-exercises-to-improve-vision.blogspot.com/2011/07/better-vision-for-greater-memory.html</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/comment-page-1/#comment-748637</link> <dc:creator>http://eye-exercises-to-improve-vision.blogspot.com/2011/07/better-vision-for-greater-memory.html</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 01:23:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1896#comment-748637</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Improve your vision naturally!...&lt;/strong&gt;Thanks. Left you a trackback to help your readers improve eye vision naturally....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Improve your vision naturally!&#8230;</strong></p><p>Thanks. Left you a trackback to help your readers improve eye vision naturally&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/comment-page-1/#comment-343011</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:42:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1896#comment-343011</guid> <description>I agree that Lieberman and Edwards weren&#039;t smart picks. They seemed to me to be strikingly unconvincing, weak, and not particularly enlightened candidates. I was surprised it took so many others so long to turn against them. Sebelius strikes me as an exceedingly reasonable and deeply self-aware politician, though I understand that others feel differently both about her and the import of those qualities in this campaign.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;About the demographics question, small, tightly-targeted groups like &#039;Jewish Floridians,&#039; and &#039;southern white men,&#039; aren&#039;t on the level of magnitude of women voters. Like I said, they&#039;re more than 50% of the electorate. The value of their vote is of an entirely different order than the much-smaller, more targeted groups, and the party that delivers policy and power to them most effectively won&#039;t have to deal in the Mark Pennish, micro-targeting bullshit that produced candidates like Lieberman and Edwards.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;About McCain&#039;s POW sleeve-wearing, the Obama campaign actually went furthest in dismantling his credibility last week with their &#039;housing&#039; media offensive. And of course that was all before Biden was even picked, let alone on the attack against McCain&#039;s POW cred.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, I personally think Biden isn&#039;t an unredeemable pick. To his credit, he&#039;s about as liberal as pres ticket candidates are willing to be these days. But the Times reported that Obama picked him particularly for the micro-targeting reasons that you decry.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Lieberman and Edwards weren&#39;t smart picks. They seemed to me to be strikingly unconvincing, weak, and not particularly enlightened candidates. I was surprised it took so many others so long to turn against them. Sebelius strikes me as an exceedingly reasonable and deeply self-aware politician, though I understand that others feel differently both about her and the import of those qualities in this campaign.</p><p>About the demographics question, small, tightly-targeted groups like &#39;Jewish Floridians,&#39; and &#39;southern white men,&#39; aren&#39;t on the level of magnitude of women voters. Like I said, they&#39;re more than 50% of the electorate. The value of their vote is of an entirely different order than the much-smaller, more targeted groups, and the party that delivers policy and power to them most effectively won&#39;t have to deal in the Mark Pennish, micro-targeting bullshit that produced candidates like Lieberman and Edwards.</p><p>About McCain&#39;s POW sleeve-wearing, the Obama campaign actually went furthest in dismantling his credibility last week with their &#39;housing&#39; media offensive. And of course that was all before Biden was even picked, let alone on the attack against McCain&#39;s POW cred.</p><p>Finally, I personally think Biden isn&#39;t an unredeemable pick. To his credit, he&#39;s about as liberal as pres ticket candidates are willing to be these days. But the Times reported that Obama picked him particularly for the micro-targeting reasons that you decry.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/comment-page-1/#comment-162837</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:42:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1896#comment-162837</guid> <description>I agree that Lieberman and Edwards weren&#039;t smart picks. They seemed to me to be strikingly unconvincing, weak, and not particularly enlightened candidates. I was surprised it took so many others so long to turn against them. Sebelius strikes me as an exceedingly reasonable and deeply self-aware politician, though I understand that others feel differently both about her and the import of those qualities in this campaign.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;About the demographics question, small, tightly-targeted groups like &#039;Jewish Floridians,&#039; and &#039;southern white men,&#039; aren&#039;t on the level of magnitude of women voters. Like I said, they&#039;re more than 50% of the electorate. The value of their vote is of an entirely different order than the much-smaller, more targeted groups, and the party that delivers policy and power to them most effectively won&#039;t have to deal in the Mark Pennish, micro-targeting bullshit that produced candidates like Lieberman and Edwards.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;About McCain&#039;s POW sleeve-wearing, the Obama campaign actually went furthest in dismantling his credibility last week with their &#039;housing&#039; media offensive. And of course that was all before Biden was even picked, let alone on the attack against McCain&#039;s POW cred.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, I personally think Biden isn&#039;t an unredeemable pick. To his credit, he&#039;s about as liberal as pres ticket candidates are willing to be these days. But the Times reported that Obama picked him particularly for the micro-targeting reasons that you decry.