<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The Turd in Tony Blair&#8217;s Bed</title> <atom:link href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2006/10/the-turd-in-tony-blairs-bed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2006/10/the-turd-in-tony-blairs-bed/</link> <description>A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:45:19 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Vigilante</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2006/10/the-turd-in-tony-blairs-bed/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link> <dc:creator>Vigilante</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://s45368.gridserver.com/?p=109#comment-77</guid> <description>I just read Sam Huntington quoted on another site:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;i&gt;&#039;If the statesman decides upon war which the soldier knows can only lead to national catastrophe, then the soldier, after presenting his opinion, must fall in and make the best of a bad situation&#039;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;However, it seems to me that part of the contract of civilian control over the military implies also civilian proprietary care for the armed forces. I don&#039;t see that. What I see is an attitude that (a) this is a professional army, (b) they get paid to do what they&#039;re doing, (c) they should get on with it and quit their complaining, (d) we support them - see, we got our ribbons up on our cars, and (e), you go to war with civilian leaders you have, not the civilian leaders you might want at a future time.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Our feckless &lt;i&gt;civilian&lt;/i&gt; Congressional leadership and gullible &lt;i&gt;civilian&lt;/i&gt; electorate has been &lt;b&gt;constitutionally derelict&lt;/b&gt; in their proprietary responsibilities.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read Sam Huntington quoted on another site:</p><p><i>&#8216;If the statesman decides upon war which the soldier knows can only lead to national catastrophe, then the soldier, after presenting his opinion, must fall in and make the best of a bad situation&#8217;</i></p><p>However, it seems to me that part of the contract of civilian control over the military implies also civilian proprietary care for the armed forces. I don&#8217;t see that. What I see is an attitude that (a) this is a professional army, (b) they get paid to do what they&#8217;re doing, (c) they should get on with it and quit their complaining, (d) we support them &#8211; see, we got our ribbons up on our cars, and (e), you go to war with civilian leaders you have, not the civilian leaders you might want at a future time.</p><p>Our feckless <i>civilian</i> Congressional leadership and gullible <i>civilian</i> electorate has been <b>constitutionally derelict</b> in their proprietary responsibilities.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 254/258 objects using apc

Served from: www.jackandjillpolitics.com @ 2012-02-10 10:49:44 -->
