<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: And Another One</title> <atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/</link> <description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Zox Pro</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/comment-page-1/#comment-1029555</link> <dc:creator>Zox Pro</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 03:15:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1573#comment-1029555</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Life Mastery...&lt;/strong&gt;...It&#039;s a known truth that right knowledge can be very important when having no experience with some kind of work and even more it if is important to us......</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Life Mastery&#8230;</strong></p><p>&#8230;It&#8217;s a known truth that right knowledge can be very important when having no experience with some kind of work and even more it if is important to us&#8230;&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: test</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/comment-page-1/#comment-865129</link> <dc:creator>test</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:36:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1573#comment-865129</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;What&#039;s Mandatory When Choosing Women...&lt;/strong&gt;...When you are aware when working at your projects you can be a lot more successful than if you don&#039;t have much skills.....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What&#8217;s Mandatory When Choosing Women&#8230;</strong></p><p>&#8230;When you are aware when working at your projects you can be a lot more successful than if you don&#8217;t have much skills&#8230;..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Camera reviews</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/comment-page-1/#comment-639968</link> <dc:creator>Camera reviews</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:54:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1573#comment-639968</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Nichole Cherny...&lt;/strong&gt;Real superb visual appeal on this web site , I&#039;d rate it 10 10....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nichole Cherny&#8230;</strong></p><p>Real superb visual appeal on this web site , I&#8217;d rate it 10 10&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: property &#38; casualty insurance license</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/comment-page-1/#comment-557658</link> <dc:creator>property &#38; casualty insurance license</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 21:42:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1573#comment-557658</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;The best website…...&lt;/strong&gt;[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]…...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The best website…&#8230;</strong></p><p>[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]…&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pat Newbold</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/comment-page-1/#comment-342180</link> <dc:creator>Pat Newbold</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:24:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1573#comment-342180</guid> <description>Jesse demonstrated in Jenna regarding lynching. Black men were castrated also how may tell can an advocate of civil rights use that term so blatenly its just as bad as another black using the n work when refering to another black. Jesse may be you are suffering from dementia. And as for fathers responsibility i am one who constantly stay in family court trying to get assistance from my baby daddy and he will not work in order to not pay child support.  what obama missed was acculades to the women that are fathers when he made that speech in addition to honoring those men that are because we do have them. but dont let the media define who we are by dividing and concuring us in an attempt to distance us from Obama that we stay home and dont vote. read between the lines the media is hard at work.VOTE VOTE VOTE DONT LET DOWN THE ONES THAT DIED FOR US TO HAVE THIS PRIVILIGE</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse demonstrated in Jenna regarding lynching. Black men were castrated also how may tell can an advocate of civil rights use that term so blatenly its just as bad as another black using the n work when refering to another black. Jesse may be you are suffering from dementia. And as for fathers responsibility i am one who constantly stay in family court trying to get assistance from my baby daddy and he will not work in order to not pay child support.  what obama missed was acculades to the women that are fathers when he made that speech in addition to honoring those men that are because we do have them. but dont let the media define who we are by dividing and concuring us in an attempt to distance us from Obama that we stay home and dont vote. read between the lines the media is hard at work.VOTE VOTE VOTE DONT LET DOWN THE ONES THAT DIED FOR US TO HAVE THIS PRIVILIGE</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pat Newbold</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/comment-page-1/#comment-166797</link> <dc:creator>Pat Newbold</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:24:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1573#comment-166797</guid> <description>Jesse demonstrated in Jenna regarding lynching. Black men were castrated also how may tell can an advocate of civil rights use that term so blatenly its just as bad as another black using the n work when refering to another black. Jesse may be you are suffering from dementia. And as for fathers responsibility i am one who constantly stay in family court trying to get assistance from my baby daddy and he will not work in order to not pay child support.  