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Lieberman and Edwards weren&#39;t smart picks. They seemed to me to be strikingly unconvincing, weak, and not particularly enlightened candidates. I was surprised it took so many others so long to turn against them. Sebelius strikes me as an exceedingly reasonable and deeply self-aware politician, though I understand that others feel differently both about her and the import of those qualities in this campaign.</p><p>About the demographics question, small, tightly-targeted groups like &#39;Jewish Floridians,&#39; and &#39;southern white men,&#39; aren&#39;t on the level of magnitude of women voters. Like I said, they&#39;re more than 50% of the electorate. The value of their vote is of an entirely different order than the much-smaller, more targeted groups, and the party that delivers policy and power to them most effectively won&#39;t have to deal in the Mark Pennish, micro-targeting bullshit that produced candidates like Lieberman and Edwards.</p><p>About McCain&#39;s POW sleeve-wearing, the Obama campaign actually went furthest in dismantling his credibility last week with their &#39;housing&#39; media offensive. And of course that was all before Biden was even picked, let alone on the attack against McCain&#39;s POW cred.</p><p>Finally, I personally think Biden isn&#39;t an unredeemable pick. To his credit, he&#39;s about as liberal as pres ticket candidates are willing to be these days. But the Times reported that Obama picked him particularly for the micro-targeting reasons that you decry.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/comment-page-1/#comment-37213</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:42:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1896#comment-37213</guid> <description>I agree that Lieberman and Edwards weren&#039;t smart picks. They seemed to me to be strikingly unconvincing, weak, and not particularly enlightened candidates. I was surprised it took so many others so long to turn against them. Sebelius strikes me as an exceedingly reasonable and deeply self-aware politician, though I understand that others feel differently both about her and the import of those qualities in this campaign.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;About the demographics question, small, tightly-targeted groups like &#039;Jewish Floridians,&#039; and &#039;southern white men,&#039; aren&#039;t on the level of magnitude of women voters. Like I said, they&#039;re more than 50% of the electorate. The value of their vote is of an entirely different order than the much-smaller, more targeted groups, and the party that delivers policy and power to them most effectively won&#039;t have to deal in the Mark Pennish, micro-targeting bullshit that produced candidates like Lieberman and Edwards.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;About McCain&#039;s POW sleeve-wearing, the Obama campaign actually went furthest in dismantling his credibility last week with their &#039;housing&#039; media offensive. And of course that was all before Biden was even picked, let alone on the attack against McCain&#039;s POW cred.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, I personally think Biden isn&#039;t an unredeemable pick. To his credit, he&#039;s about as liberal as pres ticket candidates are willing to be these days. But the Times reported that Obama picked him particularly for the micro-targeting reasons that you decry.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Lieberman and Edwards weren&#39;t smart picks. They seemed to me to be strikingly unconvincing, weak, and not particularly enlightened candidates. I was surprised it took so many others so long to turn against them. Sebelius strikes me as an exceedingly reasonable and deeply self-aware politician, though I understand that others feel differently both about her and the import of those qualities in this campaign.</p><p>About the demographics question, small, tightly-targeted groups like &#39;Jewish Floridians,&#39; and &#39;southern white men,&#39; aren&#39;t on the level of magnitude of women voters. Like I said, they&#39;re more than 50% of the electorate. The value of their vote is of an entirely different order than the much-smaller, more targeted groups, and the party that delivers policy and power to them most effectively won&#39;t have to deal in the Mark Pennish, micro-targeting bullshit that produced candidates like Lieberman and Edwards.</p><p>About McCain&#39;s POW sleeve-wearing, the Obama campaign actually went furthest in dismantling his credibility last week with their &#39;housing&#39; media offensive. And of course that was all before Biden was even picked, let alone on the attack against McCain&#39;s POW cred.</p><p>Finally, I personally think Biden isn&#39;t an unredeemable pick. To his credit, he&#39;s about as liberal as pres ticket candidates are willing to be these days. But the Times reported that Obama picked him particularly for the micro-targeting reasons that you decry.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CO</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/comment-page-1/#comment-37195</link> <dc:creator>CO</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:39:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1896#comment-37195</guid> <description>I agree with Miranda.   McCain&#039;s camp is trying the divide and conquer tactic-- with Hillary&#039;s women and African-Americans.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Powell has repeatedly praised Obama&#039;s presidential run, and has offered him foreign policy advice.  I very much doubt that he would do anything to derail Obama.  In fact, Powell has refused to even endorse any candidate.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Miranda.   McCain&#39;s camp is trying the divide and conquer tactic&#8211; with Hillary&#39;s women and African-Americans.</p><p>Powell has repeatedly praised Obama&#39;s presidential run, and has offered him foreign policy advice.  