[...]“Good info. Lucky me I reach on your website by accident, I bookmarked it.” download baixar (vt.DHsemlIF_IF) [...]……

[...]“I love your blog.. very nice colors & theme. Did you create this website yourself? Plz reply back as I’m looking to create my own blog and would like to know wheere u got this from. thanks” download baixar (vt.DHsemlIF_IF) [...]……

I’m guessing that you are using the WordPress.com version of WordPress. You can edit HTML code in WordPress, but to affect the layout of all pages you must upgrade to premium and edit CSS. If you install WordPress on your own domain you do not need to…

I really hope to read more of your posts in the future, so I’ve bookmarked your blog. But I couldn’t just bookmark it, oh no.. When I see quality website’s like this one, I like to share it with others So I’ve created a backlink to your site (from …

I really hope to read more of your posts in the future, so I’ve bookmarked your blog. But I couldn’t just bookmark it, oh no.. When I see quality website’s like this one, I like to share it with others So I’ve created a backlink to your site (from …

I really hope to read more of your posts in the future, so I’ve bookmarked your blog. But I couldn’t just bookmark it, oh no.. When I see quality website’s like this one, I like to share it with others So I’ve created a backlink to your site (from …

I really hope to read more of your posts in the future, so I’ve bookmarked your blog. But I couldn’t just bookmark it, oh no.. When I see quality website’s like this one, I like to share it with others So I’ve created a backlink to your site (from …

Craig, I can’t wait to read what you have to say when you open up that lockbox. Between you and rikyrah and anyone else from the JJP crowd saving up — something to hang onto when I read the crap in the mainstream about “women” voters and all.

Have a great afternoon and evening, everyone! See ya tomorrow for the Primary.

Machine politics in the big primaries is so different from caucus activism in the smaller states.

Open primaries and semi-open caucuses test candidates appeal to Independents and Republicans; closed primaries and caucuses test the candidates strength in the Democratic base.

Proportional assignment of delegates disallows a candidate from ignoring the smaller states.

We took it a step further and bypassed the threat we went straight into war. Why? McCain said as recently as 2 weeks ago — because of their oil.

And there you have it.

IMO Feminist movement plus Civil Rights achieved their main and necessary goals 20+ years ago. At present, both groups don’t know of a purposely useful next agenda. These groups have devolved into who’s-the-most-victimized competitions. I ignore both.
___

After this nomination battle, I bet DNC will change superdelegate rules and primary schedule. Will they establish a shorter per region primary voting cycle?

A shorter cycle assists a more established, or well-known candidate. A long cycle sometimes helps a challenger. A long cycle also shakes out weaknesses that could cripple a candidate during the GE.

I’ve got a slew of my own I’m holding in lockbox till it makes more sense to roll them out.

I read the details, on occasion. :)

Here’s a pretty good essay on this issue, titled “Hillary is White”, by Zillah Eisenstein.

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/05/18/9031/

Iran did not threaten the existence of Israel. This is one of those right-wing memes that people such as yourself repeat without actually assessing its veracity. If you know any Farsi (i.e. the Persian language), you would know that this meme is a purposeful, manipulative mistranslation of what was actually said.

Also this: the one country that *has* been a real threat to the existence of its neighbours in the Middle East is Israel. (In case you’ve conveniently forgotten, Israel pretty much destroyed Lebanon almost two years ago.)

I got sort of caught up this weekend in the discussions at the NARAL blog — not the initial long thread but a couple of more recent ones. That is some crazy stuff over there!

It’s weird to have Clinton-supporting women claiming “women” should support other “women” — who then go ballistic nasty clearly not respecting the basic humanity and intelligence of any actual woman who doesn’t agree with them.

If we don’t agree it’s because we don’t see it like they do — according to one Clinton supporter, I was in fact insulted by NARAL’s decision even if I say I wasn’t, because “all women” were insulted and if I say not me, it’s because I don’t know when I have been insulted.

The push-back against any discussion of white feminist racism is the most overt shit I have seen, and I have seen a lot of push-back when white feminist racism comes up. But in my experience it’s usually more subtle or covert than what I see over there. Maybe it’s just the situations I travel in or something.

One other poster — who assumed I was a woman of color simply because I was agreeing with what a black woman had posted (and then gotten attacked for) and myself talking about white feminist racism — literally told me to “sit down and shut up” (I think there was a fuck in there too but not 100% sure and don’t want to re-read it to find out).

And I am really struck by this thing about loyalty & betrayal. I know it’s a Clinton thing but I think it’s not just that when it comes to the white feminist outcries. One of the commenters over at the NARAL discussion actually used the phrase “traitor to the cause” for those who don’t agree with her/support Clinton. (I remember even NY NOW saying this about Ted Kennedy that he had betrayed women or the women’s movement or something like that, when he endorsed Senator Obama).

I’m trying to understand WTF specifically this is all about.

I just wrote out some of what I’m thinking, with the idea that I would post it here in this comments section, but I saw rikyrah’s comment to b-serious (Mon May 19, 09:24:00 AM 2008) and decided to not post it in case it’s un-strategic to publicly say the things that are on my mind about this right now (it’s pretty harsh).

And now I see this today:

Geraldine Ferraro, calling Barack Obama “sexist,” may not back him

I am extremely extremely hungry to read good sharp pull no punches analyses of this whole white feminists going off about sexism thing as it is coming up now and linked back through the whole campaign.

And my own thoughts about all this are — well, as I said, pretty harsh and rikyrah’s comment gives me pause about posting them right now.

He’s got my post, a post from Big Man and a recent post from Field Negro under his name.

He lists Field Negro’s and Big Man’s websites for attribution (at the tale end).

He doesn’t attribute me whatsoever.

Once again. I AM NOT the “Bserious” over at TPM.

Does anyone know who this person is? It would help to avoid further confusion in the future.