what obama missed was acculades to the women that are fathers when he made that speech in addition to honoring those men that are because we do have them. but dont let the media define who we are by dividing and concuring us in an attempt to distance us from Obama that we stay home and dont vote. read between the lines the media is hard at work.VOTE VOTE VOTE DONT LET DOWN THE ONES THAT DIED FOR US TO HAVE THIS PRIVILIGE</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse demonstrated in Jenna regarding lynching. Black men were castrated also how may tell can an advocate of civil rights use that term so blatenly its just as bad as another black using the n work when refering to another black. Jesse may be you are suffering from dementia. And as for fathers responsibility i am one who constantly stay in family court trying to get assistance from my baby daddy and he will not work in order to not pay child support.  what obama missed was acculades to the women that are fathers when he made that speech in addition to honoring those men that are because we do have them. but dont let the media define who we are by dividing and concuring us in an attempt to distance us from Obama that we stay home and dont vote. read between the lines the media is hard at work.VOTE VOTE VOTE DONT LET DOWN THE ONES THAT DIED FOR US TO HAVE THIS PRIVILIGE</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pat Newbold</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/comment-page-1/#comment-34951</link> <dc:creator>Pat Newbold</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:24:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1573#comment-34951</guid> <description>Jesse demonstrated in Jenna regarding lynching. Black men were castrated also how may tell can an advocate of civil rights use that term so blatenly its just as bad as another black using the n work when refering to another black. Jesse may be you are suffering from dementia. And as for fathers responsibility i am one who constantly stay in family court trying to get assistance from my baby daddy and he will not work in order to not pay child support.  what obama missed was acculades to the women that are fathers when he made that speech in addition to honoring those men that are because we do have them. but dont let the media define who we are by dividing and concuring us in an attempt to distance us from Obama that we stay home and dont vote. read between the lines the media is hard at work.VOTE VOTE VOTE DONT LET DOWN THE ONES THAT DIED FOR US TO HAVE THIS PRIVILIGE</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse demonstrated in Jenna regarding lynching. Black men were castrated also how may tell can an advocate of civil rights use that term so blatenly its just as bad as another black using the n work when refering to another black. Jesse may be you are suffering from dementia. And as for fathers responsibility i am one who constantly stay in family court trying to get assistance from my baby daddy and he will not work in order to not pay child support.  what obama missed was acculades to the women that are fathers when he made that speech in addition to honoring those men that are because we do have them. but dont let the media define who we are by dividing and concuring us in an attempt to distance us from Obama that we stay home and dont vote. read between the lines the media is hard at work.VOTE VOTE VOTE DONT LET DOWN THE ONES THAT DIED FOR US TO HAVE THIS PRIVILIGE</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TRW</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/comment-page-1/#comment-35040</link> <dc:creator>TRW</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 03:18:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1573#comment-35040</guid> <description>I think that we just have a fundamental disagreement on how the government should work.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) &quot;You already pay the taxes. The question is in how those taxes are utilized. I think there is a definite meanness component in Conservative ideology. They believe in punishment and shame as motivation for good behaviour.&quot;  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First of all, I think that it is a generalization to say that there is a component of &quot;meanness&quot; in conservative ideology.  How is it &quot;mean&quot; to expect people to take care of themselves?  And again, I go back to the fact that people are well aware that they have to pay taxes to provide for infrastructure, security, etc.  but many people do NOT want their tax money to go to programs that are enabling bad behavior, which they see as a dependent relationship on government assistance.  I was focusing my comments on Black people, but this goes for everyone.  And I will speak for myself.  I don&#039;t want the money that I make at my job to go to someone who doesn&#039;t know how or doesn&#039;t try to take care of themselves.  I guess that makes me mean, but that&#039;s fine.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Not even the extremely wealthy are completely self-sufficient. They require infrastructure and the civilization it fosters in order to survive.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course no one is absolutely self-sufficient.  But people just want to take it back to the basics, and not throw in a lot of social programs that are doing more harm than good.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;It&#039;s in everyone&#039;s best interest to ensure that those people are fed and cared for. As a matter of fact, it&#039;s a bargain! If not, then that person will flounder, they may turn to crime, they may take someone&#039;s life, they may end up in jail.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s just the point.  It&#039;s in YOUR best interest to make sure that you are fed and cared for NOT the government.  I refuse to subscribe to the belief that people can just be lax and irresponsible in their personal decision making, but its okay because its in everyone&#039;s best interest that they land on their feet so we should just pitch in and help them out.  