<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barack Obama tells Glamour: &#8220;Debate me, not Michelle&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/</link>
	<description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:56:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sexyer12</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/comment-page-2/#comment-161859</link>
		<dc:creator>sexyer12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1626#comment-161859</guid>
		<description>hey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sexyer12</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/comment-page-2/#comment-125261</link>
		<dc:creator>sexyer12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1626#comment-125261</guid>
		<description>hey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TruthSeeker</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/comment-page-2/#comment-28154</link>
		<dc:creator>TruthSeeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1626#comment-28154</guid>
		<description>Elizabeth doesn&#039;t fool me for one second.  She thought she was saying the &quot;right thing&quot; and still got slammed for it, because it didn&#039;t come from a place of understanding.   Elizabeth takes positions that she thinks are guaranteed to receive approval by various groups...there&#039;s no genuine feeling behind it..that&#039;s why she&#039;s so confused when she gets slammed.   She&#039;s got to say what she REALLY believes and let the shit hit the fan. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So what if some black people want to use the &quot;N&quot; word.  That&#039;s none of her business, just as long as she doesn&#039;t use it...because of the history.  Her opposition is that blacks are perceived to have a &lt;i&gt;privilege&lt;/i&gt; that she doesn&#039;t have.  There is no joy or privilege in the &quot;N&quot; word.  Really, what is she saying, that because some blacks say it, that changes her position on not saying it herself?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sometimes it seems AA&#039;s are saying: I&#039;m gonna use it, but don&#039;t you dare use it cause it&#039;s my word now and I&#039;ll kick your ass if you dare.  How do you like them there apples?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree, it is complicated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth doesn&#39;t fool me for one second.  She thought she was saying the &#8220;right thing&#8221; and still got slammed for it, because it didn&#39;t come from a place of understanding.   Elizabeth takes positions that she thinks are guaranteed to receive approval by various groups&#8230;there&#39;s no genuine feeling behind it..that&#39;s why she&#39;s so confused when she gets slammed.   She&#39;s got to say what she REALLY believes and let the shit hit the fan. </p>
<p>So what if some black people want to use the &#8220;N&#8221; word.  That&#39;s none of her business, just as long as she doesn&#39;t use it&#8230;because of the history.  Her opposition is that blacks are perceived to have a <i>privilege</i> that she doesn&#39;t have.  There is no joy or privilege in the &#8220;N&#8221; word.  Really, what is she saying, that because some blacks say it, that changes her position on not saying it herself?</p>
<p>Sometimes it seems AA&#39;s are saying: I&#39;m gonna use it, but don&#39;t you dare use it cause it&#39;s my word now and I&#39;ll kick your ass if you dare.  How do you like them there apples?</p>
<p>I agree, it is complicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRW</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/comment-page-2/#comment-28153</link>
		<dc:creator>TRW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 16:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1626#comment-28153</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I was really disappointed with Whoopi.  She usually has very insightful comments, but I just thought she was wrong.  The &quot;N&quot; word is not endearing, and it is not a word that I want to take ownership of.  It has a very ugly history with the force of hate behind it.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And as much as Elizabeth annoys me, especially the crying, she had a good point.  To move forward, people need to abandon aspects of the past and that includes the use of the word.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But on the other hand, the use of the word can be very powerful in certain contexts, i.e. Chris Rock&#039;s stand up about Black people being racists.  So, the issue is very complicated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I was really disappointed with Whoopi.  She usually has very insightful comments, but I just thought she was wrong.  The &#8220;N&#8221; word is not endearing, and it is not a word that I want to take ownership of.  It has a very ugly history with the force of hate behind it.  </p>
<p>And as much as Elizabeth annoys me, especially the crying, she had a good point.  To move forward, people need to abandon aspects of the past and that includes the use of the word.  </p>
<p>But on the other hand, the use of the word can be very powerful in certain contexts, i.e. Chris Rock&#39;s stand up about Black people being racists.  So, the issue is very complicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenLadyHere</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/comment-page-2/#comment-28159</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1626#comment-28159</guid>
		<description>truth:  Yeah Karmi.  Take that [as i give a fist bump to you - TRUTH!]  :&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>truth:  Yeah Karmi.  Take that [as i give a fist bump to you - TRUTH!]  :&gt;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eNews Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/comment-page-2/#comment-28114</link>
