<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CBC&#8217;s Response to Dollar Bill Jefferson &#8212; A Mixed Bag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2007/06/cbcs-response-to-dollar-bill-jefferson-a-mixed-bag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2007/06/cbcs-response-to-dollar-bill-jefferson-a-mixed-bag/</link>
	<description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:56:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2007/06/cbcs-response-to-dollar-bill-jefferson-a-mixed-bag/comment-page-1/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=342#comment-769</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m definitely disappointed to see the names of some of the people who supported him, but I&#039;m glad it was a split decision, so to speak. What I didn&#039;t expect to find in the comments on this post, at this blog, is people ignoring the fact that it was a split decision, despite the excerpt in the post that makes it clear that CBC members are not unanimously supporting Jefferson. I saw it on some other blogs, and wasn&#039;t surprised. But here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m definitely disappointed to see the names of some of the people who supported him, but I&#8217;m glad it was a split decision, so to speak. What I didn&#8217;t expect to find in the comments on this post, at this blog, is people ignoring the fact that it was a split decision, despite the excerpt in the post that makes it clear that CBC members are not unanimously supporting Jefferson. I saw it on some other blogs, and wasn&#8217;t surprised. But here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Christian Progressive Liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2007/06/cbcs-response-to-dollar-bill-jefferson-a-mixed-bag/comment-page-1/#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator>The Christian Progressive Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=342#comment-749</guid>
		<description>ecthompson:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There IS NO LEADERSHIP in the CBC.  At least NO LEADERSHIP that matters.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;They played that race card on Pelosi, and it would have been better played when she told them to sling Cynthia McKinney under the bus for that altercation with the Capitol Hill police officer (who was at fault), instead of wasting it on a known crook like Jefferson.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Watt, Clyburn, Jackson-Lee and Kilpatrick got some payola from Jefferson, and that&#039;s why they had to circle the wagons around him.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;They look, as the kids would say, &quot;hella stupid&quot; and got &quot;straight played&quot; by Dollar Bill Jefferson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ecthompson:</p>
<p>There IS NO LEADERSHIP in the CBC.  At least NO LEADERSHIP that matters.</p>
<p>They played that race card on Pelosi, and it would have been better played when she told them to sling Cynthia McKinney under the bus for that altercation with the Capitol Hill police officer (who was at fault), instead of wasting it on a known crook like Jefferson.</p>
<p>Watt, Clyburn, Jackson-Lee and Kilpatrick got some payola from Jefferson, and that&#8217;s why they had to circle the wagons around him.</p>
<p>They look, as the kids would say, &#8220;hella stupid&#8221; and got &#8220;straight played&#8221; by Dollar Bill Jefferson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecthompson</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2007/06/cbcs-response-to-dollar-bill-jefferson-a-mixed-bag/comment-page-1/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>ecthompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 05:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=342#comment-747</guid>
		<description>Nice post.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The CBC has been foolishly standing behind Rep. Jefferson the whole time.  They should have insisted that he needed to clear his name.  The CBC opposed Nancy Pelosi&#039;s move to demote Jefferson and NOT let him be a chairman of a committee.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Where&#039;s the leadership?&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post.  </p>
<p>The CBC has been foolishly standing behind Rep. Jefferson the whole time.  They should have insisted that he needed to clear his name.  The CBC opposed Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s move to demote Jefferson and NOT let him be a chairman of a committee.  </p>
<p><b>Where&#8217;s the leadership?</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Christian Progressive Liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2007/06/cbcs-response-to-dollar-bill-jefferson-a-mixed-bag/comment-page-1/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>The Christian Progressive Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 05:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=342#comment-745</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s review.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The same SOBs that are urging the CBC/Fox Channel debate, are the same ones who so eagerly circled the wagons around Jefferson and gave him a friggin&#039; standing ovation upon his return to Congress in January.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Now, they&#039;re ditching him because they don&#039;t want any primary opponent using their support to hang around their necks when they run for re-election in 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s review.</p>
<p>The same SOBs that are urging the CBC/Fox Channel debate, are the same ones who so eagerly circled the wagons around Jefferson and gave him a friggin&#8217; standing ovation upon his return to Congress in January.</p>
<p>Now, they&#8217;re ditching him because they don&#8217;t want any primary opponent using their support to hang around their necks when they run for re-election in 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