Um no.  We need to go to the root of the problem.  And the root of the problem is that people need to make better decisions for themselves and take more initiative to invest in their future.  If you feel that your schools are inadequate, form a group/organization and petition the school board/hang out in the library as much as you can/or move.   If you feel that you need more money to live comfortably, look for ways to get training or more education or get another job.  And if you can&#039;t afford to have children right away, either invest in sound birth control methods or abstain.  These are things that individuals can do that have nothing to do with the government, but can change people&#039;s quality of life significantly.     &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And when has poverty become an excuse for criminality?  And how is that a bargaining chip?  I should support these paternalistic social programs that I don&#039;t agree with, or these people may end up robbing/killing me later?  Again, I think it shifts the argument to the wrong group of people.  Instead of shaming others into thinking that it is their duty to take care of everyone in this way, we should be encouraging people to find ways to take care of themselves.    &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Maybe Conservatives need to acquire some wisdom and understanding to go with their prejudice and greed.&quot;  This is another generalization.  Just because many conservatives believe in self-sufficiency doesn&#039;t make them prejudiced.  And just because people want to make sure the money in their pocket doesn&#039;t go to certain social programs doesn&#039;t make them greedy.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But to sum up, I think we can agree to disagree.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that we just have a fundamental disagreement on how the government should work.</p><p>1) &#8220;You already pay the taxes. The question is in how those taxes are utilized. I think there is a definite meanness component in Conservative ideology. They believe in punishment and shame as motivation for good behaviour.&#8221;</p><p>First of all, I think that it is a generalization to say that there is a component of &#8220;meanness&#8221; in conservative ideology.  How is it &#8220;mean&#8221; to expect people to take care of themselves?  And again, I go back to the fact that people are well aware that they have to pay taxes to provide for infrastructure, security, etc.  but many people do NOT want their tax money to go to programs that are enabling bad behavior, which they see as a dependent relationship on government assistance.  I was focusing my comments on Black people, but this goes for everyone.  And I will speak for myself.  I don&#39;t want the money that I make at my job to go to someone who doesn&#39;t know how or doesn&#39;t try to take care of themselves.  I guess that makes me mean, but that&#39;s fine.</p><p>&#8220;Not even the extremely wealthy are completely self-sufficient. They require infrastructure and the civilization it fosters in order to survive.&#8221;</p><p>Of course no one is absolutely self-sufficient.  But people just want to take it back to the basics, and not throw in a lot of social programs that are doing more harm than good.</p><p>&#8220;It&#39;s in everyone&#39;s best interest to ensure that those people are fed and cared for. As a matter of fact, it&#39;s a bargain! If not, then that person will flounder, they may turn to crime, they may take someone&#39;s life, they may end up in jail.&#8221;</p><p>That&#39;s just the point.  It&#39;s in YOUR best interest to make sure that you are fed and cared for NOT the government.  I refuse to subscribe to the belief that people can just be lax and irresponsible in their personal decision making, but its okay because its in everyone&#39;s best interest that they land on their feet so we should just pitch in and help them out.  Um no.  We need to go to the root of the problem.  And the root of the problem is that people need to make better decisions for themselves and take more initiative to invest in their future.  If you feel that your schools are inadequate, form a group/organization and petition the school board/hang out in the library as much as you can/or move.   If you feel that you need more money to live comfortably, look for ways to get training or more education or get another job.  And if you can&#39;t afford to have children right away, either invest in sound birth control methods or abstain.  These are things that individuals can do that have nothing to do with the government, but can change people&#39;s quality of life significantly.</p><p>And when has poverty become an excuse for criminality?  And how is that a bargaining chip?  I should support these paternalistic social programs that I don&#39;t agree with, or these people may end up robbing/killing me later?  Again, I think it shifts the argument to the wrong group of people.  Instead of shaming others into thinking that it is their duty to take care of everyone in this way, we should be encouraging people to find ways to take care of themselves.</p><p>&#8220;Maybe Conservatives need to acquire some wisdom and understanding to go with their prejudice and greed.&#8221;  This is another generalization.  Just because many conservatives believe in self-sufficiency doesn&#39;t make them prejudiced.  And just because people want to make sure the money in their pocket doesn&#39;t go to certain social programs doesn&#39;t make them greedy.</p><p>But to sum up, I think we can agree to disagree.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TruthSeeker</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/comment-page-1/#comment-35039</link> <dc:creator>TruthSeeker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:57:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1573#comment-35039</guid> <description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;..but I think the argument is, we have gone way over the top with&lt;br&gt;government programs and government involvement in our everyday lives.