		<dc:creator>eNews Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1626#comment-28114</guid>
		<description>This is all politics...and it&#039;s to be expected. There is no depth too low in politics... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.enewsreference.com&quot;&gt;http://www.enewsreference.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all politics&#8230;and it&#39;s to be expected. There is no depth too low in politics&#8230; <a href="http://www.enewsreference.com">http://www.enewsreference.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peeyou</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/comment-page-2/#comment-28115</link>
		<dc:creator>Peeyou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 04:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1626#comment-28115</guid>
		<description>Michelle ... thanks for telling us that Barack is so stinky,&lt;br&gt;his wife and two daughters won&#039;t even get into bed with him.&lt;br&gt;WHO WANTS A STINKY PRESIDENT???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle &#8230; thanks for telling us that Barack is so stinky,<br />his wife and two daughters won&#39;t even get into bed with him.<br />WHO WANTS A STINKY PRESIDENT???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TruthSeeker</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/comment-page-2/#comment-28156</link>
		<dc:creator>TruthSeeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 03:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1626#comment-28156</guid>
		<description>Brilliant insight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msmartin</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/comment-page-2/#comment-28152</link>
		<dc:creator>msmartin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 03:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1626#comment-28152</guid>
		<description>You know I respect your opinion, but IMO Whoopi made a fool of herself suggesting that the use of the word is okay FOR ANY REASON!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know I respect your opinion, but IMO Whoopi made a fool of herself suggesting that the use of the word is okay FOR ANY REASON!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msmartin</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/comment-page-2/#comment-28155</link>
		<dc:creator>msmartin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 03:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1626#comment-28155</guid>
		<description>I know you do.  It&#039;s Karmi and people like him who try to use the topic to demean us all that makes one want to stand in defense of something they don&#039;t approve of.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We can say the use of the word is wrong and tell Karmi to kiss our asses at the same time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He could care less about Elisabeth or race relations and probably uses the word himself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have debated and will continue to debate this issue with people of color.  It is the most b.a.c.k.w.a.r.d.s behavior I have ever witnessed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know you do.  It&#39;s Karmi and people like him who try to use the topic to demean us all that makes one want to stand in defense of something they don&#39;t approve of.</p>
<p>We can say the use of the word is wrong and tell Karmi to kiss our asses at the same time.</p>
<p>He could care less about Elisabeth or race relations and probably uses the word himself.</p>
<p>I have debated and will continue to debate this issue with people of color.  It is the most b.a.c.k.w.a.r.d.s behavior I have ever witnessed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karmi</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/comment-page-2/#comment-28161</link>
		<dc:creator>Karmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 03:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1626#comment-28161</guid>
		<description>For starters...&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_liberation_theology&quot;&gt;Black liberation theology&lt;/a&gt; Under “James Cone and Black Liberation Theology” - &lt;i&gt;&quot;Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community ... Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy.”&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Under “Criticisms”: Dr. Robert A. Morley - &lt;i&gt;He states that black theology turns religion into sociology, and Jesus into a black Marxist rebel. While making statements against whites and Asians, it promotes a poor self-image among blacks, and describes the black man as a helpless victim of forces and people beyond his control. Black theology calls for political liberation instead of spiritual salvation.&lt;/i&gt; Wright wrote: &lt;i&gt;&quot;There will be no peace in America until whites begin to hate their whiteness, asking from the depths of their being: &#039;How can we become black?&#039;&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Under “Black Theology Quotes” - &lt;i&gt;&quot;It is important to make a further distinction here among black hatred, black racism, and Black Power. Black hatred is the black man&#039;s strong aversion to white society. No black man living in white America can escape it...But the charge of black racism cannot be reconciled with the facts. While it is true that blacks do hate whites, black hatred is not racism.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For starters&#8230;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_liberation_theology">Black liberation theology</a> Under “James Cone and Black Liberation Theology” &#8211; <i>&#8220;Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community &#8230; Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy.”</i></p>
