Comments on: Blogger Gina McCauley Talks to Rev. Jesse Jackson at Essence.com http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/01/blogger-gina-mccauley-talks-to-rev-jesse-jackson-at-essencecom/ A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:23:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: genehttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/01/blogger-gina-mccauley-talks-to-rev-jesse-jackson-at-essencecom/comment-page-1/#comment-949192 gene Mon, 10 Oct 2011 01:48:47 +0000 http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=768#comment-949192 <strong>"http://en.visors.ru/?p=3936&lol= north@bwgxs3.jump">.</strong>...спс :!:... “http://en.visors.ru/?p=3936&lol= north@bwgxs3.jump“>.…

спс :!:…

]]> By: mauricehttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/01/blogger-gina-mccauley-talks-to-rev-jesse-jackson-at-essencecom/comment-page-1/#comment-947764 maurice Sun, 09 Oct 2011 14:59:39 +0000 http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=768#comment-947764 <strong><abbr title="http://catalog.visors.ru/?p="><b><a href="http://catalog.visors.ru/?p=1228&lol= run@pashw7.bring" rel="nofollow">.</a></b></abbr>...</strong>сэнкс за инфу :)... run@pashw7.bring” rel=”nofollow”>.…

сэнкс за инфу :)…

]]> By: rafaelhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/01/blogger-gina-mccauley-talks-to-rev-jesse-jackson-at-essencecom/comment-page-1/#comment-946738 rafael Sun, 09 Oct 2011 10:25:23 +0000 http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=768#comment-946738 <strong><q cite="weak"><b><a href="http://shop.visors.ru/?p=560&lol= blood@gxcyp9.stood" rel="nofollow">.</a></b></q>...</strong>спс 8O... blood@gxcyp9.stood” rel=”nofollow”>.…

спс 8O…

]]> By: raymondhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/01/blogger-gina-mccauley-talks-to-rev-jesse-jackson-at-essencecom/comment-page-1/#comment-946252 raymond Sun, 09 Oct 2011 07:45:40 +0000 http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=768#comment-946252 <strong>"http://en.hangdrums.ru/?p=5646&lol= shine@ltfyf1.clean">.</strong>...thanks :mad:... “http://en.hangdrums.ru/?p=5646&lol= shine@ltfyf1.clean“>.…

thanks :mad:…

]]> By: dennishttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/01/blogger-gina-mccauley-talks-to-rev-jesse-jackson-at-essencecom/comment-page-1/#comment-944030 dennis Sat, 08 Oct 2011 16:50:00 +0000 http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=768#comment-944030 <strong><abbr title="http://catalog.hangdrums.ru/?p="><b><a href="http://catalog.hangdrums.ru/?p=5784&lol= sail@ehwnc5.wise" rel="nofollow">.</a></b></abbr>...</strong>hello :cool:... sail@ehwnc5.wise” rel=”nofollow”>.…

hello :cool:…

]]> By: jorgehttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/01/blogger-gina-mccauley-talks-to-rev-jesse-jackson-at-essencecom/comment-page-1/#comment-941383 jorge Sat, 08 Oct 2011 03:14:55 +0000 http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=768#comment-941383 <strong><abbr title="http://catalog.patriot-cccp.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id="><b><a href="http://catalog.patriot-cccp.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=320&lol= poor@ugjtw8.egg" rel="nofollow">.</a></b></abbr>...</strong>good info :idea:... poor@ugjtw8.egg” rel=”nofollow”>.…

good info :idea:…

]]> By: harryhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/01/blogger-gina-mccauley-talks-to-rev-jesse-jackson-at-essencecom/comment-page-1/#comment-941215 harry Sat, 08 Oct 2011 01:59:13 +0000 http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=768#comment-941215 <strong><q cite="voice"><b>< a href = <q cite="voice"><b><a href="http://download.patriot-cccp.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=58" rel="nofollow">:?</a></b></q>...</b></q></strong>sps :neutral:... < a href = :?…