&lt;br&gt;And with increased government programs, people have to pay for it in&lt;br&gt;taxes.  &quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That argument hasn&#039;t been made with supportive facts and evidence.  So, it is more of a &#039;prejudice&#039; rather than an argument.  It&#039;s like saying black people are lazy ...but never providing measurement of their laziness in comparison to any other race.    You already pay the taxes.  The question is in how those taxes are utilized.   I think there is a definite meanness component in Conservative ideology.  They believe in punishment and shame as motivation for good behaviour.&lt;br&gt;Not even the extremely wealthy are completely self-sufficient.  They require infrastructure and the civilization it fosters in order to survive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;..And the next person doesn&#039;t make wise decisions, or fails to properly&lt;br&gt;plan for a child, and then seeks government assistance in the form of&lt;br&gt;food stamps, welfare, etc. when they can&#039;t make ends meet Many people&lt;br&gt;feel that these types of programs are encouraging bad behaviour.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s in everyone&#039;s best interest to ensure that those people are fed and cared for.  As a matter of fact, it&#039;s a bargain!  If not, then that person will flounder, they may turn to crime, they may take someone&#039;s life, they may end up in jail.  At each step, taxes will be used to bring them to justice, and punish them.  It is far cheaper to provide food and housing.  The problem is, that even food and housing is used to shame and punish the recipients.  It is not the government&#039;s job to use the necessities of life to punish and mitigate &quot;behaviour&quot;.  It is the government&#039;s job to make sure we maintain our civilization and keep ALL people moving forward.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;So when people look at their situation, and understand that they made&lt;br&gt;sacrifices to live comfortably, to simply say that it is selfish to&lt;br&gt;expect someone else to do the same is short sighted.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s short-sighted to preoccupy ourselves with what someone else does.  There are bigger fish to fry.  I don&#039;t care what choices they&#039;ve made, I care that they have the opportunity to change course and move forward...whatever that takes.  Maybe Conservatives need to acquire some wisdom and understanding to go with their prejudice and greed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;..but I think the argument is, we have gone way over the top with<br />government programs and government involvement in our everyday lives.<br />And with increased government programs, people have to pay for it in<br />taxes.  &#8220;</i></p><p>That argument hasn&#39;t been made with supportive facts and evidence.  So, it is more of a &#39;prejudice&#39; rather than an argument.  It&#39;s like saying black people are lazy &#8230;but never providing measurement of their laziness in comparison to any other race.    You already pay the taxes.  The question is in how those taxes are utilized.   I think there is a definite meanness component in Conservative ideology.  They believe in punishment and shame as motivation for good behaviour.<br />Not even the extremely wealthy are completely self-sufficient.  They require infrastructure and the civilization it fosters in order to survive.</p><p><i>&#8220;..And the next person doesn&#39;t make wise decisions, or fails to properly<br />plan for a child, and then seeks government assistance in the form of<br />food stamps, welfare, etc. when they can&#39;t make ends meet Many people<br />feel that these types of programs are encouraging bad behaviour.&#8221;</i></p><p>It&#39;s in everyone&#39;s best interest to ensure that those people are fed and cared for.  As a matter of fact, it&#39;s a bargain!  If not, then that person will flounder, they may turn to crime, they may take someone&#39;s life, they may end up in jail.  At each step, taxes will be used to bring them to justice, and punish them.  It is far cheaper to provide food and housing.  The problem is, that even food and housing is used to shame and punish the recipients.  It is not the government&#39;s job to use the necessities of life to punish and mitigate &#8220;behaviour&#8221;.  It is the government&#39;s job to make sure we maintain our civilization and keep ALL people moving forward.</p><p><i>&#8220;So when people look at their situation, and understand that they made<br />sacrifices to live comfortably, to simply say that it is selfish to<br />expect someone else to do the same is short sighted.&#8221;</i></p><p>It&#39;s short-sighted to preoccupy ourselves with what someone else does.  There are bigger fish to fry.  I don&#39;t care what choices they&#39;ve made, I care that they have the opportunity to change course and move forward&#8230;whatever that takes.  Maybe Conservatives need to acquire some wisdom and understanding to go with their prejudice and greed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TW</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/comment-page-1/#comment-35038</link> <dc:creator>TW</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:38:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1573#comment-35038</guid> <description>But I think that you are talking about the extreme of conservatism.  Of course we need people&#039;s taxes to contribute to basic infrastructure and the security of this country, which everyone benefits from, but I think the argument is, we have gone way over the top with government programs and government involvement in our everyday lives.  And with increased government programs, people have to pay for it in taxes.  