<p>Under “Criticisms”: Dr. Robert A. Morley &#8211; <i>He states that black theology turns religion into sociology, and Jesus into a black Marxist rebel. While making statements against whites and Asians, it promotes a poor self-image among blacks, and describes the black man as a helpless victim of forces and people beyond his control. Black theology calls for political liberation instead of spiritual salvation.</i> Wright wrote: <i>&#8220;There will be no peace in America until whites begin to hate their whiteness, asking from the depths of their being: &#39;How can we become black?&#39;&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Under “Black Theology Quotes” &#8211; <i>&#8220;It is important to make a further distinction here among black hatred, black racism, and Black Power. Black hatred is the black man&#39;s strong aversion to white society. No black man living in white America can escape it&#8230;But the charge of black racism cannot be reconciled with the facts. While it is true that blacks do hate whites, black hatred is not racism.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My new WordPress MU Site &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Barack Obama tells Glamour: “Debate me, not Michelle”</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/comment-page-2/#comment-23705</link>
		<dc:creator>My new WordPress MU Site &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Barack Obama tells Glamour: “Debate me, not Michelle”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 03:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1626#comment-23705</guid>
		<description>[...] gem2001 wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptHat tip: Michelle Obama Watch. Barack Obama did an interview with Glamour Magazine. GLAMOUR: An AP poll shows that while the positive ratings on Michelle are higher than those of Cindy McCain, her negative ratings are higher as well. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gem2001 wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptHat tip: Michelle Obama Watch. Barack Obama did an interview with Glamour Magazine. GLAMOUR: An AP poll shows that while the positive ratings on Michelle are higher than those of Cindy McCain, her negative ratings are higher as well. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TruthSeeker</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/comment-page-2/#comment-28151</link>
		<dc:creator>TruthSeeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 03:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1626#comment-28151</guid>
		<description>You just reminded me that I agree.  I am so focused on opposition to Elisabeth and her manipulative blubbering I forgot.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hate the use of that word...I don&#039;t understand the idea of it being a term of endearment.  But, for whites to throw it back in our faces and say that if we say it, then so can they....is absurd.  For the first time, I see Whoopi as being strong and sure in her position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just reminded me that I agree.  I am so focused on opposition to Elisabeth and her manipulative blubbering I forgot.</p>
<p>I hate the use of that word&#8230;I don&#39;t understand the idea of it being a term of endearment.  But, for whites to throw it back in our faces and say that if we say it, then so can they&#8230;.is absurd.  For the first time, I see Whoopi as being strong and sure in her position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas_Girl_in_LA</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/comment-page-2/#comment-28132</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas_Girl_in_LA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 03:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1626#comment-28132</guid>
		<description>Truth, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are very welcome&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah...I saw that one and just started to tear up. I really need to get a grip. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They are so excited to have her writing in. However, there were about 2 tasteless comments, out of more than 70...not bad. One commenter wrote that someone should monitor the site for abusive comments because Michelle is a wonderful woman and should not be disrespected. in any way; it would be completely unacceptable if they did. The site is no place for cheap shots at the potential First Lady. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note: They offered the same opportunity to Cindy McCain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truth, </p>
<p>You are very welcome</p>
<p>Yeah&#8230;I saw that one and just started to tear up. I really need to get a grip. </p>
<p>They are so excited to have her writing in. However, there were about 2 tasteless comments, out of more than 70&#8230;not bad. One commenter wrote that someone should monitor the site for abusive comments because Michelle is a wonderful woman and should not be disrespected. in any way; it would be completely unacceptable if they did. The site is no place for cheap shots at the potential First Lady. </p>
<p>Note: They offered the same opportunity to Cindy McCain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TruthSeeker</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/comment-page-2/#comment-28158</link>
		<dc:creator>TruthSeeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1626#comment-28158</guid>
