[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]…

Hey Admin , Extremely nice blog , if you need backlinks to your website I provide upto 10,000 high quality SEO backlinks for only $5. Check it out here :http://bit.ly/msweL2...

[...]just below, are some totally unrelated sites to ours, however, they are definitely worth checking out[...]…

Our military deserves the best we have to offer instead we are offering them table scraps.

Don’t you see the issue with McCain’s version of the GI Bill? In order to pay for 4 years of college you have to give the military 12 years of service. 12. Did you get that. In trade for 4 years of college you have to give 12 years of your life.

Does that sound remotely fair to you? If that individual was hurt in the military and could not serve, or was discharged or killed, would they still qualify for that plan? I don’t think so.

Logging off all. Catch you tomorrow.

McCain’s proposal would somewhat improve GI Bill benefits currently offered to American service members.

McCain’s bill was crafted as an alternative to Webb/Warner.

Under McCain’s plan, the GI Bill benefit for active duty soldiers who pay the $1,200 enrollment fee would jump from a max of $1,100 per month to $1,500 and to $2,000 for service members with 12 years of service. It would also allow service members to transfer 50 percent of their benefits to family members after six years of service and 100 percent after 12 years.

Do Americans really want to return to the Carternomics that sent inflation, interest rates, and unemployment skyrocketing. Obama and Carter making the same pitch — shows Obama’s incompetence at economic stewardship.

Working-class voters would find themselves most affected by a return to Carter-style economic policy. No one will be excited to return to the Carter Era.

2. S, the federal government could not get bigger or more intrusive than it is now, under the Bush Administration. Fortunately, McCain would expand it further while cutting taxes for the rich, as well as cutting social programs like social security and medicare, at a time when there are millions of people who don’t have insurance. More “goodies” for the average American.

3. The great part about McCain’s foreign policy is not only would he want us to see through an ephemeral “commitment” Iraq for a hundred years or more, but that he’s very eager to make other such commitments elsewhere, like in Iran. More war for everybody.

4. If you’re not already excited about McCain’s mo’ war platform, consider that another one of the things he doesn’t want to fund is a GI Bill that would actually make it possible for veterans to pay for higher education. The WWII era GI bill was instrumental in creating a middle class, (especially in the black community) but in McCain’s America, who needs one? It might keep people from reenlisting to fight in the long list of endless wars he wants to start.

5. Any responsible stewardship of the federal budget will require raising taxes. Personally, I think the people who have been doing fantastically well over the past few years should be the ones to help out. Of course, McCain doesn’t feel that way, maybe because to him “average american” means someone making more than 200 grand a year.

Frankly, looking to bigger, more intrusive federal government in the form of higher taxes and government controlled as promised by Obama may be Val’s idea of a ‘benefit’ but I am skeptical.

Val, if you make too much money to benefit from McCain’s middle class targeted proposals, you may be able see the value in repealing the AMT:

* The AMT disproportionately penalizes families, with only 3.8 percent of single filers projected to pay the tax.

* The AMT is increasingly regressive, as 82 percent of projected AMT taxpayers earn less than $200,000 per year.

* The AMT adds needless complexity to a tax code that already costs Americans $140 billion per year simply to file their taxes.

Cutting the capital gains tax rate also benefits the very large ‘investor class’ who will be able to grow their investments and save more for retirement.

Cutting corporate tax rates (which are the highest in the world) would encourage corporations to say here in the US, creating more jobs for American workers.

As for the housing crisis:

98% of homeowners have been able to pay their mortgages on time, refinance their risky adjustable rate mortgages and switch to fixed rate loans all without government assistance. Of the 2% of homeowners currently in forclosure, many are real estate speculators who intended to ‘flip’ the homes for profit. Most homeowners oppose any ‘bailout’ by the government.

McCain said, “Government assistance to the banking system should be based solely on preventing systemic risk that would endanger the entire financial system and the economy,” McCain said, adding that any government assistance should be for homeowners alone. Aid should be temporary “and must not reward people who were irresponsible at the expense of those who weren’t.”

Don’t even get me started on the Dems and energy.

Truth be told, many Dems are pleased to see the price of gas so high, and they will do nothing to allow us to drill for oil, build new refineries or nuclear power plants, or import sugar from Brazil to make ethanol without creating higher food prices and shortages.

Now, moving on to national security and the global war against Islamic extremism and the threat posed by Iran…

This is not even a concern for most Obama supporters.

Val and others here see absolutely no reason for us to see through our commitment in Iraq, they refuse to see any progress there and support a withdrawal regardless of conditions on the ground or the grave consequences of a precipitous exit from Iraq.

And I’ve found that most of McCain’s visions not only outline what he’s going to do, but how it will affect the average American.

Can’t say the same for Obama. Guess he’s got time to figure it out, since it seems like he’ll still be fighting Clinton for a while.

There is nothing quite as vague as what McCain has proposed to do domestically. Although his foreign policy platform of “war for everyone” is crystal clear.

Go Barack 08

Vote for McCain as is your right. We will vote for the next President of the United States and work to move this country forward by addressing and attempt to resolve the core issues.

D – I more than met your challenge. Read the 64 pages of the Blueprint for Change doc. It gives you the issues and provides detailed solutions.

If you want more information drop in any of the Barack Obama offices across the state.

If you want more information drop in any of the Barack Obama offices across the state.

“The Democrat, Travis Childers, a local courthouse official, pulled together a coalition of blacks, who turned out heavily, and old-line “yellow dog” Democrats, to beat his Republican opponent, Greg Davis, the mayor of Southaven, a Memphis suburb. With 99 percent of the precincts reporting, the vote was 54 percent for Mr. Childers to 46 percent for Mr. Davis.”

The same group that voted against Clinton.

I have a copy of the Blueprint for Change as well. I refer to it whenever I cite the vagueness of Obama’s proposals.

You still haven’t responded to my challenge.

To get a better understanding of Obama, I recommend you read his books — 1) The Audicity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream and 2) Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance. You borrow them from your local library.

Blessings