And I don&#039;t think its fair to simply attribute people&#039;s concern about increased taxes  to meanness, selfishness, or small mindedness.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Say for example, I wait to have children until I am married and have two incomes, or I am single with a significant income to support that child.  And the next person doesn&#039;t make wise decisions, or fails to properly plan for a child, and then seeks government assistance in the form of food stamps, welfare, etc. when they can&#039;t make ends meet  Many people feel that these types of programs are encouraging bad behavior.  That instead of restraint, responsibility, and sound financial planning, people are getting themselves into situations that they are ill equipped to handle and then turning to government assistance to fill in the gaps (this is a generalization, I realize there are exceptions).  So when people look at their situation, and understand that they made sacrifices to live comfortably, to simply say that it is selfish to expect someone else to do the same is short sighted.  Yes, we live in a collective society, but ultimately we have to take care of ourselves.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I think that you are talking about the extreme of conservatism.  Of course we need people&#39;s taxes to contribute to basic infrastructure and the security of this country, which everyone benefits from, but I think the argument is, we have gone way over the top with government programs and government involvement in our everyday lives.  And with increased government programs, people have to pay for it in taxes.  And I don&#39;t think its fair to simply attribute people&#39;s concern about increased taxes  to meanness, selfishness, or small mindedness.</p><p>Say for example, I wait to have children until I am married and have two incomes, or I am single with a significant income to support that child.  And the next person doesn&#39;t make wise decisions, or fails to properly plan for a child, and then seeks government assistance in the form of food stamps, welfare, etc. when they can&#39;t make ends meet  Many people feel that these types of programs are encouraging bad behavior.  That instead of restraint, responsibility, and sound financial planning, people are getting themselves into situations that they are ill equipped to handle and then turning to government assistance to fill in the gaps (this is a generalization, I realize there are exceptions).  So when people look at their situation, and understand that they made sacrifices to live comfortably, to simply say that it is selfish to expect someone else to do the same is short sighted.  Yes, we live in a collective society, but ultimately we have to take care of ourselves.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pat Newbold</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/comment-page-1/#comment-34952</link> <dc:creator>Pat Newbold</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:49:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1573#comment-34952</guid> <description>i think coming from a Rev who cheated on his wife and produced a child his assuption of Obama is hypacritical especially when he uses the term moral. i lost respect for Jesse Jackson sin he smeared Martin Luthers blood on himself and lied and said Martin Luther died in his arms. He is an opportunist of the worst kind as his own son said sit down and KEEP HOPE ALIVE.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think coming from a Rev who cheated on his wife and produced a child his assuption of Obama is hypacritical especially when he uses the term moral. i lost respect for Jesse Jackson sin he smeared Martin Luthers blood on himself and lied and said Martin Luther died in his arms. He is an opportunist of the worst kind as his own son said sit down and KEEP HOPE ALIVE.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TruthSeeker</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/comment-page-1/#comment-35037</link> <dc:creator>TruthSeeker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:38:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1573#comment-35037</guid> <description>Pass the deficit onto children, but no will to have invested that money into those same children in the first place.  Had that investment taken place, the children would be more than equipped to handle the much smaller debt incurred.  Instead, they will pay for what we haven&#039;t equipped them to handle.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your pay cheque pays for an unjust war.  I don&#039;t hear a great outcry from Conservatives especially....the ones who are averse to taxes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The model they propose has been tried before.  It was called the Dark Ages.  The advent of government, social programs, unions, law enforcement, health care system, fire department, public school,  has brought us to our present civilization.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now that we have reaped the benefit of that civilization, we look askance at the very institution that has made it possible: Government and taxation. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now that we&#039;ve made it safely out of infancy, have gone to the schools that others have helped build (surely your parents tax dollars alone were not sufficient to educate you) we look suspiciously at taxes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is meanness.  Selfishness.   Small-mindedness.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pass the deficit onto children, but no will to have invested that money into those same children in the first place.  Had that investment taken place, the children would be more than equipped to handle the much smaller debt incurred.  Instead, they will pay for what we haven&#39;t equipped them to handle.</p><p>Your pay cheque pays for an unjust war.  I don&#39;t hear a great outcry from Conservatives especially&#8230;.the ones who are averse to taxes.