		<description>Hasselbeck made no point.  All she did was reveal her sense of privilege.   Whoopi expects the majority to conduct themselves like human beings.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You seem to have a list of African American &quot;problems&quot; that you dole out one by one.  Why don&#039;t you just post the entire list.  Yes, we are the center of our own universe....as are you, in yours.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You have decided to engage yourself in a loser&#039;s argument.  It is an argument that you can never hope to win, in it you will never triumph.  You will not be congratulated, nor will you feel good about yourself.   You will only be forced into more outlandish rationalizations and argue yourself right out of fellowship with the rest of humanity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am amazed by the white supremacists who pose arguments to me that essentially say that I am inferior.  I am amused that they think they can convince me.  It takes a certain kind on mental illness to be so...dense.  So, I kick their asses in debate....and they keep coming back for more.  I think they enjoy being slapped around by a black woman.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I find that very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hasselbeck made no point.  All she did was reveal her sense of privilege.   Whoopi expects the majority to conduct themselves like human beings.  </p>
<p>You seem to have a list of African American &#8220;problems&#8221; that you dole out one by one.  Why don&#39;t you just post the entire list.  Yes, we are the center of our own universe&#8230;.as are you, in yours.</p>
<p>You have decided to engage yourself in a loser&#39;s argument.  It is an argument that you can never hope to win, in it you will never triumph.  You will not be congratulated, nor will you feel good about yourself.   You will only be forced into more outlandish rationalizations and argue yourself right out of fellowship with the rest of humanity.</p>
<p>I am amazed by the white supremacists who pose arguments to me that essentially say that I am inferior.  I am amused that they think they can convince me.  It takes a certain kind on mental illness to be so&#8230;dense.  So, I kick their asses in debate&#8230;.and they keep coming back for more.  I think they enjoy being slapped around by a black woman.</p>
<p>I find that very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msmartin</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/comment-page-2/#comment-28160</link>
		<dc:creator>msmartin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1626#comment-28160</guid>
		<description>Just what is the real issue of race?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what is the real issue of race?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msmartin</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/comment-page-2/#comment-28118</link>
		<dc:creator>msmartin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1626#comment-28118</guid>
		<description>Did you get lost and end up here at JJP.  We don&#039;t buy this bs and you probably don&#039;t either.  Please, let me show you the way out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you get lost and end up here at JJP.  We don&#39;t buy this bs and you probably don&#39;t either.  Please, let me show you the way out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msmartin</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/comment-page-2/#comment-28150</link>
		<dc:creator>msmartin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1626#comment-28150</guid>
		<description>Today, I disagree with Whoopi and agree with Elisabeth.  Nobody should use that word.  It demeans us.  PERIOD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, I disagree with Whoopi and agree with Elisabeth.  Nobody should use that word.  It demeans us.  PERIOD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karmi</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/comment-page-2/#comment-28157</link>
		<dc:creator>Karmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1626#comment-28157</guid>
		<description>Hasselbeck actually made a great point. If America is going to move forward, then offensive words like the “N” word need to be dropped from all conversations, and labeled by all as unacceptable. Whoopi showed her racist side...demanding that others (whites) need to &quot;understand&quot;. In other words, she expects the majority to adapt to the demands and wishes of the minority. That&#039;s the problem with most &lt;i&gt;&#039;African&#039;&lt;/i&gt;-Americans...nothing matters but them...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wright, TUCC, Obama, Black Liberation Theology, and today, Whoopi. Americans - the majority anyway - are seeing the real issue of race in America this year...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hasselbeck actually made a great point. If America is going to move forward, then offensive words like the “N” word need to be dropped from all conversations, and labeled by all as unacceptable. Whoopi showed her racist side&#8230;demanding that others (whites) need to &#8220;understand&#8221;. In other words, she expects the majority to adapt to the demands and wishes of the minority. That&#39;s the problem with most <i>&#39;African&#39;</i>-Americans&#8230;nothing matters but them&#8230;</p>
<p>Wright, TUCC, Obama, Black Liberation Theology, and today, Whoopi. Americans &#8211; the majority anyway &#8211; are seeing the real issue of race in America this year&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenLadyHere</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/barack-obama-tells-glamour-debate-me-not-michelle/comment-page-2/#comment-28120</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenLadyHere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1626#comment-28120</guid>
		<description>TRW:  I know the feeling.  WHEW!!!!  DEEP BREATHS!!!  :&gt;)  :&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TRW:  I know the feeling.  WHEW!!!!  DEEP BREATHS!!!  :&gt;)  :&gt;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
