Well here’s the crow as spirit guide:

Crows are very vocal birds. They are sly and often deceptive in their actions. Crows have been known to build false nests high in treetops to confuse predators. The height of their nests give them the opportunity to watch everything that is going on around them. Many cultures think of crow as the keeper of knowledge for nothing escapes their keen sight.

Crows travel in groups and make mischief in teams. As one crow explores something new, others will watch closely to see what happens and then learn from it. In this way they seem to always be in council with each other. They often raise a ruckus when hunters are around, warning deer and other birds. Crows recognize possible danger and always post lookouts when feeding—thier most vulnerable time.

Their language is complex and they have a remarkable voice range. Each caw has its own meaning. Sometimes crow warns of impending danger. Other times it signals a time to join in council and make decisions. Listening to crow can teach those with this medicine how to hear the truth of what is being said.

The striking black color of crow represents the color of creation. It is the womb out of which the new is born. Black the color of night gives birth to the light of a new day. Crow is a daytime bird reminding us that magic and creation are present in both. Their ability to shift between the known and unknown world indicates new journeys.

Because crow is adaptable to all environments and will eat almost anything they can survive in almost any situation. Crow is associated with magic, unseen forces and spiritual strength. If crow flies into your life, get out of your familiar nest, look beyond your present range of vision, listen to its caw and act accordingly.

::

Barack is going to be just fine.

Billary is channeling Queen of Hearts.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/20830259/the_superdelegates

Rollingstone.com

Back to The Superdelegates

The Superdelegates
By trying to overturn Obama’s victory, Hillary has helped make America a place where elections are decided by lawyers instead of voters
MATT TAIBBI

Posted May 29, 2008 12:00 PM

The reality, though, is that no one really knows what the fuck is going on now over the phone lines. All we know is that D-day is May 31st and that between now and then — unless Hillary bows out — the orderly and rational process of primary season is going to give way to the clubs-and-stones Hobbesian jungle that is unregulated, raw politics, the politics of using any means necessary to fight your enemy. While we wait for this process to play itself out, we are as helpless as Chinese citizens waiting for the Politburo to hand them a new premier, or Catholics watching the chimney in St. Peter’s Square for word of a new pope.”

Smearing Obama and his campaign for inflaming the situation by calling her remarks unfortunate with no place in the campaign.

All of them are evil incarnate.

::

Sen. Barack Obama accused Sen. Hillary Clinton of stoking anger in Florida and Michigan over the Democratic Party’s decision not to recognize the states’ primary votes.

“I want to be looking at them when I’m standing on the stage in Denver in August,” Obama said.

Continue Reading

::

Nixon is saying the nomination process needs to be changed.

May I remind people that after the 2000 election, she claimed that the first thing she’d do in the US Senate was work on pushing through an amendment to get rid of the electoral college.

Far as I’m aware that was all hot air.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/05252008/news/nationalnews/kennedys_feel_bobby_socked_112469.htm

Yup, I don’t think Hillary’s completely off the hook as far as the Kennedy family is concerned. They might play it cool, but I don’t think they’re gonna forget it. And I’d think that this could come back to bite her in the near future back in NY politics.

It was weird to see RFK Jr. come out with such a strong defense so soon. I know he’s the son, but I’m not sure if he speaks for the whole family like that.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/05252008/news/nationalnews/kennedys_feel_bobby_socked_112469.htm

Kennedy’s Feel Bobby-Socked.

May 25, 2008 —

Members of the Kennedy family are incensed over Hillary Rodham Clinton’s invoking the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy to explain why she’s staying in the race – and they think it could be the death knell of an increasingly desperate and sloppy campaign.

Trouble brewing in N.Y. for Clinton: Black leaders say that if Hillary Rodham Clinton returns as senator, she’ll need to heal racial wounds her campaign has inflicted.

You just gotta cut some people loose sometimes.

Message to Obama: Keep bill and hill as FAAAAAR away from your campaign as possible.