</p><p>The model they propose has been tried before.  It was called the Dark Ages.  The advent of government, social programs, unions, law enforcement, health care system, fire department, public school,  has brought us to our present civilization.</p><p>Now that we have reaped the benefit of that civilization, we look askance at the very institution that has made it possible: Government and taxation.</p><p>Now that we&#39;ve made it safely out of infancy, have gone to the schools that others have helped build (surely your parents tax dollars alone were not sufficient to educate you) we look suspiciously at taxes.</p><p>It is meanness.  Selfishness.   Small-mindedness.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TRW</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/comment-page-1/#comment-35036</link> <dc:creator>TRW</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:20:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1573#comment-35036</guid> <description>I&#039;m not going to make generalizations about everybody&#039;s else&#039;s situation, but my Mom worked more than eight hours a day, and I turned out just fine.  Would I have liked if she worked less?  Of course.  But she doesn&#039;t agree with taking handouts from anyone, especially since it means you might have to sacrifice some of your privacy and autonomy.  And since she has always wanted children, she felt it was her job to do what needed to be done to sacrifice for them.  &lt;br&gt;So despite her long hours, what made the difference was good parenting.  It&#039;s that simple.  She taught me certain values at a young age, and I respected her authority.  She was also vigilant when she needed to be, and made sure that I had good influences in my life.  &lt;br&gt;Now, if my father would have been present and active, things would have been different.  She wouldn&#039;t have had to work as much to support my sister and I.  But from here, I don&#039;t see where the government comes in.      &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And as far as program funding, it might take a will, but it also takes money.  And plenty of people are not happy that their paychecks are constantly being sliced and diced to support government programs.  I think a total overhaul is needed, and some of these programs should be cut.  And is the war really a good analogy?  We are in a huge deficit right now because of it, and we are going to pass it on to our children.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not going to make generalizations about everybody&#39;s else&#39;s situation, but my Mom worked more than eight hours a day, and I turned out just fine.  Would I have liked if she worked less?  Of course.  But she doesn&#39;t agree with taking handouts from anyone, especially since it means you might have to sacrifice some of your privacy and autonomy.  And since she has always wanted children, she felt it was her job to do what needed to be done to sacrifice for them. <br />So despite her long hours, what made the difference was good parenting.  It&#39;s that simple.  She taught me certain values at a young age, and I respected her authority.  She was also vigilant when she needed to be, and made sure that I had good influences in my life. <br />Now, if my father would have been present and active, things would have been different.  She wouldn&#39;t have had to work as much to support my sister and I.  But from here, I don&#39;t see where the government comes in.</p><p>And as far as program funding, it might take a will, but it also takes money.  And plenty of people are not happy that their paychecks are constantly being sliced and diced to support government programs.  I think a total overhaul is needed, and some of these programs should be cut.  And is the war really a good analogy?  We are in a huge deficit right now because of it, and we are going to pass it on to our children.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TruthSeeker</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/comment-page-1/#comment-35035</link> <dc:creator>TruthSeeker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:35:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1573#comment-35035</guid> <description>Is it really good for the collective for a parent to work more than 8 hours per day?  What happens when the collective feels the effect of a child who&#039;s been ignored by a parent?  A needy child is an emergency.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You say &quot;it&quot; in reference to goverment as if it forms an entity of it&#039;s own, with it&#039;s own rights that need to be protected.  I say &quot;us&quot; in reference to government.  Government is a tool.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for program funding...all it takes is will.  You&#039;ve waged a 5 year war in a sovereign  country that was not a threat.  The Iraq war has lasted longer than the 2nd world war.  There was a will to invade Iraq.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it really good for the collective for a parent to work more than 8 hours per day?  What happens when the collective feels the effect of a child who&#39;s been ignored by a parent?  A needy child is an emergency.</p><p>You say &#8220;it&#8221; in reference to goverment as if it forms an entity of it&#39;s own, with it&#39;s own rights that need to be protected.  I say &#8220;us&#8221; in reference to government.  Government is a tool.</p><p>As for program funding&#8230;all it takes is will.  You&#39;ve waged a 5 year war in a sovereign  country that was not a threat.  The Iraq war has lasted longer than the 2nd world war.  There was a will to invade Iraq.