I very much doubt that he would do anything to derail Obama.  In fact, Powell has refused to even endorse any candidate.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CO</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/comment-page-1/#comment-37191</link> <dc:creator>CO</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:32:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1896#comment-37191</guid> <description>Why all the hostility?  Obama is working to keep your cash in your pocket.   Look beyond skin color.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why all the hostility?  Obama is working to keep your cash in your pocket.   Look beyond skin color.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BARB</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/comment-page-1/#comment-37187</link> <dc:creator>BARB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 23:35:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1896#comment-37187</guid> <description>Remembering Joe Biden and Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.feministing.com/archives/010594.html&quot;&gt;http://www.feministing.com/archives/010594.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Biden&#039;s also a long-serving member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which, because it vets and approves Supreme Court nominees, has an incredibly important role in protecting choice. There&#039;s good and bad on Biden&#039;s record here. He chaired the committee from 1987 to 1995, presiding over the confirmation hearings of Robert Bork (who was rejected) and Clarence Thomas.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Biden&#039;s role in the Thomas hearings, particularly his treatment of Anita Hill, are something that get little mention these days. (Although some women remember.) Biden says he did not vociferously pursue Hill&#039;s charges of sexual harassment because he didn&#039;t want to go after a Supreme Court nominee the way Republicans would. Here&#039;s Charles Ogletree, who represented Hill, on why Biden&#039;s excuse is bullshit:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    OGLETREE: (Senator Biden) doesn&#039;t understand that by sitting back and taking no position that he has encouraged the victimization of Anita Hill. She has civil rights and civil liberties, too. She wasn&#039;t applying for a lifetime appointment on the Supreme Court. She was not coming forward with an agenda to change the landscape of America.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    And so for him to say that he didn&#039;t help her because he didn&#039;t want to be like the other side, to me, is to acknowledge that he has neglected to do his duties. He was the chairman. He was supposed to ask tough questions. He was supposed to get to the bottom of issues....And the bottom line is that Anita Hill was pilloried from beginning to end without any protection from anybody in that process....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    What the senator did regrettably was to bend over in the wrong direction, and I think he did a great disservice in the sense of civil rights by being so tolerant of the lack of responsiveness on the part of one party and being so intolerant of efforts on the other side to bring out issues that may have shed light on (Thomas&#039; character).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some believe that thanks to Joe Biden, and his refusal to let those testify who confirmed Anita Hill&#039;s allegations, we now have Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remembering Joe Biden and Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill:</p><p><a href="http://www.feministing.com/archives/010594.html">http://www.feministing.com/archives/010594.html</a></p><p>Biden&#39;s also a long-serving member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which, because it vets and approves Supreme Court nominees, has an incredibly important role in protecting choice. There&#39;s good and bad on Biden&#39;s record here. He chaired the committee from 1987 to 1995, presiding over the confirmation hearings of Robert Bork (who was rejected) and Clarence Thomas.</p><p>Biden&#39;s role in the Thomas hearings, particularly his treatment of Anita Hill, are something that get little mention these days. (Although some women remember.) Biden says he did not vociferously pursue Hill&#39;s charges of sexual harassment because he didn&#39;t want to go after a Supreme Court nominee the way Republicans would. Here&#39;s Charles Ogletree, who represented Hill, on why Biden&#39;s excuse is bullshit:</p><p> OGLETREE: (Senator Biden) doesn&#39;t understand that by sitting back and taking no position that he has encouraged the victimization of Anita Hill. She has civil rights and civil liberties, too. She wasn&#39;t applying for a lifetime appointment on the Supreme Court. She was not coming forward with an agenda to change the landscape of America.</p><p> And so for him to say that he didn&#39;t help her because he didn&#39;t want to be like the other side, to me, is to acknowledge that he has neglected to do his duties. He was the chairman. He was supposed to ask tough questions. He was supposed to get to the bottom of issues&#8230;.And the bottom line is that Anita Hill was pilloried from beginning to end without any protection from anybody in that process&#8230;.</p><p> What the senator did regrettably was to bend over in the wrong direction, and I think he did a great disservice in the sense of civil rights by being so tolerant of the lack of responsiveness on the part of one party and being so intolerant of efforts on the other side to bring out issues that may have shed light on (Thomas&#39; character).</p><p>Some believe that thanks to Joe Biden, and his refusal to let those testify who confirmed Anita Hill&#39;s allegations, we now have Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TruthSeeker</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/comment-page-1/#comment-37188</link> <dc:creator>TruthSeeker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:23:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1896#comment-37188</guid> <description>Larry King has GOT to go!   