Ain’t gonna happen! Is your understanding warped? Barack will not disown Rev Wright! You can bring it up til the cows come home but Barack ain’t backing down for you or any of your Rethug buddies!
Capeesh!

Move or get out the f-ing way!

But back to the point: you think that anyone in the group you just named is seriously going to vote for Obama? Of course not. If you cover the chink in the armor, people will stop trying to hit it.

Obama’s stuck in this one spot. If he stays here, he’ll miss his chance to offer his stance on the REAL issues in our country.

We didn’t introduce Rev. Wright in the first place, so I think you’re misplaced in suggesting that we retire the issue. It’s Sean Hannity; it’s Rush Limbaugh; it’s Neil Boortz; it’s Michael Savage; it’s FOX News; it’s all of your favorite conservative pundits who are working feverishly to keep the issue alive.

Now, if there’s one thing that I preach is to never surrender the power of self-definition. So it is in this situation–where a non-Black news media is essentially mis-defining a vital element American and Black culture, that somebody has to hold forth and not allow this to happen.

And if you Black conservatives who value the opinions of the folks who seek to mis-define the Black church and Black culture won’t speak up, then others will.

You see, this isn’t about Obama as much as it’s about maintaining our power of self-definition.

I agree. You have to pick and chose your battles and sometimes it can be hard but you have to take the high ground! I for one, don’t think I can take the continuous dicussion of Wright. They are anxiously waiting to start running thouse sound bite “religiously” again! As an Obama supporter who knows they took it out of context it’s hard for me to listen to!!!! Not to mention that I don’t agree with everything he says particulary the “angry” sounding tone. BO does NOT need to be seen as the angry black man! Bill already said they are “picking on the girl”. Come on! That’s exactly what racists/racially senstive/racially challenged etc need to completely go mad! The angry Black man cheating the women out of her “rightful” place in history. Many women relate to this- no matter the ethnicity. As they told Oprah – we are woman first! You see how Oprah backed off. Woman (mostly white) are her bread and butter – not that she needs any more!! :-) At any rate, the last thing a woman needs, particulary a white woman is to think an angry Black man is “cheating” Hillary out of what she deserves!
n

It’s not about doing nothing; it’s about knowing what battles to fight and which ones not to. Like I said earlier, most of America already thinks this (Wright) isn’t an issue. Why continue to give it creedence? Aren’t there more important things to discuss?

What will ultimately happen is the the Obama campaign (and its supporters) will get stuck in defense. Let’s face it: Obama is going to get attacked from ALL sides. Unless the resources exist to fend of every single attack (which I already know they don’t), there’s going to be some stuff you have to let ride.

But if 55% of the country is satisfied with the explantion of Wright, guess what: you’ve made your point. Let the pundits talk; that’s their job. But don’t plant your flag here.

Make this your line in the sand, and you lose.

Evil (and hate) prevail where good people do nothing.

D prefers that his political opponents do nothing so that the hatefulness of Clintonism and (some) Republicanism may prevail.

Go Nancy —Go Nancy!

http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0308/Pelosis_office_responds_to_Clinton_supporters.html#comments

Pelosi’s office responds to Clinton supporters

Brendan Daly, a spokesman for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), responded late Wednesday night to a letter by supporters of New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton urging his boss to stop making comments about the superdelegates respecting the will of Democratic primary voters and caucus-goers:

“Speaker Pelosi is confident that superdelegates will choose between Sens. Clinton or Obama — our two strong candidates — before the convention in August,” Daly said. “That choice will be based on many considerations, including respecting the decisions of millions of Americans who have voted in primaries and participated in caucuses. The speaker believes it would do great harm to the Democratic Party if superdelegates are perceived to overturn the will of the voters. This has been her position throughout this primary season, regardless of who was ahead at any particular point in delegates or votes.”

The Clinton supporters had asked Pelosi, who remains neutral in the presidential contest, to refrain from making comments that could influence undecided superdelegates to back the candidate with the most votes — who, at this point, happens to be the New York senator’s rival, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama. But Daly’s comments suggest the speaker will not be backing off her stance anytime soon.

Squarepeg,

That’s exactly what the Handkerchief Heads thought! They were looking for Barack to collaspe because he is running against a Clinton! They got tricked- The m-fers!

Their @sses will be voted–O.U.T.!

One thing that disgusts me is an Uncle Tom Handkerchief Head M-Fer!

Hey, I get emotional!

Thats not what Anon 6:30 said, he was trying desperately to misdirect this discussion by arguing that she was ASKED the question. Had she not gone to that rag, how was she going to get her talking point for day out? It was all calculated since she is now so desperate that she doesn’t care about the Black vote at all at this point, assuming that since most of us would not vote for McCain, we would eventually return to the Democratic fold and vote for her. Ain’t going to happen. She has truly gone over the line.

Also, the CBC has been sell-outs long before the Obama/Clinton campaigns began. These people are interested in only one thing: themselves and maintaining their perceived entitled life time positions. It’s time for them to retire.

At this point, they are running scared, because they were waiting for Obama to collapse so they could bring their sorry asses out of the closet and openly support Hillary. They have waited to long and have painted themselves in a corner, they they now have to live with.

Hopefully, the people who have supported these posers will vote them out ASAP!

And from that, we once again get the complete freak-out and melee of race-baiting out of the Obama Compound and its cultists that we’ve all grown accustomed to, ever since the knee-jerk shrieks of “racism!” occurred after Bill Clinton called Obama a “kid”.
F’ing laughable

And, the further comparisons of Wright to:
a) Don Imus
b) DAVID DUKE

Oh, I guess those were innocent too.

———————————–
ahahahhahahahaha! I’m with you!

Hillary’s Prayer: Hillary Clinton’s Religion and Politics

Read it. It’s an eye opener to be sure.

So now he’s anti-Israel and pro-Palestine and that means that Obama is lying about his pro-Israel stances and he will lose Jewish voters.

That’s what the talking heads are suggesting anyway.

Will voters see this is desperate smear tactic or will they believe it?

If you know they’re not going to vote for him anyway, why give them airtime? The more you push back, the more angry you look to those same white voters, and by default, you drag the campaign down.

I don’t think anyone cares about the actual issue anymore, but believe that the more you attack Obama’s attackers, the more unifed you’re going to make some whites against Obama.

I think you are right and I am a BO supporter. They are and will continue to be ALL over his comments re:Wright. In fact, it gives Fox all the more reason to play the clips every time Wright is mentioned by anyone! In fact, all day long yesterday Fox had “BREAKING” news about Wright..he changed locations…he canceled an appearance. Seriously guys, it was “BREAKING NEW”!! Even MSNBC made fun of it!

The ones that are attacking Barack isn’t going to vote for him anyway & their main objective is to stop white voters from voting for him!

These are the haters! The mean, spiteful haters to anything and all that is good!