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mr, Commonsense</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/comment-page-1/#comment-34953</link> <dc:creator>Mr, Commonsense</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:03:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1573#comment-34953</guid> <description>This stuff is like watching a freaking perverse minstrel show with Bill Oreilly as rhe interlocutor</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This stuff is like watching a freaking perverse minstrel show with Bill Oreilly as rhe interlocutor</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TRW</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/comment-page-1/#comment-35034</link> <dc:creator>TRW</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:13:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1573#comment-35034</guid> <description>Wait.  Huh?  I am totally confused by this statement: &quot;When the religious institution collapses, the government must find ways to support single parents.&quot;  I totally disagree.  Instead of more government intervention in our lives we need less.  Historically, when people needed help making ends meet, they got another job, or made sacrifices in other areas.  And kept it moving.  Government assistance should be the last resort, i.e. in case of emergencies only.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And to address your responses below, the government does represent its citizens, but we in should no way be looking for it to take care of our children.  It&#039;s about proper planning. And where is the money going to come from to sustain these programs?  I honestly think that within the next 10 years or so, a lot of these programs are going to be cut altogether, which should give plenty of people an incentive to take initiative.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait.  Huh?  I am totally confused by this statement: &#8220;When the religious institution collapses, the government must find ways to support single parents.&#8221;  I totally disagree.  Instead of more government intervention in our lives we need less.  Historically, when people needed help making ends meet, they got another job, or made sacrifices in other areas.  And kept it moving.  Government assistance should be the last resort, i.e. in case of emergencies only.</p><p>And to address your responses below, the government does represent its citizens, but we in should no way be looking for it to take care of our children.  It&#39;s about proper planning. And where is the money going to come from to sustain these programs?  I honestly think that within the next 10 years or so, a lot of these programs are going to be cut altogether, which should give plenty of people an incentive to take initiative.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Big Bill</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/comment-page-1/#comment-34956</link> <dc:creator>Big Bill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:00:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1573#comment-34956</guid> <description>Correct.  Obama is not going to be Soul Brother No. 1.  All the more reason for black folks to push him hard on his policies before he is elected.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama and McCain have both committed to total amnesty (with a token &quot;back taxes&quot; payment of maybe $3000 - chump change)  of illegals and to letting them stay in America and keep working AND to bring their families here.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is going to be a devastating blow to our already overburdened now-multilingual school systems, welfare systems, and medical systems.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama, as a member of the Democratic Party (which 40 years ago was the working class party) can probably be worked on better than McCain.  And he should be.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As Booker T. Washington explained, America has a duty to black folks and ought to &quot;cast down its bucket&quot; right here in the black community rather than inviting aliens of questionable (or no) loyalty to this country. See:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/88&quot;&gt;http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/88&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Which also has a recording of Mr. Washington giving that portion of his speech in Atlanta,1895.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mexicans are not going to stop sneaking illegals into the USA and protecting them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct.  Obama is not going to be Soul Brother No. 1.  All the more reason for black folks to push him hard on his policies before he is elected.</p><p>Obama and McCain have both committed to total amnesty (with a token &#8220;back taxes&#8221; payment of maybe $3000 &#8211; chump change)  of illegals and to letting them stay in America and keep working AND to bring their families here.</p><p>This is going to be a devastating blow to our already overburdened now-multilingual school systems, welfare systems, and medical systems.</p><p>Obama, as a member of the Democratic Party (which 40 years ago was the working class party) can probably be worked on better than McCain.  And he should be.</p><p>As Booker T. Washington explained, America has a duty to black folks and ought to &#8220;cast down its bucket&#8221; right here in the black community rather than inviting aliens of questionable (or no) loyalty to this country. See:</p><p><a href="http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/88">http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/88</a>.</p><p>Which also has a recording of Mr. Washington giving that portion of his speech in Atlanta,1895.</p><p>Mexicans are not going to stop sneaking illegals into the USA and protecting them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: caligirl</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/comment-page-1/#comment-34954</link> <dc:creator>caligirl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:46:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1573#comment-34954</guid> <description>you clearly misunderstood my comments.  i am thoroughly aware (and grateful) that barack obama isn&#039;t running as the black people&#039;s president.  