A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics
So even Jesse Jackson Sr. has weighed in on this. You know, I got an email from somebody asking me what all the fuss is all about, what we’re so afraid of? FOx isn’t going to brainwash people, after all, is it?
It’s less fear than outrage. Why on earth would the Congressional Black Caucus choose to align itself with a network that has proven itself to be racist as a course of normal business operations? As part of their branding strategy? If the Ku Klux Klan or Council of Conservative Citizens had a cable news network, would it be appropriate to collaborate with them on hosting presidential debates, particularly when one of the candidates is black, a CBC member and a consistent target of the network’s hatred and misinformation? Like Jesse says, why let the Fox guard the henhouse?
Here’s just one example of Fox’s fare (thanks Media Matters):
Yet the description of Trinity as “separatist” continued. While discussing Obama’s church on the February 28 edition of Fox News’ Hannity & Colmes, co-host Sean Hannity stated that “many” call Trinity “separatist,” adding that “in some cases, even drawing comparisons to a cult.” Guest Erik Rush, a columnist for the conservative website WorldNetDaily, said that the church’s “scary doctrine” is “something that you’d see in more like a cult or an Aryan Brethren Church or something like that.”
Referring to “The Black Value System,” Rush also stated on Hannity & Colmes: “I would go beyond saying that they’re Afrocentric. They’re African-centric. They refer to themselves as an African people, and that somewhat disturbs me from the viewpoint of, well, do they consider themselves Americans? Do they consider themselves Christians? Are they worshipping Christ? Are they worshipping African things black? Well, I mean, what is it?” Later in the segment, when co-host Alan Colmes asked: “Are you questioning Barack Obama’s Christianity?” Rush responded simply: “Yeah.”
Right. Fox attacks the very roots of our culture yet they are appropriate partners? None of this makes sense given that there are other networks that would probably be eager to partner with the CBC including the major non-cable broadcasters. Cuz you know what, neither my mama nor my big mama plans to pay for TV anytime soon. They ain’t got no cable. Nor probably do the mamas and big mamas of most CBC members either. Y’all know what I am talking about. All this talk about reaching the widest possible audience is a bunch of hooey.
Tavis Smiley is hosting a presidential debate on PBS which is accessible to almost all Americans and that’s a good model. No, none of this makes sense unless there is cheddar, benjamins, gravy, big $MONEY$ involved – h/t Politico. Shame on the CBC. If they’re not careful, the black eye from this is going to leave a mark.
rikyrah
March 30th, 2007 at 7:41 pm
The Tacky Clintonista-CBC-Fox News Backstory
http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/3/30/174338/386#commenttop
Yeah, it’s from Politico, but it doesn’t mean it’s not the truth. Follow the money, boys and girls.
The Christian Progressive Liberal
April 1st, 2007 at 8:53 pm
The CBC is mad because Tavis called them out at the SOBU, especially when he announced those PBS debates he’s hosting.
They’re trying to upstage Tavis, and what better way (in their pea-brained thinking)than to host their own debates on Fox Noise?
Sometimes, you have to allow people to take that ass-whipping you tried to warn them away from, for them to get the message. Watch how fast the CBC will be crying about racism from Fox when the reality is, they’ve invited the fox into the henhouse and watching him eat all the chickens, even though the fox said he wouldn’t…
Anonymous
April 3rd, 2007 at 6:58 am
I remember as a child reading about the CBC and the pride I felt and as a child in the 60’s they were like the NAACP, We all remember what it was like in the 60, and 70’s But organizations like CBC the NAACP the black panthers and others, made me feel safe to an extent. yes I remember feeling somewhat safe. But hearing that the CBC will Cosponce a Dem debate with Fox news wow! Thank God I remember when.
Anonymous
April 5th, 2007 at 3:05 pm
There’s a difference between media bias and propaganda. Fox don’t step over that line every day cause Fox lives in that hood. Fox exists to do that, is the reason Murdoch built it, to give him the power to change politics and take money out of our pockets and put it into his pocket.
Don’t think that is real? Everyday, the right-wing (built off the segregationist southern political block that switched to Republicans after Johnson passed the Civil Rights Act) sends out “talking points”. And, everyday Fox picks it up and spits it back out at us.
You can prove it for yourself by sitting down and watching and writing down the same phrases that get used over and over from the “talking points”.
That’s not simple bias of opinion, that’s pure propaganda and propaganda has one purpose. To give power to someone else who ain’t you, don’t care about you and don’t mind robbing you.
Fat White Boy from the Wood