Babyming, what you said was so succinct: Assassination is to African Americans as oven is to Jews. That truly summarizes it.

Craig, I read the article about the Obama campaign allegedly asking bill to campaign for him to heal the rift in the party. To me that seems like somewhat of a faulty strategy, and one that I am vehemently opposed to. For one, bill hasn’t done that great for hill. I have seen quite a bit of footage of him talking about himself and his accomplishments when he is (so-called) campaigning for his (so-called) wife. It’s almost as if he is saying “if you vote form her, you’ll get me back.” Secondly, he didn’t campaign all that great for Al Gore, who he knows well and “respected.” You never hear of them having anything to do with each other since then either. I think the best bill would be able to do would be similar to a John Edwards fake ass endorsement, suggesting that hillary is better, but since she’s not going to win, I endorse Obama. Who needs it? Third, I think billy is a lose cannon and can’t be trusted. He has also endorsed McCryptkeeper over Obama along with her. Part of why these people keep doing this unsavory stuff is because they continuously get bailed out. I honestly don’t believe he wants to heal his relationship with AA’s except for the sake of continuing his career & having power. He didn’t hesitate to play the race card & then blame it on Obama & neither did she. Let them just live with the ramifications of that.

You hit the nail on the head with that one, truthseeker.

Olbermann made a great point in his special comment. . . Hillary won’t go away until we, the people and media, start holding her accountable. She gets away with as much as we’re willing to let her.

Keith Olberman’s audience, particularly between 25-54, is roughly the equal to O’Reilly’s and is pretty much must see TV for progressive Political Junkies.

And this is taking into consideration that it isnt available in parts of the NY media market apparently for some kind of random carrier reasons.

“Uhhhh, why does Obama keep giving this pig a pass???”

My family and I were having the same conversation today. Of course, the idea is that taking the high road gives a stark contrast to her evil ways.

But Obama needs to bring the hammer down the next time she even THINKS of stepping out of line. Otherwise, he’s just enabling her poor behavior.

The next time she shows her a*s (which should be any day, now) Obama needs to come out with a list, just like Olbermann did, to shut her up and put this thing to bed.

This issue came up on some other discussion threads. People are noting how Obama has a list that he can point to of times when he either (a) took the high road; and/or (b) gave Hillary cover for one of her stupid statements.

Hillary, on the other hand, doesn’t have such a list. In fact, she has a list of times where she’s piled on along with the media, John McCain and the RNC (Rev. Wright, “bittergate,” “NAFTA-gate” etc.).

One person recalled how Obama also defended Hillary’s “sniper” gaffe during the ABC debate in late April.

Add that to his constant praise of Hillary despite her evil ways, and Obama’s got a TON of karma points through good faith.

But he needs to cash them in sooner or later.

People have a tendency to mistake kindness for weakness.

Maybe this is why he didn’t spend a lot of time in WV or KY.

On that same note… over at The Field, Al posted an interesting plea NOT to give HRC’s remarks more play (and this may also explain Obama’s decision to take the high road): He asked folks to read this (http://www.psychohistory.com/htm/eln01_leader.html) article before “speaking aloud” about her remarks.

————————-

lexusOakland: I’m almost 100% certain I saw the new picture (him alone, not the family) on May 7th when donating $25 in response to his campaign’s email about Clinton lending her campaign 6.4 million — I think I noticed and remarked on it to my girlfriend at the time. I just asked her and she thinks she remembers that too, we were both standing there with the credit card and looking. But then, rikyrah says she saw the old picture a couple of days ago. So maybe they’ve switched it before as well?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080525/pl_nm/usa_politics_dc

But then again, I guess he has to keep taking the high road. Lord knows I would have snatched off my microphone by now and told Hillary a thing or two.

But that’s why he’s going to be our next President…

Heeey party ovah heeere!!!

I went to the site a couple of days ago, and the opening picture was of the family. You are probably right, and it hurts my heart too.

She’s a wretched, evil woman.

EVIL.