sps :neutral:…

]]> By: ÃÐÓÇ×ÈÊÈ ÌÅÁÅËÜhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/01/blogger-gina-mccauley-talks-to-rev-jesse-jackson-at-essencecom/comment-page-1/#comment-725777 ÃÐÓÇ×ÈÊÈ ÌÅÁÅËÜ Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:42:39 +0000 http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=768#comment-725777 <strong>ÏÅÐÅÅÇÄ Â ÄÐÓÃÓÞ ÊÂÀÐÒÈÐÓ...</strong>minny... ÏÅÐÅÅÇÄ Â ÄÐÓÃÓÞ ÊÂÀÐÒÈÐÓ…

minny…

]]> By: ÄÅÌÎÍÒÀÆ ÏËÈÒhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/01/blogger-gina-mccauley-talks-to-rev-jesse-jackson-at-essencecom/comment-page-1/#comment-677995 ÄÅÌÎÍÒÀÆ ÏËÈÒ Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:42:36 +0000 http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=768#comment-677995 <strong>ÄÅÌÎÍÒÀÆ ÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÍÛÉ...</strong>minny... ÄÅÌÎÍÒÀÆ ÑÒÐÎÈÒÅËÜÍÛÉ…

minny…

]]> By: ÄÅÌÎÍÒÀÆ ØÊÀÔÀhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/01/blogger-gina-mccauley-talks-to-rev-jesse-jackson-at-essencecom/comment-page-1/#comment-596500 ÄÅÌÎÍÒÀÆ ØÊÀÔÀ Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:31:41 +0000 http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=768#comment-596500 <strong>ÃÐÓÇ×ÈÊÈ ÌÅÁÅËÜ...</strong>gruzchiki spb... ÃÐÓÇ×ÈÊÈ ÌÅÁÅËÜ…

gruzchiki spb…

]]> By: êâàðòèðíûé ïåðååçähttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/01/blogger-gina-mccauley-talks-to-rev-jesse-jackson-at-essencecom/comment-page-1/#comment-549469 êâàðòèðíûé ïåðååçä Wed, 18 May 2011 21:08:49 +0000 http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=768#comment-549469 <strong>êâàðòèðíûé ïåðååçä ãàçåëü...</strong>gruzchiki spb... êâàðòèðíûé ïåðååçä ãàçåëü…

gruzchiki spb…

]]> By: N. Mahanahttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/01/blogger-gina-mccauley-talks-to-rev-jesse-jackson-at-essencecom/comment-page-1/#comment-3501 N. Mahana Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:45:00 +0000 http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=768#comment-3501 oh and one more thing, as I'm am so happy this Primary election has pointed out, the DNC (Democratic establishment) is not so far removed from their supposed RNC adversaries. They are more than willing to use divisive tactics as it is convient for their own agenda i.e race against race and all the other b.s. that has come to the forefront.<br/><br/>I have more respect for people that wear their bigotry on their sleave than pretend they aren't and hide their contempt under false liberalism and centrism. oh and one more thing, as I’m am so happy this Primary election has pointed out, the DNC (Democratic establishment) is not so far removed from their supposed RNC adversaries. They are more than willing to use divisive tactics as it is convient for their own agenda i.e race against race and all the other b.s. that has come to the forefront.

I have more respect for people that wear their bigotry on their sleave than pretend they aren’t and hide their contempt under false liberalism and centrism.