and...you conveniently left out the part where i wrote that these issues have a DISPROPORTIONATELY negative impact on black (and brown) communities.  that--in my view--is the key piece of this, and probably why barack feels comfortable in discussing it.  frankly, it would be irresponsible of him NOT to.   i&#039;m very sensitive to black people being painted in a pathological light, as it&#039;s been done by so-called &quot;social scientists&quot; before in attempts to justify punitive public policy.  however, i&#039;ve listened to barack&#039;s speeches/rallies/etc. and  i feel that he&#039;s treated the topic in a respectful, positive way. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;issues of privacy notwithstanding (and i daresay any person abandoned by their father probably always owns a little &quot;angst&quot;) , it&#039;s about time that parental responsibility gets a national stage.  sweeping it under the rug has not worked well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;an aside:  reading about your fundraiser made me HUNGRY!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you clearly misunderstood my comments.  i am thoroughly aware (and grateful) that barack obama isn&#39;t running as the black people&#39;s president.  and&#8230;you conveniently left out the part where i wrote that these issues have a DISPROPORTIONATELY negative impact on black (and brown) communities.  that&#8211;in my view&#8211;is the key piece of this, and probably why barack feels comfortable in discussing it.  frankly, it would be irresponsible of him NOT to.   i&#39;m very sensitive to black people being painted in a pathological light, as it&#39;s been done by so-called &#8220;social scientists&#8221; before in attempts to justify punitive public policy.  however, i&#39;ve listened to barack&#39;s speeches/rallies/etc. and  i feel that he&#39;s treated the topic in a respectful, positive way.</p><p>issues of privacy notwithstanding (and i daresay any person abandoned by their father probably always owns a little &#8220;angst&#8221;) , it&#39;s about time that parental responsibility gets a national stage.  sweeping it under the rug has not worked well.</p><p>an aside:  reading about your fundraiser made me HUNGRY!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Big Bill</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/comment-page-1/#comment-35002</link> <dc:creator>Big Bill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:42:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1573#comment-35002</guid> <description>Booker T Washington had a good deal to say about facing uncomfortable race truths, the need to deal with white folks honestly and forthrightly (after all, it&#039;s not like white folks can&#039;t see it, too) and how many white folks, even though they are racists, want the best for their communities, which does involve the uplift of the black race.  Perhaps Obama is following Mr. Washington&#039;s footsteps and not Jesse&#039;s or Al&#039;s.  See:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://docsouth.unc.edu/fpn/washeducation/washing.html#wash42&quot;&gt;http://docsouth.unc.edu/fpn/washeducation/washi...&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Booker T Washington had a good deal to say about facing uncomfortable race truths, the need to deal with white folks honestly and forthrightly (after all, it&#39;s not like white folks can&#39;t see it, too) and how many white folks, even though they are racists, want the best for their communities, which does involve the uplift of the black race.  Perhaps Obama is following Mr. Washington&#39;s footsteps and not Jesse&#39;s or Al&#39;s.  See:</p><p><a href="http://docsouth.unc.edu/fpn/washeducation/washing.html#wash42">http://docsouth.unc.edu/fpn/washeducation/washi&#8230;</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pjamma</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/07/and-another-one/comment-page-1/#comment-35090</link> <dc:creator>pjamma</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:30:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/?p=1573#comment-35090</guid> <description>1) He did speck to all of America&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) Here is the breakdown by race of the American problem:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The nation&#039;s out-of-wedlock birth rate is 38%. Among white children, 28% are now born to a single mother; among Hispanic children it is 50% and reaches a chilling, disorienting peak of 71% for black children. According to the National Center for Health Statistics, nearly a quarter of America&#039;s white children (22%) do not have any male in their homes; nearly a third (31%) of Hispanic children and over half of black children (56%) are fatherless.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So by shear numbers, yes it is an American problem.  But if you are  going to single out any race to make a point  the one with alarming statistics may be the one that you reference in your speech.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) He did speck to all of America</p><p>2) Here is the breakdown by race of the American problem:</p><p>The nation&#39;s out-of-wedlock birth rate is 38%. Among white children, 28% are now born to a single mother; among Hispanic children it is 50% and reaches a chilling, disorienting peak of 71% for black children. According to the National Center for Health Statistics, nearly a quarter of America&#39;s white children (22%) do not have any male in their homes; nearly a third (31%) of Hispanic children and over half of black children (56%) are fatherless.</p><p>So by shear numbers, yes it is an American problem.  But if you are  going to single out any race to make a point  the one with alarming statistics may be the one that you reference in your speech.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 596/600 objects using apc

Served from: www.jackandjillpolitics.com @ 2012-02-09 23:42:03 -->
