<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congressional Black Caucus: The Male/Female Split</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2006/12/congressional-black-caucus-the-malefemale-split/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2006/12/congressional-black-caucus-the-malefemale-split/</link>
	<description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:45:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rikyrah</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2006/12/congressional-black-caucus-the-malefemale-split/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=192#comment-197</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll step in it again. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having been locked out for so long, Black Men, IMO, want to prove that they can &#039;Play The Game&#039; as well as the White ones in Congress. I definitely think it&#039;s a male thing, this &#039; Game&#039; part. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Black Women, on the other hand, don&#039;t see it as a Game. They see it as LIFE. And don&#039;t have time for foolishness. They know the foot is on the necks of their constituencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll step in it again. </p>
<p>Having been locked out for so long, Black Men, IMO, want to prove that they can &#8216;Play The Game&#8217; as well as the White ones in Congress. I definitely think it&#8217;s a male thing, this &#8216; Game&#8217; part. </p>
<p>Black Women, on the other hand, don&#8217;t see it as a Game. They see it as LIFE. And don&#8217;t have time for foolishness. They know the foot is on the necks of their constituencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill Tubman</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2006/12/congressional-black-caucus-the-malefemale-split/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill Tubman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=192#comment-191</guid>
		<description>I think you might be on to something there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you might be on to something there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rikyrah</title>
		<link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2006/12/congressional-black-caucus-the-malefemale-split/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>rikyrah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=192#comment-189</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What&#039;s your theory? Why are the female CBC members reliably progressive and the men aren&#039;t?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh Boy, I feel like I&#039;m going to step in it answering this question.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. While the &#039;leaders&#039; of the &#039;movement&#039; have been men, most of the foot soldiers have been women. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Not many women are looking for higher office. Not many women have their eyes on &#039;moving on&#039;. Not that the Sisters aren&#039;t ambitious; it&#039;s just that they won&#039;t sell their principles to get there and call it being &#039; enlightened&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Women, quite frankly, CATCH HELL.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Black Women, are on the front lines of every bad thing that happens in the community. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
THEY are the ones left holding the bag, so they feel the effects of practically every political choice out there. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is their sons being imprisoned.&lt;br /&gt;
It is their sons being shot by the police.&lt;br /&gt;
It is their children that they have to fight for an education.&lt;br /&gt;
It is THE WOMEN who are the new face of AIDS&lt;br /&gt;
It is THE WOMEN who are at the lowest end, hanging in there, trying to hold the community together while the men do &#039; whatever&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The women in Congress know that. The men believe they are &#039;enlightened&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What&#8217;s your theory? Why are the female CBC members reliably progressive and the men aren&#8217;t?</i></p>
<p>Oh Boy, I feel like I&#8217;m going to step in it answering this question.</p>
<p>1. While the &#8216;leaders&#8217; of the &#8216;movement&#8217; have been men, most of the foot soldiers have been women. </p>
<p>2. Not many women are looking for higher office. Not many women have their eyes on &#8216;moving on&#8217;. Not that the Sisters aren&#8217;t ambitious; it&#8217;s just that they won&#8217;t sell their principles to get there and call it being &#8216; enlightened&#8217;. </p>
<p>3. Women, quite frankly, CATCH HELL.</p>
<p>Black Women, are on the front lines of every bad thing that happens in the community. </p>
<p>THEY are the ones left holding the bag, so they feel the effects of practically every political choice out there. </p>
<p>It is their sons being imprisoned.<br />
It is their sons being shot by the police.<br />
It is their children that they have to fight for an education.<br />
It is THE WOMEN who are the new face of AIDS<br />
It is THE WOMEN who are at the lowest end, hanging in there, trying to hold the community together while the men do &#8216; whatever&#8217;. </p>
<p>The women in Congress know that. The men believe they are &#8216;enlightened&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