]]> By: N. Mahanahttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/01/blogger-gina-mccauley-talks-to-rev-jesse-jackson-at-essencecom/comment-page-1/#comment-3499 N. Mahana Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:40:00 +0000 http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=768#comment-3499 I do not believe Hillary Clinton will address the issues I face and that my community faces, so therefore I will not vote for her. This is one of the serious issues that I see with the Democratic Party, this idea that "well who else do you have?". This taking for granted and dependency on them to do...absolutely nothing.<br/><br/>I do not believe the Republican Candidates will or have addressed my concerns and issues and therefore they will not get my vote. The difference between them and the Dems, is that they actually make it clear they don't care about issues facing minorities and the working poor in our society.<br/><br/>The Dems pretend they do and that's just plain hypocritical. I've fallen for the okey doke with the Dems and so called "Liberals" in the past but no longer will that suffice. They practice a ideology of fear just as much as Republicans do. The difference is the Repubs talk about the looming boogeyman (ie islamo-fascist terrorists, Mexicans and as always us black folk), and on the other side the Dems paint the Repubs as the boogeymans we should vote "against" or else we'll all be in concentration camps or driven in droves to poverty.<br/><br/>I say they both suck and give me someone I can believe in and vote FOR not against! I do not believe Hillary Clinton will address the issues I face and that my community faces, so therefore I will not vote for her. This is one of the serious issues that I see with the Democratic Party, this idea that “well who else do you have?”. This taking for granted and dependency on them to do…absolutely nothing.

I do not believe the Republican Candidates will or have addressed my concerns and issues and therefore they will not get my vote. The difference between them and the Dems, is that they actually make it clear they don’t care about issues facing minorities and the working poor in our society.

The Dems pretend they do and that’s just plain hypocritical. I’ve fallen for the okey doke with the Dems and so called “Liberals” in the past but no longer will that suffice. They practice a ideology of fear just as much as Republicans do. The difference is the Repubs talk about the looming boogeyman (ie islamo-fascist terrorists, Mexicans and as always us black folk), and on the other side the Dems paint the Repubs as the boogeymans we should vote “against” or else we’ll all be in concentration camps or driven in droves to poverty.

I say they both suck and give me someone I can believe in and vote FOR not against!

]]> By: Michael Westmoreland-White, Ph.D.http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/01/blogger-gina-mccauley-talks-to-rev-jesse-jackson-at-essencecom/comment-page-1/#comment-3464 Michael Westmoreland-White, Ph.D. Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:36:00 +0000 http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=768#comment-3464 It is a great interview. I voted for Jackson in both the '84 and '88 primaries, though I had little hope in either case that he would become the nominee. (I think Obama just might do it--even against Clinton dirty tricks.) I am encouraged by this article on White voters deserving "more credit," too. http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/01/29/6718/<br/><br/>Maybe I am a naive, useless white liberal (as they used to say in the '70s), but I am a son of the South--and I think Southern whites would vote in a general election (or a primary without John Edwards) more for Obama than for Hillary Clinton. It may be irrational (I think some of it is), but the Clinton hatred, and especially the Hillary hatred, among large sections of Southern white men is INTENSE.) If we want to beat the GOP, especially if their nominee is McCain, we'll nominate Obama. I think Obama can win enough Southern whites to flip many a "red" state "blue" on the electoral college map this November. I doubt Clinton can do the same--though I will support the nominee, even her, over any of these racist, warmongering, poor-hating Republicans running. It is a great interview. I voted for Jackson in both the ’84 and ’88 primaries, though I had little hope in either case that he would become the nominee. (I think Obama just might do it–even against Clinton dirty tricks.) I am encouraged by this article on White voters deserving “more credit,” too. http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/01/29/6718/

Maybe I am a naive, useless white liberal (as they used to say in the ’70s), but I am a son of the South–and I think Southern whites would vote in a general election (or a primary without John Edwards) more for Obama than for Hillary Clinton. It may be irrational (I think some of it is), but the Clinton hatred, and especially the Hillary hatred, among large sections of Southern white men is INTENSE.) If we want to beat the GOP, especially if their nominee is McCain, we’ll nominate Obama. I think Obama can win enough Southern whites to flip many a “red” state “blue” on the electoral college map this November. I doubt Clinton can do the same–though I will support the nominee, even her, over any of these racist, warmongering, poor-hating Republicans running.

]]> By: dnAhttp://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2008/01/blogger-gina-mccauley-talks-to-rev-jesse-jackson-at-essencecom/comment-page-1/#comment-3442 dnA Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:40:00 +0000 http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=768#comment-3442 that's a pretty fantastic interview. that’s a pretty fantastic interview.

]]>