Claire McCaskill was on, and he asked her if she was disappointed that she wasn&#039;t VP pick....WHAT A JERK!.   Larry had that female Colombian hostage on, he asked her if she was raped...CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT?   Larry had Rick Warren on, the guy who lied about the &quot;cone of silence&quot;.  Larry treated Rick with kid gloves, throwing him softball questions and virtually answering them for him.  The richer you are, the more humanely you&#039;re treated on Larry King.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry King has GOT to go!   Claire McCaskill was on, and he asked her if she was disappointed that she wasn&#39;t VP pick&#8230;.WHAT A JERK!.   Larry had that female Colombian hostage on, he asked her if she was raped&#8230;CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT?   Larry had Rick Warren on, the guy who lied about the &#8220;cone of silence&#8221;.  Larry treated Rick with kid gloves, throwing him softball questions and virtually answering them for him.  The richer you are, the more humanely you&#39;re treated on Larry King.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GreenLadyHere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/comment-page-1/#comment-37203</link> <dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:20:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1896#comment-37203</guid> <description>TruthSeeker:   Me 2!!  Sometimes, she doesn&#039;t let an opponent get a word in edgewise!!  She&#039;s a great surrogate!!   :&gt;)   :&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She &quot;LET IT [them] GO!!!   :&gt;)   :&gt;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TruthSeeker:   Me 2!!  Sometimes, she doesn&#39;t let an opponent get a word in edgewise!!  She&#39;s a great surrogate!!   :&gt;)   :&gt;)</p><p>She &#8220;LET IT [them] GO!!!   :&gt;)   :&gt;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GreenLadyHere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/comment-page-1/#comment-37242</link> <dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:17:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1896#comment-37242</guid> <description>TruthSeeker:  I&#039;m still laughing -  &quot;and it WASN&#039;T Hillary!&quot;   Yaaaaa!!!  :&gt;)   :&gt;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TruthSeeker:  I&#39;m still laughing &#8211;  &#8220;and it WASN&#39;T Hillary!&#8221;   Yaaaaa!!!  :&gt;)   :&gt;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GreenLadyHere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/comment-page-1/#comment-37225</link> <dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:15:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1896#comment-37225</guid> <description>taritac:   Great stuff!   :&gt;)    :&gt;)   Thanks!!   :&gt;)   :&gt;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>taritac:   Great stuff!   :&gt;)    :&gt;)   Thanks!!   :&gt;)   :&gt;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GreenLadyHere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/comment-page-1/#comment-37199</link> <dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:11:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1896#comment-37199</guid> <description>Nick:  Thanks for this info. :&gt;)     &lt;a href=&quot;http://BarackObama.com&quot;&gt;BarackObama.com&lt;/a&gt; has a t-shirt 2!  :&gt;)   :&gt;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick:  Thanks for this info. :&gt;) <a href="http://BarackObama.com">BarackObama.com</a> has a t-shirt 2!  :&gt;)   :&gt;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GreenLadyHere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/comment-page-1/#comment-37193</link> <dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:10:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1896#comment-37193</guid> <description>Antoine:   &quot;Big Bill zipper . . . . .&quot;    LOL x10  :&gt;)    :&gt;)    :&gt;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antoine:   &#8220;Big Bill zipper . . . . .&#8221;    LOL x10  :&gt;)    :&gt;)    :&gt;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GreenLadyHere</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/08/biden-really/comment-page-1/#comment-37189</link> <dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:06:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1896#comment-37189</guid> <description>So, I&#039;m running into my house, STR8 to my computer, booting it up!!!  :&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whew!!  Really out of breath DEEP Breaths!!   :&gt;)   :&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Did I miss anything????      JUST KIDDING!!!!   :&gt;)    :&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here&#039;s the song -   -    &quot;Ebony and Ivory&quot;  [Stevie Wonder]   :&gt;)   :&gt;)    :&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So  B O has been transformed into O - B and to me this says . . .&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;DING!   DING!     DING!!    We have a WINNER!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;billary WHO????   :&gt;)   :&gt;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I&#39;m running into my house, STR8 to my computer, booting it up!!!  :&gt;)</p><p>Whew!!  Really out of breath DEEP Breaths!!   :&gt;)   :&gt;)</p><p>Did I miss anything????      JUST KIDDING!!!!   :&gt;)    :&gt;)</p><p>Here&#39;s the song &#8211;   &#8211;    &#8220;Ebony and Ivory&#8221;  [Stevie Wonder]   :&gt;)   :&gt;)    :&gt;)</p><p>So  B O has been transformed into O &#8211; B and to me this says . . .</p><p>DING!   DING!     DING!!    We have a WINNER!!!!</p><p>billary WHO????   :&gt;)   :&gt;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 596/600 objects using apc

Served from: www.jackandjillpolitics.com @ 2012-02-09 23:15:52 -->
