HUGE CORRUPT FUNDRAISER MAY HAUNT CLINTON YET

ART MOORE, WORLDNET DAILY – Bill Clinton, according to the complaint, promised to promote Paul’s Internet entertainment company, Stan Lee Media, in exchange for stock, cash options and massive contributions to his wife’s 2000 Senate campaign. Paul contends he was directed by the Clintons and Democratic Party leaders to produce, pay for and then join them in lying about footing the bill for a Hollywood gala and fundraiser.

The Clintons’ legal counsel has denied the former president made any deal with Paul. But Paul attorney Colette Wilson told WND there are witnesses who say it was common knowledge at Stan Lee Media that Bill Clinton was preparing to be a rainmaker for the company after he left office.

Paul claims former Vice President Al Gore, former Democratic Party chairman Ed Rendell and Clinton presidential campaign chairman Terry McAuliffe also are among the people who can confirm Paul engaged in the deal.

[Campaign finance director David] Rosen was acquitted in 2005 for filing false campaign reports that later were charged by the FEC to treasurer Andrew Grossman, who accepted responsibility in a conciliation agreement that fined the campaign $35,000. Paul points out the Rosen trial established his contention that he personally gave more than $1.2 million to Clinton’s campaign and that his contributions intentionally were hidden from the public and the Federal Election Commission.

Rosen, accused of concealing Paul’s in-kind contribution of more than $1 million, was acquitted, but Paul contends the Clinton staffer was a scapegoat.

WALL STREET JOURNAL, 2007 – As Sen. Hillary Clinton grapples with the burgeoning scandal surrounding disgraced fund-raiser Norman Hsu, she can’t quite shake a fund-raising controversy from her 2000 Senate campaign. Mrs. Clinton’s entanglement with a thrice-convicted felon named Peter Paul is proof of how long campaign-finance problems can haunt a public official. Mr. Paul became a problem for Mrs. Clinton when his criminal past became public shortly after he helped organize and finance a gala Hollywood fund-raiser for her in August 2000.

AND THERE’S MORE. . . .

WE’VE reported much of this before, as well as concerning a video that shows Hillary Clinton acting as though she knew exactly what Peter Paul was up to.

But there’s another curious aspect to the story: why didn’t Bush appointed prosecutors press the caser harder?

Here you have a huge potential case against the then leading Democratic candidate and the Bush Justice Department goes after a minor figure, blows the case and the partly admitted offense is settled for a puny amount.

The two most logical explanations for such behavior in politics is a deal or blackmail. Whether either was involved in this case, we don’t know but the pattern is curious to say the least.

The chief of the Public Integrity Section of the Justice Department was a man named Noel Hillman. Here are some interesting facts about him:
there’s much more…How can anyone vote for Clinton?

http://www.paulvclinton.com/Latest

He did!

I’ve heard this statement made several times during the last few months.

Unbelievable.

Do these people really believe that they did blacks a favor by forcing our ancestors to live in a foreign land where they didn’t not speak the language, were worked like and treated as animals; lynched, beaten, forced to remain in the South to help build their wealth for less than they could have been paid in a better place and on and on and on.

What? Could Obama be bewildered and frustrated that some people ‘are just not that into’ him? If they don’t get him, it must be because they are just gun-toting, bible-thumping, bigots.

“This remark is offensive and condescending on so many levels. The sheer breadth of the sterotype, if a white politician had made a similar sweeping caricature of blacks”

You keep trying to make this an argument about race.

Obama did not make a caricature of whites – he was talking about people and he was telling the truth.

Stop it with the gotcha bullshit!

This remark is offensive and condescending on so many levels. The sheer breadth of the sterotype, if a white politician had made a similar sweeping caricature of blacks, would send Team Obama screaming from the rooftops.

You have just spent that last couple of hours admonishing a McCain supporter as racist for comparing Obama to Tiger Woods. Yet you are blind to the offense in these remarks.

Exactly how much Obama-aid did you drink?

That’s not an idiotic remark, it’s the truth.

Why is it that people like you can’t hear the truth. Why must the untidy truth be swept under a rug rather than dealt with?

Sorry that the real world is interfering with your cush little existence.

“You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them…And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not.

And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

He could simply have said “You can have Barack Obama…”

That would have been less loaded. But he had a point to make and calling Barack Obama by his own name wouldn’t have made it.

You see he also then went on to say that John McCain was the real audacity of hope for what he endured in Vietnam, which is to suggest that Obama is not.

So if we want to extrapolate further, he was making the point that Obama is not real and is therefore interchangeable with any other mixed-race Black man in the minds of Americans.

You may argue the statement isn’t racist it the least, you may argue that it’s the height of attitudinal racism. Only one of those arguments is valid from where I sit.

Perhaps next time he’ll say that Tiger Woods doesn’t steal cars but he should be taken out into an alley and lynched anyway.

Just saying.

The man made an idiotic remark and it deserves to be picked apart.

So what.

There are women who will vote for Mrs. Nixon because she’s a woman.

So what.

There are white people who will vote for her just because she’s white.

So what.

There are white people who will vote for John McCain simply because he’s white.

So what.

There are military people who will vote for John McCain simply because he’s a war hero.

So what.

People can vote for candidates for whatever reason they want: emotional, intellectual, superficial, identity-based reasons, etc. and they can vote AGAINST people for the very same reasons.

I don’t see what the big deal is.

I wish things didn’t have to viewed through a prism of race, however, we have not trascended race and it still matters to many – both sides.

It has been proven that race has been an effecive political tool to sway voters.

“If the tables were turned, and two whites of extreme talent and success were compared, would we even be having this discussion?”

No we wouldn’t because race couldn’t be an issue where race is the same.

“You can keep your phenom, celebrity…We’ll take experience.”

If would have been acceptable to me and left a lot less to the imagination. Maybe the presenter should have followed up his comments with an explanation – or, at least, explained them once it became a controversy.

You seem to be a reasonable person so I assume you can understand that in an election where race has become a significant issue, the comments were irresponsible and could be deemed an attempt to interject race.

“You can keep your phenom, celebrity…We’ll take experience.”

Again, I disagree. Everything should not be view through the prism of race.

If the tables were turned, and two whites of extreme talent and success were compared, would we even be having this discussion?

Your comment, ‘the Tiger Obama comparison was meant to invoke feelings of racism’ is pure conjecture and projection.

Of course not, but that doesn’t change the fact that the Tiger Obama comparison was meant to invoke feelings of racism.